[{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.96-K\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Ghulam Hyder v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._96_k_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-09-2021","dateCreated":"10-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.101-K\/2021","caseSubject":"Sentence\/Enhancement of (in Session Cases)","caseTitle":"Mushtaque Hussain v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh","caseFileName":"crl.p._101_k_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-09-2021","dateCreated":"10-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.147-K\/2020","caseSubject":"Sentence\/More than 5 years and upto 10 years","caseTitle":"Aijaz Ali Rajpar v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._147_k_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-09-2021","dateCreated":"10-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.143-K\/2020","caseSubject":"Sentence\/Enhancement of (in ATA\/STA Cases)","caseTitle":"Faheemullah v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._143_k_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-09-2021","dateCreated":"10-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.A.108\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Rehmat (decd) thr.LRs & others v. Mst. Zubaida Begum (decd) thr.LRs & others","caseFileName":"c.a._108_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":226},{"caseNumber":"C.A.471-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Limitation","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafique v. Abdul Aziz","caseFileName":"c.a._471_l_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-05-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3683},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3587\/2020","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Others","caseTitle":"Getz Pharma (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Muhammad Nafees and another","caseFileName":"c.p._3587_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-03-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":220},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3772\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yousaf & others v. Nazeer Ahmad Khan (decd) thr. LRs & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3772_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-08-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":166},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1092\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Khushdil Khan Malik v. The Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1092_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-09-2018","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":179},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1010\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"The Chief Postmaster General Post Office, Multan & others v. Hameed-ud-Din","caseFileName":"c.a._1010_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-06-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":163},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1496\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Ministry of Finance thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Syed Afroz Akhtar Rizvi & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1496_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-07-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":110},{"caseNumber":"C.A.239\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Public Health Engineering Peshawar & others v. Abdul Manan & others","caseFileName":"ca.a_239_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":244},{"caseNumber":"C.A.326-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Dr. Iqrar Ahmad Khan v. Dr. Muhammad Ashraf, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._326_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-07-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":274},{"caseNumber":"C.A.30-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. M.Y. Labib-ur-Rehman & others","caseFileName":"c.a._30_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-07-2021","dateCreated":"08-09-2021","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.4\/2021","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"In Re order dated 20.08.2021 in SMC No.4\/2021","caseFileName":"s.m.c._4_2021_26aug2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-08-2021","dateCreated":"26-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1149-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment","caseTitle":"Nasir @ Nasiree v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._1149_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-01-2021","dateCreated":"25-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1280\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery","caseTitle":"M\/s. Universal Insurance Company & another v. Karim Gul & another","caseFileName":"c.a._1280_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-08-2021","dateCreated":"24-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"In re: order dated 20.08.2021 in SMC No.4 of 2021","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Enforcement of Fundamental Rights with regard to independence of  Press\/Media v. ","caseFileName":"s.m.c._4_2021_23082021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-08-2021","dateCreated":"23-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.4\/2021","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Enforcement of Fundamental Rights with regard to independence of  Press\/Media v. ","caseFileName":"s.m.c._4_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-08-2021","dateCreated":"20-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Reference.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 186\/Reference by the President","caseTitle":"Reference by the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Under Article 186 of the Constituion of Pakistan regarding Elections for the Members of the Senate of Pakistan v. ","caseFileName":"reference_1_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-03-2021","dateCreated":"17-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":239},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1498\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Eligibility of Candidature","caseTitle":"Muhammad Salman v. Naveed Anjum, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._1498_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-08-2021","dateCreated":"17-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":920},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1547\/2019","caseSubject":"Arbitration\/Award","caseTitle":"Orient Power Company (Pvt) Ltd, Lahore v. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd thr. its Managing Director, Lahore","caseFileName":"c.a._1547_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-08-2021","dateCreated":"17-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":213},{"caseNumber":"C.A.491\/2012","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"Muhammad Afzal & others v. The Secretary Establishment Division Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.a._491_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-08-2021","dateCreated":"17-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":165},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1152\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/7 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Makki v. The State thr. A.G. Islamabad  and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1152_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-01-2021","dateCreated":"17-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.797-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Azam Saleem v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._797_l_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Maintainability of the second pre-arrest bail petition after dismissal of the first pre-arrest bail petition for non-appearance of the accused and lack of his satisfactory explanation for his non-appearance in the earlier pre-arrest  bail petition.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-08-2021","dateCreated":"16-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.39-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Inam Ullah v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._39_l_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Maintainability of the second pre-arrest bail petition after withdrawal of the first pre-arrest bail petition without satisfactory explanation for withdrawing the earlier pre-arrest bail petition.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-08-2021","dateCreated":"16-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4540\/2021","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy M\/o Industries & Production and another v. M\/s. Humza Sugar Mills Ltd, Rahim Yar Khan and others","caseFileName":"c.p._4540_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-08-2021","dateCreated":"16-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.P.957\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Ghulam Qasim & others v. Mst. Razia Begum & others","caseFileName":"c.p._957_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-06-2021","dateCreated":"16-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.60\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment","caseTitle":"Inhaf Ullah v. The State and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._60_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-04-2021","dateCreated":"11-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.14-Q\/2021","caseSubject":"Sentence\/Others","caseTitle":"Naseem Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._14_q_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-03-2021","dateCreated":"11-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.860-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Imran v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._860_l_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Denial of post-arrest bail in non-prohibitory offence in a case falling under one of the exceptions in Tariq Bashir case.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-08-2021","dateCreated":"10-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.90-P\/2016","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Asif Khan v. Sher Shah & others","caseFileName":"crl.p._90_p_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-07-2021","dateCreated":"10-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2144-L\/2011","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Khallid Hussain, etc v. Nazir Ahmad, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._2144_l_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-07-2021","dateCreated":"05-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1075-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Shahzaib, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1075_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Effect of non-presence of the petitioner in Court at the time of hearing his pre-arrest bail petition: Import of Section 498-A CrPC explained.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-07-2021","dateCreated":"03-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1079-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Akash Masih v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1079_l_of_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Importance of the role of Advocate-on-Record under the Supreme Court Rules, 1980.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-07-2021","dateCreated":"02-08-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.26-P\/2020","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/Others","caseTitle":"The State through Director ANF, Peshawar v. Aurangzeb","caseFileName":"crl.p._26_p_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-07-2021","dateCreated":"30-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.83-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"State through Advocate General, K.P. Peshawar v. Sabz Ali Khan and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._83_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2021","dateCreated":"29-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1274-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab, etc v. Hafiz Muhammad Ahmad","caseFileName":"c.p._1274_l_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Headnotes are not part of the judgment, therefore, it is neither safe nor desirable to cite headnotes in judgments.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2021","dateCreated":"29-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1050-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Nawaz v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1050_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Difference between the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 185 (3) of the constitution in bail matters and the original jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 498 CrPC to grant bail highlighted.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2021","dateCreated":"29-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.93-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mst. Rukhsana v. Rehmanullah and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._93_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2021","dateCreated":"29-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.42-P\/2018","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mst. Naseem v. Farhad Khan & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._42_p_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2021","dateCreated":"29-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.805-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Against Interim Order\/.","caseTitle":"Haji Muhammad Latif v. Muhammad Sharif, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._805_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-03-2021","dateCreated":"26-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":227},{"caseNumber":"C.A.249\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Agriculture, Livestock & Cooperative, Department Peshawar & others v. Saeed ul Hassan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._249_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":795},{"caseNumber":"C.A.201\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through the Special Secretary Specialized Healthcare & Medical Education Department, Lahore, etc v. Khadim Hussain Abbasi","caseFileName":"c.a._201_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":566},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3209\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Atif Mehmood Kiyani and another v. M\/s Sukh Chayn Private Limited, Royal Plaza, Blue Area Islamabad and another","caseFileName":"c.p._3209_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2021","dateCreated":"26-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":337},{"caseNumber":"J.P.302\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Zia Ullah and Waheed Anwar v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._302_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-01-2021","dateCreated":"24-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.457-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rashid v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._457_l_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Role of the AOR\/submission of attested better copy of FIR.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2021","dateCreated":"23-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":74},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.529\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Iftikhar Ahmad v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._529_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Principle relating to post-arrest bail in offences not falling within prohibitory clause of section 497(1) Cr.P.C","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.540-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Syed Husnain Haider v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._540_l_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.172\/2020","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/.","caseTitle":"Abdul Sattar Mahar v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._172_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-03-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.27-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Gul Zarin & others v. Fazal Khaliq & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._27_p_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.6-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"State through Advocate General K.P, Peshawar v. Hakim Zada and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._6_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.46-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Iftikhar Ali v. Gul Rehman and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._46_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.30-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"State through AG Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Peshawar v. Amanat Khan & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._30_p_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.48-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Daud and others v. Syed Abid Ali and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._48_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.9-Q\/2021","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ghulam Abbas v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._9_q_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.112-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ilyas v. Waris Khan and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._112_p_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-07-2021","dateCreated":"16-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.583\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Amjad Khan v. The State thr. A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._583_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2021","dateCreated":"13-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1097-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Cheif Secrertary Govt of the Punjab, Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman","caseFileName":"c.p._1097_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The bar contained under Article 212 of the Constitution.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2021","dateCreated":"12-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.624\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Gul Rehman v. The State through Advocate General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar","caseFileName":"crl.p._624_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2021","dateCreated":"09-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1499\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Divisional Superintendent Postal Services, Jhang & another v. Siddique Ahmed","caseFileName":"c.a._1499_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2021","dateCreated":"09-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.957\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Secretary Govt. of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Govt. & Rural Development & another v. Muhammad Tariq Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._957_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2021","dateCreated":"09-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1057\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"JS Bank Ltd, Karachi v. Province of Punjab thr. Secretary Food, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1057_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2021","dateCreated":"08-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3760},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.48\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)\/Others","caseTitle":"Asad Ali Khan & others v. Province of Punjab through Secretary Govt. of Punjab & others","caseFileName":"const.p._48_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2021","dateCreated":"05-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"C.A.45-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Insurance Claims\/.","caseTitle":"Rana Basit Rice Mills Private Ltd., v. Shaheen Insurance Company, Karachi through Incharge Claim, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._45_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-06-2021","dateCreated":"05-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4570\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Harassment","caseTitle":"Nadia Naz v. The President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4570_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-07-2021","dateCreated":"05-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.126-P\/2011","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Abdul Latif v. Noor Zaman & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._126_p_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2021","dateCreated":"05-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.47-P\/2017","caseSubject":"Consumer Protection Act.\/.","caseTitle":"Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd through its General Manager Hayatabad, Peshawar v. M\/S Saif Textile Mills Ltd & others","caseFileName":"crl.p._47_p_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-06-2021","dateCreated":"05-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.700\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Mian Shaukat Ali v. Punjab Public Service Commission thr. its Secretary, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.a._700_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Marks when to be rounded off - the maxim expressio unis est exclusion alterius i.e., the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of the other thing.","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  118","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-11-2018","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":432},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.277\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Zulfiqar Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._277_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-11-2020","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"J.Sh.P.3\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yaqoob v. The State","caseFileName":"j.sh.p._03_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-12-2020","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.Sh.A.9\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Siddique v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.sh.a._9_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-12-2020","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"J.P.40\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Gulshan Shah v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._40_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-11-2020","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.30-P\/2012","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"Sthate through Director ANF Peshawar v. Khurshid Khan","caseFileName":"crl.p._30_p_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2021","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.103-P\/2011","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Nazir Jan v. Sail Khan & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._103_p_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2021","dateCreated":"03-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.A.489\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"The Inspecting Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Peshawar & another v. M\/s A.G.E. Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. thr. its Director","caseFileName":"c.a._489_2013l.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1362","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-03-2021","dateCreated":"01-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.A.130\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/Termination from Service","caseTitle":"Tasawar Hussain v. Deputy Commissioner, District Jhelum & others","caseFileName":"c.a._130_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1367","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2021","dateCreated":"01-07-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3525\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Removal from Service","caseTitle":"Fayyaz Hussain v. Executive District Officer (Education), Rawalpindi & another","caseFileName":"c.p._3525_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1358","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-03-2021","dateCreated":"30-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.954\/2014","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sharif v. Mst. Niamat Bibi","caseFileName":"c.a._954_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1355","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-06-2021","dateCreated":"29-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1319\/2020","caseSubject":"Execution Petitions \/ Proceedings\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Farrukh Iqbal v. Mrs. Ayesha Iram & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1319_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1341","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-06-2021","dateCreated":"28-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.82\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Allied Bank Ltd v. Zulfiqar Ali Shar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._82_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1213","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3958},{"caseNumber":"C.A.502\/2017","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"The Commissioner Inland Revenuje, Zone-I, LTU, Tax House, Lahore v. M\/s. MCB Bank Limited, 15-Main Gulberg, Lahore","caseFileName":"c.a._502_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1325","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-01-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":120},{"caseNumber":"C.P.846-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue, Multan, etc v. M\/s. Acro Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., Multan, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._846_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1308","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-05-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1562\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Quetta Development Authority through Director General v. Abdul Basit and others","caseFileName":"c.a._1562_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1313","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-05-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.A.97\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd thr. its President, Islamabad v. Sarfraz Khan Jadoon & others","caseFileName":"c.a._97_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1305","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-06-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":807},{"caseNumber":"C.A.506\/2011","caseSubject":"Company Law\/.","caseTitle":"English Biscuit Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. (EBM) and others v. Associated Biscuit International Ltd.","caseFileName":"c.a._506_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1182","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-11-2014","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3226},{"caseNumber":"C.A.561\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan thr. the General Manager\/Operations Pakistan Railways, HQ Office, Lahore & others v. Shah Mohammad","caseFileName":"c.a._561_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1249","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-06-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":2441},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1134\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Allowances","caseTitle":"Abdul Hameed v. Water & Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & another","caseFileName":"c.a._1134_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1230","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3233},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1237\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through Secretary, Finance Department, Lahore and another v. Atta Muhammad Zafar","caseFileName":"c.a._1237_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1195","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3422},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1767\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Agreement to sell","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asif Awan v. Dawood Khan, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._1767_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1270","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1944},{"caseNumber":"C.P.593\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Performance Automotive (Pvt) Ltd, Lahore v. Akbar Adamjee & others","caseFileName":"c.p._593_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1257","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1681},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1128\/2020","caseSubject":"NAB\/Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"NAB thr. its Chairman v. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani","caseFileName":"c.p._1128_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1175},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1171\/2021","caseSubject":"Election-Senate\/Eligibility of Candidature","caseTitle":"Zubair Ali v. Election Commission of Pakistan through its Chairman, Islamabad and others","caseFileName":"c.p._1171_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1319","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1230},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1925\/2020","caseSubject":"Educational Institutions Cases\/Recognition\/Equivallation of Degrees","caseTitle":"Yasir Nawaz and others v. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan Islamabad thr. its Chairman and others","caseFileName":"c.p._1925_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1783},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2379\/2016","caseSubject":"Lamberdari Cases\/Appointment as to Lamberdar","caseTitle":"Sohail Ahmed v. Haji Shafqat Ali & others","caseFileName":"c.p._2379_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1336","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2021","dateCreated":"26-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1101},{"caseNumber":"C.A.350\/2020","caseSubject":"Insurance Claims","caseTitle":"State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan, Peshawar Cantt v. Atta ur Rehman","caseFileName":"c.a._350_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1347","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-06-2021","dateCreated":"25-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.390-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Qasim, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._390_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1344","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-06-2021","dateCreated":"23-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.A.410\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"The  Government of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Muhammad Ismail & another","caseFileName":"c.a._410_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1246","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.21\/2021","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Contempt proceedings initiated against Masood ur Rehman Abbasi on account of derogatory and contemptuous language v. -","caseFileName":"crl.o.p._21_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":10},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1125\/2020","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue, Bahawalpur v. M\/s. Bashir Ahmed Prop. (decd.) thr. LR","caseFileName":"c.a._1125_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1290","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.458\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Hussain Ahmed v. The State through A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._458_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1263","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1477\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Saddique v. Senior Executive Vice President (HR\/Admin), PTCL Headquarter,  Islamabad and others","caseFileName":"c.a._1477_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1284","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.442\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Saeed Yousaf v. The State thr. A.A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._442_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1295","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.509\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Akhtar Ullah alias Akhtar Ali v. The State through A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._509_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1287","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.40\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Secretary Agriculture, Livestock & Cooperation Department, Peshawar & others v. Anees Ahmad","caseFileName":"c.a._40_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1266","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.P.18-P\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Govt. of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others v. Hizbullah Khan and another","caseFileName":"c.p._18_p_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1281","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2021","dateCreated":"22-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1498\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Ijaz Bashir Qureshi v. Shams-un-Nisa Qureshi & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1498_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1298","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-06-2021","dateCreated":"21-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":723},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2597\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yousaf v. Allah Ditta & others","caseFileName":"c.p._2597_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1241","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2021","dateCreated":"17-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2836\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Through pre-emption","caseTitle":"Sheikh Ishtiaq Ahmad and others v. Muhammad Usman Ali Sheikh and another","caseFileName":"c.p._2836_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1277","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2021","dateCreated":"17-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.5602\/2021","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, through Chairperson, Dr. Mehdi Hasan and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Ministry of Education and others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._5602_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-06-2021","dateCreated":"11-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.495\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Syeda Sumera Andleeb v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._495_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1227","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-06-2021","dateCreated":"10-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.763-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ameer @ Kali,etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._763_l_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1192","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-10-2020","dateCreated":"10-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1824\/2021","caseSubject":"Permission to file and argue\/.","caseTitle":"Ghayasuddin Shahani and others v. Akhtar Hussain and others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._1824_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1204","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-05-2021","dateCreated":"08-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.460\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Noor Khan v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab","caseFileName":"crl.p._460_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1212","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2021","dateCreated":"04-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.493\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Noor Aslam v. The State thr. A.A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._493_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1225","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2021","dateCreated":"04-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1125\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Lt. Asim Bashir v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M\/o Defence thr. Secretary Defence, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1125_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1176","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-05-2021","dateCreated":"03-06-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.35-Q\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/.","caseTitle":"Abdul Wasay v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._35_q_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1059","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-02-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.106\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Bilal v. The State thr. A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa & another","caseFileName":"crl.a._106_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1039","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-09-2020","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":10515},{"caseNumber":"C.A.258\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Govt of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary, Peshawar & others v. Muhammad Younas & others","caseFileName":"c.a._258_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1045","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":9200},{"caseNumber":"C.A.31\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Chairman, Pakistan Ordnance Factories Board, Wah Cantt v. Shahzad Amin & others","caseFileName":"c.a._31_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1055","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":8011},{"caseNumber":"C.P.874-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against reduction of penalty","caseTitle":"Director Postal Life Insurance, Lahore v. Shakeel Ahmad","caseFileName":"c.p._874_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1162","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-03-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":6736},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1295\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Possession","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafique & others v. Syed Warand Ali Shah & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1295_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1068","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":12965},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2104-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Execution\/Auction Matters","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sharif alias Muhammad Sadiq, etc v. MCB Bank Ltd., etc","caseFileName":"c.p._2014_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1158","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-03-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":6260},{"caseNumber":"C.A.616\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Samiullah","caseFileName":"c.a._616_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 998","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-04-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18030},{"caseNumber":"C.A.359\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Punjab Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Lahore, etc v. Husnain Abbas, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._359_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1017","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23492},{"caseNumber":"C.A.617\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Khushal Khan Khattak University, Karak thr. its Vice Chancellor and others v. Jabran Ali Khan and others","caseFileName":"c.a._617_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 977","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18103},{"caseNumber":"C.P.852\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Agreement to sell","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jamil & others v. Muhammad Arif","caseFileName":"c.p._852_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1108","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-09-2020","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":25226},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1385\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Divisional Superintendent, Postal Services, Gujranwala & another v. Muhammad Arif Butt","caseFileName":"c.a._1385_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1033","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-03-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":11617},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1972-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/s. Fateh Yarn (Pvt.) Ltd., Faisalabad. v. The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Faisalabad, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1972_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1133","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":7888},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3148\/2020","caseSubject":"Arbitration\/Award","caseTitle":"Capital Development Authority (CDA) through its Chairman CDA, Headquarters, Islamabad and another v. M\/s Habib Rafiq (Pvt) Ltd and others","caseFileName":"c.p._3148_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1137","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17023},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2902\/2018","caseSubject":"Judicial Service\/Compulsory Retirement","caseTitle":"Fayyaz Ullah Khan v. Peshawar High Court, Peshawar thr. Registrar","caseFileName":"c.p._2902_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1051","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2021","dateCreated":"29-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":8721},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1530\/2019","caseSubject":"Family\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Arshad Anjum v. Mst. Khurshid Begum & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1530_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1145","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-04-2021","dateCreated":"28-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"J.P.739\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences","caseTitle":"Haroon-ur-Rasheed v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._739_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1106","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2021","dateCreated":"28-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.438\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Ghazan Khan v. Mst. Ameer Shuma and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._438_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1157","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-05-2021","dateCreated":"26-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.A.909\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"Khalil Ullah Kakar & others v. Inspector General of Police Balochistan, Quetta  & others","caseFileName":"c.a._909_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1168","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-05-2021","dateCreated":"21-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.435\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Mohammad Sarfraz Ansari v. The State thr. D.A.G. and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._435_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Confessional statement of a co-accused needs independent corroboration even at the bail stage. (Article 43 Qanun e Shahdat order, 1984)","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-05-2021","dateCreated":"18-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1989\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Secretary (M-V), Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad v. Zeenat Hussain Bangash & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1989_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1151","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-04-2021","dateCreated":"18-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3031\/2021","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Maqbool Ahmed Mahessar and others v. Executive Engineer Highways Division Kamber-Shahdadkot and others","caseFileName":"c.p._3031_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1166","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-05-2021","dateCreated":"07-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19) v. ","caseFileName":"s.m.c._1_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2021","dateCreated":"06-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.A.65-K\/2019","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Wagee, Bonus, Adhoc, Causal, Daily Wages & Regularisation","caseTitle":"M\/s Shahbaz Garments (Pvt) Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others","caseFileName":"c.a._65_k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1088","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-03-2021","dateCreated":"06-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":92},{"caseNumber":"C.A.527\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"The Controller Military Accounts (Pension), Lahore Cantt & others v. Muhammad Sabir (decd.) thr. LRs. & others","caseFileName":"c.a._527_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1124","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-12-2020","dateCreated":"06-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"C.A.10\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/Against reduction of penalty","caseTitle":"Senior General Manager\/CEO Pakistan Railways HQ, Lahore & others v. Abdul Rauf Shamoon","caseFileName":"c.a._10_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1027","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2021","dateCreated":"06-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3249\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Others","caseTitle":"Mst. Akhtar Sultan v. Major (R) Muzaffar Khan (decd) thr. his LRs & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3249_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 715","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2021","dateCreated":"06-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":89},{"caseNumber":"C.P.283-K\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sajjad v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"c.p._283_k_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1064","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-03-2021","dateCreated":"03-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1033\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Member (Administration) F.B.R., Islamabad & another v. Mian Khan","caseFileName":"c.p._1033_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1077","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2021","dateCreated":"03-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1399\/2019","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Section 78 and 83 of ROPA","caseTitle":"Shamona Badshah Qaisarani v. Election Tribunal, Multan, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._1399_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 988","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2021","dateCreated":"03-05-2021","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.A.985\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Compulsory Retirement","caseTitle":"Secretary Elementary & Secondary Education Department, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar and others v. Noor-Ul-Amin","caseFileName":"c.a._985_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 959","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2021","dateCreated":"28-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.517-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sharif v. Inspector General of Police Punjab Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._517_l_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Principle regarding grant of back benefits under service law.","citation":"2021 SCMR 962","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2021","dateCreated":"28-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.7084\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._7084_2020_opinion_hj_5.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 639","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2021","dateCreated":"28-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.296\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"c.r.p._296_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 667","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2021","dateCreated":"26-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1017\/2021","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Tariq Ahmed v. Deputy Director Coor, for Director IW, Sukkur and others","caseFileName":"c.p._1017_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 871","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2021","dateCreated":"22-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1474\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Muhammad Naeem Khan v. The President, N.B.P., Karachi & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1474_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 785","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-12-2020","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":2800},{"caseNumber":"C.A.178\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Elementary & Secondary Education, Peshawar and others v. Latif Ullah Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._178_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 829","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2021","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1313},{"caseNumber":"C.A.712\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Govt. of K.P. through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others v. Zahoor Ahmad Khalil","caseFileName":"c.a._712_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 816","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2021","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1407},{"caseNumber":"C.A.925\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"The Chairman Board of Governors, Medical Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital, MTI, LRH, Peshawar  and others v. Syed Roidar Shah and others","caseFileName":"c.a._925_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 867","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2021","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":920},{"caseNumber":"C.A.597\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Controller General of Accounts, Islamabad v. Fazli Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"c.a._597_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 800","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2021","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1461},{"caseNumber":"C.P.510\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Agreement to sell","caseTitle":"Hassan Nawaz v. Atta Muhammad (decd) his LRs","caseFileName":"c.p._510_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 857","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-01-2021","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1612},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4821\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, through Chairperson, Dr. Mehdi Hasan and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Ministry of Education and others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._4821_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 863","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-02-2021","dateCreated":"19-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":928},{"caseNumber":"C.A.931\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Wali Jan v. Govt of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Agriculture, Livestock Cooperative Department, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._931_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 855","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2021","dateCreated":"15-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1290-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"D. G. Khan Cement Company Ltd. v. Government of Punjab through its Chief Secretary, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1290_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of \u201cNegative Area\u201d under the Punjab Industries (Control on Establishment and Enlargement) Ordinance, 1963. Precautionary Principle in Dubio Pro Natura. Climate change, climate justice, water justice, inter-generational justice and climate democracy.","citation":"2021 SCMR 834","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2021","dateCreated":"15-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":99},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2661\/2020","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Sikander Ali Qureshi v. Chairman NAB, Islamabad and another","caseFileName":"c.p._2661_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-11-2020","dateCreated":"14-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1243\/2021","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._1243_2021_short_order.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 595","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2021","dateCreated":"13-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1331-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s. Lung Fung Chinese Restaurant, Lahore, etc v. Punjab Food Authority, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1331_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"International principles of food laws - Power to seal premises under section 13(1)(c) of the Punjab Food Authority Act, 2011 declared to be unconstitutional and illegal.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 684","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2021","dateCreated":"13-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":549},{"caseNumber":"C.P.590\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Shahzad Shahmir and others v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and others","caseFileName":"c.p._590_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 824","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2021","dateCreated":"12-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.801-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Shahzada Qasier Arfat @ Qasier v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._801_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Constitutional grounds for pre-arrest bail.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 708","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2021","dateCreated":"07-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1564\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Akhtar Ali v. Mst. Taj Mahal and another","caseFileName":"c.p._1564_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 806","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-04-2021","dateCreated":"05-04-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"J.P.147\/2016","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Naveed Asghar and others v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._147_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of murder reference \u2013 heinous nature of crime not to influence the mind of the judge - standard of care required for relying on circumstantial evidence \u2013 scope of last seen evidence \u2013 effect of material improvements made by witnesses \u2013 evidentiary value of blood stained weapons \u2013 recovery of weapon of offence is corroborative evidence \u2013 medical evidence not corroborative but supportive evidence.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 600","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2020","dateCreated":"30-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":304},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.713-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Chief Executive Officer, Multan Electric Power Company Ltd, Khanewal Road, Multan. v. Muhammad Ilyas, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._713_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Encroachment in the sphere of the Executive - judicial overreach \u2013 separation of powers.","citation":"2021   SCMR  775","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-03-2021","dateCreated":"30-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2210-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through Secretary Livestock & Dairy Development Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore, etc v. Dr. Javed Iqbal","caseFileName":"c.p._2210_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Regularization with effect from the date of regularization.","citation":"2021   SCMR  767","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2021","dateCreated":"30-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.634\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Muhammad Shafiq Ullah & others v. Allah Bakhsh (decd) thr. LRs & others","caseFileName":"c.p._634_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  763","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2021","dateCreated":"27-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1127\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Bashir Ahmad Anjum v. Muhammad Raffique and others","caseFileName":"c.p._1127_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  772","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2021","dateCreated":"27-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.467\/2021","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Defence Housing Authority, Quetta v. Quetta Residencia Housing Scheme, Quetta & others","caseFileName":"c.p._467_ 2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Vires of the Defence Housing Authority Quetta Act, 2015.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2021","dateCreated":"26-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.599\/2020","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"The State thr. P.G, Sindh v. Ahmed Omer Shaikh","caseFileName":"crl.a._599_2020_26032021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 873","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2021","dateCreated":"26-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":315},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.251\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Atif Zareef & others v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._251_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Constitutionality of two fingers test (\"TFT\") in rape cases.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 550","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-01-2021","dateCreated":"25-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":238},{"caseNumber":"C.A.17-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Execution\/Auction Matters","caseTitle":"Mst. Samrana Nawaz, etc v. MCB Bank Ltd., etc","caseFileName":"c.a._17_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of the second proviso to Order XXI Rule 90 CPC - matter referred to the HCJ for constitution of a Larger Bench.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 581","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2021","dateCreated":"24-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"C.A.827\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Allowances","caseTitle":"Govt. of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others v. Syed Sadiq Shah and others","caseFileName":"c.a._827_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 PLC (C.S.) 643","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2021","dateCreated":"24-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.50-Q\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._50_q_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  758","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-10-2020","dateCreated":"19-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.43-L\/2021","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Deputy Director Food Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, etc v. Muhammad Tauqir Shah","caseFileName":"c.p._43_l_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scheme of regularization under the Punjab Regularization of Service Act, 2018.","citation":"2021   SCMR  760","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-03-2021","dateCreated":"19-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.166\/2021","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Ali Asjad Malhi v. Ms. Syeda Nosheen Iftikhar and others","caseFileName":"c.a._166_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  726","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2021","dateCreated":"17-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2547\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Agreement to sell","caseTitle":"Inayat Ullah Khan (decd) thr. his LRs & others v. Shabir Ahmad Khan","caseFileName":"c.p._2547_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  686","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-03-2021","dateCreated":"17-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6762\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Administrator Municipal Corporation, Peshawar v. Taimur Hussain Amin & others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._6762_2020_13032021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  714","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-03-2021","dateCreated":"16-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.P.962\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Agreement to sell","caseTitle":"Sheikh Muhammad Muneer v. Mst. Feezan","caseFileName":"c.p._962_2016 .pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 538","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2021","dateCreated":"09-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2717-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Regional Operation Chief, National Bank of Pakistan, Human Recourse Department, Regional Office,Sargodha, etc v. Mst. Nusrat Perveen","caseFileName":"c.p._2717_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Survivability of right to sue under service laws.","citation":"2021 SCMR 702","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-12-2020","dateCreated":"06-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1630\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Challenging the decree","caseTitle":"Muhammad Riaz and others v. Mst. Badshah Begum and others","caseFileName":"c.p._1630_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  605","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2021","dateCreated":"06-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.P.883-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"The Province of Punjab through Secretary, Finance Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore, etc v. Kanwal Rashid","caseFileName":"c.p._883_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The heirs of a civil servant are entitled to receive pension of both the deceased parents simultaneously unless they are disentitled under the Rules.","citation":"2021 SCMR 730","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-02-2021","dateCreated":"06-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.335\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/5 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Fareed S\/o Sultan Muhamad and others v. The State thr. A.G, KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._335_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  621","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-09-2020","dateCreated":"05-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.446-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Direction","caseTitle":"Mian Irfan Bashir v. The Deputy Commissioner (D.C.), Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._446_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Meaning of judicial overreach.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 571","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-01-2021","dateCreated":"05-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.742-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment","caseTitle":"Muhammad Idrees v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._742_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Reliance on Police diary and Police investigation in a trial.","citation":"2021   SCMR  612","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-01-2021","dateCreated":"03-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1692-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through Secretary Primary & Secondary Healthcare, Punjab, Lahore, etc v. M\/s Bloom Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Limited","caseFileName":"c.p._1692_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of section 22 of the Drugs Act, 1976.","citation":"2021   SCMR  590","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2021","dateCreated":"02-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.284\/2021","caseSubject":"Transfer of family suit\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Kulsoom Rasheed v. Noman Aslam","caseFileName":"c.m.a._284_281.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 579","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-02-2021","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Reference.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 186\/Reference by the President","caseTitle":"Reference by the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Under Article 186 of the Constituion of Pakistan regarding Elections for the Members of the Senate of Pakistan v. ","caseFileName":"reference._1_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 480","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-03-2021","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"J.P.282\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ramzan v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._282_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  655","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-10-2020","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.Sh.A.16\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hanif v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.sh.a._16_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2021 SC (Cr.C.) 126","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-12-2020","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2580\/2020","caseSubject":"Damages\/.","caseTitle":"Munawar Ahmed Chief Editor Daily Sama and another v. Muhammad Ashraf Shahid and others","caseFileName":"c.p._2580_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 564","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2021","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.960\/2017","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Saddar-ud-Din (decd.) thr. LRs. v. Sultan Khan (decd.) thr. LRs. & other","caseFileName":"c.a._960_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  642","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-01-2021","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.62-P\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Saeeda Sultan v. Liaqat Ali Orakzai and others","caseFileName":"crl.m.a._62_p_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 671","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2020","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1103},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3923\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Hazrat Bilal (decd.) through LRs & others v. Mst. Spogmai and others","caseFileName":"c.p._3923_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 700","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2020","dateCreated":"01-03-2021","fileSizeInBytes":811},{"caseNumber":"C.A.228\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Secretary Higher Education Archives & Libraries Department Peshawar & others v. Sher Ali & others","caseFileName":"c.a._228_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  494","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1035},{"caseNumber":"C.A.754\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Shakeel Ahmad Zaidi & others v. Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Punjab, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.a._754_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  474","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-01-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1562},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6786\/2020","caseSubject":"Election-Bar Council\/Others","caseTitle":"Syed Iqbal Hussain Shah Gillani v. Pakistan Bar Council thr. its Secretary, Supreme Court Bar Building, Islamabad and others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._6786_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  425","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1620},{"caseNumber":"C.A.498\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Compulsory Retirement","caseTitle":"Deputy Postmaster General Central Punjab, Lahore & another v. Habib Ahmed","caseFileName":"c.a._498_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  584","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-01-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1089},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4500\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Registration of FIR","caseTitle":"Pak Gulf Construction (Pvt) Ltd, the Centaurus Mall, Islamabad v. Capital Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4500_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  600","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":1129},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2148\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Malik Munsif Awan, Advocate, Chairman Pakistan Justice Party, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad and others","caseFileName":"c.p._2148_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 379","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-12-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":3364},{"caseNumber":"C.A.240\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Secretary Industires, Commerce & Technical Education, Manpower Training Department, Peshawar & others v. Shahzad Iqbal & others","caseFileName":"c.a._240_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  673","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":491},{"caseNumber":"C.A.268\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt. of K.P. through Secretary Administration Department, Peshawar & others v. Liaqat Ali","caseFileName":"c.a._268_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 PLC (C.S.) 721","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-01-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":638},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.526\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Abid Hussain v. Secretary M\/o Defence Govt. of Pakistan thr. Chief of Air Staff, Islamabad","caseFileName":"c.r.p._526_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  645","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":67},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4428\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Correction in Date of Birth","caseTitle":"Muhammad Khaliq Mandokhel v. Government of Balochistan thr. Chief Secretary, Quetta & another","caseFileName":"c.p._4428_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  595","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.A.936\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others","caseFileName":"c.a._936_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  609","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-02-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.47\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Salman Sarwar Abro v. The Government of Sindh thr. Prosecutor General Sindh, Karachi & others","caseFileName":"c.p._47_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  658","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-02-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.900\/2020","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/.","caseTitle":"PESCO WAPDA House Shami Road, Peshawar thr. its Chief Executive v. Ishfaq Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._900_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  637","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.902\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"University of Malakand thr. Registrar and another v. Dr. Alam Zeb and others","caseFileName":"c.a._902_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  678","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3604\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Removal from Service","caseTitle":"Saboor Khan v. Chairman WAPDA, WAPDA House, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3604_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  667","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-01-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1134-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through Secretary Communication & Works Department, Lahore through Chief Engineer (Noth\/Central), Punjab Highway Department, 2-Lake Road, Lahore v. Yasir Majeed, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1134_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  624","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.994\/2020","caseSubject":"Superdari\/Others","caseTitle":"The State thr. Director General FIA, FIA Headquarters, Islamabad v. Alif Rehman","caseFileName":"crl.p._994_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  503","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2021","dateCreated":"27-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"Crl.Sh.A.23\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Qaiser Mehmood & anohter v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.sh.a._23_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2021 (Cr.C.) 140","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-12-2020","dateCreated":"24-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.7084\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._7084_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 639","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2021","dateCreated":"22-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":94},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.490\/2021","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Action Against Distribution of Development Funds to MNAs\/MPAs by Prime Minister v. ","caseFileName":"c.m.a._490_2021_20022021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 446","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-02-2021","dateCreated":"20-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":201},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.40\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ghulam Mustafa v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._40_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  542","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-09-2020","dateCreated":"17-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1245\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Zahid Aslam  S\/o Muhammad Aslam and another v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1245_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  554","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2021","dateCreated":"17-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1591-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue, Lahore v. Kohinoor Sugar Mills Ltd. Lahore.","caseFileName":"c.p._1591_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  536","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2021","dateCreated":"17-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.490\/2021","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Action Against Distribution of Development Funds to MNAs\/MPAs by Prime Minister v. ","caseFileName":"c.m.a._490_2021_11022021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 446","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-02-2021","dateCreated":"11-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1975\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Gul Nawaz & others v. Rashid Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1975_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  529","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2021","dateCreated":"11-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3380-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery\/.","caseTitle":"M\/s. James Consturction Company (Pvt.) Ltd., Lahore v. Province of Punjab through Secretary Communication & Works, Government of Punjab, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._3380_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  548","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-01-2021","dateCreated":"10-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.239\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Mian Khalid Perviz v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F. & another","caseFileName":"crl.a._239_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  522","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-10-2020","dateCreated":"10-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.420\/2016","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Safia Bano v. Home Department, Govt. of Punjab thr. its Secretary, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.r.p._420_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 488","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2021","dateCreated":"10-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":170},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.996\/2020","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Abid Hussain v. Tassawar Hussain and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._996_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  518","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2021","dateCreated":"10-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6762\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Administrator Municipal Corporation, Peshawar v. Taimur Hussain Amin & others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._6762_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  714","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-02-2021","dateCreated":"06-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.513\/2020","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ali Haider alias Pappu v. Jameel Hussain and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._513_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Importance of forensic science and DNA - admissibility and corroborative value.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 362","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2021","dateCreated":"04-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.490\/2021","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Action Against Distribution of Development Funds by Ex-Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf","caseFileName":"c.m.a._490_2021.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 446","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2021","dateCreated":"03-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.551\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/3 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Mehmood Qaiser v. The State thr. A.G. Islamabad and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._551_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  510","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-09-2020","dateCreated":"03-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"J.P.296\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Shaheen Ijaz @ Babu v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._296_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  500","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-09-2020","dateCreated":"02-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"J.P.508\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Zubair Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._508_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  492","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-01-2021","dateCreated":"01-02-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.475\/2019","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Kamran v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a._475_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  479","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2020","dateCreated":"30-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.291\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Farhan @ Irfan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._291_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  488","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-10-2020","dateCreated":"30-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.180\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Tariq Mehmood v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._180_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  471","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-11-2020","dateCreated":"30-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.599\/2020","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"The State thr. P.G, Sindh v. Ahmed Omer Shaikh","caseFileName":"crl.a._599_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 873","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2021","dateCreated":"28-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.26\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"The Commissioner Inland Revenue, RTO, Peshawar v. Tariq Mehmood","caseFileName":"c.a._26_2015l.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  440","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-01-2021","dateCreated":"28-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.149-K\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Kamran Attaullah & another v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._149_k_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2021 SC (Cr.C.) 98","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-09-2020","dateCreated":"27-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1515\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Bilal Khan v. The State thr. A.G. KPK","caseFileName":"crl.p._1525_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  460","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-01-2021","dateCreated":"27-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2732-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue Multan v. Sh. Muhammad Amin Arshad","caseFileName":"c.p._2732_l_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  437","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2021","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.279-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition\/.","caseTitle":"Govt. of K.P. through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others v. Muhammad Khurshid","caseFileName":"c.p._279_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2021 SC 191","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2020","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1120\/2009","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"C.D.A.  thr. its Chairman Islamabad v. Rana Munawar Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._1120_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  483","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2020","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2021-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Wealth Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/S Liberty Car Parking (Pvt.) Ltd through its Director v. The Commissioner Inland Revenue, (Ex. Commissioner of Income Tax\/Wealth Tax), Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._2021_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  375","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2020","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"J.P.657\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Zulfiqar @ Zulfa v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._657_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  531","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2020","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.A.782\/2014","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery","caseTitle":"Kh. Bashir Ahmed & Sons Pvt Ltd v. M.s Martrade Shipping & Transport & another","caseFileName":"c.a._782_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 373","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-01-2021","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1567-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"District Police Officer, Mianwali, etc v. Amir Abdul Majid","caseFileName":"c.p._1567_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 PLC (C.S.) 587","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-11-2020","dateCreated":"21-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.P.692\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against reduction of penalty","caseTitle":"Director General, Federal Directorate of Education, Islamabad & another v. Tanveer Muhammad Khokhar & another","caseFileName":"c.p._692_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 PLC (C.S.) 602","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-12-2020","dateCreated":"16-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":274},{"caseNumber":"C.A.346\/2020","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Validity of mutation","caseTitle":"Sardar Muhammad and others v. Imam Bakhsh (decd.) thr. LRs. and others","caseFileName":"c.a._346_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  391","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2020","dateCreated":"16-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"J.P.960\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Abbas Ali and Haji Umer @ Ghulam Hussain v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._960_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2021 SC (Cr.C.) 103","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-10-2020","dateCreated":"15-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.184\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Mst. Sakina Ramzan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._184_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Safe custody and safe transmission in narcotics case.","citation":"2021   SCMR  451","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-01-2021","dateCreated":"13-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":214},{"caseNumber":"C.A.870\/2012","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"M\/s Sazco (Pvt) Ltd. thr. its Chief Executive v. Askari Commercial Bank Ltd thr. its G.M.","caseFileName":"c.a._ 870_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2020","dateCreated":"09-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":95},{"caseNumber":"C.A.681\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"National Bank of Pakistan and another v. Zahoor Ahmed Mengal","caseFileName":"c.a._681_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 144","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-12-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":156},{"caseNumber":"C.A.420\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against reduction of penalty","caseTitle":"Divisional Superintendent, Postal Services, Faisalabad & others v. Muhammad Zafarullah","caseFileName":"c.a._420_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  400","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-11-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":466},{"caseNumber":"C.A.357\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Chairman, Pakistan Ordinance Factory Board, Wah Cantt v. Dr. Naveeda Rauf and others","caseFileName":"c.a._357_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 172","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-12-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":511},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.421\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Cherat Cement Co. Ltd, Nowshera v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M\/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others","caseFileName":"c.r.p._421_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 327","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-11-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":5706},{"caseNumber":"C.A.497\/2020","caseSubject":"Service","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Shafqut-ur-Rehman Ranjha & others","caseFileName":"c.a._497_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 153","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":697},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.630\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences","caseTitle":"Gulzar v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._630_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  380","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.231\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Shah Nawaz Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._231_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  373","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-11-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.128\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Mahboob v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._128_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-10-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.154\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/14 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Afzalur Rehman v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._154_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  359","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-10-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":153},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.1659\/2019","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Utility Store Corporation of Pakistan thr its M.D. v. The State thr D.G. NAB Karachi and others","caseFileName":"crl.m.a._1659_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  408","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-11-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":277},{"caseNumber":"C.P.84\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Sajjad Ahmad Khan v. Muhammad Saleem Ilvi & others","caseFileName":"c.p._84_.2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  415","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-10-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":128},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.310\/2018","caseSubject":"Trade Union\/Determination of Collective Bargaining Agent","caseTitle":"Shaheen Airport Services v. National Industrial Relation Commission thr. its Deputy Registrar, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.r.p._310_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  294","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":143},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1369-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department, Lahore v. Murree Brewery Company Ltd., (MBCL), Rawalpindi, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1369_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  305","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-12-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":492},{"caseNumber":"C.A.485\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Imtiaz Ahmad Malik & others","caseFileName":"c.a._485_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 166","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-11-2020","dateCreated":"07-01-2021","fileSizeInBytes":173},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.110\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ishtiaq Hussain v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._110_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 159","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-10-2020","dateCreated":"18-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1554-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab through Conservator of Forest, Faisalabad, etc v. Javed Iqbal","caseFileName":"c.p._1554_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Departmental proceedings to be finalized within two years of the retirement of civil servant \u2013 interpretation of the proviso to section 21 of PEEDA Act.","citation":"2021   SCMR  328","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-11-2020","dateCreated":"16-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":378},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.67-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Shaban Akhtar v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._67_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  395","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-10-2020","dateCreated":"16-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.635\/2019","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yaseen v. The State thr. P.G. Balochistan","caseFileName":"crl.a._635_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  404","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-10-2020","dateCreated":"15-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.659\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Hiba-ownership","caseTitle":"Atta Muhammad & others v. Mst. Munir Sultan (decd) thr. LRs & others","caseFileName":"c.p._659_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 73","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-12-2020","dateCreated":"14-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"Crl.Sh.A.12\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hayat and others v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.sh.a._12_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 92","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-12-2020","dateCreated":"12-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.296-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/.","caseTitle":"Akbar Ali v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a._296_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 104","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-10-2020","dateCreated":"10-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1210\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Lal Marjan S\/o Khaista Jan and another v. Islam Gul and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._1210_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  301","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-12-2020","dateCreated":"09-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4459\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Permanent Injunction","caseTitle":"Farhan Aslam & others v. Mst. Nuzba Shaheen & another","caseFileName":"c.p._4459_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 179","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-11-2020","dateCreated":"08-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.421\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Cherat Cement Co. Ltd, Nowshera v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M\/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others","caseFileName":"c.r.p._421_2020_dissenting_notes.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Dissent in the GIDC review judgment - dissenting judge is an essential member of the review bench.","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 327","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2020","dateCreated":"07-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":826},{"caseNumber":"C.A.762-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"Dr. Zohara Jabeen, etc v. Muhammad Aslam Pervaiz, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._762_l_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Seniority in the case of the same \"batch\" of promotees.","citation":"2021 SCMR 194","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-12-2020","dateCreated":"04-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1023\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Jahanzeb S\/o Masam Khan and others v. The State thr. A.G. KPK, Peshawar and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1023_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 63","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-12-2020","dateCreated":"04-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1228\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Sharif Khan v. The State thr. A.G. KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1228_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 87","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-11-2020","dateCreated":"03-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.540\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ejaz v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._540_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  387","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2020","dateCreated":"02-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2444\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"M\/s Shahid Gul & Partners v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Audit-V, RTO, Peshawar","caseFileName":"c.a._2444_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 27","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2019","dateCreated":"02-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":291},{"caseNumber":"J.P.210\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/.","caseTitle":"Abdul Khaliq v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._210_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  325","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-09-2020","dateCreated":"01-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1806-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Shabbir Hussain v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._1806_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 198","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-09-2020","dateCreated":"01-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.69-Q\/2019","caseSubject":"Sentence\/.","caseTitle":"Manzoor Ahmed Akhtar v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._69_q_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  292","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-09-2020","dateCreated":"01-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1143\/2019","caseSubject":"Sentence Already Undergone","caseTitle":"Nakhuda Mustafa S\/o Tafassul & another v. The State thr. P.G. Balochistan","caseFileName":"crl.p._1143_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  319","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-10-2020","dateCreated":"01-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.405\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"National Saving Central Directorate, Islamabad thr. its D.G. & another v. Muhammad Farooq Raja","caseFileName":"c.p._405_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 320","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-11-2020","dateCreated":"01-12-2020","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.248\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Secretary Health, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar & others v. Jawad Ali & others","caseFileName":"c.a._248_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 185","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-10-2020","dateCreated":"25-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1922},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1476\/2018","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition\/Compensation","caseTitle":"Federal Government Employees Housing Foundation (FGEHF), Islamabad v. Malik Ghulam Mustafa & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1476_2018_urdu.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Urdu Version","citation":"2020 PSC 1526","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-10-2020","dateCreated":"25-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1304},{"caseNumber":"C.A.731\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Syed Muddasar Shah Termizi v. Peshawar High Court, Peshawar thr. Registrar, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._731_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 116","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2020","dateCreated":"25-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":3899},{"caseNumber":"C.A.323\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Upgradation","caseTitle":"Director General, National Savings Central Director of National Saving 32-N and others v. Muhammad Sultan and others","caseFileName":"c.a._323_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 97","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-04-2020","dateCreated":"25-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1032},{"caseNumber":"C.A.433\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Government of Balochistan through Secretary Services & General Adminstration Department and others v. Abdul Rauf","caseFileName":"c.a._433_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 313","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-10-2020","dateCreated":"25-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1885},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4-P\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Inspector General of Prison, KPK Peshawar and others v. Habib Ullah","caseFileName":"c.p._4_p_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2020","dateCreated":"25-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6762\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Administrator Municipal Corporation, Peshawar v. Taimur Hussain Amin & others","caseFileName":"cma_6762_20.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  714","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-11-2020","dateCreated":"23-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":114},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.851-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Zeeshan @ Shani v. Muhammad Ayub, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._851_l_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 142","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-08-2020","dateCreated":"18-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.85\/2020","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Imran v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._85_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 69","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-10-2020","dateCreated":"18-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1285\/2020","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/.","caseTitle":"Jahangir Khan v. Khalid Latif & another","caseFileName":"c.p._1285_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 136","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-08-2020","dateCreated":"18-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"J.P.385\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Afzal v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._385_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  289","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-10-2020","dateCreated":"18-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"J.P.382\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Munir Akhtar @ Munir Ahmad v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._382_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  298","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-10-2020","dateCreated":"18-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.69-Q\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quashment","caseTitle":"Jamal Khan v. The Secy: Home Deptt: Govt. of Balochistan & others","caseFileName":"c.p._69_q_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  468","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-09-2020","dateCreated":"12-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1\/2020","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Illegal & Corrupt Practice","caseTitle":"Sardar Abdul Rehman v. Abdul Kareem Kehtran and others","caseFileName":"c.a._1_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 82","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-10-2020","dateCreated":"12-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2633\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Through pre-emption","caseTitle":"Bashir Ahmed v. Muhammad Zaman","caseFileName":"c.p._2633_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 134","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2020","dateCreated":"11-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.692\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Ikhtiar Khan v. Sarfaraz Khan and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._692_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-08-2020","dateCreated":"10-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"J.P.14\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Shaukat Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._14_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-09-2020","dateCreated":"10-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":136},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.907\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Mian Haroon Riaz Lucky  & another v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._907_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 56","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2020","dateCreated":"10-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":867},{"caseNumber":"C.A.73\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Government of KPK, Workers Welfare Board thr. its Chairman v. Raheel Ali Gohar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._73_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2068","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-07-2020","dateCreated":"06-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2081},{"caseNumber":"C.A.559\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Tahawwar Ahmad","caseFileName":"c.a._559_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 46","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-09-2020","dateCreated":"06-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1467},{"caseNumber":"C.A.675\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"Senior General Manager\/CEO, Pakistan Railways, HQ, Lahore & another v. Asif Ali","caseFileName":"c.a._675_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 2171","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-05-2020","dateCreated":"04-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":245},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.17\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p._17_2020_dissenting_note_hj11.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2020","dateCreated":"04-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":481},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.17\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p._17_2020_dissenting_note_hj4.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2020","dateCreated":"04-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":397},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.1591\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Ehtiram Ud Din v. Iqbal Muhammad Chauhan & others","caseFileName":"crl.m.a._1591_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Faisal Arab","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-10-2020","dateCreated":"03-11-2020","fileSizeInBytes":90},{"caseNumber":"J.P.348\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/6 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Ibrar Ullah v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._348_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 128","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-10-2020","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":103},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.125\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/12 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Mst. Khalida v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._125_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  109","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-10-2020","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":129},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.518\/2010","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan v. Nadeem H. Shaikh & others","caseFileName":"crl.a._518_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021   SCMR  343","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-10-2020","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":133},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1067\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Khair Muhammad S\/o Allah Wasaya and another v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1067_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 130","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-10-2020","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":151},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4862\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Ajmir Shah v. The Inspector General, Frontier Corps KPK, HQ, Peshawar","caseFileName":"c.a._4862_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 2129","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2020","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":121},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1076\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Termination from Service","caseTitle":"Martin Dow Marker Ltd, Quetta v. Asadullah Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1076_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 2147","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2019","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":148},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4053\/2018","caseSubject":"Stay","caseTitle":"Mst. Samina Riffat & others v. Rohail Asghar & others","caseFileName":"c.m.a._4053_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 7","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-05-2020","dateCreated":"29-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":430},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1029\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Sajid v. Samin-ur-Rehman (deceased) thr. his father Gul Jawab Khan and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._1029_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 138","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-10-2020","dateCreated":"28-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":115},{"caseNumber":"C.A.353\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Gul Tiaz Khan Marwat v. The Registrar Peshawar High Court, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._353_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2020","dateCreated":"27-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20329},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.77-P\/2020","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Imtiaz v. Azam Khan and others","caseFileName":"crl.p_77_p_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 111","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-10-2020","dateCreated":"24-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.17\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p._17_2019_detailed_reasoning.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2021 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-06-2020","dateCreated":"23-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":903},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.457-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Amjad, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._457_l_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2084","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2020","dateCreated":"21-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":170},{"caseNumber":"C.P.686-K\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Execution\/Auction Matters","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jawed v. First Women Bank Ltd and others","caseFileName":"c.p._686_k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2134","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-09-2020","dateCreated":"21-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":252},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.105-K\/2020","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Sidra Abbas v. The State & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._105_k_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2089","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-09-2020","dateCreated":"21-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"C.P.720\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Amjad Khan v. Muhammad Irshad (decd) thr. his LRs & others","caseFileName":"c.p._720_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2155","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-09-2020","dateCreated":"21-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":247},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.7923\/2019","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Application for Release of Funds to be paid by Bahria Town Karachi to the Govt. of Sindh pursuant to order dated 21.3.2019","caseFileName":"c.m.a._7923_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Faisal Arab","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2122","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-10-2020","dateCreated":"20-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":133},{"caseNumber":"C.A.647\/2018","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue Enforcement & Compliance Division v. The Secretary Revenue Division Govt of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._647_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2055","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-09-2020","dateCreated":"19-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":164},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.958\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Irfan v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor, A.N.F. and another","caseFileName":"c.p._958_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2017","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2020","dateCreated":"17-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":138},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2231\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Registration of Criminal Case","caseTitle":"Abdul Rehman Malik v. Cynthia D. Ritchie American National and others","caseFileName":"c.p._2231_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2037","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2020","dateCreated":"13-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":3009},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3998\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Muhammad Tariq v. Afzal Hussain","caseFileName":"c.p._3998_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-10-2020","dateCreated":"12-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":135},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1522\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Haji Wajdad v. Provincial Government through Secretary Board of Revenue, Govt. of Balochistan, Quetta & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1522_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2046","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2020","dateCreated":"12-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":142},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1664\/2014","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Kalsoom Begum v. Rizwan Shah & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1664_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2029","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-09-2020","dateCreated":"10-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.916\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Waheed v. The State thr. A.G. KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._916_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2066","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-09-2020","dateCreated":"10-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":107},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.606\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Dad Khan v. The State through Special Prosecutor ANF","caseFileName":"crl.p._606_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2062","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-08-2020","dateCreated":"10-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":103},{"caseNumber":"J.P.335\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Arshad v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._335_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2025","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-10-2020","dateCreated":"09-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":197},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1476\/2018","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition\/Compensation","caseTitle":"Federal Government Employees Housing Foundation (FGEHF), Islamabad v. Malik Ghulam Mustafa & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1476_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 PSC 1526","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-10-2020","dateCreated":"08-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":763},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2482\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Cancellation of Transfer Order","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary, Ministry of Engergy (Power Division), Islamabad and others v. Shafiq ul Hassan and others","caseFileName":"c.p._2482_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2119","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2020","dateCreated":"03-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1698\/2014","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/.","caseTitle":"Manzoor Hussain (decd.) thr. LRs. v. Misri Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._1698_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 749","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-09-2020","dateCreated":"03-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":154},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.371\/2020","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"The State thr. P.G, Sindh v. Ahmed Omer Shaikh","caseFileName":"crl.p._371_2020l.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2096","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-09-2020","dateCreated":"03-10-2020","fileSizeInBytes":127},{"caseNumber":"C.A.171\/2019","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Illegal & Corrupt Practice","caseTitle":"Mir Mujib-ur-Rehman Muhammad Hassani v. Returning Officer & others","caseFileName":"c.a._171_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 718","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-12-2019","dateCreated":"26-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":233},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.534\/2019","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Khalid Naseer v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab","caseFileName":"crl.p._534_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1966","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-09-2020","dateCreated":"25-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":115},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.923\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf v. The State thr. Prosecutor General Punjab, Lahore and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._923_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2105","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-09-2020","dateCreated":"24-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.290\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Uzair Jamal v. The State thr. A.G, KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._290_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1862","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":162},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.640\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Kamran v. Kamran Malik and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._640_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1814","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":128},{"caseNumber":"C.A.551\/2020","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Director General of Intelligence & Investigation, F.B.R., Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Aslam Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._551_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1846","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-09-2020","dateCreated":"22-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":161},{"caseNumber":"C.P.398-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"The Commissioner Inland Revenue, Lahore, etc v. M\/s Hamza Nasir Wire, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._398_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1822","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-11-2018","dateCreated":"19-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":247},{"caseNumber":"J.P.501\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Javed v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._501_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2116","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-08-2020","dateCreated":"18-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":140},{"caseNumber":"J.P.263\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._263_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1841","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-08-2020","dateCreated":"16-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":131},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.654\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous\/Others","caseTitle":"Saeed Zaman v. The State thr. F.I.A. Cyber Crime Reporting Circle, Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._654_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1855","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-08-2020","dateCreated":"16-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":137},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.682\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Abbas Raza v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._682_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1859","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-09-2020","dateCreated":"16-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":130},{"caseNumber":"J.P.262\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sharif v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._262_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1818","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-07-2020","dateCreated":"14-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":142},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.263-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ibrar Hussain v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._263_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1850","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-07-2020","dateCreated":"14-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":140},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3097\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Abdul Hameed v. Jahangir Khan","caseFileName":"c.p._3097_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  2107","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-07-2020","dateCreated":"11-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":138},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2129\/2020","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Khawaja Anver Majid v. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman & another","caseFileName":"c.p._2129_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 635","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-09-2020","dateCreated":"10-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":130},{"caseNumber":"C.A.451\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Termination from Service","caseTitle":"Miss Naureen Butt v. Pakistan International Airlines, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._451_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1625","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1540},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3952\/2019","caseSubject":"Judicial Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Rizwana Altaf v. The Chief Justice of Sindh High Court thr. its Registrar","caseFileName":"c.p._3952_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Faisal Arab","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1401","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-06-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1384},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.911\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Farman Ullah v. The State thr. Additional Advocate General, Government of KPK at Dar-ul-Qaza, Swat and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._911_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1687","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-08-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":904},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.64\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Dr. Shahnawaz Munami & others v. The Federal Govt. of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p._64_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1713","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2511},{"caseNumber":"C.A.324\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"The District Police Officer, Mianwali, etc v. Muhammad Hanif","caseFileName":"c.a._324_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1610","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-07-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2359},{"caseNumber":"C.A.17\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Pakistan Railways thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & another v. Sajid Hussain","caseFileName":"c.a._17_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1664","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-08-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2296},{"caseNumber":"C.A.429\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Government of Balochistan through Chief Secretary,  Quetta and others v. Dr. Muhammad Tariq Jafar and others","caseFileName":"c.a._429_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1689","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-08-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":4124},{"caseNumber":"C.A.188\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Allowances","caseTitle":"Province of K.P. through Chief Secretary, Peshawar & others v. Farasatullah","caseFileName":"c.a._188_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1629","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-07-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":184},{"caseNumber":"C.A.507\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Chief Secretary Government of Balochistan, Quetta and others v. Asmatullah Kakar","caseFileName":"c.a._507_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1678","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-08-2020","dateCreated":"09-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":186},{"caseNumber":"C.A.152-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"LDA through its D.G, etc v. Muhammad Tariq Niaz","caseFileName":"c.a._152_l_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1957","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-08-2020","dateCreated":"07-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":121},{"caseNumber":"J.P.499\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Abbas v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._499_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 620","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-08-2020","dateCreated":"04-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":260},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.658\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Tahir Zeb S\/o Ghani Muhammad and another v. The State thr. A.G, KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._658_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2020   SCMR  1685","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-08-2020","dateCreated":"01-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":101},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.20883\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"In the Matter of Excessive and Unannounced Loadsheding in Sindh","caseFileName":"h.r.c._20883_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 1702","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-09-2020","dateCreated":"01-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":150},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.520\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Hazrat Nabi Shah alias Hazrat Khan v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._520_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1672","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-08-2020","dateCreated":"01-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":110},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.630\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Mumtaz Ahmad and others v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._630_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1701","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-08-2020","dateCreated":"01-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":102},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4185\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Removal from Service","caseTitle":"Dr. Sohail Hassan Khan v. Director General (Research) Livestock & Dairy Development Department, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4185_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1708","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-08-2020","dateCreated":"01-09-2020","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"C.P.800-P\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Government of KPK through Secretary Excise & Taxation Department, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar and others v. Sarfaraz Khan and another","caseFileName":"c.p._800_p_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1410","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-05-2020","dateCreated":"28-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":206},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1355\/2006","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Mrs.Zakia  Hussain and another v. Syed Farooq Hussain","caseFileName":"c.a._1355_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 401","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-05-2020","dateCreated":"28-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4683\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, M\/o Law & Justice Division, Islamabad v. Mamoon Ahmed Malik","caseFileName":"c.p._4683_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1154","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-05-2020","dateCreated":"28-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.370\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Commissioner Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, etc v. Allah Bakhsh","caseFileName":"c.a._370_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1418","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2020","dateCreated":"28-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.989\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Mst. Brehna v. Faiz Ullah Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.p._989_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1618","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2020","dateCreated":"25-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":127},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4690\/2018","caseSubject":"Family\/Recovery of Dower Amount","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jamil & others v. Mst. Sajida Bibi & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4690_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 613","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-08-2020","dateCreated":"24-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":117},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.104-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC","caseTitle":"Farooq Hussain, etc v. Sheikh Aftab Ahmad, etc","caseFileName":"c.r.p._104_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No need for a detailed judgment by this Court in every case. Adopting the reasoning of the courts below is sufficient.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 617","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-08-2020","dateCreated":"24-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":187},{"caseNumber":"C.P.205-L\/2017","caseSubject":"OGRA\/.","caseTitle":"Wafaqi Mohtasib Secretariat, Islamabad. v. S.N.G.P.L, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._205_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Ombudsman cannot challenge the curtailment of powers vested in him by law or as interpreted by the constitutional courts. Difference between rights and powers enjoyed by the Ombudsman.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 586","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-08-2020","dateCreated":"24-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":156},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.218\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Acceptance of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Allah Dino Khan Bhayo v. Election Commission of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"c.r.p._218_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 591","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-02-2020","dateCreated":"21-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4188\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Hubdar Hussain Malik v. Deputy Commissioner Chakwal & another","caseFileName":"c.p._4188_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1507","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-08-2020","dateCreated":"20-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":133},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.591\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Sheqab Muhammad v. The State thr. AG KPK and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._591_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1486","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-08-2020","dateCreated":"20-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":128},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.17-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment","caseTitle":"Muhammad Khan @ Kali v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._17_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-08-2020","dateCreated":"20-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":129},{"caseNumber":"C.P.140-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Malik Ubaidullah v. Government of the Punjab through Secretary Education, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._140_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Rights based approach and mode of determination of 2% employment quota for persons with disabilities (PWDs)","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 599","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2020","dateCreated":"13-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":310},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1113\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Khurshid Soap & Chemical Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M\/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others","caseFileName":"c.a._1113_2017_dissenting_note.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Fee. Service in return or quid pro quo must have a timeline. Gidc declared unconstitutional.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 641","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-08-2020","dateCreated":"13-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":451},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1113\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Khurshid Soap & Chemical Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M\/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others","caseFileName":"c.a._1113_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Faisal Arab","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Minority view per Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah: Fee.  Service in return or quid pro quo must have a timeline. Gidc declared unconstitutional.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 641","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-08-2020","dateCreated":"13-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":602},{"caseNumber":"C.A.634\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Aqeel Shahzad & others v. Govt. of KPK thr. Chief Secretary KPK Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._634_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1425","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-07-2020","dateCreated":"08-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":157},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.619\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Aqal Khan v. The State thr. A.G, KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._619_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1431","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-08-2020","dateCreated":"05-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":121},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.691\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Shehryar Khan v. The State thr. AG, KP and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._691_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1436","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-08-2020","dateCreated":"05-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":122},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1124-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Raza v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1124_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Majority judgment : The meaning of confession and the  admissibility of a  confessional statement before a police officer after the arrest of the accused (first version) if used in favour of the accused. The scope of articles 27 and 38 of the qanun e shahadat order 1984 and section 161 crpc. Mode of appreciation of evidence in a criminal case and the concept of reasonable possibility of truth of the defence version and its legal effect.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-06-2020","dateCreated":"04-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.44\/2019","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/From one Court to another Court within District","caseTitle":"Sadiq Ullah & another v. The State thr. A.G. KPK, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"c.p._44_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1422","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-07-2020","dateCreated":"04-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":129},{"caseNumber":"C.A.573\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M\/s. Faisal Bank Limited","caseFileName":"c.a._573_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1045","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-03-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1802},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4635\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Hidayat Ullah v. Muhammad Younas & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4635_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 362","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":155},{"caseNumber":"C.A.977\/2018","caseSubject":"PTA\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/o Information Technology and Telecommunications, Islamabad v. CMPAK (Pvt) Ltd, Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"c.a._977_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 551","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-04-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":166},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1400\/2019","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies\/Others","caseTitle":"Umaid Ali v. The Election Commission of Pakistan thr. Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1400_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1058","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-03-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":149},{"caseNumber":"C.A.656\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Others","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue, Legal Division, RTO-III v. Mst. Yasmeen Bano","caseFileName":"c.a._656_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1120","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":130},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1077\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Collector of Custom v. M\/s Filtters Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd","caseFileName":"c.a._1077_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1157","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1061},{"caseNumber":"C.A.136\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Property Tax","caseTitle":"Chaklala Cantonment Board, Rawalpindi thr. its Executive Officer v. Ahmad Kamal Nasir & others","caseFileName":"c.a._136_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 386","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-03-2020","dateCreated":"03-08-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1330},{"caseNumber":"C.A.73\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Mst. Attia Bano & others v. Abdul Majeed","caseFileName":"c.a._73_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1396","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-06-2020","dateCreated":"30-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":535},{"caseNumber":"J.P.112\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Javed Ishfaq v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._112_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1414","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-07-2020","dateCreated":"29-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":136},{"caseNumber":"Crl.S.M.R.P.84\/2018","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Sikandar Hayat and another v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.s.m.r.p._84_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 559","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-07-2020","dateCreated":"28-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1025},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.849\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/5 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Aamir Shahzad v. The State thr. D.A.G. & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._849_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1406","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-06-2020","dateCreated":"24-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":438},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.594\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Jehanzeb Khan v. The State thr. AG KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._594_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1268","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.622\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Imran Abbas v. The State thr. A.G, Islamabad and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._622_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1262","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.543\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Habib Ullah Jan and another v. The State thr. A.G. KPK and others","caseFileName":"crl.p._543_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1278","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.610\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Noman Munir v. The State thr. P.G, Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._610_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1257","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"J.P.105\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/6 Months R.I.","caseTitle":"Mufti Kafayat Ullah v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._105_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1248","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2020","dateCreated":"23-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.549\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Babar Nadeem v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._549_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1253","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-07-2020","dateCreated":"23-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2243-L\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Khawaja Salman Rafique v. National Accountability Bureau through its Chairman, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._2243_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 456","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2020","dateCreated":"20-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":285},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1196-L\/2015","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/L.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jameel v. Muhammad Yasin, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1196_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1237","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2020","dateCreated":"20-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.445-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/.","caseTitle":"Akhtar Ali v. The State, etc.","caseFileName":"crl.p._445_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1243","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-07-2020","dateCreated":"20-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.310-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Restoration\/.","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Legal Division, Regional Tax Office, 40-Lawrence Road, Lahore v. M\/s Rafeh Limited, 18-KM, G.T Road, Lahore","caseFileName":"c.p._310_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Tax Reference can be dismissed for non-prosecution.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 518","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-07-2020","dateCreated":"17-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4129\/2019","caseSubject":"Guardian and Ward\/Custody of Minor","caseTitle":"Mst. Beena v. Raj Muhammad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4129_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 508","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2020","dateCreated":"17-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1485-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jahangir Khan, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1485_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1270","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2020","dateCreated":"13-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.13316-P\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding colossal losses incurred by Pakistan Railways","caseFileName":"h.r.c._13316_p_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 1216","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-07-2020","dateCreated":"09-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.443-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Ali Akbar v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._443_l_2020_dissenting_note.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1225","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-06-2020","dateCreated":"08-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.18\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/6 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Mati Ullah v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor A.N.F.","caseFileName":"crl.p._18_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1222","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2020","dateCreated":"06-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1483-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Insurance Claims\/.","caseTitle":"Adamjee Insurance Company Ltd., Lahore v. Muhammad Ramzan, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1483_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of Section 124 of the Insurance Ordinance, 2000.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 414","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-07-2020","dateCreated":"06-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.A.158-L\/2011","caseSubject":"Service\/Removal from Service","caseTitle":"Mirza Aamer Hassan v. Commissioner of Income Tax, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._158_l_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Major penalty like reduction to lower post or lower time scale ought to be time specific.","citation":"2020   SCMR  1218","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-06-2020","dateCreated":"06-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.527\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Noor Bakhsh v. The State thr. P.G. Balochistan","caseFileName":"crl.p._527_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1205","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2020","dateCreated":"06-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.500\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Kamran Ullah v. The State thr. A.G. KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._500_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1214","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-07-2020","dateCreated":"06-07-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.230\/2019","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/.","caseTitle":"Ali Gohar son of Bakhtiar @ Yakhtiar & others v. Pervaiz Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"crl.p._230_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 427","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-06-2020","dateCreated":"30-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":115},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.163\/2020","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/From one District to another District","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sultan v. Muhammad Raza & others","caseFileName":"crl.p._163_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1200","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2020","dateCreated":"30-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.66-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Shabbir, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a._66_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1206","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-06-2020","dateCreated":"30-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.860\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Sentence","caseTitle":"Tariq Saeed v. The State thr. PG, NAB","caseFileName":"c.p._860_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1177","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2020","dateCreated":"30-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.231\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Sami Ullah S\/o Hazrat Ullah & another v. Laiq Zada & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._231_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1115","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-05-2020","dateCreated":"30-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1431\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Noor Muhammad v. The State thr. P.G, Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1431_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1049","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-05-2020","dateCreated":"30-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"J.P.462\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Javed Akhtar v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._462_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 419","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2020","dateCreated":"27-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._1_2020_25062020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 1189","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-06-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.464\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hayat v. The State thr. A.G. KPK & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._464_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1183","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-06-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.445\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Ghulam Abbas v. The State thr. A.G. KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._445_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1198","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.154-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Cancellation of Document","caseTitle":"Anjuman-e-Khuddam-ul-Quran, Faisalabad through its President v. Lt. Col (R) Najam Hameed, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._154_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 390","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-05-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"C.A.570\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan Thr. Chairman FBR & others v. Saleem Raza","caseFileName":"c.a._570_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 320","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-02-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.10\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Anthony Roy (decd) through LRs v. The Prime Minister of Islamic Republic of Pakistan thr. P.M. Secretariat, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.a._10_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1053","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-04-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2928},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2063\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Against reduction of penalty","caseTitle":"Chief Postmaster Faisalabad, GPO & another v. Muhammad Afzal","caseFileName":"c.a._2063_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1029","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":3393},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2911\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Owais Shams Durrani & others v. Vice Chancellor, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda & another","caseFileName":"c.p._2911_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1041","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-04-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2002},{"caseNumber":"C.A.51\/2011","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Mohammad Mansha v. Industrial Development Bank Ltd., etc","caseFileName":"c.a._51_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1069","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-02-2020","dateCreated":"26-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.17\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. The President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p._17_2019_19062020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 346","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-06-2020","dateCreated":"19-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1145-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Saima Ashiq Javed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1145_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1160","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2020","dateCreated":"16-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.251-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Saleem Khan v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._251_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Determination of age of a juvenile and the continuation of the trial.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 356","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-05-2020","dateCreated":"13-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"C.A.91-K\/2017","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"c.a._91_k_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 366","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-08-2019","dateCreated":"13-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":79},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._1_2020_08062020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 1036","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2020","dateCreated":"08-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":173},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.120\/2020","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Allah Rakha v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._120_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1063","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-05-2020","dateCreated":"08-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"J.P.317\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Fateh Sher v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._317_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1004","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-04-2020","dateCreated":"04-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1205\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Asmat Ali v. The State thr. A.G. KPK","caseFileName":"crl.p._1205_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1000","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-05-2020","dateCreated":"04-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.574\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Tasar Mehmood v. The State thr. A.G. Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"crl.p._574_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1013","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2020","dateCreated":"04-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.21-P\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Zahoor Khan v. Akhter Muhammad and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._21_p_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  993","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-05-2020","dateCreated":"03-06-2020","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.318\/1993","caseSubject":"Pollution\/.","caseTitle":"Mr. Nazir Ahmad & Salman Siddique","caseFileName":"h.r.c._318_1993.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-05-2020","dateCreated":"20-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._1_2020_19052020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 1006","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-05-2020","dateCreated":"20-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1965\/2019","caseSubject":"Insurance Claims","caseTitle":"Jubilee General Insurance Co. Ltd, Karachi v. Ravi Steel Company, Lahore","caseFileName":"c.p._1965_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 324","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-10-2019","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":55},{"caseNumber":"C.A.58\/2020","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Capital City Police Officer Peshawar & others v. Shahid","caseFileName":"c.a._58_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  981","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-04-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1118},{"caseNumber":"C.P.669-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Government of Pakistan, Revenue Division, Federal Board of Revenue through its Chairman, Islamabad, etc v. Nawaz Ali Sheikh","caseFileName":"c.p._669_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  656","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":3560},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3057\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Muhammad Saleem v. MCB Bank Limited","caseFileName":"c.p._3057_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  984","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-12-2019","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1664},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2056\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Government of the Punjab through Secretary  Special Education Department, Lahore, etc v. Abdul Jabbar","caseFileName":"c.a._2056_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  976","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-04-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1825},{"caseNumber":"C.P.449\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"M\/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. The Registrar of Trade Unions, National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._449_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  638","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2258},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1736\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Mehmood Ahmed v. District Police Officer, Bahawalpur, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._1736_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  653","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-02-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1455},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1882\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Collector of Customs, PNCA Building, Islamabad v. M\/s Askari Cement Company, Rawalpindi & another","caseFileName":"c.p._1882_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Maqbool Baqar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  649","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2107},{"caseNumber":"C.P.138-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Asal Janan & others v. Zareef Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.p._138_p_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  668","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-01-2020","dateCreated":"19-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1478},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._01_2020_18052020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  987","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-05-2020","dateCreated":"18-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"J.P.73\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Farooq Ahmad v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._73_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 313","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-05-2020","dateCreated":"16-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.419\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Saddam Hussain v. The State thr. A.G. Islamabad and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._419_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 310","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-05-2020","dateCreated":"13-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.391\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Shabran Khan v. The State through A.G. KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._391_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  974","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-05-2020","dateCreated":"08-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.324\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Faisal v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._324_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  971","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2020","dateCreated":"07-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.368\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Mukaram v. The State thr. A.G, KPK and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._368_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  956","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-05-2020","dateCreated":"07-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"J.P.324\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Munir Ahmad v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._324_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  968","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2020","dateCreated":"06-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1460\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"F.B.R. thr. Chairman FBR, Islamabad v. M\/s Wazir Ali & Company & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1460_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  959","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-03-2020","dateCreated":"06-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._01_2020_04052020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-05-2020","dateCreated":"05-05-2020","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.258\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jahangir Afzal v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._258_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  935","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2020","dateCreated":"30-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"J.P.255\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Nasir Abbas @ Nasiri v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._255_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2020","dateCreated":"30-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1246\/2019","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Bashir v. Rukhsar & others","caseFileName":"crl.p._1246_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 334","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-04-2020","dateCreated":"27-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"J.P.324\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Irfan Ali Sher v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._324_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 295","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-04-2020","dateCreated":"27-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.74-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Superdari","caseTitle":"Amjad Ali Khan v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._74_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of Superdari under CNSA and registration of vehicle by the Motor Vehicle Authority when the vehicle is on superdari.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 299","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-03-2020","dateCreated":"24-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1676-L\/2011","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Barkat Ali (decd.) through his L.Rs, etc v. Tanvir Abbas Tabish, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1676_l_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  850","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-02-2020","dateCreated":"24-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"C.A.95-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Shahbaz Gul & others v. Muhammad Younas Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._95_p_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  867","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-02-2020","dateCreated":"24-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2866\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Sakhi Jan & others v. Shah Nawaz","caseFileName":"c.p._2866_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  832","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2020","dateCreated":"24-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1298\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asif v. Mehboob Alam and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1298_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  837","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-04-2020","dateCreated":"24-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.A.303\/2014","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/.","caseTitle":"Ahmad Bakhsh (decd.) thr. LRs. v. Ameer Ali Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._303_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  873","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2020","dateCreated":"23-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.240-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/.","caseTitle":"Liaqat Ali & others v. Safdar Khan","caseFileName":"c.a._240_p_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  863","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-03-2020","dateCreated":"23-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":222},{"caseNumber":"J.P.36\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yaqoob v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._36_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  853","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-04-2020","dateCreated":"23-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.252\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Babar Hussain v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._252_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  871","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2020","dateCreated":"23-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.283-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Hamid Ashraf (Late) through his L.Rs., etc v. Commissioner Inland Revenue, Lahore","caseFileName":"c.p._283_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Income tax refund and compensation under sections 170 and 171 of the income tax ordinance, 2001.","citation":"2020   SCMR  843","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-03-2020","dateCreated":"22-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._1_2020_20042020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 930","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-04-2020","dateCreated":"21-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.130-K\/2019","caseSubject":"Restoration","caseTitle":"Muhammad Imran v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.m.a._130_k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  857","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-03-2020","dateCreated":"20-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4178\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Ambreen Khatoon & others v. Mumtaz Bibi & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4178_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  643","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2019","dateCreated":"18-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1080\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Others","caseTitle":"Sultan v. Noor Asghar","caseFileName":"c.a._1080_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  682","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2020","dateCreated":"18-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3213-L\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Islam v. The State through Advocate General Punjab, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._3213_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  841","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2020","dateCreated":"17-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.277\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Dr. Atif Muhammad Khan v. The State thr. D.A.G. & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._277_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  830","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-04-2020","dateCreated":"17-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.459\/2020","caseSubject":"Permission to file and argue\/Others","caseTitle":"Tanveer Ahmed Qureshi, Secy.M\/O NHSR & C v. Brig.Retd.Dr.Hafizuddin Ahmed Siddiqui,etc","caseFileName":"crl.m.a._459_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2020","dateCreated":"17-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2020","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING COMBATING THE PANDEMIC OF CORONA VIRUS (COVID -19)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._01_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 SCMR 731","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2020","dateCreated":"14-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.299\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Raja Muhammad Nadeem v. The State (Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Interior) and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._299_2020_07042020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-04-2020","dateCreated":"08-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":164},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.234\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Asfand Yar Khan S\/o Muqarab Khan & another v. The State thr. A.G. KPK & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._234_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  715","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-04-2020","dateCreated":"03-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.251\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Alamgir Khan v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab, Lahore & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._251_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  759","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-03-2020","dateCreated":"03-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.299\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Raja Muhammad Nadeem v. The State (Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Interior) and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._299_2020_01042020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-04-2020","dateCreated":"01-04-2020","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1420-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Babar v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1420_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  761","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-02-2020","dateCreated":"30-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.299\/2020","caseSubject":"Miscellaneous","caseTitle":"Raja Muhammad Nadeem v. The State (Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Interior) and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._299_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-03-2020","dateCreated":"30-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1729\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Mirza Muhammad Nazakat Baig v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, M\/o Law & Justice, Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"c.a._1729_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  631","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2020","dateCreated":"24-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":123},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4178\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"Ambreen Khatoon & others v. Mumtaz Bibi & others","caseFileName":"c.p_.4178_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  643","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2019","dateCreated":"24-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"J.P.461\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hussain, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"j.p._461_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2020 SC (Cr.C.) 151","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-03-2020","dateCreated":"18-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"J.P.333\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Aamer Hanif v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._333_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  675","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-03-2020","dateCreated":"18-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.166-L\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Hassan Javed v. The State, etc.","caseFileName":"crl.p._166_l_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  670","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-03-2020","dateCreated":"18-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1322-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafique @ Neela v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1296_l_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  664","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-03-2020","dateCreated":"18-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"J.P.450\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Sadiq Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._450_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  679","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2020","dateCreated":"12-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"J.P.430\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Islam Sharif v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._430_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  690","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2020","dateCreated":"12-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"J.P.1\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Arfan Akram v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._01_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  685","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2020","dateCreated":"12-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.169\/2020","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Ghulam Farooq Channa v. Special Judge ACE (Central-I) Karachi & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._169_2020.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 293","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2020","dateCreated":"12-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"J.P.712\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Zahid and Riaz Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._712_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  590","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2020","dateCreated":"06-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"J.P.488\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Aurangzeb v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._488_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  612","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-03-2020","dateCreated":"04-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.154\/2019","caseSubject":"Family\/Recovery of Dower Amount","caseTitle":"Fawad Ishaq & others v. Mrs. Mahreen Mansoor & others","caseFileName":"c.p._154_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 269","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-02-2020","dateCreated":"04-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":65},{"caseNumber":"J.P.431\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Bashir Ahmed Leghari v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._431_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  595","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2020","dateCreated":"04-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.A.472\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Administration of property","caseTitle":"Mirza Abid Baig v. Zahida Sabir (decd.) thr. LRs.","caseFileName":"c.a._472_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  601","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-02-2020","dateCreated":"03-03-2020","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.P.611-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Through pre-emption","caseTitle":"Badl (deceased) through his L.Rs., etc v. Lashkari (deceased) through his L.Rs., etc","caseFileName":"c.p._611_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  573","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2119\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Dr. Shamim Tariq v. International Islamic Univeristy, Islamabad thr. its President & others","caseFileName":"c.p._2119_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  568","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-02-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":73},{"caseNumber":"J.P.497\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mazhar Ellahi v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._497_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  586","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-02-2020","dateCreated":"27-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.547\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery\/.","caseTitle":"Chairman Pakistan Telecommunication Corp. Presently Pakistan Telecommunication Compnay & others v. Konish Enterprize (PVt) Ltd. & others","caseFileName":"c.a._547_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 261","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2020","dateCreated":"24-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.A.20\/2014","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Administrator Municipal Corporation, Peshawar v. Taimur Hussain Amin & others","caseFileName":"c.a._20_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 249","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-02-2020","dateCreated":"18-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2230\/2015","caseSubject":"Allotment\/of Land","caseTitle":"Allah Rakha (decd) thr. LRs & others v. Additional Commissioner (Revenue) Gujranwala & others","caseFileName":"c.p._2230_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  502","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-02-2020","dateCreated":"18-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2477-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Muhammad Siddique (decd) through his L.Rs. etc v. Mst. Noor Bibi (decd) through her L.Rs. etc","caseFileName":"c.p._2477_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  483","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2020","dateCreated":"18-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"J.P.887\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/5 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Shakeel Abbas v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._887_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  479","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-02-2020","dateCreated":"18-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.797\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Province of Punjab thr. Executive District Officer (Education), Rawalpindi & another v. Ruqia Islam","caseFileName":"c.a._797_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  490","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-01-2020","dateCreated":"12-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.R.P.1\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Ziad Shah @ Joggi v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.r.p_1_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  497","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-01-2020","dateCreated":"12-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.537\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"M\/s Habib & Company and others v. Muslim Commercial Bank Limited and others","caseFileName":"c.r.p_537_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 227","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-11-2019","dateCreated":"04-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":952},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1084\/2011","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Fulfillment of Talbs","caseTitle":"Mir Muhammad Khan v. Haider & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1084_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 233","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-11-2019","dateCreated":"04-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2674},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3317\/2018","caseSubject":"Tax\/Excise Duty","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal),  Zone-IV, LTU, Islamabad v. M\/s Wi-Tribe Pakistan Ltd, Islamabad","caseFileName":"c.p._3317_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  420","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2020","dateCreated":"04-02-2020","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.A.455\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Mst Gulnaz v. Haji Muhammad Riaz & others","caseFileName":"c.a._455_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 221","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-12-2019","dateCreated":"29-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.A.661\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Enhancement in pay and allowances","caseTitle":"Cheif Secy., Govt. of Punjab, etc v. Zia-ur-Rehman","caseFileName":"c.a._661_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  436","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-01-2020","dateCreated":"29-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1758},{"caseNumber":"C.A.383\/2013","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Miskeen v. District Judge Attock & others","caseFileName":"c.a._383_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAJJAD ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  406","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2020","dateCreated":"29-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1618\/2019","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Chairman, NAB thr. Prosecutor General, NAB v. Muhammad Shafique","caseFileName":"c.a._1618_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAJJAD ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  425","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-01-2020","dateCreated":"29-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1409\/2013","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Zohra Khatoon v. Ghulam Farid","caseFileName":"c.a._1409_2013 .pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  465","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-01-2020","dateCreated":"29-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"J.P.847\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/4 Years & 6 Months R.I.","caseTitle":"Shazia Bibi v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._847_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  460","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-01-2020","dateCreated":"28-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1839\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Fayaz Khan v. Government of Pakistan thr.  Secretary, Aviation, Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"c.p._1839_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  432","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-01-2020","dateCreated":"27-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.621\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"National Accoutability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Shabbir Ahmed Malik & others","caseFileName":"c.a._621_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of voluntary return and section 33E of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 193","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-01-2020","dateCreated":"24-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":294},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1271\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Babar Latif v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1271_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-01-2020","dateCreated":"24-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1280\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Zaka Ullah v. The State thr. P.G, Punjab and another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1280_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  452","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2020","dateCreated":"24-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1672-L\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Zulfiqar v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1672_l_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  417","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2020","dateCreated":"24-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.370\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/4 Years & 6 Months R.I.","caseTitle":"Mushtaq Ahmad v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._370_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  474","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-01-2020","dateCreated":"22-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.154-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ali Ahmed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a._154_l_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Scope of section 342 Crpc.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 201","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-03-2019","dateCreated":"22-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":414},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.1-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Narcotic Substance Cases\/Forfeiture of Property","caseTitle":"Tasneem Jalal v. Deputy Director ANF, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a_01_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Conviction by a foreign court and forfeiture of property in Pakistan. Article 12 of the Constitutio","citation":"2020   SCMR  454","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2020","dateCreated":"22-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":262},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.79-K\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"Sh.Iqbal Azam Farooqui and others v. The State thr. Chairman NAB","caseFileName":"crl.p._79_k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  359","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-01-2020","dateCreated":"11-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"J.P.24\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Siddique v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._24_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  342","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-01-2020","dateCreated":"11-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.120\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/3 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Raja Khurram Ali Khan v. Tayyaba Bibi (minor) daughter of Muhammad Azam & another","caseFileName":"crl.a._120_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE YAHYA AFRIDI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 146","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-01-2020","dateCreated":"10-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":179},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2186\/2017","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition\/.","caseTitle":"Sarhad Development Authority N.W.F.P. (now K.P.K) thr.  COO\/ CEO (Officio) v. Nawab Ali Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._2186_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE YAHYA AFRIDI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  265","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3855\/2019","caseSubject":"Customs\/Confiscation of vehicle","caseTitle":"Noor Muhammad v. Customs Appellate Tribunal, Peshawar Bench thr. its Chairman & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3855_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  246","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":591},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1170\/2018","caseSubject":"Service","caseTitle":"Dr. Azad Hussain v. The Deputy Commissioner, Rawalpindi & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1170_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  251","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":729},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1028\/2019","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment\/Default in Payment of Rent","caseTitle":"The President, All Pakistan Women Association, Peshawar Cantt v. Muhammad Akbar Awan (Uniform Center), APWA Market, Peshawar Cantt & others","caseFileName":"c.p._1028_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  260","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1257},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1950-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sarwar v. Mumtaz Bibi, etc","caseFileName":"c.p._1950_l_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  276","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1336},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1241\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Chanani Begum (decd) thr. her LRs v. Mst. Qamar Sultan (decd.) thr. LRs","caseFileName":"c.a._1241_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SAJJAD ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  254","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1354},{"caseNumber":"J.P.201\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Safyan v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._201_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  192","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-10-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":840},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1444\/2019","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"M\/s Kuwait National Real Estate Company (Pvt.) Ltd. and others v. M\/s Education Excellence Limited and others","caseFileName":"c.p._1444_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  171","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-09-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":2008},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3985\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Moon Enterprises CNG Station, Rawalpindi v. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd thr. its General Manager, Rawalpindi & another","caseFileName":"c.p._3985_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  300","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":1143},{"caseNumber":"C.A.185-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Mian Zafar Ali, etc v. Mian Khrsheed Ali","caseFileName":"c.a._185_l_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  291","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-12-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":605},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3224\/2019","caseSubject":"Tax\/.","caseTitle":"Pak Gulf Construction Company (Pvt) Ltd, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Finance M\/o Finance, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3224_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  146","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-10-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":116},{"caseNumber":"C.A.837\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M\/s. Linde Pakistan Ltd.","caseFileName":"c.a._837_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  333","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":87},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.490\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/3 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Dr. Waqar Hameed v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._490_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  321","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-10-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":147},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1286\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Correction of date of Birth","caseTitle":"Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Islamabad thr. its Chairman v. Abeer Masood","caseFileName":"c.a._1286_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2020   SCMR  316","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-12-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"C.A.837\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Faqir Ahmed Khan (decd.) thr. LRs v. Riaz Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"c.a._837_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  346","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-11-2019","dateCreated":"09-01-2020","fileSizeInBytes":61},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3846\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Nazir Ahmed Shaikh v. National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._no.3846-2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  297","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-12-2019","dateCreated":"29-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":139},{"caseNumber":"C.P.549-K\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Gulab Khan v. The Chairman (NAB) and another","caseFileName":"c.p.549-k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  285","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-12-2019","dateCreated":"29-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":117},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.231-K\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Abdul Aziz Memon v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._231-k-2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  313","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-12-2019","dateCreated":"29-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":81},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.197-K\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Gulshan Ali Solangi v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh","caseFileName":"cr.p.no.197_k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  249","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2019","dateCreated":"21-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":132},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.733\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/4 Years & 6 Months R.I.","caseTitle":"Qaiser Javed Khan v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab, Lahore & another","caseFileName":"cp-733_of_2019_final.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The requirement of protocols under CNSA 1997.","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 57","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-12-2019","dateCreated":"21-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":99},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.39\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"The Jurists Foundation thr. its Chairman v. Federal Govt. thr. Secty M\/O Defence and others","caseFileName":"const.p._39_16122019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Extension in the tenure of COAS","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-11-2019","dateCreated":"16-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":799},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1481\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Absorption","caseTitle":"Muhammad Saleem v. Federal Public Service Commission thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1481_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Any loss caused to a citizen of the country as a result of the illegal and unlawful conduct of the government and officials of its departments has to be appropriately compensated. \r\n","citation":"2020   SCMR  221","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2019","dateCreated":"16-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":88},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4439\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Selection Grade","caseTitle":"Shams-ur-Rehman v. Military Accountant General, Rawalpindi","caseFileName":"c.p._4439_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  188","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-10-2019","dateCreated":"11-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2459\/2017","caseSubject":"Cases Relating to PEMRA ","caseTitle":"PEMRA thr. its Secretary v. Trade Serve International (Pvt.) Ltd. Lahore and others","caseFileName":"c.p._2459_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE YAHYA AFRIDI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  206","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-10-2019","dateCreated":"11-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.955-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Safdar Abbas, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._955_l_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  219","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-12-2019","dateCreated":"04-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.302\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Javed Hanif Khan v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Sindh thr. its D.G. Sindh & another","caseFileName":"c.p._302_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020 S C M R 185","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-11-2019","dateCreated":"04-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.359\/2018","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/10 Years R.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Muhammad Mumtaz v. Mehtab & another","caseFileName":"crl.a._359_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  200","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-12-2019","dateCreated":"04-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1121\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Muhammad Boota v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab, Lahore & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._1121_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  196","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-12-2019","dateCreated":"04-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4719\/2017","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Phoenix Security Service (Pvt) Ltd thr. its Manager (Admn), Islamabad v. Pir Muhammad & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4719_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  132","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2019","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1127\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax v. Safeer Jan","caseFileName":"c.a._1127_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  182","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-11-2019","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.547\/2017","caseSubject":"Quashment\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hanif v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._547_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2029","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-10-2018","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":94},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2693\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-2018\/Nomination Papers Dispute","caseTitle":"Sardar Yar Muhammad Rind v. The Election Tribunal Balochistan, Quetta & others","caseFileName":"c.p._2693_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 137","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2018","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1219\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad v. Mrs. Naureen Ahmed Tarar & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1219_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  90","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-02-2019","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":387},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1660\/2014","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/s Al-Khair Gadoon Ltd v. The Appellate Tribunal, Custom Excise and Sales Tax,Islamabad,etc","caseFileName":"c.a._1660_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE YAHYA AFRIDI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  2018","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-01-2019","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.7-P\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Hussain Shah & another v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a.7_p_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-09-2019","dateCreated":"02-12-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4029\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Mir Muhammad & another v. The National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman , Islamabad","caseFileName":"c.p._4029_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  168","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-11-2019","dateCreated":"28-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.39\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"The Jurists Foundation thr. its Chairman v. Federal Govt. thr. Secty M\/O Defence and others","caseFileName":"const.p._39_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-11-2019","dateCreated":"28-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.528-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Afzal (decd) through his L.Rs. etc v. Muhammad Bashir, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._528_l_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  197","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-11-2019","dateCreated":"27-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.39\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"The Jurists Foundation thr. its Chairman v. Federal Govt. thr. Secty M\/O Defence and others","caseFileName":"const.p.39_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-11-2019","dateCreated":"26-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1520\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Validity of mutation","caseTitle":"Shabla, etc v. Jahan Afroz Khillat, etc","caseFileName":"c.a._1520_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  352","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-11-2019","dateCreated":"25-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":253},{"caseNumber":"C.A.125-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/.","caseTitle":"The Government of Sindh through Secretary Health Department v. Dr. Nadeem Rizvi and others","caseFileName":"c.a._125_k_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Transfer\/devolution of some institutions viz. SZMC, JPMC, NICVD, NICH and NMP from Federal Government to Provincial Governments is declared to be unconstitutional, without lawful authority and of no legal effect and within 90 days the Federal and Provincial Governments and all related Departments shall take all necessary steps relating to return of the afore-noted Institutions from the Provinces to the Federation.","citation":"2020   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-01-2019","dateCreated":"21-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":179},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.31\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 186(A)\/Islamabad High Court, Islamabad to any other High Court","caseTitle":"Raja Arshad Mahmood v. Mst. Maliha Malik & others","caseFileName":"const.p._31_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  69","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-11-2019","dateCreated":"16-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.29-Q\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Abdul Haq & another v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._29_q_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  116","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-11-2019","dateCreated":"16-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3107\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Sajjad Ali v. Vice Chancellor thr. Registrar University of Malakand at  Chakdara, Dir Lower & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3107_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Meaning of 2% quota for persons with disabilities","citation":"2020   SCMR  124","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-11-2019","dateCreated":"15-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.36-Q\/2012","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Dad Muhammad v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._36_q_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  128","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-11-2019","dateCreated":"13-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2440\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"The Commissioner Inland Revenue, RTO, Peshawar v. M\/s Paper World (Pv) Ltd","caseFileName":"c.a._2440_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  105","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-11-2019","dateCreated":"05-11-2019","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.95\/2019","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Ghulam Hussain v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._95_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Any action constituting an offence, howsoever grave, shocking, brutal, gruesome or horrifying, does not qualify to be termed as terrorism if it is not committed with the design or purpose specified or mentioned in clauses (b) or (c) of subsection (1) of section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997). Action could be termed as terrorism if the use or threat of that action is designed to coerce and intimidate or overawe the Government or the public or a section of the public or community or sect, etc. or if such action is designed to create a sense of fear or insecurity in the society or the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a religious, sectarian or ethnic cause, etc. Creating fear or insecurity in the society is not by itself terrorism unless the motive itself is to create fear or insecurity in the society and not when fear or insecurity is just a by product, a fallout or an unintended consequence of a private crime. Mere shock, horror, dread or disgust created or likely to be created in the society does not transform a private crime into \"terrorism\". \"Terrorism\" is a totally different concept which denotes commission of a crime with the design or purpose of destabilizing the government, disturbing the society or hurting a section of the society with a view to achieve objectives which are essentially political, ideological or religious. Violent activity against civilians that has no political, ideological or religious aims is just an act of criminal delinquency, a felony, or simply an act of insanity unrelated to \"terrorism\".","citation":"PLD 2020 SC 61","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-10-2019","dateCreated":"30-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":304},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1001-L\/2017","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Haroon Bin Tariq v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.p._1001_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2014","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-10-2019","dateCreated":"23-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"J.P.415\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/10 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._415_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2054","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2019","dateCreated":"23-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1004\/2019","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Anti Narcotice Force thr. its Regional Director\/Force Commander, ANF Rawalpindi v. Syed Paris Ali","caseFileName":"crl.p._1004_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2027","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2019","dateCreated":"22-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"J.P.480\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/9 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Abdul Wahab v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._480_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2061","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2019","dateCreated":"22-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.A.735\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Usman Ali Chachar v. Moula Bux Chhachhar & another","caseFileName":"c.a._735_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions regarding departmental appeals\/representations and review in the relevant rules fall into two categories. One category is of the Federation and the Punjab, while the other is that of Balochistan, Sindh and KPK. In the latter category, if the departmental appeal\/representation\/review is filed beyond the prescribed period, then the delay may be condoned if reasonable cause is shown while in the first category, the appeal may be ?withheld? if filed after the prescribed period and the appellant is unable to show any reasonable cause for the delay. Thus, in both categories, a departmental appeal is not to be dismissed outright if beyond time; the delay can be condoned.  The law needs to be settled and made certain. The Office may place this appeal before the Hon?ble Chief Justice for such orders as are deemed appropriate.   ","citation":"2019   SCMR  2043","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2019","dateCreated":"18-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":101},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.366\/2010","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hanif v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._366_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The statements of the witnesses constitute an uninterrupted chain of facts ranging from seizure to forensic analysis of the contraband; the witnesses are in a comfortable unison on all the salient details regarding interception of the huge consignment as well as steps taken subsequent thereto. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  2033","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-10-2019","dateCreated":"18-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.1404\/2019","caseSubject":"Permission to file and argue\/Others","caseTitle":"Raja Farhat Iqbal v. The State and another","caseFileName":"crl.m.a._1404_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The dismissal of review petition foreclosed avenues for subsequent attempts by the accused and for that law is well settled by now.","citation":"2019   SCMR  2063","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2019","dateCreated":"16-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.185\/2006","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Waqar Ali Shamsi v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._185_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The prosecution was able to constitute a chain of circumstances, link by link, through last seen evidence, occupation of premises, recovery of electric wire and ropes, employed by the culprits to cause death confirmed as asphyxial and, thus argument that there was no evidence for a guilty return does not hold much water.\r\n\r\n\t\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  2039","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-10-2019","dateCreated":"16-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"J.P.467\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Sabir Hussain and Nadir Hussain v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._467_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2006","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-10-2019","dateCreated":"11-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.20\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Tariq Ramzan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._20_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1971","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-10-2019","dateCreated":"11-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1772\/2008","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Moinuddin & another v. The State & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1772_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An offence which the law declares to be non-compoundable remains non-compoundable even if in a coordinate compoundable offence a compounding takes place between the relevant parties and, therefore, despite any compounding of the coordinate compoundable offence an acquittal cannot be recorded in the non-compoundable offence on that sole basis. There is no scope for maintainability of a second or subsequent review petition before the Supreme Court after the first review petition has been decided.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 749","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-10-2019","dateCreated":"11-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":122},{"caseNumber":"C.A.864\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Divisional Superintendent, Pakistan Railways, Rawalpindi & others v. Syed Usman Ali","caseFileName":"c.a._864_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2021 SCMR 1008","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-10-2019","dateCreated":"09-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.270-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Wajeeh-ul-Hassan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._270_l_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is most intriguing as to why the appellant who consistently hid himself over a long period of time, finally dispatched a copy of National Identity Card so as to voluntarily rope himself in a case. Evidence of extrajudicial confession, in the absence of any incriminatory evidence thenceforth, is really mindboggling. The inflammatory material had been handed over to the police after the appellant's arrest without any plausible explanation as to why the complainant retained it with him for a period exceeding two years. A weak piece of evidence cannot corroborate another weak piece of evidence. Absconsion cannot be viewed as a proof for the crime. The appellant's declaration of faith is to be preferred over divergent imputations. Citizen regardless of religion are equal before law and entitled to equal protection. A criminal charge is to be essentially settled on positive proof alone and not on perceptional or optical paradigms.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1994","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2019","dateCreated":"08-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"J.P.10\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Shahbaz Ali Khalid v. The State","caseFileName":"j.p._10_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  2012","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2019","dateCreated":"07-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.11827-S\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter of National Assets including PIA being sold on throw-away prices.","caseFileName":"h.r.c_11827_s_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appointment of Mr. Musharraf Rasool Cyan as the Chief Executive Officer of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Limited (PIA) is set aside in the matter of selling of national assets including PIA at throwaway price. ","citation":"2019 S C M R 1952","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-09-2018","dateCreated":"05-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":2731},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.145-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Ali Raza @ Peter, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a._145_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Retributive torture, that too by mobs through street justice, would not only have most de-humanizing impact on our society but also triggers chaos and anarchy as is evident in the present case besides being violative of Constitutional mandate. Vendetta cannot equate itself with justice. It is devoid of solemnity inherent in the process of law, leaving an offender as a victim, an object of sympathy at the end of the day, without judicial certainty about his guilt.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1982","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-09-2019","dateCreated":"03-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.83-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Izzatullah v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.p._83_p_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1975","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-09-2019","dateCreated":"01-10-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.396\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Fazal Ellahi (decd.) thr. LRs v. Mst. Zainab Bi","caseFileName":"c.a._396_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"With a suspect entry, entire transaction is structured upon a self-serving statement pointed upon the legitimate proprietary rights of a hapless female in a rural neighborhood. Mutation by itself does not create title unless demonstrated to be backed by a valid transaction. Fraud vitiates most solemn proceedings and thus period of limitation would not embargo a justiciable claim directed against fraud. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  1930","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-09-2019","dateCreated":"30-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3632\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-2018","caseTitle":"Roshan Ali Buriro v. Syed Murad Ali Shah & others","caseFileName":"c.p._3632_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Returning Officer is not a court of law but a statutory forum of limited jurisdiction. The condition that only a court of law can issue a declaration of disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution is not met in the present case. The order passed by the Returning Officer is ineffective to impose a disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1939","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-01-2019","dateCreated":"30-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":981},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4725\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Pakistan Aeronautical Complex thr. its Chairman, Kamra  & others v. Nazar ul Islam","caseFileName":"c.p._4725_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once the respondent appeared in the departmental promotion examination held under the Standardization of Recruitment Rules, 2012, it could not be asserted that he is not governed by the said Rules framed under Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Board Ordinance, 2000. The respondent cannot be allowed to blow hot and cold in the same breath. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1933","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2019","dateCreated":"28-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":446},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.282\/2019","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Anti Narcotics Force thr. its Regional Director\/Force Commander, A.N.F. Rawalpindi v. Qasim Ali","caseFileName":"crl.a._282_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 (the Act) clearly ousts application of the provisions of section 497, Cr.P.C. to the cases under the Act and, thus, any reference to section 497(2), Cr.P.C. by the High Court while admitting the respondent to bail was uncalled for. The merits of the case against the respondent had not been attended to by the High Court at the time of passage of the impugned order. The matter of the respondent\u2019s bail is, therefore, remanded to the High Court for a fresh decision on the merits of the petitioner\u2019s case.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1928","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-08-2019","dateCreated":"28-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.18\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 186(A)\/Others","caseTitle":"Justice (R) Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi & another v. Aam Loeg Ittehad & others","caseFileName":"const.p._18_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioners' objection to the alleged lack of jurisdiction of the Sindh High Court in Constitution Petition No. D-444 of 2019 has already been taken in their pleadings\/comments filed in the Court. That objection has also been argued on behalf of the two other disputed Members of the ECP. Therefore, it is premature and inappropriate for us to hear that objection presently because the High Court seized of the matter shall soon be pronouncing its judgment thereon. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 745","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-09-2019","dateCreated":"27-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.522-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Waqf Property\/.","caseTitle":"Sikandar Hayat Khan Jogzai v. Muhammad Hashim, etc.","caseFileName":"c.p._522_l_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Waqf property can either be put to use to serve a religious, pious or charitable cause directly i.e., by running and managing a shrine or a khanqah or by establishing a school, college, university, hospital, research and training centres, etc. for the general public utility and welfare of the society, either free or at subsidized rates; or indirectly, by leasing it out for purposes closer to the objectives of the waqf. Only as an exception and in the absence of any viable option to lease the property out for purposes closer to the objectives of the waqf, can the waqf property be leased out for commercial purposes. Sanction for lease of any waqf property, in the absence of a well thought out scheme, cannot be permitted. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 730","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-09-2019","dateCreated":"16-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":201},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.716\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Husnain Mustafa v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab, Lahore & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._716_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1914","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-09-2019","dateCreated":"16-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.224\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Rifat Hussain v. The State thr. P.G, Punjab","caseFileName":"crl.p._224_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-09-2019","dateCreated":"16-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1542\/2017","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Munir Ahmed Sheikh v. Director General, NAB, Karachi Cantonment and another","caseFileName":"c.p._1542_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It would be unjust to keep the petitioners behind the bars when the law regulating accountability does not appear to have been applied across the board. \r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1738","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-05-2017","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":229},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.266\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Sentence","caseTitle":"Hashmat Ullah v. The State & another","caseFileName":"crl.a._266_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A perusal of section 9(a)(x) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 shows that the relevant offence is attracted only if the accused person is proved to have committed the offence of criminal breach of trust as defined in section 405, P.P.C. and if there was an entrustment of property involved in the matter.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1730","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-08-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.3-P\/2017","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Miss Nusrat Yasmeen v. The Registrar Peshawar High Court Peshawar","caseFileName":"crl.a._03_p_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Strictures against a judge of District judicary","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 719","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-05-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":507},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1095\/2018","caseSubject":"Educational Institutions Cases\/.","caseTitle":"Mohammad Imran v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others","caseFileName":"c.a._1095_2018_13092019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 7-A of the Punjab Private Educational Institutions (Promotion and Regulation) Ordinance, 1984 (the Ordinance of 1984), is intra vires the Constitution. Rule 10 of the Sindh Private Educational Institutions (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2005 (the Rules of 2005) is intra vires the Sindh Private Education Institutions (Regulation and Control) Ordinance, 2001 (the Ordinance of 2001), and the Constitution. All interim orders passed during the pendency of the present case have ceased to be effective, subject to recalculation of fee by using the fee prevailing in the year 2017 as the base fee, in accordance with the provision(s) of the Punjab Private Educational Institutions (Promotion and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2017 (the Act of 2017) and onwards, for the Province of Punjab. For the Province of Sindh, fees may be recalculated using the fee prevailing on 29-06-2017 as the base fee and onwards, in accordance with the Rules of 2005. The private schools shall not recover any arrears on account of the reduction in fee by reason of the interim order of the Supreme Court dated 13-12-2018 till the date of present judgment; that all schools shall collect the fee, strictly in accordance with the procedure and timeframe provided by the law, the rules and regulations including, but not limited to the Ordinance of 1984, as amended by the Act of 2017 and the Rules of 2005.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1657","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":353},{"caseNumber":"C.P.664-K\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others","caseFileName":"c.a._664_k_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The probable time of death within seven years period can be independently visualized and declared by a court of law keeping in view the circumstances in which a person in a particular case went missing.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 710","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-09-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2084\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Hafiz Muhammad Iqbal v. Gul-e-Nasreen & others","caseFileName":"c.a._2084_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The purchaser cannot claim specific performance of a contract as a matter of right even where it is lawful to do so and ample discretion lies with the Court to deny such relief keeping in view the circumstances of each case.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1880","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4703\/2017","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Refinery Ltd, Karachi v. Barrett Hodgson Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd & others","caseFileName":"c.p._4703_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A perusal of the impugned judgment would reveal that the Division Bench of the High Court did not state the points of determination, decision thereon and reasons therefor and such judgment cannot be said to have been rendered in substantial compliance with Rule 31 of Order XLI, C.P.C. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1726","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-01-2018","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":385},{"caseNumber":"C.A.799\/2007","caseSubject":"Evacuee Trust Property\/Determination of status of","caseTitle":"Sh. Abdul Waheed v. Custodian Evacuee Property Lahore & others","caseFileName":"c.a._799_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Property, declared as evacuee property after partition, was restored to family of original owner on an application filed u\/s 17 of the West Punjab Protection of Evacuee Property Act 1948 with the condition that owners would not sell it and on failure to reside in Pakistan the order of restoration would be annulled and property would regain status of evacuee property. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  1745","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":898},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1029\/2019","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"M\/s Mujahid Soap & Chemical Industries (Pvt) Ltd v. Customs Appellate Tribunal, Bench-I, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1029_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Impugned decision given by the respondent, Customs Appellate Tribunal, Bench-1 Islamabad, was beyond time prescribed in section 179(3) of the Customs Act 1969 and, therefore, the decision was held invalid and set aside accordingly.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1735","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-04-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":345},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.512\/2019","caseSubject":"Permission to file and argue","caseTitle":"Kareem Nawaz Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.r.p._52_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Petitioner was convicted on three counts of offence U\/S 302 PPC and was sentenced to death on each count and to pay compensation and diyat to the heirs of the deceased. The petitioner was also\r\nconvicted by the trial court for an offence under section 7(a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and even on that count of the charge he was sentenced to death and to pay fine. The petitioner was additionally convicted by the trial court for an offence under section 21-L of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and for the said offence he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine.\r\nAppeal filed was dismissed by Learned High Court and by this Court. The  heirs of all the three deceased had entered into a compromise with the petitioner which compromise was presented before the trial court. the learned Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court, Sargodha was pleased to accept the said compromise on all three counts of the charge under section 302(b), PPC while the said compromise was rejected to the extent of the petitioner\u2019s convictions and sentences for the offences under sections 7(a) and 21-L of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997.\r\nThere was no ongoing enmity between the parties and provocation over ancestral property caused the occurrence. Court considered a valid and accepted compromise in the coordinate offence to be a valid ground for reduction of a sentence of death to imprisonment for life on the charge of terrorism or a non-compoundable offence.\r\nReview petition was allowed and converted into appeal and was partly allowed with the result that the sentence of death passed against the petitioner\/appellant for the offence under section 7(a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 was converted into a sentence of imprisonment for life.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1741","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-06-2019","dateCreated":"14-09-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.160\/2010","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"The State v. Muhammad Kaleem Bhatti","caseFileName":"crl.a._160_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of fine is not a substitute for payment of fine but as a matter of fact the said sentence of imprisonment is a punishment for non-payment of fine.\r\nIt has categorically been provided in section 33-E of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 that a fine imposed upon a convict is to be recovered by way of arrears of land revenue and the said provision is not controlled by or subject to the provisions of section 70, PPC.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1321","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-07-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.513\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Lahore High Court Bar Association through its President v. General (R) Pervez Musharaff & another","caseFileName":"c.r.p._513_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 9 of the Criminal Law (Special Court) Act, 1976 (the Act) envisages that once the trial has begun, it shall not be adjourned by reason of absence of the accused. If the accused voluntarily chooses not to exercise his right to appear and to be present at trial, it does not infringe the fairness of the trial nor does it violate the right to fair trial under Article 10A of the Constitution. The accused has been declared a proclaimed offender and being a fugitive from the law loses the right of audience. The Special Court shall proceed with the trial on the next date of hearing. In case the accused surrenders and appears before the Court, constituted under the Act, for the charge of high treason, he would be entitled to record his statement under section 342, CrPC. and lead any other defence under the law. However, in case the accused fails to appear on the next date of hearing, being a proclaimed offender, the Special Court is empowered to proceed against the accused even in his absence under section 9 of the Act.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1029","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-04-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":493},{"caseNumber":"C.P.381-K\/2019","caseSubject":"Banking\/Execution\/Auction Matters","caseTitle":"Nazli Hilal Rizvi v. Bank Al-Falah Ltd. and others","caseFileName":"c.p._381_k_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 19 (1) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001 has done away with the general requirement of instituting fresh proceedings for the execution of the decree as provided in the Code of Civil Procedure, hence, a clear deviation is intended by the legislature from the general procedure and envisages that after the banking suit is decreed, the proceedings do not come to an end but stand automatically converted into execution proceedings for which no fresh notice is required to be served.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1679","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-08-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.188\/2019","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Eligibility of Candidature","caseTitle":"Nida Khuhro v. Moazzam Ali Khan & others","caseFileName":"c.a._188_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The respondent\/returned candidate did not disclose his entire landholding. The fact that the father is administering the land as his nominee and receiving the benefits reflects the mutual family arrangement and does not detract from the fact that the respondent is the owner of the said land. He concealed his assets and filed a false affidavit. Nomination of the respondent was invalid and his declaration as a Member of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh is annulled.","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  1684","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-08-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":100},{"caseNumber":"C.A.251\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Import and Export","caseTitle":"Collector of Customs v. M\/s Faisal Enterprises","caseFileName":"c.a._251_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The question of invoking sub-section 5 of section 25 of the Customs Act 1969 does not arise at all if the value of the goods can be assessed on the basis of transaction value (the price actually paid or payable for the goods sold for export to Pakistan) under sub-section 1 of section 25 of the Customs Act 1969.   ","citation":"2019   SCMR  1126","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-05-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":374},{"caseNumber":"C.A.433\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"The Chief Commissioner IR, RTO, Peshawar v. M\/s Sabrina Tent Services Gulbahar, Peshawar","caseFileName":"c.a._433_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"\u2018Definite Information\u2019 does not mean a reanalysis of existing information or an analysis of further information that was previously accessible but had not been taken into account.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1639","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-05-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":323},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1226\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Against Reinstatment into Service","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue, F.B.R., Hyderabad v. Ghulam Mustafa Mari & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1226_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The executive  authorities cannot  re-open  a  case  after  it  had  been  decided finally by a judgment of the Supreme Court delivered inter parties and further action in the matter is barred by res judicata and the doctrine of past and closed transaction.         ","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  1657","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-03-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":336},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1269\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue, RTO, Rawalpindi v. M\/s Trillium Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd, Rawalpindi & others","caseFileName":"c.a._1269_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An explanation in a statute (in this case a fiscal statute) ordinarily operates to clarify the law prospectively. However, retrospective liability is imposed when an explanation attributes a meaning to a substantive provision or expression whereby the burden, obligation or liability of a person is increased for a past period. Such retrospective impact is to be avoided unless the express language of the explanation warrants such an interpretation.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1643","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-01-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":330},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.10\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Ishtiaq Ahmed Mirza v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary M\/o Law and Justice Govt. of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p._10_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There cannot be two opinions about the legal position that during the pendency of an appeal, after conviction and sentence, it is the Court of Appeal alone which can maintain, alter or set aside such conviction and sentence on the basis of the evidence brought on the record. Any Commission constituted by the Government or by this Court, any inquiry or investigation conducted by the police or by any other agency and any probe into the matter (of video recording of the trial judge purportedly showing him stating that he was pressurized into convicting the accused) by any other institution or body can only render an opinion in the matter of the relevant video which opinion is treated by the law as irrelevant and it cannot per se be treated as evidence for the benefit of the convict in his pending appeal. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 675","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-08-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":92},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.319-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Sentence Already Undergone","caseTitle":"Qari Muhammad Ishaq Ghazi v. The State","caseFileName":"crl.a._319_l_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A plain reading of Section 9 of the Anti Terrorism Act, 1997, unambiguously, suggests that possession of inflammatory material by itself is an offence even before it is distributed. Arrested red-handed, objection over non-association of public witnesses to confirm the possession does not hold water. Police officials, being functionaries of the State, are no less credible witnesses to drive home the charge in a milieu of pervasive apathy towards civic responsibilities. The officials who testified in the witness-box had seemingly no axe to grind, otherwise, found by us in a comfortable unison with one another.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1646","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-06-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.562\/2019","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Fawad Ali v. The State thr. A.G. KPK & another","caseFileName":"crl.p._562_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The law already stands settled that if an accused person admitted to bail is subsequently declared a Proclaimed Offender or non-bailable warrants for his arrest are issued then such declaration or issuance of non-bailable warrants ipso facto amounts to cancellation of that accused person\u2019s bail.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1641","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-07-2019","dateCreated":"24-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1137\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Akram (decd.) thr. LRs. v. Mst. Noor Begum (decd.) thr. LRs. & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1137_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The proviso to section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 contemplates that no court shall make any declaration where the plaintiff, being able to seek further relief than a mere declaration of title, omits to do so. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 599","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-05-2019","dateCreated":"07-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":359},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1515\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Federal Board of Revenue thr. Chairman, Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Law, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1515_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Declaring a statute promulgated by Parliament under the Constitution to be void is a very serious matter. Such declaration may be given on the ground of incompetence of Parliament to enact the law or for a violation of fundamental rights by the enacted law. A declaration given solely on the ground of incorrect arithmetical calculation, lack of rational basis or reasonableness of the statute is devoid of legal foundation. Such grounds, if at all, are criteria for testing the validity of executive action and not legislative measures.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1311","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-05-2019","dateCreated":"07-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":304},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.81-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Against Remand Order\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Naeem, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._81_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The requirement of calculating the percentage of narcotic drug in a liquid preparation or mixture is mandatory as per section 3 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 (the Act) read with the definitional test under section 2 of the Act. The Reports of the Chemical Examiner fail to mention the percentage of morphine found in the intoxicating substance, leaving it uncertain whether it passes for a narcotic drug. This fatal omission makes the Reports of the Chemical Examiner inconclusive and unreliable to support conviction under the Act. The court being a neutral arbiter has to dispassionately appreciate, appraise, examine and weigh the evidence placed before it, rather than by ignoring the evidence and embarking on a probing journey guided by emotions, sentiments and sense of self-styled justice pegged on the lofty notion of societal reform. The direction of the High Court for obtaining fresh samples of the alleged intoxicating substance and preparing a fresh report of the Chemical Examiner amounts to granting the prosecution a premium on its failure to put up a proper case in the first instance. Such judicial intervention is opposed to the adversary principle and offensive to the fundamental right of fair trial and due process guaranteed under the Constitution.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 669","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-05-2019","dateCreated":"07-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":592},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.103\/2019","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Nadeem Hussain v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._103_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A confession before the police is inadmissible in evidence in normal cases but in cases of terrorism section 21-H of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 has made such a confession before the police conditionally admissible. The condition placed by the said section upon admissibility of such a confession before the police is that there must be some other evidence, including circumstantial evidence, which must reasonably connect the accused person with the alleged offence before a confession made by the accused person before the police is accepted by a court worthy of any consideration.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1290","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-07-2019","dateCreated":"07-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.386\/2018","caseSubject":"NAB\/.","caseTitle":"Chairman, National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General NAB, Islamabad v. Mir Faiq Ali Jamali","caseFileName":"Crl.A._386_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The time of commencement of the respondent\u2019s disqualification under section 15(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 was to be the date on which he had completely served out all his sentences by undergoing the sentences of imprisonment as well as by payment of fine.\r\n \r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 702","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2019","dateCreated":"07-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.533\/2019","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Alamghir Khan v. The State thr. A.G. KPK & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._533_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Section 462-C of the PPC falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497 of Criminal Procedure Code.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1457","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-07-2019","dateCreated":"01-08-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.3\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies\/Rejection of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Nasir Mahmood & another v. Umar Sajid & others","caseFileName":"C.A._03_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The benefit of running sentence concurrently is only for the purpose of incarceration in jail and same would have no effect on the sentences awarded to a person on different counts which have to be read cumulatively for the purpose of disqualification envisaged by Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution and section 27(2)(i) of Punjab Local Government Act 2013. Moreover, suspension of sentence pending an appeal would have no bearing upon conviction of the appellant for the purpose of being qualified either to contest local bodies or Legislative Assembly elections. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  382","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-11-2018","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":689},{"caseNumber":"C.A.93\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Property Tax","caseTitle":"Liaquat National Hospital v. The Province of Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.A._93_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Profits of an organization if not distributed amongst the members\/shareholders does not by itself establish that it is a charitable organization and therefore exempted from property tax under section 4 of the Sindh Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958.","citation":"2019   SCMR  865","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-02-2019","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":861},{"caseNumber":"C.A.663\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Collector of Customs LHR v. Umer Khan","caseFileName":"C.A._663_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The clear purpose and effect of Section 196(10) of the Customs Act is that technical and superfluous objections are put to rest at the outset so that the  matter may be decided on merits. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  619","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-01-2019","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":179},{"caseNumber":"C.A.845\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Abu Bakar Farooq v. Muhammad Ali Rajpar & others","caseFileName":"C.A._845_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sajjad Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Adhoc appointee does not acquire a right to claim his seniority in accordance with Section 8 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 vis-\u00e0-vis the civil servants who are appointed on regular basis on the recommendation of the Federal Public Service Commission after going through the selection process.","citation":"2019   SCMR  830","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-01-2019","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"C.P.107\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Ainuddin & others v. Abdullah & another","caseFileName":"C.P._107_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Ordinarily a suit for specific performance should be filed if the suit is based on an agreement to sell. ","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  880","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2019","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":458},{"caseNumber":"C.P.478\/2019","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment","caseTitle":"Fareed-ud-Din Masood v. Additional District Judge, Bahawalpur and others","caseFileName":"C.P._478_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  842","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2019","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":329},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2350\/2015","caseSubject":"Federal Public Service Commission\/Others","caseTitle":"Abdullah Nawaz Cheema v. Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC), Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"C.P._2350_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where a female candidate secures sufficient merit to be allocated a group on the Open Merit, she may opt for a better group, if that is available in the Women Quota. Once she has opted for a better group, the one she had previously been allocated in Open Merit will be left vacant. This vacant group seat is then transferred to the Women Quota which was short a seat when the candidate had opted for the then available better seat. This allows for there to be a constant number of reserved seats in the Women Quota without depriving deserving Female Candidates, higher on the merit list, better group seats.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  622","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-12-2018","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":543},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2982\/2016","caseSubject":"Federal Public Service Commission\/Others","caseTitle":"Yaqub Ali Khan v. Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) thr. its Chairman & another","caseFileName":"C.P._2982_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Respondent no. 2 had requisite experience in the relevant field for being appointed to the post of Divisional Forest Officer and leave to appeal is refused.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  413","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-12-2018","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":443},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.322\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/5 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafiq v. The State thr. Director General, Regional NAB, Quetta","caseFileName":"Crl.A._322_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice YAHYA AFRIDI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chairman, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has the legal authority to delegate his power to file a reference under Section 18(g) read with Section 34 A of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (Ordinance). The principles of principal and agent arising out of contractual delegation could not apply to the delegated authority of the delegator and the delegate, which derived its source from an enactment, being statutory delegation. The authority of the Chairman, NAB to file a reference and to sanction the filing of an appeal against the decision of the Accountability Court are two distinct functions and have thus been accordingly dealt with separately in the Ordinance.","citation":"2019   SCMR  846","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-12-2018","dateCreated":"22-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"C.A.110-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Government of the Punjab through Secretary Communication & Works Department, Lahore, etc v. Muneer Ahmad Tariq, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._110_L_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Faisal Arab","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Services of ad-hoc employees are liable to be terminated either on 30 days? notice or one month pay in lieu thereof as mentioned in section 10(3) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act or upon expiry of the period for which person was appointed on ad-hoc basis. Admittedly respondents? termination on the expiry of one year ad-hoc period attained finality. Intra court appeal was not decided on merit and court did not advert to the point that respondents be re-employed on regular basis after being terminated from ad-hoc employment and for the determination of this point the appeal is accepted and the case is remanded to High Court. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  998","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-03-2016","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":774},{"caseNumber":"C.A.699\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Commandant, Elite Force, K.P. Peshawar & others v. Jamshed Ali","caseFileName":"C.A._699_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"In an appeal against learned Service Tribunal?s judgment of reinstating the respondent merely on the basis of his acquittal under a compromise, the Court directs that the department is to conduct a fresh inquiry in accordance with the provisions of law and that the respondent would have no entitlement to back benefits unless the allegations against him are dismissed in the inquiry. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 570","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-04-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":732},{"caseNumber":"C.P.330-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Sabir Iqbal v. Contonement Board Peshawar through its Executive Officer & others","caseFileName":"C.P._330_P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Authorized Officer, disagreeing with the recommendation of Inquiry Officer given in disciplinary proceedings, should have issued fresh notice to the petitioner (Telephone Operator in the Cantonment Board) and given reasons for his disagreement and justification for visiting the petitioner with a graver penalty. Further, the court can examine and judicially review the executive discretion exercised by the Authorized Officer on the ground of proportionality. A disproportionate act that infringes upon a human right is an illegal act. Proportionality is a standard that examines the relationship between the objective the executive branch wishes to achieve, which has the potential of infringing upon a human right, and the means it has chosen in order to achieve that infringing objective. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 189","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-01-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1728-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Naveed Akram, etc v. Muhammad Anwar","caseFileName":"C.P._1728_L_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz-Ul-Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Neither the date of attestation nor the name or place when the oral gift was made could be established. Further, no witness in whose presence the oral gift was made was examined. The mere fact that gift mutation was entered is insufficient to establish a valid gift which could have the effect of defeating the rights of the Respondent. There was complete failure on the part of the petitioners to prove the oral gift through production of credible witnesses.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1095","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":716},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1787\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Dr. Yasmeen Jaffar v. Dr. Shehla Sami & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1787_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz-Ul-Ahsan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Service Tribunal examined Proforma Promotion Policy, 2011 which spelt out the criteria for grant of proforma promotion to Civil Servants and came to the conclusion that the petitioner did not meet any of the criteria provided in the Proforma Promotion Policy for entitlement to proforma promotion. The Tribunal had valid reasons and lawful justification to set aside the notification through which the petitioner was granted proforma promotion w.e.f. 22.01.2008 as Assistant Professor (BS-18).\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  993","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-04-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":627},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2108\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Dr. Tariq Iqbal v. The Government of KPK thr. Secretary Administration, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2108_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 7(3) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Provincial Buildings (Management, Control and Allotment) Act, 2018 (\"the Act of 2018\") merely provides that a public office holder can either be entitled to or eligible for allotment in the general pool or in the pool of his own department, office or agency if it has such a pool but a public office holder not eligible for allotment under the pool of his department, office or agency, is obviously, eligible for allotment in the general pool, as it cannot be the intention of the legislature to totally exclude such public office holder from any and all official residential accommodations. All allotments of residential accommodation made prior to the promulgation of the Act of 2018 must pass the test of being consistent and subject to the provisions of Act of 2018, as the saving provision i.e. Section 16 of the Act of 2018 is of such limited amplitude.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  859","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-02-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.582\/2018","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafique @ Feeqa v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._582_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Yahya Afridi","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When the very presence of the eye-witnesses is doubtful, then, the veracity of their testimony would surely fall short of credence to saddle capital punishment upon the present appellant.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1068","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-04-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":860},{"caseNumber":"Crl.R.P.15\/2011","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Mukhtar Mai v. Abdul Khaliq and others","caseFileName":"crl.r.p._15_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1302","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-06-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"J.P.217\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Siddique v. The State","caseFileName":"J.P._217_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Manzoor Ahmad Malik","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1048","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-03-2019","dateCreated":"16-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":514},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1257\/2012","caseSubject":"Service\/.","caseTitle":"SME Bank Ltd thr. its President Islamabad & another v. Izhar ul Haq","caseFileName":"C.A._1257_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The remedy of Intra Court Appeal will not be available against the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge in the writ petition when the proceedings from which the writ petition has arisen provided for either review, revision or appeal in terms of proviso to section 3 of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972. Moreover, relief denied by the High Court in a writ petition cannot be claimed again by the petitioner in a second writ petition.","citation":"2019   SCMR  939","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2019","dateCreated":"13-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1189\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Habib Bank Ltd v. Gulzar Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1189_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The nature of work being performed by the respondent as OG II and Manager of the branch of the bank was not of a clerical nature and did not fall within the ambit of term ?workman? as defined in the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 and the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002. The functions which he performed and also stated in his evidence were mainly of managerial and supervisory nature. Further, the Branch Manager of the bank according to section 9 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is competent to file a suit on behalf of the bank and the person who is authorized by law to file a suit on behalf of a bank in the Court of law could not be considered to be a 'workman'. Thus, the Labour Court did not have jurisdiction to entertain his Grievance Petition.","citation":"2019   SCMR  946","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-04-2019","dateCreated":"13-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"C.P.29\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Muhammad Aamir Khan v. Govt. of KPK and others","caseFileName":"C.P._29_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court has no power to further relax the upper age limit for recruitment because the jurisdiction of the Court is to apply the law and rules as they appear on the statute book.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1021","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-04-2019","dateCreated":"13-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"C.P.866-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Others","caseTitle":"Chief Executive Officer MEPCO through Manager (Admin) Khanewal  Road, Multan, etc v. Muhammad Fazil, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._866_L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The employee being gainfully employed or not while remaining out of service has not always been a reason for granting or non-granting of back benefits. Where the Court reinstates the employee in service, it is not bound to grant back benefits automatically. Rather it is within the discretion of the Court to grant back benefits or not and exercise of such discretion could not be interfered with by the High Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction unless it is shown that such discretion has been exercised without lawful authority and is of no legal effect.  Further, where the Court or the Tribunal has jurisdiction and it determines specific question of fact or even of law, unless patent legal defect or material irregularity is pointed out, such determination cannot ordinarily be interfered with by the High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution.","citation":"2019   SCMR  919","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-04-2019","dateCreated":"13-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.230\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"MATTER REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 06.12.2018","caseFileName":"C.M.A._230_2019_09072019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of suo motu proceedings regarding selling of bottled water extracted from the ground without any charge and its fitness for human consumption, directs the case to be re-listed for further hearing with certain directions.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019 SCMR 1160","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-07-2019","dateCreated":"10-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.300\/2018","caseSubject":"NAB\/Sentence","caseTitle":"Malik Din v. Chairman National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._300_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  372","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.160-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Mohammad Sharif, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._160_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1368","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.149-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Zubair v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._149_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The case of the prosecution is fraught with doubts and it would be unsafe to maintain the convictions.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1210","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.76-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Akhmat Sher v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._76_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Every crime is repugnant, murder being most abhorrent and shocking; impacts and aftermaths of violence upon the victims, their families and surroundings are seldom benign with fear invariably concomitant thereof, nonetheless, special jurisdiction under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 has been created to deal with situations enumerated in section 6 thereof; these fall outside the ambit of personal pursuits and vendettas, carried out through violence.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1365","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.651\/2012","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Syed Imtiaz Ali v. Chairman Implementation Tribunal for Newspaper Employees (ITNE) Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"C.A._651_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1034","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"C.A.322\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Chairman Federal Board of Revenue thr. Member Administration, Revenue Division v. Muhammad Asfandyar Janjua and others","caseFileName":"C.A._322_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The question before this Court is whether in cases where length of service is provided for promotion, the time spent in litigation prior to the first appointment of civil servant could be counted towards such length of service. It is held that 'Seniority' and 'Promotion' are not vested rights, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without actual length of service on account of vested rights. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  349","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":64},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.18877\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding deduction of High Tax\/other charges by mobile companies in Pakistan","caseFileName":"H.R.C._18877_2018_03072019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 645","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"03-07-2019","fileSizeInBytes":139},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.301-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ikram Shah v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._301_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Genesis of the occurrence cannot be doubted and the family certainly does not have an axe to grind against the accused; two from amongst them have been done to death, statedly while resisting the police; one has not opted to dispute her conviction and sentence, upheld by the High Court.\r\n\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.298-L\/2017","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/L.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Tariq Ali Shah v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._298_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Witnesses do not appear to have come forward with the whole truth and given the formidable past hounding both sides, patent discrepancies cannot be viewed as trivial, particularly after prosecution's failure qua three of the co-accused albeit with somewhat different roles. It would be unsafe to maintain the conviction.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1391","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.195-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Tariq Shah, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._195_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Those acquitted from the charge are inexorably placed in an identical position with the present appellants. The witnesses were found unworthy of reliance; there is nothing to improve upon their credence; injuries suffered by them are not passports into the realm of truth; once rejected, evidence of prosecution's witnesses cannot be pressed into service to sustain the charge, similar on all fours. It would be unsafe to maintain the convictions without potential risk of error.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1394","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.52-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Syed Anwar Ali Shah v. Irfan Ali @ Ghulam Raza @ Ramzan, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._52_L_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1214","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.2\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Ishaq Khan Khakwani and another v. Railway Board thr. its Chairman & others","caseFileName":"Const.P._2_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The terms of the Pakistan Railways Golf Club Lahore Leasing Agreement dated 26.07.2001 (\u201cAgreement\u201d) executed in favour of a consortium comprising Maxcorp Development Sdn Bhd, M\/s Husnain Construction Company (Private) Limited and Unicon Consulting Services (Private) Limited pertaining to the area of the property to be leased out, the term of the lease and the revenue sharing formula, were changed to benefit one bidder; the terms and conditions of the agreement were substantially and materially different from what was advertised; whole of the information was not available to all the potential bidders; and, therefore, the agreement is non est, null and void ab initio and of no legal effect and possession of the land given to the lessee under the agreement is to be handed over to Pakistan Railways forthwith along with all the assets and infrastructure thereupon. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 602","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":193},{"caseNumber":"J.P.521\/2017","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/4 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Kamran v. The State","caseFileName":"J.P._521_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1314","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.303-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Diyat","caseTitle":"Muhammad Shamoon (decd) through his L.Rs v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.P._303_L_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1144","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.140-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Nazeer Khan v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._140_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  1308","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.67-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Saleem Zada & others v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._67_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1309","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.154-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yaqoob v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._154_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Totality of circumstances does not space any hypothesis other than appellant?s guilt, however, quantum of sentence warrants reconsideration. The appellant attended the Court to record his statement as a witness and it is subsequent thereto that as many as six accused started firing upon the deceased and the PWs, two from amongst them have since been exonerated, never tried even through private complaint; Muhammad Mushtaq alongwith two unknown accomplices is still away from law; appellant?s acquittal from the charge of attempted homicide has not been challenged. Appellant himself sustained injuries receipt whereof is denied by the prosecution witnesses. These circumstances cloud moments immediately preceding the occurrence into mystery, particularly when in the given background, the appellant had no exclusive motive, targeted upon the deceased. In this backdrop, as a cumulative impact, alteration of death penalty into imprisonment for life would not be \r\nunconscionable in circumstances.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 580","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.9-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Zulfiqar Ali v. Imtiaz, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._9_L_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1315","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.725\/2008","caseSubject":"Tax\/Central Excise & Salt Act","caseTitle":"M\/s. Adamjee Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Sales Tax & Central Excise.","caseFileName":"C.A._725_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The fact that no provision existed under the Central Excises Act, 1944 for recovery of the deemed arrear of duty under s. 3-D did not mean that it could not be recovered at all. Any amount of duty or tax is, ultimately, a debt owed to the Government by the person who is liable to pay the same. It can therefore be recovered as any debt can by any person, i.e., by way of suit. Of course, Government hardly ever needs to take recourse to remedy by way of suit because the relevant fiscal legislation provides for specific and tailor made methods, which are far more effective as means of recovery.  Remedy by way of suit is not barred for the Government. Thus, the proper remedy in respect of the facts and circumstances at hand would have been for the Government to file a suit for recovery of the deemed arrear of duty, for which the period of limitation would be as provided for under Article 149.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 583","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1095\/2018","caseSubject":"Educational Institutions Cases","caseTitle":"Mohammad Imran v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1095_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1753","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":380},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.230\/2019","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"MATTER REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT DATED 06.12.2018","caseFileName":"C.M.A._230_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court examines the progress vis-\u00e0-vis implementation of the order in suo motu case about commercial consumption of water without any charge and adjourns the hearing for consideration of the report regarding water wastage by DG, EPA, the preferred methods of water conservation for immediate enforcement and the establishment of a reliable and productive mechanism for the charge and collection of water cess.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1160","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-06-2019","fileSizeInBytes":89},{"caseNumber":"C.A.125-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"The Government of Sindh through Secretary Health Department v. Dr. Nadeem Rizvi and others","caseFileName":"C.A._125_K_2016_JPMC_Dissenting_Note.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The basic feature, rather the spirit and soul of federalism, is the distribution of legislative powers between the federation and the province, with its core being provincial autonomy. Interpretation of constitutional provisions should thus be in consonance with the said principle rather than in a manner that encroaches upon the space reserved for the provinces. The Court should therefore avoid an expansive construction of a federal legislative power which renders redundant or nugatory the legislative field, power and authority assigned to the provinces, either expressly or as residuary, thus undermining provincial autonomy. Disregarding the mandatory provisions of the Constitution and the categorical mandate prescribed thereunder would embolden and encourage those who are averse to the rule of law and have scant regard for the supremacy of the Constitution, thereby strengthening those who want to create dissention and discord in our national polity.","citation":"2020   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"30-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.157-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Faisal Abbas v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._157_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Occurrence took place inside the shop impact whereof though grievously devastating for the witnesses, however, cannot be said to have spilled over to the public at large. Therefore, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, appellant\u2019s conviction under Section 7 of Anti Terrorism Act, 1997, is not sustainable and set aside accordingly.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1285","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"30-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1195\/2019","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Water and Sanitation Agency, Lahore thr. its Managing Director v. Lotte Akhtar Beverages (Pvt) Ltd, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1195_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Any flaws or deficiencies in the steps taken by the Provincial Governments for the enforcement of this Court's directions for the conservation of the water resource of the country given in the proceedings of SMC No. 26 of 2018  are to be highlighted before the Implementation Bench of this Court. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1160","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"30-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.158-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Azad @ Javaid @ Jadi v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._158_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Accused\u2019s guilt is proved to the hilt on the basis of chain of circumstances though few in number, nonetheless, well synchronized with one another, intrinsically confidence inspiring; he has rightly been convicted and sentenced to death given the brutality inflicted upon the abducted child.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1330","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.148-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Asad Rehmat v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._148_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The prosecution has not come up with the whole truth and thus its case cannot be viewed as beyond reasonable doubt, benefit whereof cannot be withheld merely on account of magnitude of violence and consequent loss of lives.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1156","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.122-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Iftikhar Ahmed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._122_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Evidence of the last seen is well within the remit of proximity of time and space. Recovery of articles constitutes another strong link particularly last belongings including school bag as well as stationery items. Recovery of sim and generation of calls therefrom, received by the complainant, confirmed by cell phone data presents a formidable piece of evidence, based upon an automated system, immune from foreign interference. Investigative process and conclusion thereof inexorably point towards the appellant?s culpability. Prosecution?s failure of DNA profile generation of rectal and vaginal swabs is a most grievous lapse that in retrospect makes out a case to visit the appellant with alternate penalty of imprisonment for life though amounts of fine and compensation are kept intact.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1224","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.107-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Sadi Ahmad, etc v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._107_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Conviction, in the absence of reliable evidence, on moral satisfaction alone cannot sustain.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1220","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.106-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Manzoor Hussain @ Babo v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._106_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The inherently flawed plea of accidental shot canvassed by the defence cannot dislodge preponderance of evidence furnished by the eye witnesses, found to be in a comfortable unison on all the details, salient as well as collateral. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  1325","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.133-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Shaukat Ali v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._133_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A retracted confession can form basis for conviction if found voluntary and truthful. \r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 577","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.104-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Muhammad Bilal v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._104_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Every act of violence triggers fear and panic with collateral impact on the surroundings; this by itself would not bring even a most violent act to fall within the mischief of terrorism as contemplated by law.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1362","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.91-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Noor Ahmed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._91_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Vendetta notwithstanding, seemingly, there are beneficiaries of death other than the appellant, with many other options in life. Position taken by the appellant when juxtaposed with the totality of prosecution\u2019s evidence, does not appear to be entirely beside the mark. Findings recorded by the medical officer are realistically intriguing, casting doubts, neither illusionary nor imaginary. It would be unsafe to maintain the conviction. Therefore, by extending the benefit of the doubt, the conviction and sentence of the appellant are set aside.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1327","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.75-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Tariq Mehmood v. The State etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._75_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once it is found that the genesis of prosecution case is inherently suspect, loss of life notwithstanding, it is considered grievously unsafe to maintain the convictions in a case fraught with improbabilities and positions, each self destructive. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  1170","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.137-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Khurram v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Cr.A._137_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1317","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1247\/2016","caseSubject":"PTA\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, PTA, Islamabad v. Pakistan Mobile Communication Ltd","caseFileName":"C.P._1247_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The High Court could not suspend or strike down the show cause notices in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction under section 7(1) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act, 1996 (\"the Act\"). The High Court's appellate jurisdiction under the Act commences once there was a decision or order, however, there wasn't any in the present case.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  924","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1069-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/s Independent Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.P._1069_K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011, had repealed the Sindh Sales Tax Ordinance, 2000 but by virtue of section 83 had saved certain matters accrued thereunder which henceforth had to be administered by the Sindh Revenue Board, including the power to issue notifications exempting the collection of sales tax on service, accrued penalties and default charges.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1053","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":75},{"caseNumber":"C.P.289-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Haji Muhammad Nawaz and others v. Aminullah (decd) through L.Rs. and others","caseFileName":"C.P._289_P_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The sale agreement is not a title document. The purported seller had specifically denied the execution of the sale agreement and no effort was made to establish his signature thereon. The two persons stated to be the witnesses of the sale agreement were not produced though one of them was admittedly alive. The purported scribe was not the person who had actually written the sale agreement. The sale agreement is dated before the enactment of the Qanun-e-Shahadat however the same is also not proved in terms of section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872. Since the sale agreement was not proved therefore the benefit of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act would also not accrue. The legal heirs of the purported buyer admitted that the purported seller was the owner of the said land therefore it was not a case of two contending claims where the purported seller had no title\/ownership to the said land. Mere possession by the petitioners would not be the determinative factor in terms of Article 126 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  974","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2019","dateCreated":"25-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1926-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Property Tax","caseTitle":"Director General, Excise and taxation, Lahore, etc v. Market Committee, Multan through its Chairman, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._1926_L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Market committees enjoy exemption from tax under the unamended section 4(b)(ii) of the Punjab Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958 (\u201cthe Act\u201d). However, after the amendment in section 4(b) of the Act brought about through Punjab Finance Ordinance, 2002, market committees are liable to pay tax under the Act. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1099","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"22-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":588},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1926-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Property Tax","caseTitle":"Director General, Excise and taxation, Lahore, etc v. Market Committee, Multan through its Chairman, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._1926_L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Market committees enjoy exemption from tax under the unamended section 4(b)(ii) of the Punjab Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958 (\u201cthe Act\u201d). However, after the amendment in section 4(b) of the Act brought about through Punjab Finance Ordinance, 2002, market committees are liable to pay tax under the Act. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  1099","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-05-2019","dateCreated":"22-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":588},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.67-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Safdar Baloch @ Ali v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._67_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1412","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"20-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.135-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Shewaiz Rasool alias Shabi v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._135_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellant is identically placed, on all fours, with Muhammad Rafi and Shahid Afzaal, co-accused; they had been assigned joint firing on the deceased; in the absence of any specific motive no distinction can be possibly drawn so as to distinguish, even obliquely appellant?s case from his co-accused. Though not assigned any harm to the deceased or the witnesses, acquittal of Khawar Ali, Muhammad Boota, Qamar-uz-Zaman, Asad Ullah and Muhammad Luqman stated to be in the company and community of intention with the appellant and acquitted co-accused, firing side by side, does cast a dark shadow upon prosecution?s case.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1448","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"20-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1262\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"H.M. Extraction Ghee & Oil Industries (Pvt) Ltd, Islamabad v. Federal Board of Revenue thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1262_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An exemption may eliminate the need for an assessment altogether (if it is whole) or reduce it by the relevant amount if it is partial. A tax credit, on the other hand, has no bearing on the assessment; it comes into operation after assessment and when the question of recovery arises. Clause (a) of subsection (1) of S. 159 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 does not apply to a tax credit; therefore, no exemption certificate can be issued under S. 159 in respect of the same.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1081","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"16-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.446-L\/2016","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ghulam Haider v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.P._446_L_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1129","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.6-P\/2010","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Alamgir v. Gul Zaman & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A_6_P_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The circumstances of the case spell out a situation that no one anticipated; once started it aggravated, resulting into injuries to both parties, with a heavier toll on the complainant\u2019s side. The liability of accused persons more aptly falls within the mischief of section 302(c), P.P.C.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1415","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.97-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Bashir Ahmed v. The State etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._97_L_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The entire household is in the array of the accused and in this backdrop argument that it is a case of wider net is not entirely beside the mark. Similarly, a pistol and shotgun, admittedly with the deceased and the complainant, lend credence to hypothesis of aggression; renunciation of crime report by the complainant goes a long way to tremor the very basis of his case. Suppression of injuries of an opponent is yet another intriguing circumstance. While the complainant was well within the remit of law to pursue his case through a private complaint, nonetheless, non-examination of investigating officer alongside some other witnesses cannot be countenanced without exposing the accused to a grievous prejudice. Prosecution case is not free from doubt and thus it would be unsafe to maintain the conviction.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1417","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.80-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mansab Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._80_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The prosecution has not been able either to justify witnesses\u2019 departure from previous statements or to explain conflict between ocular account and medical evidence. Its case is fraught with doubts and it would be unsafe to maintain the conviction.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1306","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.52-P\/2009","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"State through Advocate General KP Peshawar v. Hassan Jalil & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._52_P_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1154","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.48-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Shafi @ Kuddoo v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._48_L_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1045","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.37-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Pervaiz v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._37_L_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 592","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.22-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"State through Director ANF v. Parvez Khan & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._22_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.21-P\/2010","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Wazir v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._21_P_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1297","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.19-P\/2014","caseSubject":"NAB\/Sentence","caseTitle":"Abdullah Jan v. The State & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._19_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1079","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.17-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"The State v. Imran Nazir","caseFileName":"Crl.A._17_P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1227","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.16-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"State through ANF Peshawar v. Olufemi","caseFileName":"Crl.A._16_P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1284","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.13-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Wajahat v. Gul Daraz & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._13_P_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1451","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.13-P\/2014","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/.","caseTitle":"The State through Regional Director ANF Peshawar v. Sohail Khan","caseFileName":"Crl.A._13_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  1288","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.13-P\/2009","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/.","caseTitle":"State through Director ANF Peshawar v. Muhammad Ramzan","caseFileName":"Crl.A._13_P_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1295","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.12-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"State through Deputy Attorney General v. Abdul Ali","caseFileName":"Crl.A._12_P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1102","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.11-P\/2017","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Azhar Hussain v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._11_P_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 595","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.11-P\/2014","caseSubject":"Quashment\/Of FIR","caseTitle":"Javed Khan v. Ali Gohar Shah & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._11_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.8-P\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Fazal Subhan v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._8_P_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1027","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.7-P\/2014","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/.","caseTitle":"State through Director ANF Peshawar v. Fakhar Zaman","caseFileName":"Crl.A._7_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1122","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.7-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"State through Advocate General KP v. Muhammad Rafiq & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._7_P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1150","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.3-P\/2014","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Somaid v. Ali Gohar @ Gohar Zaman & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._3_P_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1008","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.441\/2010","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax v. National Bank of Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.A._441_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"As a matter of law the \u201chybrid\u201d system of accounting could be adopted under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 regarding taxability on interest earned by financial institutions on Government securities.","citation":"2019   SCMR  1011","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":82},{"caseNumber":"C.A.26-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Service","caseTitle":"Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another","caseFileName":"C.A._26_K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Contract employees in question are governed by the National Database and Registration Authority Employees (Service) Regulations, 2002 which are non-statutory in nature and therefore they cannot be granted relief in constitutional jurisdiction. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  984","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"13-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"C.P.396\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"The Secretary Revenue Division\/ Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Muhammad Arshad Hilali","caseFileName":"C.P._396_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Paragraph 6(i)(a) of instructions contained in Serial No. 30, Chapter III, Part II of Estacode (1989 edition) provides that where a person is transferred to another office in a situation where it was open to him to accept or refuse such transfer, his seniority is to be reckoned from the date of his transfer to the new office. The only exception to this rule contained in paragraph 6(i)(b) is that where a person is compulsorily transferred to another office then he is allowed to count his service in the previous office towards his seniority in his new office.","citation":"2019   SCMR  980","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"10-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.339-K\/2017","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Permanent Injunction","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rahim v. Mohsin Ali and another","caseFileName":"C.P._339_K_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner claims that an area of 919 square feet plot out of Bhadda land of Deh Pattar was transferred by Gul Muhammad in his name on the basis of registered sale deed and mutation was affected in the revenue record but plot number or survey number is not mentioned and the description in the sale deed also does not match with the plot in question. Also, he claims to have purchased the plot in question from Gul Muhammad but he was unable to satisfy the High Court as to how Gul Muhammad acquired title in the disputed plot.  ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"08-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.306-L\/2012","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/L.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._306_L_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Identification of an accused is a two-step process. First, the suspect undergoes a test identification parade and second, the credibility of the eye-witness is assessed by weighing the evidence in the light of the estimator variables. A non-exhaustive list of \"estimator variables\" negatively affecting the memory process includes stress, weapon focus, duration, distance and lighting, characteristics of witness and perpetrator.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  956","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"07-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":738},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.306-L\/2012","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/L.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._306_L_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Identification of an accused is a two-step process. First, the suspect undergoes a test identification parade and second, the credibility of the eye-witness is assessed by weighing the evidence in the light of the estimator variables. A non-exhaustive list of \"estimator variables\" negatively affecting the memory process includes stress, weapon focus, duration, distance and lighting, characteristics of witness and perpetrator.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  956","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-04-2019","dateCreated":"07-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":738},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.94\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/6 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Khair-ul-Bashar v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab","caseFileName":"Crl.A._94_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Report of Government Analyst, in order to serve the purposes of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, must contain (i) the tests and analysis of the alleged drug (ii) the result of each test(s) carried out and (iii) the test protocols applied (the name(s) of protocols applied) to carry out these tests. Re-testing of the drug in case of a deficient report would amount to giving a premium to the prosecution for its mistakes and lapses. Any flaw in the case of the prosecution must only benefit the accused. The judgment reported as State v. Imam Bakhsh (2018 SCMR 2039) purposively interprets the Act and finds Rule 6 to be a mandatory provision. The report of the Government Analyst, whilst being admissible in evidence without formal proof, is rebuttable and can be questioned by the accused on the ground of non-compliance of the information required under Rule 6. The emphasis that the Report of the Government Analyst must carry the information required in Rule 6 is to ensure that convictions under the Act are based on reliable and credible reports.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  930","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-04-2019","dateCreated":"03-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":197},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.94\/2019","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/6 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Khair-ul-Bashar v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab","caseFileName":"Crl.A._94_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Report of Government Analyst, in order to serve the purposes of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, must contain (i) the tests and analysis of the alleged drug (ii) the result of each test(s) carried out and (iii) the test protocols applied (the name(s) of protocols applied) to carry out these tests. Re-testing of the drug in case of a deficient report would amount to giving a premium to the prosecution for its mistakes and lapses. Any flaw in the case of the prosecution must only benefit the accused. The judgment reported as State v. Imam Bakhsh (2018 SCMR 2039) purposively interprets the Act and finds Rule 6 to be a mandatory provision. The report of the Government Analyst, whilst being admissible in evidence without formal proof, is rebuttable and can be questioned by the accused on the ground of non-compliance of the information required under Rule 6. The emphasis that the Report of the Government Analyst must carry the information required in Rule 6 is to ensure that convictions under the Act are based on reliable and credible reports.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  930","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"03-05-2019","fileSizeInBytes":197},{"caseNumber":"C.A.805\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary Finance Regulation Wing M\/o Finance Isamabad v. Muhammad Sharif & another","caseFileName":"C.A._805_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Adhoc relief for the government employees, including an increase of Rs. 300\/- per month in their salaries w.e.f. 01.03.1997  and an increase in the pension by 10%, was announced which was then officialized through Office Memoranda. A clarificatory Office Memorandum provided that the benefit of an increase in pension was admissible to those Government servants who were retired prior to 1st March, 1997. The respondents, who admittedly retired after 01.03.1997, cannot claim both the benefits; one of increase in the monthly salary by Rs. 300\/- while in service; and the other of increase in pension after retirement.  The Office Memoranda show that two distinct reliefs were granted, one for the employees in service through increase in salary and the other for retired employees through increase in pension. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  915","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-04-2019","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":170},{"caseNumber":"C.A.227-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Chief Collector of Customs v. Iftikhar Ahmed Tabasum,etc","caseFileName":"C.A._227_L_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A civil servant as per Rules 15(2) and 25(4)(b) of the Accommodation Allocation Rules, 2002 (\u201cRules\u201d) could have retained official accommodation after his retirement only for a period of six months and thereafter he was liable to pay standard rent for the remaining period. The question whether a civil servant can unauthorizedly retain official accommodation beyond a period of six months without paying penal rent requires interpretation of the Rules and constitutes a substantial question of law of public importance because the decision by this Court would affect all those civil servants who are subject to the Rules.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 563","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-03-2019","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":183},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.183\/2019","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Notice in compliance with the order dated 12.02.2019 passed in Crl.A. Nso.259-261\/2018 to Mr. Kanwar Anwaar Ali, Special Judicial Magistrate on account of dereliction of duty and lack of sufficient legal knowledge","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A._183_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The precedent cases and the best practices regarding the legal position in respect of a test identification parade are consolidated so that any confusion may be removed and all concerned may stand instructed and guided in future.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 488","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":165},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.137-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yousaf v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A_137_L_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The issue, whether for the purpose of a valid compromise in the case of murder the heirs of the deceased at the time when the deceased was done to death are the persons who could enter into a compromise or when one of such heirs of the deceased had died after the deceased\u2019s murder could the heirs of such heir of the deceased be treated as a necessary part of a compromise to be affected, requires an authoritative pronouncement on the subject and the matter be brought to the notice of the Hon\u2019ble Chief Justice.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 461","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2669\/2016","caseSubject":"Company Law\/Others","caseTitle":"Control Risk (Pvt) Ltd v. The Additional Registrar Companies Registration Office S.E.C.P., Islamabad","caseFileName":"C.A._2669_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner-company was providing services that were beyond the scope of its Memorandum of Association and the order of High Court for winding-up of the company is upheld by the Supreme Court.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  365","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":10065},{"caseNumber":"C.A.805\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary Finance Regulation Wing M\/o Finance Isamabad v. Muhammad Sharif & another","caseFileName":"C.A._805_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  915","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":170},{"caseNumber":"C.A.227-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Chief Collector of Customs v. Iftikhar Ahmed Tabasum,etc","caseFileName":"C.A._227_L_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A civil servant as per Rules 15(2) and 25(4)(b) of the Accommodation Allocation Rules, 2002 (\u201cRules\u201d) could have retained official accommodation after his retirement only for a period of six months and thereafter he was liable to pay standard rent for the remaining period. The question whether a civil servant can unauthorizedly retain official accommodation beyond a period of six months without paying penal rent requires interpretation of the Rules and constitutes a substantial question of law of public importance because the decision by this Court would affect all those civil servants who are subject to the Rules.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 563","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":183},{"caseNumber":"C.A.94\/2012","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/S Pakistan Match Industries (Pvt) Ltd v. The Assistant Collector, Sales Tax and Central Excise Mardan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._94_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is well settled, as per the principles of the interpretation of exemptions in fiscal statutes and provisos in general, that the provisos are intended to qualify the main part of the provision and carve out an exception from the same, taking out (as it were) something that but for the proviso would be included therein. Such provisos are generally referred to as ?true? provisos. It is no doubt correct that sometimes a proviso is construed to be a substantive clause that operates in its own right. However, such instances are rare, and for a proviso to be so construed the language of the provision must be clear. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  906","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"24-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2669\/2016","caseSubject":"Company Law\/Others","caseTitle":"Control Risk (Pvt) Ltd v. The Additional Registrar Companies Registration Office S.E.C.P., Islamabad","caseFileName":"C.P._2669_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner-company was indeed providing services that were beyond the scope of its Memorandum of Association. The order of the High Court for winding-up of the petitioner-company is based on cogent reasons.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  365","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"11-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":10065},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1476\/2016","caseSubject":"Execution Petitions \/ Proceedings\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Khalil v. M\/s Faisal M.B. Corporation  (Pvt) Ltd & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1476_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court has the power to set aside any auction if the same is proved to have been conducted in an unlawful or irregular manner or the property has been sold at a throw away price.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  321","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"11-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":7050},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6250\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Fazeelat Agha v. Chief Settlement Commissioner, M.B.R., Punjab, Lahore and others","caseFileName":"C.M.A._6250_2018.PDF","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  417","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"11-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":384},{"caseNumber":"C.A.839\/2015","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Habib Bank Ltd. v. Bashir Ahmed etc","caseFileName":"C.A._839_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  362","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"11-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":5093},{"caseNumber":"C.A.157-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Abdul Ghaffar Adamji and others v. National Investment Trust Ltd. and another","caseFileName":"C.A._157_K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  812","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"04-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":78},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.18877\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding deduction of High Tax\/other charges by mobile companies in Pakistan","caseFileName":"H.R.C._18877_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"As the relevant interim order was passed by a three-member Bench, it would be appropriate if this matter is heard by a Bench comprising of at least three members. Therefore, this matter should be referred to the Hon\u2019ble Chief Justice of Pakistan for requisite orders for the constitution of the Bench and for fixing it for hearing at an early date as it pertains to the collection of public revenues.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 645","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"01-04-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.639\/2019","caseSubject":"NAB\/Suspension of Sentence","caseTitle":"Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif v. The State thr, Chairman National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._639_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The medical reports of the petitioner brought on the record of the case do suggest that he has a long history of various ailments including cardiac complications, kidney problem, hypertension and diabetes. In this peculiar backdrop, and extending due deference to the consistent medical opinion of senior doctors available on the record, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding admission of the petitioner to bail upon suspension of his sentence for a limited period has been found by us to be reasonable. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  734","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-03-2019","dateCreated":"26-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.8758\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Implementation of Judgment dated 4.5.2018 in CMA 376-K\/2014","caseFileName":"C.M.A._8758_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The offer of Rs. 460,000,000,000\/- (Rupees Four Hundred and Sixty billion) made by Bahria Town Limited Karachi for 16,896 acres of land is accepted on stated terms. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  703","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"26-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":346},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.39\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Mr. Justice Muhammad Farrukh Irfan Khan v. The Federation of Pakistan & others.","caseFileName":"Const.P._39_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is the scheme of the Constitution of 1973 that where an office for a fixed period envisages a pre-condition of making an oath, such period would commence under our Constitutional dispensation from the date when the oath is made. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 509","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"22-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":104},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.200\/2019","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Notice in compliance with the orders passed on 13.02.2019 in Crl.A. No. 238-L\/2013 to Khizar Hayat, Police Station, Qilla Gujjar Singh, Lahore on account of his false statement during the investigation of the case.","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A._200_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 527","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"20-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":152},{"caseNumber":"Supreme Judicial Council No. 242 of 2015","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui","caseFileName":"Supreme_Judicial_Council_242_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 845","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":83},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1631\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Allowances","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Capital Administration and Development Division, Islamabad and another v. Nusrat Tahir and another","caseFileName":"C.A._1631_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Education, training and rehabilitation of disabled persons are services provided in the health sector and fall within the terms of Schedule-I to the Career Structure for Health Personnel Scheme Ordinance, 2011 and, therefore, the providers thereof qualify as health personnel.","citation":"2018   SCMR  691","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":116},{"caseNumber":"C.A.25-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment\/Enhancement of rent","caseTitle":"Abdul Latif and another v. M\/s Pharmacie Plus (Pvt) Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._25_K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The periodical increases agreed between the parties under the tenancy agreement have to be regarded as the rent. The prohibition of Section 7(5) of the Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963 means that no unilateral increase is permissible before the expiry of three years. A mutually agreed increase cannot be subsequently disputed by the tenant unless it is called in question through an application for fixation of fair rent and the consequence of non-payment of agreed rent within the prescribed period would amount to default in the payment of rent and would make it liable for eviction. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  627","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"13-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.57\/2015","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asjad Abbasi & others v. Iqbal Muhammad Chauhan & others","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P._57_2015_DN.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  2051","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.12\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTU ACTION REGARDING UNSATISFACTORY INVESTIGATION IN CASE FIR NO.544\/15 UNDER SECTION 420\/468\/471 PPC AT PS DEFENCE-A, LAHORE.","caseFileName":"S.M.C._12_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.35-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Narcotic Substance Cases\/Forfeiture of Property","caseTitle":"The State \/ Narcotics Force v. Parveez Hassan Haravi and another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._35_K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1397","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2297\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Tanveer Musharraf v. Government of KPK thr. Chief Secretary, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2297_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Notwithstanding the definition or status of \"civil servant\" given or conferred upon any employee of the Federal or Provincial Government under any law or judgment, the benefit of the provisions of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Buildings (Management, Control and Allotment) Act, 2018 is available only to a special class of civil servants namely those who have been appointed under Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Civil Servants of the Federal Government posted and working in Peshawar under the Government. \r\n\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  616","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.733\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Director General Emergency Rescue Service 1122, KPK, Peshawar v. Nizakat Ullah","caseFileName":"C.P._733_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where an employee is to be removed from service, which action obviously carries a stigma with it, he is entitled to due process which includes fair opportunity to defend himself, cross-examine the witnesses and produce evidence in his defence. Further, he must be confronted with the material on the basis of which he has been issued show cause notice.","citation":"2019   SCMR  640","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.P.606\/2018","caseSubject":"Service\/Termination from Service","caseTitle":"Qazi Munir Ahmed v. Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital thr. its Principal, Rawalpindi & others","caseFileName":"C.P._606_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The only remedy available to a contract employee is to file a suit for damages alleging breach of contract or failure to extend the contract.","citation":" \n2019   SCMR  648","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1459\/2018","caseSubject":"Allotment","caseTitle":"Riffat Shaheen v. The Government of KPK thr. Chief Secretary, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1459_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Buildings (Management, Control and Allotment) Act, 2018 and KPK Residential Accommodation at Peshawar (Procedure for Allotment) Rules, 1980 do not provide an automatic benefit to the spouse or children of a deceased or retired civil servant to retain the government accommodation on retirement\/demise of the original allottee, however, their rights have been safeguarded by providing a special quota in the available government housing which is based on seniority of applications.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  659","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.694\/2008","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Khan Muhammad (Decd) thr. LRs., etc v. Mst. Khatoon Bibi, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._694_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1476","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":61},{"caseNumber":"C.A.288\/2013","caseSubject":"Succession Certificate","caseTitle":"Zohra Bibi and another v. Haji Sultan Mahmood and others","caseFileName":"C.A._288_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Limitation in this case where the daughters of the deceased filed an application for cancellation of succession certificate obtained by their step-brother showing himself to be the only heir would run from the date of knowledge.","citation":"2018   SCMR  762","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.A.14-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Family\/Return of Dowery Articles","caseTitle":"Saif ur Rehman v. Additional District Judge, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._14_L_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The only possible purposive, beneficial and rational interpretation of Section 14(2) of the Family Courts Act is that the right of appeal of a husband against whom a decree has been passed is curtailed. However, in no event, the right of the wife to file an appeal is extinguished if she is dissatisfied with any decree in a suit for dower or dowry. ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1885","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.751\/2017","caseSubject":"Sentence Already Undergone","caseTitle":"Muhammad Juman v. The State thr. P.G, Sindh and others","caseFileName":"Crl.P._751_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  318","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.201\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/4 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Syed Azhar Hussain Shah v. The State thr. P.G, Punjab and another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._201_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 34 of Cr.PC provides that the Court of a Magistrate specially empowered under section 30 of Cr.PC may pass any sentence authorized by the law except the sentence of death or imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years but that limitation on the sentence to be passed by a Magistrate only regulates the punishment and not the jurisdiction of the Magistrate to try an offence.","citation":"2019   SCMR  537","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.155\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/7 Years R.I.","caseTitle":"Abdul Wahab & others v. The State thr. P.G. Balochistan & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._155_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"According to the provisions of section 337-N(2), P.P.C. a punishment of imprisonment by way of Ta'zir can be passed against a convict only if the convict is \"previous convict, habitual or hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal or the offence has been committed by him in the name or on the pretext of honour\". Moreover in a case pertaining to causing of hurt unless the provisions of section 337-N(2), P.P.C. are attracted to the case of the convict he cannot be awarded a sentence of imprisonment by way of Ta'zir.","citation":"2019   SCMR  516","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.315\/2012","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Nasrullah @ Nasro v. The State","caseFileName":"Cr.A. 315 of 2012.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  724","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.Sh.A.1\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Govt. of Punjab thr. Chief Secretary. v. Dr. Zahoor Ahmad Azhar","caseFileName":"C.Sh.A._1_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Federal Shariat Court has no jurisdiction to examine or be influenced by any proposed draft legislation which has not yet been translated into the Act of Parliament nor possesses any jurisdiction in the nature of Article 199 or 184(3) of the Constitution, for the enforcement of fundamental rights or to issue order, declaration or directions to implement any command of the Constitution or law. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 32","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":65},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3078\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafiullah & others v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd (ZTBL) thr. its President, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3078_2016_D.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioners, who left their jobs after opting either under the Golden Handshake Scheme of 2002 or under Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Staff Regulations), 2005 and received all benefits including pensionary benefits as provided in the scheme under which they exercised their option, on account of their own voluntary act which they considered the most beneficial option, stood disentitled from claiming pensionary benefits under Agricultural Development Bank Employees Pension and Gratuity Regulations, 1981. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  598","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1598\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"Major (R) Perviaz Iqbal v. Munir Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1598_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The cause of action could have only arisen to the buyers when the petitioner had come in the position to complete the transaction with them and that accrued when the property in question was conveyed in the name of the petitioner. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  566","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.P.78-K\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Moula Bux Shaikh and others v. The Chief Minister Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.P._78_K_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is the domain of the Government to decide whether a particular academic qualification of a civil servant\/employee is sufficient for promotion from one grade to another higher grade and whereas it is in the domain of the Pakistan Engineering Council to decide whether a particular academic qualification can be equated with another academic qualification but it has no power to say that the civil servants\/employees holding particular academic qualification cannot be promoted from a particular grade to a higher grade.","citation":"2018   SCMR  2098","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":83},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1340\/2018","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"The Chairman NAB thr. Prosecutor General, Islamabad v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif","caseFileName":"C.A._1340_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The merits of the case should not be adverted to or commented upon in any detail while deciding bail\/suspension of sentence applications. Bail in NAB cases may be granted in constitutional jurisdiction of a High Court only in extraordinary circumstances and in cases of extreme hardship. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 445","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-01-2019","dateCreated":"09-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2812\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Khan Muhammad v. The Chief Secretary, Governent of Balochistan, Civil Secretariat, Zarghoon Road, Quetta and others","caseFileName":"C.P._2812_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The notification of February 3, 2014 to the extent of item 12 which grants the Minister the power to post\/transfer a civil servant is ultra vires the Balochistan Government Rules of Business, 2012 and the scheme of governance envisaged in the Constitution and therefore is of no legal effect. Under section 10 of the Balochistan Civil Servants Act, 1974 a civil servant cannot insist to be posted or transferred to a particular post but this does not mean that a civil servant can be made to serve under a subordinate. Moreover, while section 10 does not prescribe a minimum period during which a civil servant must serve at his post it does not mean that the Government without assigning any reason can move a civil servant from the place he was posted to after a month or subject the civil servant to repeated postings in a short period of time because this would amount to punishing him.\r\n           \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1411","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":63},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4682\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies\/Others","caseTitle":"Ejaz Ahmed Sandhu & another v. Election Commission of Pakistan thr. its Chief Election Commissioner, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._4682_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission exercised its discretion to order re-poll, at the polling station the ballot papers of which were stolen, which was justifiable in the facts and circumstances of the case. The Election Commission is a constitutional body and unless it is shown that the jurisdiction and discretion exercised by it is illegal, mala fide, manifestly arbitrary or unjustifiable its working and decisions should not be interfered with. ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1367","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3095\/2017","caseSubject":"Family\/Recovery of Dower Amount","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asim and others v. Mst. Samro Begum and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3095_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An appellate court, in an appeal against the judgment of family court, has the power to modify the judgment and decree of family court by relying on Order XLI Rule 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 819","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.P.371-P\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Others","caseTitle":"Govt. of K.P. through Secretary Local Govt.  & Rural Development Department, Peshawar & others v. M\/s Lucky Cement Limited","caseFileName":"C.P._371_P_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioners wanted to undo the effect of the judgment reported in 2013 SCMR 1511 which was sought to be done by changing the wording of the letter of 8th January, 2015, however, these changes are not materially significant. Unfortunately, through such questionable means, the levy which had already been struck down by this Court was sought to be resurrected. Therefore, the issuance of letter of 8th January, 2015 and imposing the said levy was illegal and void.","citation":"2019   SCMR  46","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.A.145\/2010","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Civic Centres Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax\/ Wealth Tax Islamabad","caseFileName":"C.A._145_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellant, a government owned private limited company, was transferred two state owned entities on cost basis through a decision taken by the PM which was later recalled. It during the relevant period has shown the rental income as ?Income from business or profession? and paid income tax accordingly. The department however considered that the income from the properties was ?Income from house property? and attracted a higher income tax rate. This Court holds that the appellant was wrongly declared the owner, learned High Court wrongly extended the meaning of ?owner? and ?sale? to create liability under two fiscal statutes by disregarding the provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance and the Wealth Tax Act. ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1319","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.436\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Qasim v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._436_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 840","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":90},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.430\/2017","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"The State thr. P.G. Punjab v. Jahangir Akhtar","caseFileName":"Crl.A._430_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  733","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":101},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.429\/2017","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"State thr, the Director, Distrctorate General of Intelligence & Investigation (Custom & Excise), Karachi v. Haji Nabi Bux & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._429_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 837","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":95},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.206\/2016","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mst. Nazia Anawar v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._206_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  911","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":93},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.141\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Nazir Ahmad v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._141_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  787","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":88},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.7\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Talal Ahmed Chaudhry v. The State","caseFileName":"I.C.A._7_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  542","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":222},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2755\/2006","caseSubject":"Tax","caseTitle":"Agro Tractor (Pvt.) Limited v. Facto Belarus Tractors Limited and others","caseFileName":"C.A._2755_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The procedure of the grant of permission to import tractors at zero rated duty suffered from arbitrariness, excessive jurisdiction, favoritism, lack of transparency, subjectivity and was also not in accordance with the decision of Economic Coordination Committee; therefore, the principles of promissory estoppel were not attracted in the facts and circumstances of the case. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  57","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1042\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Shaukat Ali v. Election Commission of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1042_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 9(1) of the Election Act 2017 affords women special treatment in the form of provision consciously designed for a society in which several practices depriving women of their legitimate legal rights are commonplace. Article 25(3) of the Constitution unequivocally allows for special provisions to be made for the benefit of women as an exception to the general rule of equal treatment. The right to vote is a very precious right and the safeguards provided in respect of women by Section 9(1) are permissible under Article 25(3) and hence intra vires.","citation":"2018   SCMR  2086","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.A.3\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Medical and Dental Council through its President v. Muhammad Fahad Malik and others","caseFileName":"C.A._3_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Council of Common Interest (\"CCI\") has no role in the legislative process with respect to the matters enumerated in the Federal Legislative List, rather it is restricted to formulation and regulation of policies in relation to the said matters, and that too contained only in Part II of such List. Similarly, regulations promulgated in exercise of delegated powers available under the parent statute also do not require the approval of CCI. Pakistan Medical & Dental Council (PMDC) is authorized to monitor the whole process of admission including the centralized admission program. Re-promulgation of Ordinances, especially when the earlier ones were either not approved or disapproved by Parliament, is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of democratic legislative processes. Any amendment\/ insertion\/substitution made by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 and Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 (\"the Amending Ordinances\") in the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962 (\"the Ordinance\") did not survive after the Amending Ordinances lapsed\/were repealed, and the Ordinance stood revived and the Council constituted thereunder had ceased to exist and MBBS and BDS (Admissions, House Job and Internship) Regulations, 2016 framed under S. 33 of the Ordinance by the Council constituted under S. 3 thereof, both of which were substituted by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015, also ceased to exist having been illegally and invalidly framed. An ad hoc Council shall remain functional and intact after which fresh elections shall be conducted in accordance with law. ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1956","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":140},{"caseNumber":"C.A.79-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition\/.","caseTitle":"Mst. Bibi Shah Ban (decd) through L.Rs & others v. Land Acquisition Collector A.C Mardan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._79_P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The owners of the acquired land had to be compensated according to its market value together with fifteen percent compulsory acquisition charges and six percent interest per annum from the date of taking possession of the acquired land and litigation charge. Notice is also given to the Advocates General of the four provinces, the Islamabad Capital Territory and the Attorney General to file written submission to determine the question whether the public buildings, roads, parks and colleges, across Pakistan, which were built on Government land and constructed out of public funds and for which land compulsorily acquired had been paid out of public funds could be named after a living person and one who held public office in Pakistan. ","citation":"2019   SCMR  599","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.183\/2019","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Notice in compliance with the order dated 12.02.2019 passed in Crl.A. Nso.259-261\/2018 to Mr. Kanwar Anwaar Ali, Special Judicial Magistrate on account of dereliction of duty and lack of sufficient legal knowledge","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A_183_2019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 488","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"04-03-2019","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"J.P.191\/2018","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/4 Years & 6 Months R.I.","caseTitle":"Minhaj Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"J.P._191_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  326","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"27-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.69229-P\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding functioning of Patwaries, Kanungos and Tehsildars in urban area of Lahore","caseFileName":"H.R.C._69229_P_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"All the urban areas to which the Land Revenue Act, 1967 does not apply shall be governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the Registration Act, 1908 for the purposes of transfer of property or devolution of any rights in property. No oral mutations for the purposes of the transfer of property shall be valid in law in such urban areas (which have become part of settled areas including municipalities, towns, etc.). The patwaar khanas or revenue records can only be maintained for record keeping and not for the transfer of property under any of the modes recognized by the Transfer of Property Act or any other law prevalent at the time.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 297","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"27-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":147},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.617\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Mansha v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._617_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A deaf and dumb person is the solitary eye-witness in this case, however, the trial Court did not determine the level of his comprehension. There is also nothing on record to show how the Court concluded that Muhammad Munir was \"well versed with his language of signals.\" It is also not clear in what capacity Muhammad Munir interpreted the sign language of the deaf and dumb witness, whether he did so as a translator or as an expert in terms of Article 59 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat.","citation":"2019   SCMR  64","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"27-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3186\/2017","caseSubject":"PTA\/Others","caseTitle":"Space Telecom (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Pakistan Telecommunication Authority thr. its Chairman","caseFileName":"C.P._3186_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A consortium, of which the petitioner was a member, submitted its bid for a cellular license which was accepted by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). The contract between the consortium and PTA thus stood concluded. Sub-clauses (k) and (n) of clause 9 and sub-clause (a) of clause 10 of the contract\/the memorandum clearly stipulate that the earnest money will be forfeited if the requisite payments are not made. The Consortium having failed to fulfill their contractual obligations entitled PTA to forfeit the earnest amount. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  101","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"27-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":61},{"caseNumber":"C.A.815\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Member (Taxes) Board of Revenue Punjab,Lahore,etc v. Qaiser Abbas","caseFileName":"C.A._815_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"S. 3B of the Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1997 (\"the Act\") was effective from 01-07-2013 and was to apply prospectively. However, S. 4(4) of the Act read with R. 14(3) of the Punjab Agricultural Income Rules, 2001 (?the Rules?) clearly allow for the recovery of agricultural income tax for two years prior to the assessment year. Moreover, application of S. 3B of the Act is predicated upon the agricultural income as declared by the assessee himself in his income tax return, therefore, in cases where the assessee has himself filed his income tax return in which he has declared his agricultural income, by virtue of S. 3B of the Act, the tax department is not required to levy and assess agricultural income tax in terms of S. 3 and could recover the same by issuing recovery notices directly. However, where an assessee has not filed his income tax return or has done so without disclosing his agricultural income, then the tax authorities are obliged to levy, assess and collect agricultural income tax (in spite of the presence of S. 3B) in terms of Ss. 3 & 4 of the Act and R. 14(1) of the Rules.","citation":"KLR 2019 Supreme Court 264","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"27-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":99},{"caseNumber":"C.P.4876\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Mst. Laila Qayum v. Fawad Qayum & others","caseFileName":"C.P._4876_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The plaintiff seeks a negative declaration and one which has nothing to do with his own legal character. To challenge another's adoption or legitimacy of birth does not assert the plaintiff's own legal character. The suit filed by the plaintiff is dismissed.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC  449","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"21-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.137-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yousaf v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._137_L_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"[Per Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, CJ]: Surviving heirs of the victim and not the heirs of the heirs of the victim have the right to compound in Tazir cases under Section 345 Cr.PC.\r\n[Per Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, J, agreeing with his own reasons]: The brothers of the victim were excluded not because they were the heirs of the heirs of the victim but because they were not the heirs of the victim under the Islamic Law of inheritance.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 461","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"21-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":98},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1191\/2017","caseSubject":"Insurance Claims","caseTitle":"Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan v. East West Insurance Company and others","caseFileName":"C.P._1191_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where an insurance company, or the official of an insurance company or complainant is aggrieved by the decision of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, only course available to an aggrieved party is to invoke jurisdiction of judicial review of High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  532","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.809-P\/2018","caseSubject":"Family","caseTitle":"Mir Bat Khan v. Mst. Sherin Bibi & others","caseFileName":"C.P._809_P_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The law and precedents of this Court have stressed the welfare of the minor as the paramount consideration in determining the custody of a minor and to abide by the principles of hizanat unless there are valid reasons not to do so.","citation":"2019   SCMR  520","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"15-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.7\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Islamabad - Rawalpindi Sit-in (Dharna) Case","caseFileName":"S.M.C._7_2017_06022019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2019 Court 318","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-02-2019","fileSizeInBytes":153},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.34-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Khadija Siddiqui v. Shah Hussain, etc.","caseFileName":"Crl.A._34_L_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 261","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":56},{"caseNumber":"C.A.545-K\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(On appeal from the order dated\r\r\n7.4.2009 passed by the Peshawar\r\r\nHigh Court, Peshawar in TR No;43\r\r\nof 2008)","caseFileName":"C.A._545_K_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The contributions received by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees Social Security Institution are taxable as its income.","citation":"2019   SCMR  439","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"26-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1707\/2018","caseSubject":"NAB\/Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Murad Arshad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1707_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The accused under the facts and circumstances of the case cannot be given the benefit of corporate veil when the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (NAO 1999) gives NAB authorities power to pierce the veil of incorporation and nail down the real persons under whose dictate and command affairs of errant corporate entity were conducted and to find out who is the actual and real actor and beneficiary of crime committed under the NAO, 1999.        \r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 250","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"22-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":74},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.134\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Pakistan Bar Council through its Chairman v. Federal Government through Establishment Division and others","caseFileName":"Const.P._134_2012_21012019.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Legal Education Rules of 2015 have an overriding effect and lay down, inter alia, the eligibility criteria for admission to the LL.B. programme, duration of the programme, inspection of law faculties and departments of law colleges for establishing or renewing their qualifying status as affiliates of recognized degree awarding university. Law degree awarding institutions must comply with the guidelines and rules framed by the Bar Councils from time to time.","citation":"2019   SCMR  389","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"21-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":96},{"caseNumber":"C.A.125-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"The Government of Sindh through Secretary Health Department v. Dr. Nadeem Rizvi and others","caseFileName":"C.A._125_K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2020   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"17-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.50\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Civil Aviation Authority v. Supreme Appellate Court Gilgit Baltistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P._50_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 357","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"17-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":451},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.39216-G\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter Slackness in the progress of pending inquiries relating to Fack Bank Account etc","caseFileName":"H.R.C._39216_G_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"This Court had taken Suo Motu notice under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 regarding widespread reports of fake accounts in Summit Bank Limited, Sindh Bank Limited and United Bank Limited. Different directions were issued to JIT and other investigation agencies and the requisite references were directed to be filed in the concerned Accountability Court.","citation":"2019 SCMR 332","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"16-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":81},{"caseNumber":"C.A.585\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Pakistan Airline Pilots and others v. P.I.A. and another","caseFileName":"C.A._585_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The terms and conditions of employment in Pakistan International Airline Corporation (PIAC) are not governed by any statutory provision and the employees are amenable to the Rule of ?Master and Servant?, therefore, Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 cannot be invoked.","citation":"2019 SCMR 278","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"16-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.32642-P\/2018","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(In the matter regarding non-registration of Christian Marriages)","caseFileName":"H.R.C._32642_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Union Councils are directed to register Christian marriages in accordance with law. NADRA is directed to issue computerised marriage certificates in accordance with law. The LG&CD Department and the HR&MA Department of the Government of Punjab are directed to promulgate the necessary rules, etc. and make the necessary amendments in the by-laws, notifications, letters, etc. ","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 280","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"16-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":240},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.24\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"National Commission on Status of Women through its Chairperson, etc v. Govt. of Pakistan through its Secretary Law & Justice, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P._24_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Jirgahs\/panchayats etc. do not operate under the Constitution or any other law whatsoever to the extent that they attempt to adjudicate on civil or criminal matters; however, they may operate within the permissible limits of the law to the extent of acting as arbitration, mediation, negotiation or reconciliation forums between parties involved in a civil dispute who willingly consent to the same. Since no individual or persons in the name of a jirga\/panchayat or under any other name can assume the jurisdiction of a civil or criminal court without any lawful authority; any order, decision or a direction issued by any such individual or group of persons is declared illegal and against the spirit of the Constitution.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 218","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"16-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":136},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.17599\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding Alarming High Population Growth Rate in the Country.","caseFileName":"H.R.C._17599_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019 SCMR 247","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-01-2019","dateCreated":"15-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":111},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1563\/2014","caseSubject":"Company Law\/Appointment of Liquidator\/Receiver","caseTitle":"Shoaib Ullah Cheema v. Additional Registrar of Companies, S.E.C.P.","caseFileName":"C.A._1563_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 10(1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 provides that a winding up order as well as any order passed or decision made by the Company Judge after the winding up of a company should be appealable before the Supreme Court instead of the Division Bench of the High Court. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  306","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2019","dateCreated":"15-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":88},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1509\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/s Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner Inland Revenue (legal) LTU, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1509_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 3 and the First Schedule to the Federal Excise Act, 2005 as well as the First Schedule to the Customs Act, 1969 are statutory provisions. Such provisions can only be amended by an Act of Parliament. Delegated legislation such as a Statutory Regulatory Order (SRO) cannot amend the same.\r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  282","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-10-2018","dateCreated":"15-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":83},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14959-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding Disposal of Infectious Hospital Wastes in KPK","caseFileName":"H.R.C._14959_K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 183 ","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-01-2019","dateCreated":"12-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.8\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Regarding Dual Nationality of Parliamentarians","caseFileName":"S.M.C._8_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 201     ","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2018","dateCreated":"10-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":98},{"caseNumber":"C.A.308\/2008","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"M\/s Oxford University Press v. Commissioner of Income Tax","caseFileName":"C.A._308_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The assessee, the Oxford University Press, claims exemption from tax under clause 86 of Part I of the Second Schedule (\u201cClause 86\u201d) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 for different assessment years in relation to income arising out of its Pakistan operations. Clause 86 comprises of three components (i) any income; (ii) of any university or other educational institution; (iii) established solely for educational purposes and not for purposes of profit. The purpose therefore throughout remains solely educational and not profit. The assessee is, therefore, entitled to the benefit of Clause 86 for all of the assessment years concerned.","citation":"2019  SCMR  235","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2018","dateCreated":"09-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.412\/2014","caseSubject":"Election-Autonomous Bodies\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Olympic Assocation thr. its President v. Nadeem Aftab Sindhu & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._412_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Pakistan Olympic Association is not a person exercising functions in connection with the affairs of the Federation in terms of Article 199(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Constitution. No writ of quo warranto could therefore lie against its office holders nor could a writ lie against the Association in terms of Article 199(1)(a) of the Constitution. \r\n","citation":"2019   SCMR  221","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-01-2019","dateCreated":"01-01-2019","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.10618\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"CMA for Clarification of order dated 31.8.2018 on behalf of  petitioner","caseFileName":"C.M.A._10618_2018_dt_13-12-2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-12-2018","dateCreated":"29-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":163},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.3\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Dual Nationality of Hon'ble Judges and Officials of Courts and Government Officials","caseFileName":"S.M.C._3_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019 P.S.C. 507","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-12-2018","dateCreated":"15-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":1215},{"caseNumber":"C.A.457\/2010","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"M\/s. Dewan Khalid Textile Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU)","caseFileName":"C.A._457_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Since the judgment did not exist at the relevant time it could not ipso facto constitute \u201cdefinite information\u201d in the facts and circumstances of the case. It is only a judgment of a Superior Court as available at the relevant time that can constitute \u201cdefinite information\u201d. No such judgment existed when proceedings were initiated under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and hence there was no \u201cdefinite information\u201d within the meaning of law that would have made it permissible for the Income Tax Officer to reopen the assessment.","citation":"2019   SCMR  158","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2018","dateCreated":"14-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.P.945\/2018","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Farrukh Shahzad v. Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal) RTO, Rawalpindi & others","caseFileName":"C.P._945_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1375","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-04-2018","dateCreated":"08-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":73},{"caseNumber":"C.P.731-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies","caseTitle":"Muhammad Umar Panhwar and others v. Province of Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.P._731_K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Sindh Local Government Act, 2013 does not cater for a situation where a vacancy occurs on account of the demise of the Mayor, Chairman, Vice Chairman or Member of the Union Council or Union Committee and the only possibility open to the Court in such a situation is to direct the Election Commission to hold free and fair election to the said office.","citation":"2019  SCMR 52","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-09-2018","dateCreated":"08-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.423-K\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Direction","caseTitle":"Association for the Welfare of Owner & Staff of Qingqi v. Province of Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.P._423_K_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The State is required to ensure that all public transport vehicles including Qingqi Rickshaws are those which are constructed and manufactured by duly authorized constructors and manufacturers according to the legally specified design, specifications and standards and further ensure that they are fit to ply on roads and are registered with the sanctioned route permit with specified route driven by duly licensed driver. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  1098","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-03-2017","dateCreated":"08-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"C.A.723\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Taxation Officer \/Commissioner of Income Tax\/ Wealth Tax, Lahore v. M\/s. Rupafil Ltd. Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._723_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is now well settled that procedural amendments apply to all cases which have not become past and closed transactions, therefore, the provisions of section 221 of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 have been rightly invoked in the present case. \r\n\r\n\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1131","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-10-2017","dateCreated":"08-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"C.A.634-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Mrs. Khalida Azhar v. Viqar Rustam Bakhshi, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._634_L_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  30","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-12-2018","fileSizeInBytes":75},{"caseNumber":"C.A.42-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/.","caseTitle":"Manzoor Hussain and another v. Khalid Aziz and others","caseFileName":"C.A._42_K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Disputed sale transactions are based on oral statements purportedly made by the deceased before the revenue authorities and allegedly witnessed by persons none of whom was from the side of the deceased. The disputed statements of the witnesses neither contain their CNIC numbers nor their addresses, but only their purported thumb impressions, which show that they were illiterate. None of the witnesses of the disputed statements was examined in Court. Examination of the register of Village Form VII shows that the page that contained one of the two disputed transfer entries was apparently subsequently inserted. It is sufficient to hold that the transaction of sale has not been proved.","citation":"2019   SCMR  70","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-09-2018","dateCreated":"23-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"Crl.R.P.207\/2016","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Hamid Saeed and others v. Govt of Sindh thr Chief Secretary and others","caseFileName":"Crl.R.P._207_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-10-2018","dateCreated":"16-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.36\/2017","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Zulfiqar Ahmed Lilla & others v. Shoukat Hayat, I.G. NHA, Islamabad & another","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P_36_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-10-2018","dateCreated":"16-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3752\/2018","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"The Chairman NAB thr. Prosecutor General, Islamabad v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif","caseFileName":"C.P._3752_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Leave is granted to examine a number of questions including whether in a case where there is a statutory ouster of jurisdiction of courts to grant bail pending appeal, the constitutional jurisdiction to grant bail can be invoked on the same principles or grounds as are available under the general law.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-11-2018","dateCreated":"12-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.632\/2018","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Tallat Ishaq v. NAB thr. its Chairman and another","caseFileName":"C.P._632_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The word \u201cshall\u201d used in section 16(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 is directory in nature. It does not provide that if the stipulated timeframe is not adhered to by Accountability Court in the matter of conclusion of a trial then the prosecution of the accused person would stand terminated and he would be deemed to have been acquitted or that the accused person would be entitled to be admitted to bail on such ground. Ordinarily bail is allowed to an accused person on the ground of delay only where the delay in the trial or the period of custody of the accused person is shocking, unconscionable or inordinate and not otherwise. The primary consideration for grant of bail on the ground of such delay is undue hardship and more often than not prima facie merits of the case against the accused person are also looked into before admitting him to bail on the ground of delay.","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 112","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-10-2018","dateCreated":"12-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":83},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.28\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Regarding Discussion in TV Talk Show with regard to a Sub-judice Matter","caseFileName":"S.M.C._28_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2019 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-07-2018","dateCreated":"08-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":903},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.3654\/2018","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(In the matter regarding appointment of Managing\r\r\nDirector, Pakistan Television Corporation)","caseFileName":"H.R.C._3654_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-11-2018","dateCreated":"08-11-2018","fileSizeInBytes":190},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.39-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mst.Asia Bibi v. The State,etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._39_L_2015_Urdu.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 64","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-10-2018","dateCreated":"31-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":1421},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.39-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Mst.Asia Bibi v. The State,etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._39_L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 64","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-10-2018","dateCreated":"31-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":493},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.693\/2018","caseSubject":"Compromise","caseTitle":"Shafqat @ Shafaat v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A_693_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2019 SC 43","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-10-2018","dateCreated":"30-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":108},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1616\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Muhammad Usman Dar & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1616_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Intervention through a writ in the nature of quo warranto in financial matters against an elected member can only be justified when non-disclosure of an asset is meant to conceal a wrongdoing. As law does not envisage that every rejection of nomination paper on account of non-disclosure of an asset would lead to disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution therefore unless some wrongdoings associated with an undeclared asset is established the outcome of the case would not culminate into disqualification for life.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  2128","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2018","dateCreated":"19-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":69},{"caseNumber":"S.J.C.347\/2018","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Inquiry under article 209 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 against Mr. Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, Judge, Islamabad High Court, Islamabad)","caseFileName":"S.J.C_347_2018.PDF","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2019 P.S.C. 86","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-10-2018","dateCreated":"16-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":12948},{"caseNumber":"C.P.80\/2018","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Malik Khan Muhammad Tareen v. M\/s Nasir & Brother Coal Company thr. its proprietor & others","caseFileName":"C.P._80_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The objections as to territorial jurisdiction unless raised before the Court of first instance ?at the earliest possible opportunity? are not even considered by the Appellate or Revisional Court.","citation":"2018   SCMR  2121","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2018","dateCreated":"16-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.523\/2017","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"The State thr. Regional Director\/Force Commander, A.N.F., Balochistan v. Imam Bakhsh","caseFileName":"Crl.A._523_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Rule 5 of the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001 is directory while Rule 6 is mandatory to the extent that the full protocols ought to be mentioned in the report of the Government Analyst. Non-compliance of Rule 6 will render the report of the Government Analyst inconclusive and unreliable.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  2039","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2018","dateCreated":"12-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":207},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2743\/2017","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Dismissal","caseTitle":"Aurangzaib v. M\/s Medipak (Pvt.) Ltd. and others","caseFileName":"C.P._2743_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Two things need be shown by a person who seeks to bring his claim under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (\u201c1936 Act\u201d): firstly, that he was a \"person employed\", and secondly, that he was employed in either a \"factory\" or an \"industrial establishment\" or a \"commercial establishment\". The Labour Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001 (\u201c2001 Ordinance\u201d) has expanded the scope of the 1936 Act manifold. There never was, and certainly after the 2001 Ordinance no longer is, any requirement that the claimant establish himself to be a \"workman\".\r\n","citation":"2019   PLC  51","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2018","dateCreated":"03-10-2018","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.90-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Adanan v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._90_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The case of the prosecution based on the testimony of three unreliable witnesses of doubtful integrity could not be established beyond reasonable doubt and therefore the conviction and sentence are set aside. Further, the delay in the conclusion of a juvenile's trial before a juvenile court is a ground for his release on bail as provided in section 10 (7) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000. Therefore, considering the provisions of the Ordinance and being mindful that the Constitution envisages \"the protection of women and children\" (clause (3) of Article 25) it would be appropriate to direct that trial of juveniles be concluded by juvenile courts without delay and appeals against conviction be prioritized and expeditiously decided.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 823","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-09-2018","dateCreated":"28-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.169\/2007","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Against the judgment dated 14.10.2016 passed\r\r\nby Sindh High Court, Hyderabad Circuit, in Crl.\r\r\nMisc. Application No.D-430 of 2015","caseFileName":"Crl.P._169_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  418","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-10-2017","dateCreated":"27-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2327\/2016","caseSubject":"Federal Public Service Commission\/Others","caseTitle":"Haider Abbas v. Federal Public Service Commission, thr. its Chairman & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2327_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where a vacancy is created for a particular quota of the group, if the candidate to whom it is allocated fails to avail it then it is to be filled by a candidate of the same category and cannot be allocated to a candidate who is eligible from any of the remaining two categories.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  612","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-01-2017","dateCreated":"27-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1812-L\/2017","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"M\/S Advance Telecome v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._1812_L_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Bilateral agreements cannot be read into the proviso of section 18(5) of the Customs Act. The earlier SRO was not in relation to grant of exemption from regulatory duty on goods covered under Free Trade Agreement. It only imposed regulatory duty on certain items which did not cover goods that were part of Free Trade Agreement. The Government was well within its right to impose regulatory duty on such goods as well at any stage. It was not necessary at all to first withdraw the exception granted earlier in SRO whereby the regulatory duty was imposed only on goods not covered under the Free Trade Agreement.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-07-2017","dateCreated":"27-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.264\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Muhammad Younis v. Financial Adviser & Chief Accounts Officer, Pakistan Railways and another","caseFileName":"C.P._264_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There is bifurcation between pensioners who retired on or before 01.12.2001 and those who retired thereafter which was considered necessary in order to maintain a uniform rise in pension due to the different rate of salaries the ex employees were drawing at the time of their retirement. The distinction between \u2018old pensioners\u2019 and \u2018new pensioners\u2019 is necessary as the quantum of pension is determined keeping in view the difference of pay in different time periods.","citation":"2018   SCMR  784","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-01-2018","dateCreated":"27-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.60-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment","caseTitle":"Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. and others","caseFileName":"C.P._60_K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The choice to initiate and pursue one out of host of available concurrent or co-existent proceeding\/actions or remedy from a forum of competent jurisdiction vests with the suitor. Once choice is exercised and election is made then a suitor is prohibited from launching another proceeding to seek a relief or remedy contrary to what could be claimed and\/or achieved by adopting other proceeding\/action and\/or remedy, which in legal parlance is recognized as doctrine of election. Fair trial does not envisage recourse to successive remedies one after another against one and the same impugned order on substantially same set of facts and pleadings seeking substantially similar relief as it would be against the doctrine of election.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 828","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-07-2018","dateCreated":"27-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1338\/2007","caseSubject":"Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income tax, Islamabad v. M\/s Saudi Pak Fertilizers Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._1338_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No provision of law provided that mere existence of financial obligation in the form of loans would have dis-entitled the company from claiming exemption granted under Clause 170 of Second Schedule to Part I of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  706","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-02-2017","dateCreated":"27-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.57\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Barrister Zafar Ullah Khan v. Federation of Pakistan etc","caseFileName":"Const.P._57_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court directs the Federal and Provincial Governments, the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and all the executive authorities in the country who are responsible or have nexus\/connection with the building of the Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams and all matters connected thereto, to take all necessary steps for the commencement of construction and early completion of said dams. An account shall be established for the time being in the name of the Registrar of the Supreme Court for collecting funds donated by the people of the country for the construction and establishment of the dams.","citation":"2018   SCMR  1621","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-07-2018","dateCreated":"18-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":314},{"caseNumber":"C.A.3\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Medical and Dental Council through its President v. Muhammad Fahad Malik and others","caseFileName":"C.A._3_2018_dt-14-9-2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Council of Common Interest (\"CCI\") has no role in the legislative process with respect to the matters enumerated in the Federal Legislative List, rather it is restricted to formulation and regulation of policies in relation to the said matters, and that too contained only in Part II of such List. Similarly, regulations promulgated in exercise of delegated powers available under the parent statute also do not require the approval of CCI. Pakistan Medical & Dental Council (PMDC) is authorized to monitor the whole process of admission including the centralized admission program. Re-promulgation of Ordinances, especially when the earlier ones were either not approved or disapproved by Parliament, is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of democratic legislative processes. Any amendment\/ insertion\/substitution made by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 and Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 (\"the Amending Ordinances\") in the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962 (\"the Ordinance\") did not survive after the Amending Ordinances lapsed\/were repealed, and the Ordinance stood revived and the Council constituted thereunder had ceased to exist and MBBS and BDS (Admissions, House job and Internship) Regulations, 2016 framed under S. 33 of the Ordinance by the Council constituted under S. 3 thereof, both of which were substituted by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015, also ceased to exist having been illegally and invalidly framed. An ad hoc Council shall remain functional and intact after which fresh elections shall be conducted in accordance with law. ","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  1956","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-01-2018","dateCreated":"14-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":142},{"caseNumber":"C.P.661-K\/2015","caseSubject":"Admiralty and Maritime Laws","caseTitle":"Bourbon Maritime (Pvt) Ltd. v. M.V. Salaj and others","caseFileName":"C.P._661_K_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1828","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-09-2018","dateCreated":"12-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":101},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.134\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Pakistan Bar Council through its Chairman v. Federal Government through Establishment Division and others","caseFileName":"Const.P._134_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A number of directions for maintaining professional standards of legal education are issued.","citation":"2018   SCMR  1891","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"07-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":72},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.39216-G\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter Slackness in the progress of pending inquiries relating to Fack Bank Account etc","caseFileName":"H.R.C.39216_G_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A Joint Investigation Team is formed for the purpose of conducting a thorough, in depth and incisive investigation and probe into the matter of fake bank accounts subject matter of the proceedings to get to the truth. ","citation":"2019 SCMR 332","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2019","dateCreated":"06-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.A.700\/2017","caseSubject":"Cases Relating to PEMRA ","caseTitle":"MAG Entertainment (Pvt) Ltd. v. Independent Newspapers Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. and others","caseFileName":"C.A._700_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 23 of the PEMRA Ordinance confers upon PEMRA a duty to ensure that undue concentration of media ownership is not created and Section 39(e) of the Ordinance allows PEMRA to frame rules with respect to defining the circumstances constituting undue concentration of media ownership and abuse of powers and anti-competitive practices by media companies. As the regulator, PEMRA is best placed to assess ?media market?. Article 18 of the Constitution allows for the regulation of businesses which may be in the form of licenses carrying certain conditions to protect the public interest.","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  1807","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-05-2018","dateCreated":"03-09-2018","fileSizeInBytes":98},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.74\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(1)","caseTitle":"Dr. Farhat Javed Siddique v. Govt. of Pakistan etc.","caseFileName":"Const.P._74_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where the right of Overseas Pakistanis to vote already exists as per the law and is duly recognized, it must necessarily be given due effect. The mechanism of internet voting is prima facie found to be safe, reliable and effective for being utilized in pilot project i.e. bye-elections.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 788","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-08-2018","dateCreated":"28-08-2018","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"C.A.552\/2015","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Habib Bank Ltd v. WRSM Trading Company, LLC & others","caseFileName":"C.A._552_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The factors to be considered by a special court before the assumption of jurisdiction are firstly whether it has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the lis and secondly whether the parties to the lis are subject to its jurisdiction. When the appellant bank and the respondents are present in Pakistan then it is the courts in Pakistan which must assume jurisdiction. The primary consideration before the Court must be where the ends of justice in the case will be best served. The governing law at the time unequivocally recognised interest based loans as being legally binding and treated the same as recoverable under the law, therefore, the assertion that the transaction(s) in question were void under Section 23 of the Contract Act for not having a lawful purpose, is entirely flawed and illogical.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 795","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-07-2018","dateCreated":"28-08-2018","fileSizeInBytes":81},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1475\/2007","caseSubject":"Tax\/Excise Duty","caseTitle":"Al- Noor Sugar Mills Ltd. & another v. Fed. of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1475_2007.PDF","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Notification which is prospective in operation will not breach a party's vested right of availing incentive of exemption under a previous notification. Notification (taking away the right of exemption) cannot apply to past and closed transactions.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1792","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-02-2018","dateCreated":"16-08-2018","fileSizeInBytes":17650},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.26\/2007","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Deadbeats got loans of 54 billions written off","caseFileName":"S.M.C._26_2007_02082018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018 P.S.C. 1369","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-08-2018","dateCreated":"10-08-2018","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.9\/2018","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Suo Moto contempt proceeding initiated against Mr. Talal Chaudhry, State Minister on account of derogatory and contemptuous speeches\/statements at public gathering in respect of this Hon'ble Court telecast by different T.V channels.","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P._09_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2018 SC 773","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-07-2018","dateCreated":"02-08-2018","fileSizeInBytes":115},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2853\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-2018\/Nomination Papers Dispute","caseTitle":"Sardar Confcius Imam Qasrani v. Sardar Mir Badshah Khan Qaisarani & another","caseFileName":"C.P._2853_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Leave is granted to examine the question whether the respondent is not qualified to contest the election in view of the order of this Court dated 18.07.2013 which constitutes a declaration in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2018","dateCreated":"23-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2814\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-2018\/Nomination Papers Dispute","caseTitle":"Waseem Zafar Jutt, Chak No.66\/E.B Tehsil Arifwala, Dist.Pakpattan Sharif. v. Mian Muhammaed Amjad Joya & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2814_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Leave is granted to examine the question whether an appeal can be filed by a candidate against acceptance of the nomination papers of an opposing candidate in terms of section 63 of the Elections Act, 2017.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2018","dateCreated":"23-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2790\/2018","caseSubject":"Election-2018\/Nomination Papers Dispute","caseTitle":"Hamza Rasheed Khan v. Election Appellate Tribunal, Lahore High Court, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2790_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Leave is granted to examine the questions: i) Whether the order of this Court dated 18.07.2013 constitutes a declaration in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution, ii) Whether acquittal in criminal proceedings launched pursuant to afore-said order would washout the earlier observations purporting to be a declaration in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution? and iii) Whether a candidate who has withdrawn his nomination papers can file a writ petition against the order dismissing the appeal filed against acceptance of the nomination papers of an opposing candidate?\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2018","dateCreated":"23-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.26\/2007","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Deadbeats got loans of 54 billions written off","caseFileName":"S.M.C._26_2007_04072018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018 P.S.C. 1369","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-04-2018","dateCreated":"19-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C. 26\/2007","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Deadbeats got loans 54 billions written off)","caseFileName":"S.M.C._ 26_2007_30062018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018 P.S.C. 1369","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-06-2018","dateCreated":"19-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6309\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Advertisement by UBL and HBL regarding raising of Funds for Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dam by the Government of Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.M.A.6309_2018_14072018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Some modifications are made in the Order delivered in the matter of collection and raising of Funds for Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-07-2018","dateCreated":"14-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3728\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Syed Liaqat Shah v. The Vice Chancellor, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar & another","caseFileName":"C.P._3728_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where wrongdoing of a contractual employee comes to light, who is governed by the principle of \"Master and Servant\", he can be relieved of his service first and inquiry into his wrongdoings can commence thereafter. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1661","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-09-2018","dateCreated":"13-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1203\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"WAPDA thr. its Chairman & another v. Mst. Parizada","caseFileName":"C.A._1203_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The widow of the deceased who was not a work charge employee and had been working on a permanent post in WAPDA for 9 years and 8 months until his death was entitled to receive pension.","citation":"2018   SCMR  1542","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-11-2018","dateCreated":"13-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1178\/2008","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"Haji Baz Muhammad and another v. Noor Ali and another","caseFileName":"C.A._1178_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once a party novates a contract then enforcement of the earlier agreement cannot be sought in terms of Section 62 of the Contract Act unless it is expressly stipulated in the fresh agreement that his rights in the original agreement will not be prejudiced.","citation":"2018   SCMR  1586","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-05-2018","dateCreated":"13-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.85-K\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Direction","caseTitle":"M\/s J & S Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Gulzar Ahmed and others","caseFileName":"C.A._85_K_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The 1990 Agreement, which provides that employee became redundant can be employed somewhere else and not to make redundant, must be read as a whole and interpreted in the light of well-established rules. When so considered, it appears that the agreement was intended to deal with certain immediate issues of concern peculiar to Jang Karachi. It was not intended to be an omnibus agreement, applicable generally to the workmen of the Jang Group.\r\nThe termination of services of a newspaper employee, who is a workman, for the reason that his services have become redundant because of modernization or technological changes and developments is a ?good cause? within the meaning of s. 4. It would certainly appear to be a valid ground for terminating the services of a workman in terms of the 1968 Ordinance and the 1969 Ordinance. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1626","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-06-2018","dateCreated":"13-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6155\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Advertisement by UBL and HBL regarding raising of Funds for Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dam by the Government of Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.M.A._6155_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Matters related to collection of donations for construction of dams in the country are discussed. The Court also observes that the contributions made for the purpose are to be treated as contributions towards charitable purposes not liable to any tax or duty.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-11-2018","dateCreated":"11-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.57\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Barrister Zafar Ullah Khan v. Federation of Pakistan etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.57 _2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Federal and Provincial Governments, WAPDA and all the Executive Authorities in Pakistan who are responsible or have nexus\/connection with the building of the Diamer Bhasha and Mohmand Dams and all matters connected thereto are directed to take all necessary steps for the commencement of construction and early completion of these dams. Further, an account, for the time being in the name of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, shall be established for collecting funds donated by the people of Pakistan for the construction and establishment of the aforementioned dams.","citation":"2018   SCMR  1621","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-04-2018","dateCreated":"05-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.401\/2011","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sadiq & others v. Muhammad Mansha & others","caseFileName":"C.A.401_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The existence of the mortgage has no bearing on the question of limitation for the specific enforcement of the agreement to sell. Limitation in such cases begins to run from the date of performance as given in the agreement as stipulated by the first limb of Article 113. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 692","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-05-2018","dateCreated":"03-07-2018","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.A.116-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue v. Pakistan Beverages Limited","caseFileName":"C.A._116_K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Munib Akhtar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Power under Section 40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 has been granted to ?monitor? the ?production, sale of taxable goods and stock positions? of a registered person or class of such persons, by posting Inland Revenue officers at the relevant premises but the monitoring can only be for some object, ground or purpose that is legitimately and lawfully within the contemplation of the 1990 Act. The proviso to the section itself identifies two such situations, namely sales tax evasion and tax fraud, but this monitoring is not for indefinite period. When the purpose is served it should end.  ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1544","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-06-2018","dateCreated":"30-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.3\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Compounding of Offences in the Light of Section 345(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure","caseFileName":"S.M.C._03_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2018 SC 703","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-06-2018","dateCreated":"29-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.420\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Fake Degree","caseTitle":"Mst. Sumaira Malik v. Malik Umar Aslam Awan & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._420_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUNIB AKHTAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The standard of proof in election matters is much higher than the civil standard (balance of probabilities) though short of the criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt). Recourse by the Court to Article 84 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 for visual examination of photographs and signatures was contrary to the dictates of the requisite standard of proof. The Court sets aside the judgment under review and directs that the petitioner shall be entitled to file her nomination papers if she intends to contest in any of the future elections.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1432","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-09-2018","dateCreated":"29-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1171\/2017","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"M\/s. Searle IV Solution (Pvt) Limited. v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1171_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Single Bench of the Sindh High Court, regardless of what jurisdiction it exercises, is a \"High Court\" and hence falls outside the ambit of the ouster clause in S. 217(2) of the Customs Act, 1969. Further, the Single Bench of the Sindh High Court at Karachi may take cognizance of any suit arising out of an action\/order of the tax authorities\/Customs Officers but such jurisdiction must be sparingly exercised by the Single Bench and the suits must be expeditiously decided within the period of one year or less so that these suits are not used by aggrieved parties as a means to deprive the public exchequer of the taxes due for years on the basis of interim injunctions.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1444","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-06-2018","dateCreated":"27-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.10-K\/2007","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter regarding removal of unauthorized encroachment & used of Land in the Zulfiqarabad oil Terminal","caseFileName":"H.R.C._10_K_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"KLR 2019 Supreme Court 90","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-06-2018","dateCreated":"22-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":167},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.2\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Maintaining of Foreign Accounts by Pakistani Citizens Without Disclosing the Same\/Paying Taxes","caseFileName":"S.M.C._2_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2018 SC 686","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2018","dateCreated":"22-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"J.P.298\/2018","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Imran Ali v. The State","caseFileName":"J.P._298_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1372","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2018","dateCreated":"13-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.467\/2015","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Section 78 and 83 of ROPA","caseTitle":"Malik Shakeel Awan v. Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"C.A._467_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Respondent No. 1 has perhaps declared a little more land than as alleged by the Appellant, thus, he can hardly be accused of concealing any asset. The conclusion drawn by the Election Tribunal that there was no concealment of agricultural land in the Nomination Papers filed by Respondent No. 1 is based on a correct and judicious appreciation of the evidence available on the record and in accordance with the law as laid down by this Court. Appeal is dismissed. ","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 643","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-06-2018","dateCreated":"13-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":1299},{"caseNumber":"C.A.56-L\/2018","caseSubject":"Election\/.","caseTitle":"Speaker National Assembly of Pakistan, Islamabad v. Habib Akram, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._56_L_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Comparing Nomination Forms for candidates of NA and PA issued in terms of Election Act, 2017 with those issued in terms of ROPA, 1976, it appears that the omissions would facilitate the determination of the qualification or disqualification of a candidate and would lead to greater transparency regarding the credentials of a candidate facilitating the electorate in making a more informative choice and therefore the candidates are required to submit an affidavit disclosing the requisite information omitted by the Elections Act, 2017 along with the nomination papers with RO failing which would render the Nomination Papers incomplete and liable to rejection.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 678","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2018","dateCreated":"06-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":60},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.01\/2007","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"INTRA COURT APPEALS NO.1 TO 5 OF 2007 IN S.M.C NO. 1 OF 2007","caseFileName":"I.C.A._01_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018 SCMR 1385","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-05-2018","dateCreated":"06-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":2389},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1189\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another","caseFileName":"C.A._1189_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The right to claim pension is a right connected with the tenure of service which under the applicable pension rules has to be served by an employee in order to make him eligible for pension. Where a deceased employee has put in pensionable service, only then his family becomes entitled to pension. ","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  1272","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-06-2018","dateCreated":"01-06-2018","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.242\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Dr. Ahmed Ali Shah v. Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi and others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._242_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There was no specific provision in the nomination papers that required the petitioners to disclose dual citizenship and there was no apparent mens rea or intent on their part to defraud or deceive the authorities at the time of filing of nomination papers for elections to the Parliament\/Provincial Assemblies. As such, prima facie there is inadequate material on the record to merit a finding of guilt regarding corrupt practices in terms of section 78 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 or other offences under Pakistan Penal Code as has been held in the order sought to be reviewed. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1276","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-02-2018","dateCreated":"25-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":133},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1950\/2007","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Government of Pakistan thr. the Secy. Revenue Division\/CBR House & others v. Muhammad Junaid Talat","caseFileName":"C.A._1950_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Only specific information, bringing to light the income of an assessee which he has concealed and thereby increasing tax liability of the assessee beyond his declared income or reducing his declared loss, would amount to detection of tax evasion qualifying the informant to claim reward and not otherwise.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1305","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-07-2018","dateCreated":"24-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.10842-P\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Regarding Alleged Encounter of Mohsin son of Mushtaq by Punjab Police","caseFileName":"H.R.C._10842_P_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, ACJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 595","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-05-2018","dateCreated":"23-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":189},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1083\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Raja Shaukat Aziz Bhatti v. Major (R) Iftikhar Mehmood Kayani","caseFileName":"C.A._1083_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Appellant\/Petitioner had given a false affidavit with his Nomination Papers while contesting the elections held in 2008. Filing of an affidavit with the Nomination Papers was the requirement of the law (RoPA) and the motive for filing of false affidavit was to enter the Provincial Assembly by unfair means by making false representation regarding the required educational qualification. Thus, the Appellant\/Petitioner was not honest and ameen in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the \r\nConstitution and such lack of qualification continuous, so as to disentitle the Appellant\/Petitioner from being a candidate for or being a Member of the Parliament or the Provincial Assembly.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 578","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-05-2018","dateCreated":"22-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":136},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.4\/2017","caseSubject":"Against Interim Order","caseTitle":"Akhter Umar Hayat Lalayka v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sukhaira & others","caseFileName":"I.C.A._4_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1218","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-05-2018","dateCreated":"22-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":170},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.20171-B\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the matter of non-payment of compensatition to victims of  terrorist attack on church in Quetta on 17.12.2017","caseFileName":"H.R.C._20171_B_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Deputy Commissioner Quetta is directed to immediately transmit the amount of compensation, announced by the Federal and Provincial Governments for the affectees of a suicide terrorist attack that took place in the Methodist Church at Quetta, lying in his account to the account of the Sessions Judge Quetta who is directed to ensure that all the applications of the legal heirs are decided within a period of one month from today. As soon as such applications are decided, he shall supervise and ensure that disbursement is made immediately to those found entitled. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-11-2018","dateCreated":"11-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.29\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and Justice, Islamabad.","caseFileName":"Const.P._29_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) is a unique forum created by the Constitution. It is not a Court but more akin to a Domestic Disciplinary Tribunal whose proceedings are administrative in nature and recommendatory in effect, but its findings have an element of conclusiveness. Paragraphs 7 and 13 of the SJC Procedure of Enquiry, 2005 are intra vires to the Constitution. The process of determination whether any prima facie case has been made for proceedings under Article 209 of the Constitution should be held in camera and the subsequent proceedings should also be held in camera unless the person being inquired into waives such right. However, in camera proceedings are not alien to our jurisprudence and can always be resorted to by the SJC even in the absence of the consent of the parties for well defined reasons.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 538","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-03-2018","dateCreated":"10-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":232},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3122\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies","caseTitle":"Malik Ameer Haider Sangha and another v. Mrs. Sumaira Malik and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3122_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission has the power to order a re-poll before it has issued the notification declaring the winning candidate. When the integrity of the vote is compromised, fresh elections must be held. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1166","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-08-2018","dateCreated":"08-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":52},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.57\/2015","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asjad Abbasi & others v. Iqbal Muhammad Chauhan & others","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P_57_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  2051","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2018","dateCreated":"04-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":523},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3854\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/.","caseTitle":"MATTER REGARDING NON-IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT WITH RESPECT TO DEMARCATION OF PROPERTY","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3854_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The exchange of land purportedly encroached by Bahria Town and the Forest Department and attestation of mutations in this behalf being based on erroneous assumption about the area is against law and the record and as such of no effect. Forest Department, Revenue Department and Survey of Pakistan are directed to conduct a fresh demarcation after giving notices to Forest Department and Bahria Town. ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1864","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2018","dateCreated":"04-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":85},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.376-K\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application against the illegal adjustment in Revenue Record Land is being given to Baheria Foundation, filed by Syed Mehmood Akhter Naqvi","caseFileName":"C.M.A._376-K_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The grant of the land to Malir Development Authority, its exchange with the land of the Bahria Town and anything done pursuant thereto being against the provisions of Colonization of Government Lands Act 1912 (\u201cCOGLA 1912\u201d) and statement of conditions are void ab initio and as such have no existence. The government land would go back to the government and the land of the Bahria Town exchanged for the government land would go back to the Bahria Town. Since a great deal of work has been done by the Bahria Town and a third-party interest has been created in favour of hundreds of allotees, the land could be granted to the Bahria Town afresh by the Board of Revenue under the provisions of COGLA 1912 and the questions in this regard will be determined by the implementation bench of this Court. National Accountability Bureau shall take its investigation to its logical end. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 468","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2018","dateCreated":"04-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":338},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3131\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Eligibility of Candidature","caseTitle":"Sher Alam Khan v. Abdul Munim and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3131_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"If a person suffering from a pre-election disqualification or lack of qualification slips through the cracks and no objection is raised before the Returning Officer, no complaint is made to the ECP in terms of Section 103AA of Representation of People Act of 1976 within the time specified therefor and no Election Petition filed before the learned Election Tribunal then the inherent disqualification of such person is obviously not cured nor can it be said that by mere absence of a challenge he acquires the qualification by lapse of time. In such circumstances, where unqualified or disqualified person manages to escape through the net and trespass into the Majlis-e-Shoora or the Provincial Assembly, the Constitutional jurisdiction of the learned High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution and of this Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution can always be invoked.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 449","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-02-2018","dateCreated":"04-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":111},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1628\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies\/Recounting of Votes","caseTitle":"Ch. Zulfiqar Ali Ranjha and another v. Zia Ullah Ranjha and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1628_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A ballot paper warrants out-right exclusion from the count if the signature as well as the official mark, both, are missing. In case only one of the two requirements exists and yet the final tally of votes cast at a polling station exceeds the number of ballot papers issued to the voters then too such ballot-papers should be excluded from the vote-count as excess of votes upon their count establishes that bogus voting has taken place.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  1036","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-05-2018","dateCreated":"04-05-2018","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.17842\/2018","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(in the matter regarding removing educational and\r\r\ncommercial buildings etc. from cantonments areas\r\r\nin Pakistan)","caseFileName":"H.R.C._17842_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2018","dateCreated":"27-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.7\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Islamabad - Rawalpindi Sit-in (Dharna) Case","caseFileName":"S.M.C._7_2017_dt_25-04-2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2019 Court 318","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"25-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":138},{"caseNumber":"C.P.536\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Dr. Ikramullah Khan v. The KPK, Agricultural University Peshawar thr. its V.C. & others","caseFileName":"C.P._536_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1191","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2018","dateCreated":"25-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":123},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2537\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Termination from Service","caseTitle":"Ikhlaq Ahmad v. Chief Secretary, Punjab, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2537_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974 (\u201cthe Rules\u201d) were made \"in exercise of the powers conferred by section 23\" of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 (\u201cthe Act\u201d). However, section 23(1) of the Act restricts the making of such rules \"for carrying out the purpose of this Act.\" The Act mentions the appointment, probation and confirmation of civil servants (sections 4, 5 and 6 respectively) but it does not stipulate, nor envisages, the contravention or abandonment of these provisions. Subordinate legislation cannot contravene the law, however, the manner in which rule 23 of the Rules was applied to induct the petitioners as regular civil servants did just that.\r\n","citation":"2018 SCMR 1120","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-04-2018","dateCreated":"24-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":96},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.10\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Regarding Judgment passed by the learned Lahore High Court temporarily barring TV Channels from Broadcasting Anti-Judiciary Speeches v. .","caseFileName":"S.M.C._10_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-04-2018","dateCreated":"17-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.233\/2015","caseSubject":"Election-Provincial Assembly\/Eligibility of Candidature","caseTitle":"Sami Ullah Baloch v. Abdul Karim Nousherwani & others","caseFileName":"C.A._233_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The incapacity created for failing to meet the qualifications under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution imposes a permanent bar which remains in effect so long as the declaratory judgment supporting the conclusion of one of the delinquent kinds of conduct under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution remains in effect.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 405","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2018","dateCreated":"13-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":528},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.70\/2018","caseSubject":"Misc. Appeal Against the order of The Registrar","caseTitle":"Khan Muhammad Khan v. Islamic Republic of Pak thr. President of Pak & Others.","caseFileName":"C.R.P._70_2018_dt_7_4_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No merit is found in the review petitions which are accordingly dismissed but with one clarification that the implementation shall be made with regard to the persons who have been retired\/retrenched by the respective Banks but the same shall not be done regarding the persons who left the Banks on the basis of the Golden Handshake Scheme.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2018","dateCreated":"07-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":231},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.5\/2018","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Regarding Payment of Outstanding Salaries to Reporters\/Workers of Print and Electronic Media","caseFileName":"S.M.C.5_2018_dt_6-4-2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-04-2018","dateCreated":"06-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":171},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2148\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue, Audit Range, Zone-I v. M\/S Eden Builders Limited through Mr. Mazahir Beg, General Manager (Operations)","caseFileName":"C.A._2148_2016_dt_4-4-2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Taxpayers who filed their tax returns before S. 122(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was amended through the Finance Act 2009 would be governed by S. 122(2) as it stood before the said amendment\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  991","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-04-2018","dateCreated":"04-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":253},{"caseNumber":"C.A.633\/2007","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Pakistan through Chairman F.B.R. & others v. Hazrat Hussain","caseFileName":"C.A._633_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Constitution itself grants a complete immunity for, and in relation to, sales tax and income tax in FATA\/PATA.","citation":"2018   SCMR  939","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2017","dateCreated":"03-04-2018","fileSizeInBytes":120},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1583\/2014","caseSubject":"Vires of Act of Parliament\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1583_201.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The workers of the establishments\/industries functioning in the Islamabad Capital Territory or carrying on business in more than one provinces shall be governed by the Federal legislation i.e. Industrial Relations Act, 2012, whereas, the workers of the establishments\/industries functioning or carrying on business only within the territorial limits of a province shall be governed by the concerned provincial legislations. \r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  802","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-03-2018","dateCreated":"28-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":254},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1011\/2017","caseSubject":"Habeas Corpus","caseTitle":"Mirjam Aberras Lahdeaho v. Station House Officer, Police Station Chung, Lahore and another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1011_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  427","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":174},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.630\/2017","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Kausar Mehmood Qureshi v. The RPO, Rawalpindi and others","caseFileName":"Crl.P._630_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-10-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":575},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.105\/2017","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Imtiaz Ahmed\t v. The State thr. Special Prosecutor, ANF","caseFileName":"Crl.P._105_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1194","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-03-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.466\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Saleem v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._466_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When a person is implicated in a case for committing murder at a place where he was not present, the most important question that is put to the prosecution witnesses in cross-examination is that the accused at the time of the incident was not even present in the locality.","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  1001","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-02-2018","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.97\/2017","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Faisal v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._97_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appeal is partly allowed and the sentence of life imprisonment of the appellant is converted to the one already undergone, leaving intact the amount of compensation to be paid to the legal heirs of the deceased or in default to undergo six months S.I. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-05-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":240},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.1-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jibran Nasir and others v. The State and others","caseFileName":"CRL.A._1-K_2018_21032018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 351","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2018","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":144},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.125\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Rashid Ali Channa & others v. Muhammad Junaid Farooqui etc.","caseFileName":"C.R.P._125_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"For the reasons to be recorded later, these Civil Review Petitions are dismissed.","citation":"2017   SCMR  1519","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-05-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3874\/2016","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Rai Muhammad Khan v. NAB thr. its Chairman and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3874_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The accused is alleged to have misused his public office by misappropriating millions of rupees allocated by the Government for constructions of roads, through fake and bogus completion bills while in fact no work was done on the site. The bail is refused.\r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  1152","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-03-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3451\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Allowances","caseTitle":"Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) thr. its Chairman, WAPDA House, Lahore & others v. Raja Iftikhar Ahmed","caseFileName":"C.P._3451_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The conduct of the petitioner-department (WAPDA) of not implementing the judgment of the court is deprecated and special cost of Rs.50,000\/- is imposed on the Chairman of WAPDA to be paid by him out of his own pocket.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  394","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3078\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafiullah & others v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd (ZTBL) thr. its President, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3078_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  598","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-11-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":142},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3068\/2017","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment","caseTitle":"Muhammad Iqbal Haider v. 1st Additional District Judge, Karachi and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3068_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner has nobody but himself to blame if his defence was struck off on account of his admitted failure to comply with the order of deposit of rent passed by the Rent Controller which was upheld up to the Supreme Court.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 35","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-09-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":116},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2064\/2016","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Siraj Ahmed thr. LRs v. Faysal Bank Ltd, Bahawalpur & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2064_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court remands the case to the Executing Court (Banking Court) due to legal and procedural errors in execution proceedings with the direction that a fresh auction shall be conducted in accordance with law after fixing reserve price for the property.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 91","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-12-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1885\/2017","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Olas Khan v. NAB thr. its Chairman and others","caseFileName":"C.P._1885_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"PC-1, all the work orders, cheques, monitoring reports etc. placed on record were signed and issued by petitioner Olas Khan during his tenure as the Project Director of a government scheme. He, in the given circumstances, is not entitled to bail. In the other petition, NAB was not able to show any extraordinary or exceptional circumstances that may warrant recall of the order of the grant of bail by the High Court to respondent Saibzada Alamgir. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 40","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-10-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":464},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1424\/2016","caseSubject":"Federal Public Service Commission\/Others","caseTitle":"Federal Public Service Commission thr. its Secretary v. Anwar ul Haq","caseFileName":"C.P._1424_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Upgradation is not a promotion. It is resorted only for the incumbents of isolated posts, which have no avenues or channel of promotion at all. Upgradation under the scheme is personal to the incumbents of the isolated posts, to address stagnation and frustration of incumbent on a particular post for sufficient length of service without any progression or avenue of promotion. Upgradation by no standards could be treated and or considered as promotion to higher grade. \r\n\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  890","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2016","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":71},{"caseNumber":"C.P.481-K\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Premier Barrtery Industries (Pvt) Ltd v. Karachi Water & Seawerage Board and another","caseFileName":"C.P._481-K_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  365","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":205},{"caseNumber":"C.P.423-K\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Direction","caseTitle":"Association for the Welfare of Owner & Staff of Qingqi v. Province of Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.P._423-K_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1098","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-03-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"C.P.216-Q\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Jahanzaib Malik v. Balochistan Public Procurement Regulatory  Authority  through  its  Chairman Board of Director  B-PPRa (Chief Secretary GOB) &  others","caseFileName":"C.P._216-Q_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  414","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-01-2018","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":237},{"caseNumber":"C.P.41\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Secretary Establishment, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad v. Aftab Ahmed Manika & others","caseFileName":"C.P._41_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court is not ousted in matters pertaining to appointment of a civil servant to a particular post or to be promoted to a higher grade. The appointing Authority has to make promotions in basic pay scales 20 and 21 only upon the recommendations of the Central Selection Board. Yet the law does not provide that the recommendations of the Board are binding and consequently be returned by the appointing Authority only when the procedure followed by the Board suffers from any factual or legal flaw.  ","citation":"2015   SCMR  1006","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-04-2015","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":201},{"caseNumber":"C.A.826\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Government of the Punjab through Ministry of Finance,Civil Secretariat,Lahore,etc v. Malik Zaheer Abbas","caseFileName":"C.A._826_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A convict transferred to Pakistan under the Transfer of Offenders Ordinance, 2002 would be governed by the laws of Pakistan as if it were a sentence imposed by a Court in Pakistan. Pardon\/remissions in the sentence of imprisonment awarded to an offender can also be granted\/extended to him under the Laws of Pakistan. He can also claim remission to which he became entitled to on the date of his transfer in accordance with law relating to the remissions of sentence in such specified country. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  1514","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-04-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.A.800\/2011","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Permanent Injunction","caseTitle":"Mrs. Yawar Azhar Waheed (decd) thr: her LRs v. Khalid Hussain & others","caseFileName":"C.A._800_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  76","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-10-2017","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.A.521\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Commandant, Frontier Constabulary, KPK, Peshawar v. Gul Raqib Khan","caseFileName":"C.A._521_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The employees of the Frontier Constabulary are civil servants and an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal is available to them as the exclusive remedy under the law in a matter relating to the terms and conditions of service.","citation":"2018   SCMR  903","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-01-2018","dateCreated":"21-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.100\/2017","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Ayesha Bibi v. The Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore and others","caseFileName":"Crl.P._100_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  791","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-03-2018","dateCreated":"15-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.27\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax, Karachi v. International Power Global Development Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._27_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The expense incurred on establishing recreational facility for employees is neither part of perk and privilege paid to the employees under contractual obligation nor has direct nexus with the generation of the employer?s income; hence, the same cannot be taken into consideration while computing business income of the employer. Only such allowances and deductions were permissible which in some manner had nexus with the income that was derived from a business or profession.","citation":"2018   SCMR  963","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-02-2018","dateCreated":"08-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"C.A.334\/2004","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Army Welfare Sugar Mills v. Government of Sindh through Secretary Agricultural and others","caseFileName":"C.A._334_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The concept of quality premium is nothing but an additional price which becomes payable to the growers only when a sugar mill achieves sucrose recovery level that crosses the base recovery level of 8.7%. The reason to fix the base recovery level at 8.7% for the purposes of determining the rate of quality premium is that this 8.7% is also taken as base level for fixing the sugarcane procurement price under the sugarcane price fixation formula. Obviously then the quality premium becomes payable for each 0.1% of excess recovery of sucrose achieved by a sugar mill over and above the base recovery level of 8.7%. The only situation when an increase in the rate of ?quality premium? can conceivably be called in question is when it can be demonstrated that revision in the rate of quality premium does not commiserate with the revision in the minimum procurement price of sugarcane. In the present case, as the revision of rate of quality premium was only 1.38% of the sugarcane price for each decimal point increase, there appears to be no logical reason in denying the growers their due share in facilitating the mills in achieving higher than the base sucrose recovery level which invariably results in higher sugar production. The payment of quality premium on sucrose recovery level which is over and above the base level of 8.7% is not something which can be said to be some kind of benevolence or is bereft of any consideration. This right to pay quality premium created under Clause (v) of Section 16 of the Act is based upon intelligible criteria and, therefore, cannot be regarded as confiscatory so as to question its vires.","citation":"2018   SCMR  727","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-03-2018","dateCreated":"05-03-2018","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Action taken on the advertisements in various print and electronic media regarding projects\/works done by the Governments of Punjab, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)","caseFileName":"s.m.c._dt_28-02-2018.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":91},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.20\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF RETIREMENT BENEFITS BY THE RELEVANT DEPARTMENTS","caseFileName":"S.M.C._20_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018 SCMR 736","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-02-2018","dateCreated":"27-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":97},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.37\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Cabinet Division,","caseFileName":"Const.P._37_2017_dt_21_2_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 370","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-02-2018","dateCreated":"21-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":121},{"caseNumber":"C.A.539\/2003","caseSubject":"Company Law","caseTitle":"Gerrys International (Pvt) Ltd v. Aeroflot Russian International Airlines","caseFileName":"C.A._539_2003.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  662","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-01-2018","dateCreated":"20-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":115},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2215\/2006","caseSubject":"Evacuee Trust Property","caseTitle":"Younus Habib & others v. Imranur Rashid & others","caseFileName":"C.A._2215_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Exemption was granted to the Federal Government for the acquiring of evacuee land under section 12(3)(b) of the Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Ordinance, 1949, and hence the acquisition of a part of the disputed land by the Federal Government was in accordance with the law. The remaining land, which was evacuee trust property for all legal purposes after the promulgation of the Martial Law Regulation No. 57 (MLR 57), was legally and validly transferred\/sold by the Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB) to the Karachi Development Authority (KDA) in accordance with section 4(d) of the ETP Act, 1957.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  705","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2018","dateCreated":"17-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":502},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1703\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Shahid Anwar Bajwa v. S.M. Asif & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1703_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A retired Judge of the High Court is not entitled to practice before the same High Court and the bar on a person who has been a permanent Judge of a High Court as contained under Article 207 (3) (b) of the Constitution is not limited only to the courts which are under the administrative control of the High Court but it also includes the High Court.\r\n","citation":" \nPLD 2018 SC 337","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-01-2018","dateCreated":"13-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"C.A.542-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Al-Haj Deewan Bakhtiyar Syed Muhammad v. Deewan Maudood Masood","caseFileName":"C.A._542-L_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A sajjadanashin may not necessarily be a mutawali. The latter post is an exclusively secular one limited to the matters of management of the shrine alone, whereas on the shoulders of the sajjadanashin rests the responsibility of the spiritual functions of guidance of the mureeds and the performance of rasoomaat etc., which require a person of outstanding character and one capable of leading the community and inspiring the mureeds. Thus this post and the nomination for the same carries immense importance in the hearts of a substantial section of the public and their spiritual guidance\/rejuvenation\/beliefs rest in the customs and rituals of the shrine, the person who guides these in his capacity as sajjadanashin must therefore be one who is rightfully entitled to the same on the basis of the express declaration\/nomination of the Dewan\/sajjadanashin who preceded him.","citation":" \nPLD 2018 SC 343","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2018","dateCreated":"13-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"SUO MOTU ACTION TAKEN UP IN COURT","caseFileName":"suo_motu_in_court.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2018","dateCreated":"12-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.154\/2017","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Contempt proceedings against Senator Nihal Hashmi.","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P._154_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  556","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2018","dateCreated":"12-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":240},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.1-K\/2018","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Muhammad Jibran Nasir and others v. The State and others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._1-K_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 351","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2018","dateCreated":"09-02-2018","fileSizeInBytes":63},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.479\/2015","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Sajjad Ahmed v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._479_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-01-2018","dateCreated":"31-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":906},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.218\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Intekhab Ahmed Abbasi v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._218_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A careful reappraisal of the evidence suggests that the prosecution has failed to bring home guilt to the accused. The evidence furnished at the trial is full of factual and legal defects, and is bereft of legal worth\/judicial efficacy. The accused are acquitted of the charges leveled against them by extending them benefit of doubt.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2018 SCMR 495","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-11-2017","dateCreated":"31-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.1037-P\/2018","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"In the Matter of Murder of 8 Years Old Minor Girl at Kasur","caseFileName":"H.R.C.1037_P_2018_dt_29_1_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of murder of 8 years old minor girl in Kasur, directs that the challan be submitted within stipulated period in the Trial Court, Prosecutor General Punjab shall supervise the proceedings of the prosecution before the\r\nTrial Court and allegation leveled by journalist Dr. Shahid Masood regarding 37 banks accounts be probed. \r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-01-2018","dateCreated":"29-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":120},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.1\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi & another v. Federation of Pakistan and another","caseFileName":"Const.P._1_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" None of the grounds settled by this Court for declaring a judgment per incuriam, including that the judgment was invalidly pronounced; based upon ignorance of any provisions of the Constitution or law; founded on gross and grave misinterpretation thereof; or that the law already enunciated and settled by this Court on a specific subject has not been taken into account, are to be found in the judgments challenged through the instant petitions. Where a person has\/had the opportunity of filing a review or appeal against a judgment, and either files a review\/appeal and fails, or does not avail that opportunity, or fails to become a party in any pending review\/appeal filed by another person against the same judgment, then he has no right to re-agitate the matter through a petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. A judgment of this Court can be considered to be per incuriam but it is for the Judges to revisit any such judgment, if and when pointed out by any person during the course of hearing of any other case. \r\n","citation":" \n2018   SCMR  514","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2018","dateCreated":"24-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":103},{"caseNumber":"C.A.3\/2018","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Medical and Dental Council through its President v. Muhammad Fahad Malik and others","caseFileName":"C.A._03_2018.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) constituted under the law and any Executive Committee constituted by or under the law and presently working are dissolved and till the appointment\/election of the fresh Council and the Executive Committees in accordance with law, an ad hoc Council is constituted by the Court to perform the functions and run the affairs of PMDC in accordance with the relevant law.","citation":"2018   SCMR  1956","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-01-2018","dateCreated":"15-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.01\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO CASE NO. 01 OF 2010","caseFileName":"S.M.C._01_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-01-2018","dateCreated":"12-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":1905},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2593\/2008","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"CIVIL MISC. APPLICATIONS NO.2593 AND 2812 OF 2008 IN\r\r\nCIVIL APPEAL NO.1268 OF 2008","caseFileName":"C.M.A._2593_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Limitation for filing appeal would commence from the date of preparation of the decree and the time elapsed between the announcement of the judgment and the signing of the decree shall be included in the time requisite for obtaining the copy of the judgment and decree.\r\n","citation":"2018   SCMR  401","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2017","dateCreated":"08-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3258\/2017","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"NAB thr. its Chairman v. M\/s Hudaibya Paper Mills Ltd, Lahore and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3258_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The legal process was abused by keeping the Reference pending indefinitely and unreasonably. The Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau, for over four years, did not submit an application for the restoration\/revival of the Reference. The learned Judges of the High Court were justified to quash the Reference and once it was quashed the question of reinvestigation did not arise. The petition for leave to appeal was time-barred by 1,229 days and no purpose would be served to condone such unreasonable and unjustified delay.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 296","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2018","dateCreated":"05-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":131},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.7\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Islamabad - Rawalpindi Sit-in (Dharna) Case","caseFileName":"S.M.C._7_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2019 Court 318","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-04-2018","dateCreated":"04-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1447\/2016","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Gulistan Textile Mills Ltd v. Soneri Bank Ltd","caseFileName":"C.A._1447_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 16 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 has provided a comprehensive list of the specific types of orders that a Banking Court is empowered to pass with respect to the property that is pledged etc. prior to the final judgment of a suit. There is no room to apply the general provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Proof of new facts\/circumstances is necessary in order to exclude the application from the bar of res judicata in respect of interlocutory applications during the pendency of a suit.\r\n","citation":" \nPLD 2018 SC 322","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-01-2018","dateCreated":"03-01-2018","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"C.A.300\/2017","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment\/Others","caseTitle":"Waqar Zafar Bakhtawari v. Haji Mazhar Hussain Shah & others","caseFileName":"C.A._300_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"As after the expiry of the tenancy period, a tenant, though can continue to hold over the possession of the rented premises, but his tenancy is rendered invalid because it has come to an end and if there is no express consent of the landlord to extend the tenancy period the tenant shall be guilty of having infringed the conditions of tenancy, rendering him liable to be evicted under section 17(2)(ii)(b) of the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance, 2001. ","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 81","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-12-2017","dateCreated":"21-12-2017","fileSizeInBytes":65},{"caseNumber":"C.A.508\/2017","caseSubject":"Election-Local Bodies\/Others","caseTitle":"Sardar Sher Bahadar Khan and others v. Election Commission of Pakistan Thr. its Secretary and others","caseFileName":"C.A._508_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 97","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-12-2017","dateCreated":"20-12-2017","fileSizeInBytes":78},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.36\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hanif Abbasi v. Jahangir Khan Tareen & others","caseFileName":"Const.P._36_2016_dt_15_12_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The respondent had established an off-shore company Shiny View Limited (SVL) which has legal title of the property \"Hyde House\" but the actual, true, real and beneficial owner of the said property is the respondent. SVL or Hyde House was never transferred to any trust by the respondent, thus, it is his asset which he has failed to declare in his nomination papers and, therefore, he is not honest in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution read with Section 99(1)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 114","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2017","dateCreated":"15-12-2017","fileSizeInBytes":1054},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.35\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hanif Abbasi v. Imran Khan Niazi & others","caseFileName":"Const.P._35_2016_dt_15_12_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 189","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2017","dateCreated":"15-12-2017","fileSizeInBytes":1015},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.8215\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Lahore Orange Line Metro Train Project","caseFileName":"C.M.A._8215_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Per Ijaz ul Ahsan, J (Majority View): Lahore is one of the few cities in the world with population in excess of 10 million which do not have a mass transit train system. There is indeed a need to protect and preserve our historical and heritage sites but the same need not be at the cost of depriving the citizens of Lahore of an efficient, reliable, dependable and modern mass transit system. Preservation and development are not mutually exclusive and can go side by side complementing each other. The reports submitted by the experts suggest that there is no real danger to the protected or special premises which are situated in the vicinity of the Orange Line Metro Train Project (\u201cOLMTP\u201d). The respondents have not placed on record any authentic technical data\/analysis that may reflect negatively on or rebut the accuracy of the reports, opinions and the conclusions drawn by various experts. The Government of Punjab is allowed to resume work on OLMTP subject to certain conditions and directions aimed at protection of cultural sites.\r\n\r\nPer Ejaz Afzal Khan, J (Concurring View): The proposed construction of OLMTP does not cause any considerable visual impairment of the heritage sites. Vibration caused by the operation of the train does not pose any significant threat to the said sites. The partially completed Mass Transit System cannot be obstructed on the basis of apprehensions and assumptions of the respondents which have no concrete foundations. The safeguards provided by law and highlighted in the expert reports have been taken care of in the no objection certificate issued for OLMTP by the Director General of Archaeology. Any further measure which is ancillary and reasonably incidental could still be taken at any time if and when anything endangering the heritage sites appears or emerges.\r\n\r\nPer Maqbool Baqar, J (Minority View): Heritage has to be preserved and protected in all respects, all of its virtue, qualities, facets and characteristics are to be secured from all kinds of harms, including impairment of its visual integrity. No doubt OLMTP, being a mass transit project, offers fast mobility facility to the people of Lahore and is planned to cater to about 245,000 passengers everyday and as claimed, the facility shall be an efficient, affordable and environment friendly transport service, and shall help in reducing traffic congestion and the travelling time between places, but if we recall heritage also has its immense significance, and offers lot of public goods and yields public benefits and also helps in poverty alleviation. The right to life as envisaged by Article 9 of the Constitution includes all those aspects of life which go to make a man's life meaningful, complete and worth living. The Director General Archaeology, Punjab is directed to ensure that the heritage impact assessment in the matter be carried out afresh preferably with the assistance of UNESCO; that fullest endeavour should be made to conclude the same preferably within one month from its commencement and within 15 days thereafter the Provincial Director General Archaeology and the Provincial Government shall decide the request for the NOCs in the light of the report\/findings of the fresh heritage impact assessment, with an endeavour to find practicable and viable solutions of the problems and issues that may be pointed out in the said assessment so that the project may be completed as early as possible.","citation":"2018   SCMR  211","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-12-2017","dateCreated":"08-12-2017","fileSizeInBytes":374},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.32\/2017","caseSubject":"For Enhancement","caseTitle":"State thr. The Deputy Director (Law), Regional Directorate, Anti Norcotics Force v. Mujahid Naseem Lohdi","caseFileName":"Crl.P._32_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, ACJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 671","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-07-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":147},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.465\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Fayyaz Ahmad v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._465_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  2026","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-07-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":161},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.326\/2013","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Asad Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._326_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where the entire case of the prosecution is found to be utterly unbelievable, the entire burden of proof cannot be shifted to the accused person and he cannot be convicted merely because he did not explain the circumstances in which his wife or some vulnerable dependent had lost his life.","citation":" \nPLD 2017 SC 681","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":138},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.254\/2014","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/Control of Narchotics Substance","caseTitle":"The State through DG ANF, Rawalpindi v. Abdul Jabbar @ Jabbara","caseFileName":"Crl.A._254_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The State\/Federal Government could competently file an appeal before the High Court against the order of acquittal passed by a Special Court constituted under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997; the Director-General, Anti-Narcotics Force could act in the matter as a delegatee of the Federal Government; and the function of the Anti-Narcotics Force regarding filing of an appeal could competently be performed by any official of the Force, including a Special Prosecutor, as directed by the Director-General, Anti-Narcotics Force.","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  1213","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-05-2016","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":156},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.125\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Dr. Atta Muhammad Panhwar v. Province of Sindh, etc","caseFileName":"C.R.P._125_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  456","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2015","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":11583},{"caseNumber":"C.P.826\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Asad Javed\/Javed Akhtar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._826_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1514","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-04-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.662\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Pervez Akhtar Shah v. WAPDA thr. its Chairman and others","caseFileName":"C.P._662_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 733","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-08-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":182},{"caseNumber":"C.P.549-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Deduction \/ Exemptions","caseTitle":"M\/s Bara Ghee Mills (Pvt) Ltd v. The Assistant Collector Customs, Peshawar and others","caseFileName":"C.P._549-P_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 738","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":332},{"caseNumber":"C.P.332-P\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Secretary Home & Tribal Affairs Department Peshawar & others v. Mehmood Khan","caseFileName":"C.P._332-P_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The extension of benefit of pre-conviction detention period to be deducted from the sentence awarded is mandatory and for refusal to grant the same, cogent, strong and convincing reasons are to be recorded. The general and special remissions earned by the other co-prisoners of the respondent, if denied to him, would amount to discriminatory treatment, prohibited by the command of Article 25 of the Constitution","citation":"2017   SCMR  2044","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-07-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":142},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1085\/2017","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"Chairman NAB thr. P.G, NAB v. Muhammad Usman and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1085_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The scheme of relevant provisions of Cr.P.C. and the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 show that the two categories of witnesses i.e. the prosecution witnesses and the defence witnesses are distinctly placed poles apart and cannot and shall not be intermingled. The discretion, to summon or examine any witness or refuse to do so, vested in the Trial Court ordinarily cannot be questioned and that too in extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction unless it is shown and established that exercise of such powers by the Trial Court or by not exercising the same, has resulted into a grave miscarriage of justice, therefore, calling the witness of the other party as its own witness, even in criminal trials, already examined, is not acknowledged by the law on the subject, therefore, it is neither desirable nor such a practice can be approved. In exceptional cases, where material witness has been dropped by the prosecution, the Court may exercise powers with due care and caution. However, in that case too, the prosecution witness\/witnesses cannot be examined as defence witnesses but court witness\/witnesses and for that, a written request is made to the Court showing cogent and convincing reasons for calling and examining any witness of the prosecution, not examined or has already been examined to be re-examined as court witness.  ","citation":" \nPLD 2018  SC 28","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-09-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.A.786\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt. of K.P. through Chief Secretary, Peshawar v. Mrs. Aneela Rehman & others","caseFileName":"C.A._786_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-08-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":365},{"caseNumber":"C.A.785\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Government of K.P. through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others v. Waheedullah, and others","caseFileName":"C.A._785_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-08-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":365},{"caseNumber":"C.A.709\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Repatriation","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sharif Tareen v. Government of Balochistan thr.Secy.Secretary and others","caseFileName":"C.A._709_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appointments made on deputation by absorption or by transfer under the garb of exigencies of service in an outrageous disregard of merit impaired efficiency and paralyzed good governance, and perpetuation of this phenomenon even for a day more would further deteriorate the state of efficiency and good governance.","citation":"2018   SCMR  54","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":253},{"caseNumber":"C.A.704\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Repatriation","caseTitle":"Sudhir Ahmed v. The Speaker, Balochistan Provincial Assembly, Quetta & another","caseFileName":"C.A._704_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Appointment by absorption, which more often than not, is resorted to through the intervention of the people in power by ignoring the merit cannot be approved and upheld. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  2051","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-05-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":161},{"caseNumber":"C.A.588\/2017","caseSubject":"Service\/Absorption","caseTitle":"Aziz-ul-Allah and others v. Chief Secretary, Government of Balochistan, Quetta and another\t","caseFileName":"C.A._588_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  5","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":231},{"caseNumber":"C.A.587\/2017","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Rafiq Ahmed and others v. Government of Balichistan thr. its Chief Secretary, Quetta","caseFileName":"C.A._587_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Absorption of the appellants in the Gwadar Development Authority being against the law and rules was to be set at naught.","citation":"2018   SCMR  48","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2017","dateCreated":"17-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":142},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.297\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif v. Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi","caseFileName":"C.R.P._297_2017_Reserved.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court in the review petitions against the judgment, whereby the Prime Minister was disqualified and the National Accountability Bureau was directed to file references against him and his children before the Accountability Court, rejects the argument that the salary even if agreed upon under the employment contract would not be an asset if not withdrawn and dismisses the petitions.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-09-2017","dateCreated":"07-11-2017","fileSizeInBytes":143},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1406\/2016","caseSubject":"Company Law\/Winding up","caseTitle":"State Bank of Pakistan thr. Chief Manager, Peshawar v. Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan thr. its Chairman & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1406_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Reference to dictionaries by the judges, without first examining the statutory provision and its context, is inappropriate. Words appearing in a section (of a statute) are to be read in the context in which they are used. The role of a regulator of companies and a central bank is altogether different from the promoters of a company envisaged in Section 412 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Sections 412 & 413 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 are penal provisions, and penal provisions could not be given an extended meaning to include the State Bank of Pakistan and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. \r\n","citation":" \nPLD 2018 SC 52","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-10-2017","dateCreated":"27-10-2017","fileSizeInBytes":88},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.57\/2015","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asjad Abbasi & others v. Iqbal Muhammad Chauhan & others","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P._57_2015_Additional_Note.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  2051","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-10-2017","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.M.A.1379\/2017","caseSubject":"Compromise","caseTitle":"Mureed Sultan and another v. The State thr. Prosecutor General, Punjab and another","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A._1379_2017_Additional_Note.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Per Qazi Faez Isa, J (Additional Note): Offences prescribed in terms of section 345, Cr.P.C. can be compounded, but the composition of such offences has to be in terms of subsection (6) of section 345 which stipulates that it \"shall have the effect of an acquittal\" and not that it will be an acquittal or that an acquittal ensues. Convicted murderers can only be acquitted by a court of competent jurisdiction and after application of mind by judges. Acquittal cannot be secured, or granted for that matter, whilst accepting an application under section 345 of Cr.P.C.","citation":"2018   SCMR  756","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"06-10-2017","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.353\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Bahadur Khan & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Finance, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._353_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The notification dated 30-11-1977 having been issued by the Federal Government, following the recommendations of the Pay Commission constituted to examine salary structure etc. of all categories of staff of all nationalized banks, in terms of Section 20 of the Banks Nationalization Act is statutory in nature and violation of any of its provisions is amenable to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. Even failure to have the notification published in the official gazette would not shear it off its statutory status. There could be no estoppel against the statute or the rules having statutory force. The principle of laches cannot be over emphasized when pension is a recurring right.","citation":"2017   SCMR  2066","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-06-2017","dateCreated":"25-09-2017","fileSizeInBytes":127},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.38\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Shahab Usto v. the Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh etc.","caseFileName":"Const.P._38_2016_2.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  732","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-09-2017","dateCreated":"16-09-2017","fileSizeInBytes":1613},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.297\/2017","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif v. Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi","caseFileName":"C.R.P._297_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"All review petitions are dismissed for reasons to be recorded later while the petitioner in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 6114 of 2017 in Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016, in view of the information supplied and the statement made by the learned Prosecutor-General, Accountability that the Chairman, National Accountability Bureau has approved filing of an appeal against the judgment passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in the case of M\/S Hudabiya Paper Mills, does not press the miscellaneous application which is disposed of as having not been pressed.","citation":"PLD 2018 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-09-2017","dateCreated":"15-09-2017","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1352\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust thr its General Manager v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Relegious Affairs, Zakar & Ushr Division, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1352_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust is not owned, directly or indirectly, by the Federal Government and is therefore not excluded from the definition of sahib-e-nisab under S. 2 (xxiii)(b) of the Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980 and is liable to compulsory payment of zakat under S.3 of the Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017  SC 718","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-08-2017","dateCreated":"04-08-2017","fileSizeInBytes":91},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.29\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, P.M. Pakistan, etc.","caseFileName":"Const.P._29_2016_28072016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) shall within six weeks from the date of this judgment prepare and file before the Accountability Court, the References, on the basis of the material collected and referred to by the Joint Investigating Team (JIT) in its report and such other material as may be available with the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and NAB having any nexus with assets in question or which may subsequently become available including material that may come before it pursuant to the Mutual Legal Assistance requests sent by the JIT to different jurisdictions. Having failed to disclose his un-withdrawn receivables constituting assets from Capital FZE Jebel Ali, UAE in his nomination papers filed for the General Elections held in 2013 in terms of section 12(2)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 (ROPA) and having furnished a false declaration under solemn affirmation respondent No. 1 is not honest in terms of section 99(f) of ROPA and Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution and therefore he is disqualified to be a Member of the Parliament whereafter he shall cease to be the Prime Minister of Pakistan.","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 692","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-03-2018","dateCreated":"28-07-2017","fileSizeInBytes":100},{"caseNumber":"C.A.26\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax Karachi v. M\/s. Hassan Associates (Pvt) Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._26_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The forfeiture of an amount under a contract cannot be equated with a fine or penalty incurred due to infraction or violation of any law. An amount paid as damages or compensation is an expenditure, a revenue loss, incurred in the course of carrying on the business and therefore is an admissible deduction under section 23(2)(xviii) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  1652","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-05-2017","dateCreated":"25-07-2017","fileSizeInBytes":49},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1079\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Cess and Fee","caseTitle":"Collector of Custom & another v. Saif-ud-Din","caseFileName":"C.A._1079_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Subsection (2) of S. 18 of the Customs Act, 1969 provides the general rule that all goods exported from Pakistan shall not be charged with export duty whereas subsection (3) provides the exception to such general rule in that it specifically authorizes the Federal Government to impose a regulatory duty by notification in the official Gazette on all or any of the goods imported or exported. A combined reading of both the sub-sections makes it abundantly clear that neither do they conflict with each other nor does either have supremacy over the other. Notification issued by the Federal Government under S. 18(3) of the Customs Act, 1969 imposing a regulatory duty on certain export items is valid and legal and such duty would be chargeable from the date of the notification. Relevant date for determination of the rate of regulatory duty on exported goods is the date when the \"goods declaration\" is delivered or filed. Exported goods for which the declarations are filed on or after the date of the notification imposing regulatory duty are liable to regulatory duty as envisaged by the notification.","citation":"2017   SCMR  1714","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-05-2017","dateCreated":"25-07-2017","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3986\/2017","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Hussain Nawaz Sharif","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3986_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Audio or video recording cannot be admitted into evidence for the proof of the statement of a witness till the law is amended but its use to facilitate recording of such statement cannot be discouraged on the basis of a pedantic interpretation of Sections 161 and 162 of the Cr.P.C.","citation":" \nPLD 2019 SC 196","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-06-2017","dateCreated":"22-06-2017","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.104\/2010","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Waris Ali and others v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._104_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Mens rea, an essential ingredient of every crime, in cases of terrorism becomes twofold i.e. the first object is to commit a crime, while the primary object in the second fold speaks of terrorism related ideology, purpose and object, the most nefarious and detestable designs to commit crimes, creating sense of fear, insecurity and instability in the society and community with the ultimate object to destabilize the State as a whole. The mere fact that the crimes for personal motive are committed in a gruesome or detestable manner by itself would not be sufficient to bring the acts within the meaning of terrorism. The Court while interpreting a special law had to look at the reasons and background which influenced the mind of the legislature in enacting the special law, and the history of events, which had occurred preceding the enactment of the special law. Widening the scope of such Statutes would defeat the legislative intent. Whenever Penal Statute requires interpretation then, it shall be so interpreted, which favours the accused person and not the State. If any citizen is triable under the ordinary penal law of the land, then, treating him harshly under special law, not clearly applicable to him, would be a violation of the command of the Constitution.","citation":"2017   SCMR  1572","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-05-2017","dateCreated":"22-06-2017","fileSizeInBytes":72},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2226\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"M\/s Al-Haj Enterprises (Pvt) Ltd v. Collector of Customs Model Customs Collectorate, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2226_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The consequence for short supply beyond one percent had been provided in Rule 564(4) of the Custom Rules, 2001 which were fully attracted to the case of the petitioner and accordingly applied in the present case. No legal error was committed by any of the forums below.\r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  1598","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-05-2017","dateCreated":"02-06-2017","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2105\/2008","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"Miss. Rukhsana Murrad, etc v. National Bank of Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.A._2105_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The exporter availed financial facilities under the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) Export Refinance Scheme through the respondent bank but failed to meet its export target. A penalty was then imposed on it by SBP which along with the sum availed under the scheme was perforce recovered from the respondent bank by SBP. An agreement of finance was executed to regularize the amount which the respondent bank had to pay perforce to SBP on behalf of the exporter. In these circumstances, the exporter could not claim that no amount was disbursed after the finance agreement with the respondent bank.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  1470","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-05-2017","dateCreated":"02-06-2017","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.A.767\/2014","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Sindh Revenue Board through its Chairman and another v. The Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.A._767_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1344","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-05-2017","dateCreated":"30-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":149},{"caseNumber":"C.A.682\/2008","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery","caseTitle":"The Collector of Sales Tax, Gujranwala, etc v. M\/s. Super Asia Mohammad Din & Sons","caseFileName":"C.A._682_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1427","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-03-2017","dateCreated":"27-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":148},{"caseNumber":"C.A.8\/2007","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Fancy Foundation v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karachi","caseFileName":"C.A._8_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1395","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2017","dateCreated":"18-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":104},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.59\/2015","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Muhammad Arif Idrees v. Sohail Aamir & others","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P._59_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1379","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-04-2017","dateCreated":"17-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"C.A.992\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue Zone-I, RTO, Rawalpindi v. M\/s Khan CNG Filling Station, Rawalpindi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._992_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1414","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-04-2017","dateCreated":"15-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":64},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2561\/2016","caseSubject":"Banking\/Others","caseTitle":"Syed Mushahid Shah v. F.I.A., etc","caseFileName":"C.A._2561_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 are to have an overriding effect on anything inconsistent contained in any other law for the time being in force, including the Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance 1984, the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (read with the Pakistan Penal Code 1860) and the Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974 (read with the Banking Companies Ordinance 1962). \r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  1218","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-05-2017","dateCreated":"15-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":149},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2939\/2017","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Imran Ahmed Khan & others v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif Prime Minister of Pakistan.","caseFileName":"C.M.A._2939_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The members of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) are nominated from amongst the lists sent by their departments\/institutions and the JIT is directed to commence and complete the investigation and submit its final report in the light of the directions issued by the Court. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 692","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2017","dateCreated":"05-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1515\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt. of K.P. through Secretary Energy & Power Department, Peshawar and others v. Ihsan Ullah","caseFileName":"C.A._1515_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Pakhtunkhwa Energy Development Organization (\"PEDO\") is not a government department; it is rather a semi-autonomous body. The right to regularization in service under S. 19(2) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Act, 1973 applies to employees of the government and not to employees of semi-autonomous bodies. The respondents\/project employees of \"PEDO\" are, therefore, not eligible for regularization.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  1201","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2016","dateCreated":"05-05-2017","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.622 \/2008","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Against the judgment dated 24.10.2007\/8.5.2009 of the High Court of Sindh,\r\r\nKarachi passed in ITA Nos.1114 & 1115\/1999, 485 & 486\/2000)","caseFileName":"C.A._622 _2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1006","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2017","dateCreated":"26-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":232},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3551\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"M\/s Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner Inland Revenue (Legal), LTU, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3551_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Pakistan Television Corporation Limited (PTV) was not liable to deduct tax under section 153(1)(b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as it did not make any payments to WAPDA nor was the former required to collect advance tax under section 233(2) thereof due to the absence of the relationship of agency with the latter, thus, PTV did not fall within the garb of the exception of section 21(c) supra and was entitled to claim deduction of service fee, retained by WAPDA for collection of television license fee, from its income as expenditure. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  1136","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-04-2017","dateCreated":"24-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":83},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.29\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, P.M. Pakistan, etc.","caseFileName":"Const.P._29_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 692","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-02-2017","dateCreated":"20-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":3432},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3195-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Rejection of plaint","caseTitle":"State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan through its Chairman, etc v. Mst. Sardar Begum","caseFileName":"C.P._3195-L_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"All claims, whether directly arising from or relatable to a contract of insurance, are covered under the provisions of section 46 of the Insurance Act, 1938. All such suits are to be filed in a District Court of competent jurisdiction or depending upon the territorial jurisdiction and pecuniary value of the suit, in the principal seat of Sindh High Court or the Islamabad High Court as the case may be instead of the District Court. However, no such suit can be entertained in the Civil Court.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  999","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-03-2017","dateCreated":"20-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"C.P.935\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Interior, Rawalpindi & another v. Bashir Ahmed","caseFileName":"C.P._935_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The act of absconsion or being a fugitive from law cannot be regarded as a reasonable ground \r\nto explain absence from duty by a civil servant. \r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  965","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-04-2017","dateCreated":"20-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.115\/2013","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Hashim Qasim v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._115_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"For placing reliance on circumstantial evidence, in cases involving capital punishment, such evidence must be of the nature, where, all circumstances must be so inter-linked, making out a single unbroken chain, where one end of the same touches the dead body and the other the neck of the accused. Retracted confession, if corroborated by independent evidence of reliable nature, could be made basis for conviction on a capital charge. For accepting a confession, two essential requirements must be fulfilled; first, that the confession was made voluntarily and was based on true account of facts leading to the crime and, second, the same was proved at the trial. Motive belatedly set up appeared to be self-manufactured with the connivance of the police. The medical evidence is only confirmatory or of supporting nature and is never held to be corroboratory evidence, to identify the culprit(s). Even a single doubt, if found reasonable, would entitle the accused person to acquittal and not a combination of several doubts.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  986","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2017","dateCreated":"19-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":49},{"caseNumber":"C.P.569-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M\/s ICI Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.P._569-K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The period of limitation provided under sections 66 and 66-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 is four years. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  1159","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-03-2017","dateCreated":"17-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.A.137-K\/1976","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"CIVIL APPEALS NO. 137-K to 145-K of 1976","caseFileName":"C.A._137-K_1976.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Abdul Kadir Shaikh","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017  SC  207","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-1991","dateCreated":"17-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":8660},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2109\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & others v. Dr. Muhammad Arif","caseFileName":"C.A._2109_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The matter of promotion, deferment or supersession of a civil servant, and that too of BPS-20 and 21, is of enormous significance, having a bearing on the state structure and cannot be left to be dealt with in an arbitrary, casual and capricious manner. The Establishment Division is directed to place all of those cases which were laid before the board through the impugned exercise\/process, afresh, after withdrawing the overriding effect of five (5) marks assigned for integrity\/reputation etc. and removing the deviation of the focus of the board from the service dossier to the personal knowledge of its members. \r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  969","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-03-2017","dateCreated":"14-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":95},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3345\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sohaib Shaheen, Chairman Legal Education Committee and others v. Pakistan Bar Council thr. Vice Chairman and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3345_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Pakistan Bar Council in its capacity as the principal has inherent power to decide to reconstitute its committees in an appropriately convened meeting.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017  SC  231","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-11-2016","dateCreated":"06-04-2017","fileSizeInBytes":129},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.13\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION AGAINST ILLEGALITIES, CONTRAVENTIONS & VIOLATIONS IN APPOINTMENTS WITHIN NAB","caseFileName":"S.M.C._13_2016_dt_31-03-2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   PLC(CS)  1045","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-03-2017","dateCreated":"31-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":321},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.687\/2017","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Interim Report by AIG Legal for IG Punjab.","caseFileName":"C.M.A_687_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Police is a disciplined force and officials\/officers employed in the police should not embark upon unnecessary litigation such as claiming out of turn promotions. If, however, they have a genuine grievance the same should be taken before the forums that the law provides instead of initiating proceedings before the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution.","citation":"2017   SCMR  868","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-03-2017","dateCreated":"31-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1590\/2006","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax Karachi v. M\/s Khalid Textile Mills Ltd","caseFileName":"C.A._1590_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Tax credit available under S. 107 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (since repealed) did fall within the purview of R. 8(8)(b) of the Third Schedule to the Ordinance and thus was to be excluded while computing the actual cost of an asset when determining the written down value thereof for the purposes of calculating depreciation allowance.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  813","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-03-2017","dateCreated":"29-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":75},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3364\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Husnain Cotex Limited thr. its Chief Executive v. Commissioner Inland Revenue, Lahore","caseFileName":"C.P._3364_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The tax exemption granted in the year 2010 under Clause 126F of Part I of the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, to the taxpayers of certain areas of the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, FATA and PATA, whose business suffered on account of internal strife, could only have been intended for the taxpayers falling under the domain of \u2018normal tax regime\u2019 whose profitability while doing business in the affected areas had diminished in the past on account of an external factor i.e. political strife that affected the profitability of doing business there. The exemption was never meant for the taxpayers like the petitioners whose businesses fall within the domain of \u2018final tax regime\u2019 for whom the question of experiencing loss of business opportunity on account of internal strife does not arise. They made their presence in the affected area only when they had in their hands a business opportunity to make profits and gains in the form of contracts to be executed there. \r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  822","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-01-2017","dateCreated":"28-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.38\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Shahab Usto v. the Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh etc.","caseFileName":"Const.P._38_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in consequence of the report of the commission formed to record findings as regards provision of clean water to the residents of the province of Sindh, issues directions for achieving the object for which the commission was formed.","citation":"2017   SCMR  732","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2017","dateCreated":"24-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":632},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.19\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION AGAINST CORRUPT ELEMENTS WORKING ON DEPUTATION IN THE SINDH COAL AUTHORITY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SINDH","caseFileName":"S.M.C._19_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  683","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-03-2017","dateCreated":"24-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":276},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.47\/2016","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Fida Hussain Shah v. Govt. of Sindh & others","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P._47_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  798","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-02-2017","dateCreated":"22-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"C.A.5-Q\/2014","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Acceptance of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Mir Saleem Ahmed Khosa v. Zafarullah Khan jamali and others","caseFileName":"C.A._5-Q_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  664","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2017","dateCreated":"16-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.430\/2011","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ismail v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._430_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once the prosecution sets up a particular motive but fails to prove it, then, ordinarily capital sentence of death is not awarded. Testimony of a solitary witness, which is found true and reliable and is also corroborated by some other evidence, can be made basis for conviction on capital charge. The most important factors and required standards of confession are also cited in the judgment.","citation":"2017   SCMR  713","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-01-2017","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.275\/2011","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Khalil v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._275_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  960","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-01-2017","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":536},{"caseNumber":"C.A.654\/2007","caseSubject":"Allotment\/of Plot","caseTitle":"Khushdil Khan Malik v. Secretary Ministry of Defence and others","caseFileName":"C.A._654_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellant is under the effective administrative control and management of Education Corps of the Garrison; the order of his promotion was issued by Col. Incharge in active service of the Defence Services; he is undisputedly paid from the Defence Estimates; he is competently a member of the Defence Housing Authority; he was successful in balloting and deposited the seed money\/installment and unilateral cancellation of plot is against the principle of natural justice. ","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 173","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-05-2015","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1232\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Adnan Prince v. The State thr. Prosecutor General, Punjab and another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1232_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017  SC 147","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2017","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.103\/2010","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Amjad Shah v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._103_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 152","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-02-2016","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.87\/2015","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Court Martial","caseTitle":"Lance Naik Mukarram Hussain v. M\/o. Defence thr Chief of Army Staff & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._87_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" A person, proceeded against under a special law, would be dealt with according to the procedure of enquiry\/investigation and trial as laid down in the said special law. The accused persons were tried, convicted and sentenced under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, a special law, and the Supreme Court cannot assume jurisdiction in the matter of compromise between the accused persons and the legal heirs of the deceased.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  580","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-01-2017","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.204\/2017","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Review arising out of the judgment dated 26.09.2016\r\r\npassed by this Court in Const. Petition No.3 of 2014)","caseFileName":"C.M.A._204_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The constitution of Benches is the domain of the Chief Justice and no litigant or lawyer can be permitted to ask that his case be heard by a Bench of his choice. As far as practicable the application for review shall be posted before the same Bench that delivered the judgment or order sought to be reviewed, but subject to the availability and practicability of the Bench.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 142","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-01-2017","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1129\/2013","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC","caseTitle":"Major (R) Pervez Iqbal v. Muhammad Akram Almas & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1129_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellant who failed to challenge the sale before a competent forum in the prescribed manner cannot be allowed to challenge the sale in a collateral proceedings arising out of a writ of mandamus against the Income Tax Authorities and Military Estate Officer for the issuance of sale certificate and effecting mutation in his name.  ","citation":"2017   SCMR  831","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-10-2017","dateCreated":"15-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":244},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING ELIGIBILITY OF CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF  SINDH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ETC.","caseFileName":"S.M.C._18_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  637","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-01-2017","dateCreated":"13-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":101},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.609\/2014","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Asghar, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Crl.A._609_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017 P.S.C. (Crl.) 259","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":610},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.402\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Sardar Bibi v. Munir Ahmed and others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._402_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The witnesses of the ocular account made dishonest and willful improvements and omission in order to strengthen the prosecution case and bring their case in line with the medical evidence. Independent strong corroboration was required to uphold the conviction and sentence of the appellants but in the absence of independent corroboration to the ocular account furnished by the eye-witnesses, the fate of the present appellants cannot be any different from that of their acquitted co-accused. ","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  344","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-11-2016","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.382\/2011","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Ghulam Rasool v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._382_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1206","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":561},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.324\/2011","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/L.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Mst. Rukhsana Begum v. Sajjad & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._324_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A single doubt reasonably showing that a witness\/witnesses\u2019 presence on the crime spot was doubtful when a tragedy takes place, would be sufficient to discard his\/their testimony as a whole. Eye witnesses cannot corroborate themselves but corroboratory evidence must come from independent source and shall be supported by independent witnesses other than eye witnesses.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  596","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.176\/2012","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Asif v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._176_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once prosecution witnesses are disbelieved with respect to a co-accused, they cannot be relied upon with regard to the other co-accused unless they are corroborated by corroboratory evidence coming from independent source which shall be unimpeachable in nature.","citation":"2017   SCMR  486","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.126\/2010","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Javed Khan v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._126_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellants during the identification proceedings had informed the conducting Magistrates that they had earlier been shown to the witnesses. The objection was recorded but the Magistrates surprisingly did not attend to it, which constituted a serious lapse on their part. The prosecution witnesses who identified the accused persons before the Trial Court had a number of opportunities to see the accused persons before their statements were recorded. Neither the Forensic Science Laboratory nor any of the policemen, who had retrieved the bullet and its casing and had kept them in custody and then delivered them to the Laboratory, mentioned the marks affixed on the seals affixed on the parcels in which the said items were delivered to and received by the Laboratory.","citation":"2017   SCMR  524","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2144\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Sardar Arshid Hussain & others v. Mst. Zenat un Nisa & another","caseFileName":"C.P._2144_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A registered deed reflecting transfer of certain rights qua a property though will have sanctity attached to it regarding its genuineness, and a stronger evidence would be required to cast aspersions on its correctness but cannot be given preference over an unregistered deed vide which physical possession of the property has also been given.\r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  608","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-01-2017","dateCreated":"08-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1287\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Awal Khan and others v. The State thr. Advocate General KPK and another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1287_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  538","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-12-2017","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":9},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1273\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Abid Mehmood and another v. The State thr. Advocate General, KPK and another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1273_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  728","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-11-2017","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":638},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1188\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Noman v. The State and another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1188_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  560","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-12-2017","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":61},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3020\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Baqir v. Mst. Ghulam Parwar & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3020_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1062","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-10-2017","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":707},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1419\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Chairman, F.B.R & others v. M\/s Al-Technique Corporation of Pakistan Ltd & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1419_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The process of sterilization of medical\/surgical products does not fall within the meaning of 'manufacture' as provided in Section 2(16) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, thus the respondent company is not a 'manufacturer' under Section 2(17) and is not making a 'taxable supply' as per Section 2(41) and therefore cannot be charged to sales tax under Section 3 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 99","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-11-2016","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"C.A.514\/2008","caseSubject":"Evacuee Property \/ Settlement","caseTitle":"Nasir Fahimuddin & others v. Charles Philips Mills Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.A._514_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  468","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-01-2014","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":99},{"caseNumber":"C.A.450\/2010","caseSubject":"Tax\/Cess and Fee","caseTitle":"Collector of Custom (appraisement) v. M\/s Gul Rehman","caseFileName":"C.A._450_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The section itself, before a proviso can have any application, must apply. A holistic reading of Section 33 of the Customs Act, 1969, particularly the provisions of sub-section (3), clarifies that where a refund becomes due as a result of any decision or judgment passed by a customs officer, Appellate Tribunal etc., the proviso to sub-section (1) would not be applicable because no such proviso is attached to sub-section (3).","citation":"2017   SCMR  339","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2016","dateCreated":"01-03-2017","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1252\/2016","caseSubject":"Other Sentences\/1 Month R.I.","caseTitle":"Ishtiaq Ahmad v. The State and others","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1252_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 187","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-02-2017","dateCreated":"28-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.1099\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Haji Shahid Hussain and others v. The State thr. AG, KPK, Peshawar","caseFileName":"Crl.P._1099_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  616","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2017","dateCreated":"27-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1638\/2014","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd v. Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, Peshawar thr. its Members & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1638_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A loss of Rs. 9.5 million was caused to the government exchequer when a consignment of petroleum meant for export to Afghanistan was clandestinely supplied in the local market. Subsequently, the entire amount of evaded taxes and levies was promptly deposited in the government treasury said to have been recovered from the owners of the tankers. However, the prompt deposit of the evaded levies after its disclosure is nothing but an attempt to prevent the responsible officers of Customs as well as of PSO, who might have acted as facilitators in the commission of the crime, from being subjected to criminal and disciplinary action.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  604","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2017","dateCreated":"27-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1050\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"The Collector of Customs,  Peshawar v. Wali Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1050_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  585","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-02-2017","dateCreated":"23-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3912\/2016","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Khalid Humayun v. The NAB through its D.G and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3912_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There is sufficient prima facie material on record to suggest that the petitioner had exercised his authority to enrich himself. A number of persons have implicated him as the principal beneficiary of the defalcated amounts. Medical opinion has not suggested that the petitioner's continued incarceration would prove detrimental to his life or health. Bail is refused.\r\n","citation":" \nPLD 2017 SC 194","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"22-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":71},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1313\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Muhammad Zaman & others v. Government of Pakistan thr. Secy. Finance Division & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1313_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The State Bank of Pakistan Officers (Pension-cum-Gratuity) Regulations, 1980 are instructions for the internal control or management of the State Bank of Pakistan and are therefore non-statutory. By virtue of the amendment made in S. 54(1) of the State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956, the Bank can make regulations and approval of Federal Government is no more required.","citation":"2017   SCMR  571","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-02-2017","dateCreated":"21-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"C.A.833\/2006","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases","caseTitle":"Jan Muhammad and others v. Mst.Sakina Bibi and others","caseFileName":"C.A._833_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Supreme Court has the discretion to grant leave at the time of hearing an appeal in which leave has been granted on a different point(s) and to consider such point of law, including for instance the question of inherent jurisdiction, undoubtedly being a pure question of law; even if not earlier taken up in any proceedings including those before the Supreme Court. This could very well apply to the point of limitation too where such plea was not dependent upon any factual determination. However, those cases which require a factual foundation and adjudication for the purposes of settling a legal issue cannot be said to be pure questions of law and the same cannot be allowed to be raised before this Court for the first time.","citation":" \nPLD 2017 SC 158","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2017","dateCreated":"14-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2640\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"M\/s Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad v. Commissioner of Income Tax\/Wealth Tax, Islamabad","caseFileName":"C.P._2640_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A hospital whilst being an enclosed structure is undoubtedly a building, however, by no stretch of imagination can it be considered to fall within the definition of a factory or workshop, as it is not a building where goods are manufactured, repaired or assembled. Therefore, the petitioner-hospital is only entitled to depreciation allowance at the general rate of 5% instead of 10% as provided under Entry I of the Third Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 134","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2017","dateCreated":"14-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":54},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1074\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakisan thr. Secy. Revenue Division , Islamabad & others v. M\/s. Sahib Jee & others","caseFileName":"C.A.1074_2009_dt_13-2-2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"While exercising the power of review, if the Federal Tax Ombudsman (\u201cFTO\u201d) sets aside his earlier decision and passes a new recommendation in the order of review, then such recommendation shall have been passed pursuant to S. 11(1) of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 (\u201cthe Ordinance\u201d) and a representation would be competent. Conversely, where a recommendation earlier made by FTO is not set aside while exercising the power of review, the order dismissing the review petition would not tantamount to a fresh recommendation in terms of Ss.11 & 32 of the Ordinance against which a representation could be competently filed.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 139","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-01-2017","dateCreated":"13-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.173\/2017","caseSubject":"Cases Relating to PEMRA ","caseTitle":"Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority v. Labbaik (Private) Limited and another","caseFileName":"C.P._173_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Appeal was filed against the suspension of the license of respondent no. 1 and the learned High Court suspended the order of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA). Subsequently, the learned High Court was informed that the order impugned in the appeal was withdrawn by PEMRA. The appeal had become infructuous after PEMRA had withdrawn its orders which were the subject-matter of the appeal. Respondent no. 1 ought to have challenged subsequent orders of PEMRA by filing separate appeals.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-08-2017","dateCreated":"09-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1216\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Rasheed Ahmad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Infomation, Broadcasting and National Heritage, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1216_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellant committed misconduct because in his position as Secretary to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting he recommended himself to be appointed as Chairman PEMRA without specifically disclosing his personal interest and while being in Government service did not obtain the prior written permission before applying for the post. ","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 121","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2017","dateCreated":"08-02-2017","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"C.P.173\/2017","caseSubject":"Cases Relating to PEMRA ","caseTitle":"Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority v. Labbaik (Private) Limited and another","caseFileName":"C.P._173_2017_dt_31-1-2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) contends that the appeal filed against the suspension of the licenses of Satellite TV Channels had become infructous after the orders of suspension were withdrawn by PEMRA and the learned High Court was bound to dismiss the appeal as having become infructuous. The Supreme Court observes that the appeal is fixed for hearing before the learned High Court tomorrow, therefore, it is not inclined to pass any further order and will wait for the orders which are yet to be passed by the High Court in these proceedings. However, the High Court is restrained from proceeding against the Chairman, PEMRA, or any other person on the contempt applications filed by Respondent No. 1.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-01-2017","dateCreated":"31-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1958\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Controller of Military Accounts (RC) Edu-Cell, Rawalpindi v. Muhammad Zafar & another","caseFileName":"C.P._1958_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An ad hoc employee in government service is also to be treated as civil servant.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  482","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-01-2017","dateCreated":"26-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.100\/2016","caseSubject":"Allotment\/of Land","caseTitle":"Mian Asghar Ali v. Government of Punjab thr. Secretary (Colonies) BOR, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._100_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The objection of the respondent that he was not given notice of the conversion of intra-court appeal into review application by the High Court is of no significance, particularly, when he had notice of intra-court appeal and no prejudice was caused or shown to have been caused to him on merits of the case.\r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  118","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-09-2016","dateCreated":"17-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":61},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1255\/2012","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Z.T.B.L., Islamabad thr. its Assistant  SVP (LSD) v. Muhammad Asim Rafique & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1255_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The signing of the contracts by the respondents could not be allowed to be used as an obstructive instrument in the way of confirmation\/regularization of their employment especially because of the non-equilibrium between the bargaining position of the respondents and the Bank.","citation":" \n2016   SCMR  1756","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-06-2013","dateCreated":"17-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.A.825\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Dr. Ehsan-ul-Haq Khan v. Federation of Pakistan M\/o Commerce, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._825_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Seniority in a post, service or cadre to which a civil servant is promoted shall take effect from the date of regular appointment to that post according to Section 8(4) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973.","citation":"2017   SCMR  359","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-11-2016","dateCreated":"17-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1023\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Abdul Haq Khan & others v. Haji Ameerzada & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1023_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The creation and variation of the limits of districts was not governed by the Constitution but by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act, 1967. No bar existed in the Constitution which prevented the limits of districts, whether in relation to a Provincially Administered Tribal Areas or not, from being changed without a constitutional amendment. Variation in the limits of a district did not affect the PATA status of an area, therefore, the tribal areas of one district would remain tribal areas even after they became a part of another district in PATA.","citation":"PLD 2017 SC  105","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-01-2017","dateCreated":"17-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION REGARDING ELIGIBILITY OF CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF  SINDH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ETC.","caseFileName":"S.M.C.18_2016_dt_06_01_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  637","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-03-2017","dateCreated":"06-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.540-L\/2009","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/By Co-sharer","caseTitle":"Meraj Din, etc v. Muhammad Sharif, etc","caseFileName":"C.A.540_L_2009_dt_05_01_2017.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where possession has not been delivered and\/or the sale deed has been executed but not registered as yet, a pre-emptor, of a suit for pre-emption under the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, would have no notice that sale had taken place, thereby enabling him to exercise his right. In such cases the 'first part' of Article 10 of the Limitation Act, 1908 would have no application; rather the case(s) would fall within the 'second part' thereof. The period of limitation for the cases falling in the 'second part' of Article 10 will be one year from when the sale instrument is registered and not from the date of its execution.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  376","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2017","dateCreated":"05-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":191},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.199\/2011","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Dr. Irfan Iqbal v. Syed Farrukh Hassan & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._199_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No sentence of a convict in exercise of revisional jurisdiction can be enhanced without notice to him as is evident from the provisions of section 439(2) & (6), Cr.P.C. The present occurrence was a direct result of the grave provocation offered by the complainant party but such provocation was no longer sudden at the time of the present occurrence and, therefore, the case in hand did not fall squarely within the ambit of section 302(c), PPC. As the appellant had acted under the influence of his father we have felt persuaded to reduce the sentence of death passed against him to imprisonment for life.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLJ 2017 SC 137","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-11-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.128\/2010","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Azhar Mehmood and another v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._128_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The occurrence had taken place after dark but in the FIR no source of light at the spot had been mentioned by the complainant. In identification parades, the appellants had not been identified with reference to any role played by them. The identification of a culprit during the trial is unsafe. The recovered firearms had not matched with the crime-empties secured from the place of occurrence. The medical evidence could not point towards any particular culprit. The alleged abscondance of one appellant, in the circumstances of the case, is not found to be totally inconsistent with the hypothesis of his innocence. The prosecution had failed to prove its case against the appellants beyond reasonable doubt. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  135","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-11-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2411\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Muhammad Akram v. District Co-ordination Officer, Rahim Yar Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2411_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The date of filing the writ petition within time should have been reckoned as the date of filing the departmental appeal and ought to have been treated as departmental appeal for all practical purposes as ordered by the High Court.\r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  56","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2222\/2016","caseSubject":"WAPDA\/Electricity","caseTitle":"M\/s Power Construction Corporation of China, Ltd, Islamabad v. Pakistan Water & Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2222_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Courts in the exercise of their powers of judicial review, ordinarily, do not interfere with public policy and exercise judicial restraint.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 83","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-10-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":196},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1983\/2012","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Army Welfare Trust (Nizampur Cement Project), Rawalpindi & another v. Collector of Sales Tax, Peshawar","caseFileName":"C.P._1983_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The internal pricing mechanism of a manufacturer is not a substitute for proof\/evidence of actual collection of sales tax in terms of section 3B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. Section 3B does not refer to a notional recovery of sales tax. Therefore, since sales tax was not collected by the petitioner (cement manufacturer) the question of paying the same to the respondent (revenue department) simply did not arise.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  9","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-10-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":56},{"caseNumber":"C.P.80-Q\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"Amanullah  v. Govt. of Balochistan & others","caseFileName":"C.P._80-Q_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 23 of the Balochistan Civil Servants Act, 1974 (\u201cAct, 1974\u201d) does not confer any power on the Government of Balochistan, which could be exercised through the executive authority of the Province, to relax any rules framed under the Act, 1974 governing promotion of a Civil Servant. The act of extending favour and conferring benefit of promotion on the appellant is not only against the fundamental rights of promotion of his peers on merits but is also a glaring example of nepotism and undue favour.","citation":"2017 S C M R 192","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-04-2014","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1793\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery","caseTitle":"Nadeem Farooq & others v. Newze Land Electronic Trading Co. Lcc Sharja","caseFileName":"C.A._1793_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The decree passed by the Court of first instance in the United Arab Emirates, which can neither be construed as Court of Appeal nor a superior Court in terms of S. 44-A, C.P.C., cannot be executed without having recourse to the process of S.13, C.P.C.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 95","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-11-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1525\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Dr. Farhat Abbas v. Dr. Mehmood ul Hassan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1525_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellant held the requisite qualification as an Assistant Professor of Cardiology with the requisite experience. Office order of the appellant's promotion as Associate Professor of Cardiology was valid in law and could not be set aside.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  86","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-10-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"C.A.904\/2013","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases","caseTitle":"Muhammad Fareed Khan v. Muhammad Ibrahim & others","caseFileName":"C.A._904_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  679","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-11-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":684},{"caseNumber":"C.A.219-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Abdul Rehman v. Mst.Majeedan Bibi @ Majeedan","caseFileName":"C.A._219-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  1110","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-12-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":526},{"caseNumber":"C.A.204-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/of Land","caseTitle":"Province of the Punjab through Collector , Sheikhupura, etc v. Syed Ghazanfar Ali Shah, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._204-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  172","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":74},{"caseNumber":"C.A.56\/2011","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/.","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sattar v. Tariq Javaid & others","caseFileName":"C.A._56_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Agreement to sell not signed by one of the parties if proved to have been accepted and acted upon would be a valid agreement to sell\/contract that is enforceable in law. Section 22 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, deals with discretion as to granting relief of specific performance and has no bearing on the validity of the contract. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  98","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-11-2016","dateCreated":"04-01-2017","fileSizeInBytes":221},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.49\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Shahid Pervaiz v. Ejaz Ahmad & Others.","caseFileName":"C.R.P._49_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The concerned officials and authorities are directed to fix the seniority of all the police officers, who were given out of turn promotion, along with their batch-mates as if they were never given out of turn promotion.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  206","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-12-2016","dateCreated":"30-12-2016","fileSizeInBytes":1666},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.147\/2016","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Fulfillment of Talbs","caseTitle":"Basharat Ali Khan v. Muhammad Akbar","caseFileName":"C.R.P._147_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The prescribed elements of the service of a Talb-i-Ishhad notice are specific statutory requirements for the proof of service of notice of such Talb which demand has been construed to be a mandatory obligation of a preemptor. The failure by the vendee to highlight an obvious deficiency in the performance of Talb-i-Ishhad by the pre-emptor does not debar the former from pointing out the same at any stage of the proceedings to the Court. An omission whereby the Court has over-looked important material that would alter the decision in the case constitutes a fit ground for the grant of review under Article 188 of the Constitution.\r\n","citation":" \n2017   SCMR  309","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2016","dateCreated":"27-12-2016","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"C.P.160-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Civil Suits","caseTitle":"Syed Hakeem Shah and others v. Muhammad Idrees and others","caseFileName":"C.P._160-K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When the sale consideration is totally paid and possession was also delivered to the transferee and only on account of the ban on the registration of leases that transfer document was not executed, transferee was well within his right to seek execution of the sublease in his favour when the ban was lifted and when the transferor unlawfully entered into sale transaction with a third party. In this background, it cannot be said that suit was barred by time.","citation":"2017   SCMR  316","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-12-2016","dateCreated":"27-12-2016","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.A.532\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Rai Hassan Nawaz v. Haji Muhammad Ayub","caseFileName":"C.A._532_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Tribunal is vested with a suo motu power to scrutinize, inter alia, false or incorrect statements made by a returned candidate in respect of his own assets and liabilities and those of his spouse or his dependents. Inaccurate disclosure of proprietary and financial resources is fatal to the election of a returned candidate.","citation":"PLD 2017 SC  70","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2016","dateCreated":"27-12-2016","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.21-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"The State\/ ANF v. Muhammad Arshad","caseFileName":"Crl.A._21-K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  283","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-08-2016","dateCreated":"13-12-2016","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1264\/2006","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax v. M\/s Balochistan Concrete and Block Wokrs Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._1264_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The industrial undertaking is entitled to carry forward the losses incurred during the tax holiday period and have it set-off against the income earned in the assessment years beyond the tax holiday period in accordance with S. 35 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. However, the industrial undertaking is not entitled to carry forward to the post-tax holiday period the unabsorbed depreciation allowances that arose during the tax holiday period.","citation":"2017   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2016","dateCreated":"25-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.93\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Muhammad Sadiq v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._93_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Conviction of an accused could only be based upon concrete evidence which beyond reasonable doubt leads the Court to the conclusion that the accused before it is guilty of committing the reported crime. The act of absconding could not be made sole basis for the conviction of the accused when the other prosecution evidence is doubtful and riddled with contradictions.","citation":"2017   SCMR  144","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-11-2016","dateCreated":"25-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.A.417-L\/2009","caseSubject":"Arbitration\/Challenge to Award","caseTitle":"Province of the Punjab through Secy. to Govt. of the Punjab, etc v. M\/s Muhammad Tufail & Co through Muhammad Tufail (decd) through L.Rs","caseFileName":"C.A._417-L_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 53","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":80},{"caseNumber":"C.A.490\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Collector of Customs, Custom House , Karachi v. Syed Rehan Ahmed","caseFileName":"C.A._490_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The amendment brought about by the Finance Act, 2007 which omitted only the explanation to Section 194-C(3A) of the Customs Act and not the second proviso to Section 194-C(3) was a clear indication that the legislature no longer wanted the Single Member Benches constituted under Section 194-C(3A) to be prevented from hearing cases that involved decisions in relation to a question of law.","citation":"2017   SCMR  152","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-11-2016","dateCreated":"23-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3499\/2016","caseSubject":"Election\/Challenge of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Malik Abid Hussain v. Returning Officer and others","caseFileName":"C.P._3499_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Only such person, who is directly engaged in physical work and for his subsistence relies on physical labour or falls within the definition of 'worker' as contained in the Punjab Industrial Relations Act, 2010, qualifies to contest local bodies election on the reserved seat of 'worker' and not a person who is a businessman or a trader.\r\n","citation":"2017   SCMR  132","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-11-2016","dateCreated":"18-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.928-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Colony \/ Colonization of Govt. Land Act Cases\/Grant of Proprietary Rights","caseTitle":"Jan Muhammad v. The Member (Cononies)Board of Revenue Punjab, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._928-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"All allottees under the ?Grow More Food Scheme? launched by the Board of Revenue of the then West Pakistan were to be conferred proprietary rights, provided that they had fulfilled the terms and conditions on which temporary leases were granted. ","citation":"2017   SCMR  93","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-10-2016","dateCreated":"12-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.990\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Wajid Ali v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._990_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  116","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-07-2016","dateCreated":"12-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1049\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Welfare Funds M\/O Human Resources Development, Islamabad through Secretary v. East Pakistan Chrome Tannery (Pvt) Ltd through its GM (Finance), Lahore & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1049_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2017 SC  28","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-11-2016","dateCreated":"10-11-2016","fileSizeInBytes":1739},{"caseNumber":"C.A.104-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Rejection of plaint","caseTitle":"Al Meezan Investment Management Company Limited v. WAPDA First Sukuk Company Limited, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._104-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There are certain conditions precedent which are required to be satisfied before an interpleader suit can be competently filed. Firstly, there must be rival claimants. Secondly, the same debt, sum of money or other property, moveable or immoveable, must be claimed by two or more claimants. Thirdly, the person from whom such debt, sum of money etc. is being claimed must claim no interest in the same. These conditions are set out in Section 88 CPC and reinforced by Order 35 Rule 1 CPC.","citation":"PLD 2017 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-10-2016","dateCreated":"31-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":74},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.198\/2016","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/Others","caseTitle":"Asfandyar & another v. Kamran & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._198_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sardar Tariq Masood","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  2084","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-08-2016","dateCreated":"26-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1088\/2016","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery","caseTitle":"Ghania Hassan v. Shahid Hussain Shahid & another","caseFileName":"C.P._1088_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Dower could be fixed before marriage, at the time of marriage or thereafter. Further, dower once settled could always be increased subsequently by the husband or by an agreement between the parties. \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  2170","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-09-2016","dateCreated":"26-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.P.701\/2016","caseSubject":"WAPDA\/Electricity","caseTitle":"Peshawar Electric Supply Company Ltd v. Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman), Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._701_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appointment and or recruitment in a public sector company like Peshawar Electric Supply Company Ltd is an executive function and such function cannot be performed by the Wafaqi Mohtasib under Article 9 of the Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib Order 1983 which excludes his jurisdiction to entertain a complaint of the nature. If, ex facie, the Ombudsman is not conferred with such a power, and the order of the nature is passed by it, the High Court can always in exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction rectify such error. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 940","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-07-2015","dateCreated":"26-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.17\/2016","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTO ACTION TO EXAMINE THE VIRES OF SECTION 25(a) OF NAB ORDINANCE 1999","caseFileName":"S.M.C._17_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-10-2016","dateCreated":"26-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.84-Q\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"M\/s chiltan Ghee Mills v. Deputy Collector Sales Tax Customs House Quetta & another","caseFileName":"C.P._84-Q_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where the goods that are to be supplied are exempt from sales tax, the question of seeking refund of the sales tax paid on the purchase of raw material used in the production of exempt supplies does not arise at all and where a registered person is exempted from the liability of sales tax on its supplies, it does not mean that the tax that is paid on the purchase of raw material used in the making of such supplies would be liable to be refunded.","citation":"2016   SCMR  2183","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-03-2016","dateCreated":"13-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.927\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Habib ur Rehman v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._927_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  274","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-08-2016","dateCreated":"13-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":510},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.748\/2016","caseSubject":"Juvenile Cases","caseTitle":"Intizar Hussain v. Hamza Amir & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._748_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  633","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-06-2016","dateCreated":"13-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":489},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.724\/2016","caseSubject":"Sentence Already Undergone","caseTitle":"Muhammad Akram v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._724_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  568","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-06-2016","dateCreated":"13-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":495},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2280\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"Malik Imam Baksh v. Muhammad Boota (decd) thr. his LRs","caseFileName":"C.P._2280_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  516","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-08-2016","dateCreated":"13-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":529},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1800\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Others","caseTitle":"Tariq Mahmood & others v. Mst. Zubaida Begum & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1800_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2017   SCMR  326","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-05-2016","dateCreated":"13-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":553},{"caseNumber":"C.A.222-L\/2016","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment\/Others","caseTitle":"Mian Umar Ikram-ul-Haque v. Dr.Shahida Hasnain,etc","caseFileName":"C.A._222_L_2016_dt_10_10_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When the relationship of landlord and tenant is denied, the Rent Tribunal would lack jurisdiction, on account of the doctrine of jurisdictional fact, to pass an order for payment of rent due under Section 24 of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009 until and unless the Tribunal positively ascertains the relationship of tenancy and establishes that the respondent to the eviction application is in fact a \u2018tenant\u2019 in terms of Section 2(l) of the Act.","citation":"2016   SCMR  2186","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-10-2016","dateCreated":"10-10-2016","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"C.A.280-L\/2009","caseSubject":"Execution Petitions \/ Proceedings\/of Decree","caseTitle":"Shahida Bibi, etc v. Habib Bank Ltd, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._280-L_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 or the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans, Advances, Credits and Finances) Ordinance\/Act, 1997 are special laws and the Banking Tribunal\/Court in execution proceedings could adopt any procedure it deemed fit for the sale of the mortgaged property other than the one prescribed by the said laws and having once adopted a mode of execution as set out in the CPC an executing court can deviate therefrom with due application of mind and upon assigning justifiable reasons. Correct law has been laid down in the case of Muhammad Attique v. Jami Limited (PLD 2010 SC 993) and the judgment delivered in Asma Zafarul Hassan v. M\/s United Bank Ltd. (PLJ 1981 SC 242) (1981 SCMR 108) is not the correct law.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 995","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-09-2016","dateCreated":"29-09-2016","fileSizeInBytes":86},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.3\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Muhammad Akram v. Registrar, Islamabad High Court & others","caseFileName":"Const.P_3_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 961","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-09-2016","dateCreated":"26-09-2016","fileSizeInBytes":152},{"caseNumber":"C.A.82-K\/2015","caseSubject":"NAB\/Others","caseTitle":"The State through its Chairman NAB v. Hanif Hyder and others","caseFileName":"C.A.82-K-2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provision of section 25(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 (?NAO?), which authorizes the Chairman National Accountability Bureau (?NAB?) to accept the offer of 'Voluntary Return' from a person of the amount illegally earned by him, prima facie is in conflict with the provisions of the Constitution. The office is directed to place the order before the honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan, for passing appropriate orders to treat the matter as a suo motu petition, and lay down the principles regarding cognizance by NAB in corruption matters under section 9 of NAO.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  2031","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-02-2016","dateCreated":"08-09-2016","fileSizeInBytes":1377},{"caseNumber":"C.P.842\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Execution of Death Sentence","caseTitle":"Said Zaman Khan v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Defence, Govt. of Pakistan","caseFileName":"C.P._842_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The grounds on the basis whereof a challenge can be thrown to the proceedings taken, convictions and sentences awarded by the Field General Court Marshall (FGCM) have been specified so as to include the grounds of coram non judice, without jurisdiction or suffering from mala fides, including malice in law only. Neither the learned High Court nor this Court can sit in appeal over the conclusion drawn by the FGCM or analyze the evidence produced before it.","citation":"2017   SCMR  1249","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"30-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":506},{"caseNumber":"C.P.367-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Election\/of Local Bodies","caseTitle":"Haji Khan Bhatti v. Province of Sindh through Provincial Election Commission and others","caseFileName":"C.P._367-K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Interpreting the provision of Section 35 (1) (c) of the Sindh Local Government Act 2013, the Court holds that no person can seek his election on a reserved seat of a Council unless he is enrolled as a voter in the electoral rolls of any of the Wards that fall within the limits of such Council.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1970","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-08-2016","dateCreated":"25-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.113\/2016","caseSubject":"NAB\/Forfeiture of Property","caseTitle":"Muhammad Hashim Babar v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._113_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1827","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-09-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.623\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Shah Zeb & another v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.P._623_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016 SCMR 1740","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":557},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.9-P\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Uzair Khan v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._9-P_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1792","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-08-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":619},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.274\/2006","caseSubject":"NAB\/Enhancement of Sentence","caseTitle":"The State thr. Chairman  NAB. v. M.Asif Sehgal","caseFileName":"Crl.A._274_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The phrase wilful default was statutorily defined for the first time on 3rd February 2000, by National Accountability Bureau (Amendment) Ordinance, 2000, therefore, it is from this date that it is to be given effect as per the definition.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC  620","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":94},{"caseNumber":"C.Sh.A.1\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Amjad Ali v. Federal Shariat Court thr. its Registrar","caseFileName":"C.Sh.A._1_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No appeal or petition for leave to appeal, in terms of Articles 203-F and 212(3) of the Constitution, lies before the Supreme Court against a judgment or order passed by the Federal Shariat Court in service matters of its employees.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 767","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.142\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Engineers Study Forum (Regd.), etc v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"C.R.P._142_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The review jurisdiction of the Supreme Court does not allow re-hearing of a decided case more so when the Court has given conscious and deliberate decision on the point of law as well as of fact. The grounds not urged or raised at the time of hearing of constitution petition cannot be allowed to be raised in the review proceeding. The Court is not bound to give indefinite hearing to the counsel appearing for a party before it. \r\n","citation":" \n2016   SCMR  1961","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-08-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1662\/2016","caseSubject":"Civil Suits","caseTitle":"Hai Zarwar Khan (decd) thr. LRs & others v. Haji Rehman Bangash & another","caseFileName":"C.P._1662_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Order XVIII, Rule 4, C.P.C. provides that the evidence of the witnesses in attendance shall be taken orally in open Court in the presence and under the personal direction and superintendence of the Judge. It by no stretch of imagination provides for examination of witnesses who are not mentioned in the list of witnesses.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1976","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.272\/2016","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Imran Mohsin v. The State & others","caseFileName":"C.P._272_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1965","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":693},{"caseNumber":"C.P.261-K\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Azhar Hayat v. Karachi Port Trust and others","caseFileName":"C.P._261-K_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1916","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1022\/2012","caseSubject":"NAB","caseTitle":"Hafeez-ur-Rehman v. The Judge Accountability Court No.2 & another","caseFileName":"C.A._1022_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 763","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"C.A.6\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Foreign Affairs, Islamabad & others v. Ali Naseem","caseFileName":"C.A._6_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1744","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-11-2016","dateCreated":"24-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14158-G\/2016","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Alleged gross corruption in supply of oxygen,\r\r\nnitrogen gas and theft of medicine from hospitals)","caseFileName":"H.R.C._14158-G_2016_[19082016].pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2016","dateCreated":"19-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14158-G\/2016","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Alleged gross corruption in supply of oxygen, nitrogen gas and theft of medicine from\r\r\nhospitals)","caseFileName":"H.R.C._14158-G_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-08-2016","dateCreated":"18-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":9},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1428\/2016","caseSubject":"Tax\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Mustafa Impex, Karachi v. The Government of Pakistan thr. Secretary Finance, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1428_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Rules of Business, 1973 are binding on the Government and a failure to follow them would lead to an order lacking any legal validity. The Federal Government is the collective entity described as the Cabinet constituting the Prime Minister and Federal Ministers. Neither a Secretary, nor a Minister and nor the Prime Minister are the Federal Government and the exercise, or purported exercise, of a statutory power exercisable by the Federal Government by any of them, especially, in relation to fiscal matters, is constitutionally invalid and a nullity in the eyes of the law. Similarly, budgetary expenditure, or discretionary governmental expenditure can only be authorized by the Federal Government i.e. the Cabinet, and not the Prime Minister on his own.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 808","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-08-2016","dateCreated":"18-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":231},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2564\/2001","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Court Fees","caseTitle":"Khushi Muhammad (decd) thr. LRs. v. Mst. Fazal Bibi and others.","caseFileName":"C.A._2564_2001.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The principle of actus curiae neminem gravabit has no application where a litigant approaches a wrong forum and such appeal is entertained by the staff of the court or by the court or even admitted to regular hearing and, thus, no condonation of delay can be availed by the appellant on the basis of this principle.\r\n","citation":" \n2016   PLD  872","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-08-2016","dateCreated":"16-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":309},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14158-G\/2016","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Alleged gross corruption in supply of Oxygen. Nitrogen gas and theft of medicine from hospital). ","caseFileName":"H.R.C._14158_G_2016_dt_28_07_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-08-2016","dateCreated":"12-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14158-G\/2016","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Alleged gross corruption in supply of Oxygen. Nitrogen gas and theft of medicine from hospital). ","caseFileName":"H.R.C._14158_G_2016_dt_12_08_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-08-2016","dateCreated":"12-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.4-K\/2012","caseSubject":"Illegal Dispossession","caseTitle":"Shaikh Muhammad Naseem v. Mst. Farida Gul","caseFileName":"Crl.A_04-K_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When an offence as described in the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 has been committed, the proceedings under the said Act can be initiated as the same would be maintainable in law irrespective of any civil litigation that may be pending in any Court.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1931","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-05-2016","dateCreated":"08-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1499-L\/2012","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Muhammad Imran v. City District Govt through DCO Faisalabad, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._1499-L_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Notices are issued to the respondents as also the Government of Punjab to apprise the Court as to how the billboards\/hoardings of immense sizes which endanger public life and property are permitted to be installed at public places. \r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-08-2016","dateCreated":"04-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":7},{"caseNumber":"C.A.427\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Collector of Customs v. M\/s. Best Way Cement Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._427_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"On-Highway truck, meant for long hauls, has a bunk in its cabin for its use as driver?s sleeping area. In contrast, the Off-Highway dump truck is specifically designed for use in difficult terrains where the activities of mining, quarrying or construction of big buildings are carried out. Volvo FM 400 trucks that were imported by the respondent companies, being On-Highway trucks and not Off-Highway dump trucks, were rightly treated by the Appraisement Collectorate of the Customs as not being a part of the plant of a cement factory.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1982","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2016","dateCreated":"04-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.376-K\/2016","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Application against the illegal adjustment in Revenue Record Land is being given to Bahria Foundation, filed by Syed Mehmmod Akhter Naqvi)","caseFileName":"C.M.A._376_K_2016_dt_01_08_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in order to safeguard the public interest and to avoid multitude of proceedings, passes interim restraining order against Bahria Town, Malir Development Authority and Board of Revenue Sindh, and directs the NAB to immediately obtain Google Earth maps\/images of the entire land stated to be in possession of Bahria Town as per the survey report so as to ensure that no further construction or development activity is carried out on the specified land. \r\n","citation":"2017 P.S.C. 517","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-08-2016","dateCreated":"01-08-2016","fileSizeInBytes":246},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1242\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Sardar Tariq Khan Mazari v. Govt. of the Punjab through Secretary Industries & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1242_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When the Provincial Government stopped the expansion of the sugar business it did not offend Article 18 of the Constitution. Notification issued by the Government can be challenged in constitutional jurisdiction of High Court if it is based on mala fide or for ulterior purposes or was against the public or national interest.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 778","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-07-2016","dateCreated":"25-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":162},{"caseNumber":"C.P.41\/2008","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Illegal Dispossession","caseTitle":"Mst. Ghulshan Bibi, etc v. Muhammad Sadiq, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._41_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Without any distinction any person who illegally dispossessed, grabbed, controlled or occupied property of a lawful owner or occupier shall be liable for prosecution under the provisions of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 769","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-06-2016","dateCreated":"19-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.382\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Umbaras & another v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._382_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1558","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":729},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.230\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Sana Ullah v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.P._230_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1527","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":633},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.120\/2016","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ishaq & another v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._120_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":531},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.190\/2016","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Abid @ Rana v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._190_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1515","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":648},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1515\/2016","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Mian Nazir Ahmed v. The State & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1515_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1536","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-02-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":519},{"caseNumber":"C.P.892\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Nadeem Ahmad Khan & others v. Government of Balochistan thr. Secretary, Local Government, Quetta & another","caseFileName":"C.P._892_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1543","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-06-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"C.P.319\/2016","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Arif Khan v. Auditor General of Pakistan, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._319_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1608","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":615},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1428\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Qayyum Khan v. Divisional Forest Officer, Mardan Wildlife Division, Mardan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1428_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1602","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":378},{"caseNumber":"C.A.886\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yaqub Nadeem Sethi v. Muhammad Ilyas Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._886_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"As the appellant?s winning margin was 3982 votes, the difference of 178 missing votes would have made no impact on the final result. Hence nothing substantial came on record of the Election Tribunal which would have justified nullifying the election result.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1632","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.321-L\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Ch.Muhammad Yousaf Kaselia v. Peer Ghulam Mohy-ud-Din Chishti, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._321-L_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The disclosure of liabilities by the contesting candidates is more important than the disclosure of assets. Therefore, non-disclosure of any liability is to be met with penal action in the same manner as non-disclosure of any asset.","citation":"PLD 2016  SC 689","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.185\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Chaudhry Hamid Hameed v. Barrister Abdullah Mumtaz Kahloon & others","caseFileName":"C.A._185_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1551","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-05-2016","dateCreated":"14-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2117\/2016","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority thr.its Chairman v. Independent Media Corporation (Pvt)Ltd.thr.its Attorney","caseFileName":"C.P._2117_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petition is converted into appeal and disposed of in the light of the terms agreed upon between the parties.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-07-2016","dateCreated":"09-07-2016","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.510\/2012","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Others","caseTitle":"Ghulam Qadir & others v. Sh. Abdul Wadood & others","caseFileName":"C.A._510_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The revisional court is not to dismiss a revision petition for non-prosecution but to decide it on merits only where the court has taken cognizance of the matter of its own, generally called its suo motu powers. When the revisional court decides to take up a matter suo motu, it should have necessarily done so by a conscious application of judicial mind and a thorough examination of the record. Where the revisional court has taken up the matter at the behest of a person, the court has the power to dismiss the civil revision for non-prosecution even after it has been admitted to regular hearing, and is not bound to decide the same on merits.","citation":"PLD 2016  SC 712","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2016","dateCreated":"08-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":85},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1067\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o National Food Security and Reseach, Islamabad v. Agritech Ltd & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1067_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The working of the Government neither stops, nor should stop, upon the retirement of a Secretary of a Government department and it would not be a reasonable ground for condonation of the delay. Further, the classification made between fertilizer made from imported rock and fertilizer made from domestic rock does not constitute intelligible differentia having rational nexus to the very object of the subsidy scheme announced by the government.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 676","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2016","dateCreated":"06-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1109\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Nematullah  v. Chairman Govt. Body WWB\/Secy. to Govt. of KPK Labour Dept. & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1109_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TARIQ PARVEZ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1299","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-03-2016","dateCreated":"06-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":8},{"caseNumber":"C.A.843\/2012","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"DCO\/Chairman District Recruitment Committee, Khanewal & others v. Kishwar Sultana & others","caseFileName":"C.A._843_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1288","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2016","dateCreated":"06-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1628\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Mst. Shamuna Badshah Qaisrani v. Khawaja Muhammad Daud Sulemani & others","caseFileName":"C.A.1628_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"At the time of filing of the nomination papers certain properties were not disclosed in the nomination papers though these properties were admittedly in the name of the appellant and her spouse in the revenue record. The legal objection that section 76A of Representation of the People Act, 1976 (\u201cROPA\u201d) is contrary to the provisions of Article 225 of the Constitution is misconceived. Article 225 of the Constitution clearly provides that no election to a House or Provincial Assembly shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such tribunal and in such manner as may be determined by Act of Parliament. ROPA is an Act of the Parliament, which has provided the manner in which election is to be challenged before the Election Tribunal. The scope of challenge, which covers the acts of corrupt and illegal practices committed by or on behalf of the returned candidates in the conduct of the elections, is mentioned in Section 68 of ROPA whereas Section 76A grants suo motu powers to the Election Tribunal to declare election of a returned candidate void on certain grounds which include non-disclosure or incorrect disclosure of assets of the candidate or his spouse or his dependents. \r\n\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1420","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-05-2016","dateCreated":"06-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.605\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Rizwan Javed & others v. Secretary Agriculture Livestock & Corporation Department KPK, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"C.A._605_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appellants who were discriminated against with respect to other similarly placed project employees are directed to be reinstated in service from the date of their termination and are also held entitled to the back benefits for the period they had worked with the project or the Provincial Government, and their service for the intervening period i.e. from the date of their termination till the date of their reinstatement is to be computed towards their pensionary benefits.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1443","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2016","dateCreated":"02-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.134-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Govt. of KPK thr. Secy. Agriculture & others v. Adnanullah","caseFileName":"C.A._134-P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Respondents were appointed on contract basis and were in employment\/service for several years and projects on which they were appointed have also been taken on the regular budget of the Government, therefore, their status as project employees has ended once their services were transferred to the different attached Government Departments, in terms of Section 3 of the North West Frontier Province Employees (Regularization of Services) Act, 2009. The Government of KPK cannot adopt a policy of cherry picking to regularize the employees of certain projects while terminating the services of other similarly placed employees.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1375","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2016","dateCreated":"02-06-2016","fileSizeInBytes":90},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1291\/2005","caseSubject":"Tax\/Custom Duty","caseTitle":"Collector of Customs Apprainment and another v. D.G. Khan Cement Co. Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._1291_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The very use of Off-Highway dump trucks at the quarries makes them part and parcel of the industrial process of a cement factory, and thus such trucks fall within the definition of the respondent company's cement plant and are entitled for exemption from customs duty and sales tax. However, the date of import would determine the applicability of the customs duty and exempted duties.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1448","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2016","dateCreated":"26-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.P.548-P\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Secretary Industries Commerce & Mineral Development & others v. The Frontier Chemical Industries Ram Bagh, Mardan","caseFileName":"C.P._548-P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1410","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2016","dateCreated":"23-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.P.380\/2014","caseSubject":"WAPDA\/Electricity","caseTitle":"Peshawar Electric Supply Company Ltd (PESCO) v. M\/s Syntron Ltd  & others","caseFileName":"C.P._380_2014_Urdu.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1596","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2016","dateCreated":"23-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":635},{"caseNumber":"C.P.357\/2016","caseSubject":"Family\/Maintenance Allowance","caseTitle":"Mst. Yasmeen Bibi v. Muhammad Ghazanfar Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.P._357_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The landed property, given to the wife, or the undertaking given in the \"Nikah Nama\", to be transferred to her name, is conclusive in nature and may be construed as a part of dower or a gift in consideration of marriage. When the provisions of sections 16 to 20 of the C.P.C. stand excluded from the proceedings before the Family Court then, the question of its territorial jurisdiction would never arise, provided that the Family Court where the wife resides, shall have the exclusive jurisdiction over all such matters as Rule 6 of the West Pakistan Family Court Rules, 1965 so provides.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 613","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2016","dateCreated":"23-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.A.613\/2014","caseSubject":"Tax\/Stamp Duty","caseTitle":"M\/s Lafrage Pakisan Cement Company Ltd v. District Collector, Chakwal & others","caseFileName":"C.A._613_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where possession of mortgaged property is not given or agreed to be given, the stamp-duty shall be charged on the amount secured by such deed as is provided by Article 15 of the First Schedule of the Stamp Act.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 604","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2016","dateCreated":"23-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.A.359\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Dr. Zahid Javed v. Dr. Tahir Riaz Chaudhry & others","caseFileName":"C.A._359_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chancellor while exercising revisional powers under Section 11-A of the University of the Punjab Act 1973 is not required to seek advice of the Chief Minister, therefore, on this legal point, view rendered in the cases of University of Punjab v. Sardar Ali (1992 SCMR 1093) and Federation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Tariq Pirzada (1999 SCMR 2189) is approved whereas the contrary view rendered in the case of Rana Aamer Raza Ashfaq v. Dr. Minhaj Ahmad Khan (2012 SCMR 6) is not approved.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 637","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2016","dateCreated":"20-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":2773},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1002\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Sultan Mehmood Hinjra v. Malik Ghulam Mustafa Khar & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1002_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rahman","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Verification of an election petition in the prescribed manner is a mandatory requirement and that too in accordance with the provisions of Order VI Rule 15 C.P.C. specifying to numbered paragraphs of the pleadings what he verifies of his own knowledge and what he verifies upon information received and believed to be true. When an objection with regard to the maintainability of an election petition for non compliance of a mandatory provision is raised, the Election Tribunal should decide that very objection first because if such objection sustained then the Election Tribunal would be left with no option but to dismiss the election petition.","citation":"2016  SCMR  1312","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-04-2016","dateCreated":"13-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.235\/2010","caseSubject":"For Enhancement\/L.I. to Death","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ameer v. Riyat Khan & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._235_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1233","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2016","dateCreated":"12-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.178-L\/2009","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Nasir Javed, etc v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._178-L_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1144","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-03-2016","dateCreated":"12-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2133\/2006","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Mst. Noor Bibi, etc. v. Ghulam Qamar, etc.","caseFileName":"C.A._2133_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A childless widow, under Shia law, is disqualified from claiming share from the estate of her deceased husband but only to the extent of lands (immoveable property). She would, however, be entitled to her one forth share in the value of trees and buildings standing thereon as well as in his movable property including debts due to him though they may be secured by a usufructuary mortgage or otherwise.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1195","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2016","dateCreated":"12-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1033\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Arif Muhammad Hassani v. Amanullah & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1033_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Unsubstantiated and bald allegations of rigging cannot be made basis to nullify the entire election result.","citation":"2016 \u00a0 SCMR \u00a01332","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2016","dateCreated":"12-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.A.774\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Phul Peer Shah v. Hafeez Fatima","caseFileName":"C.A._774_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The mutation by itself is not sufficient to prove the transaction but it must be independently proved through cogent, reliable and convincing evidence and more stringently in the case of illiterate ?Parda Nasheen?  lady.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1225","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2016","dateCreated":"12-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.A.446\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Dispute about inheritance","caseTitle":"Ghulam Abbas & others v. Muhammad Sahfi (decd) thr. LRs. & others","caseFileName":"C.A._446_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The withdrawal of the earlier suit by the predecessor of the appellants\/plaintiffs was unconditional or that the impugned mutation did not infringe any terms of the compromise claimed by him with the predecessor of the respondents at the time of withdrawal of the suit, therefore, the later suit filed by the appellants\/plaintiffs on the same cause of action is barred under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC. An heir, who is directly affected by a wrongfully recorded mutation of inheritance but fails to challenge such mutation for a considerable length of time until his death, deprives his heirs of locus standi to dispute such mutation on the ground of his estoppel, abandonment of claim\/cause of action.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1403","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-04-2016","dateCreated":"12-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.6-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Irfan & another v. Muhammad Yousuf & another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._6-P_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1190","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2016","dateCreated":"09-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3460\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/Challenge of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Munawar Hussain Bukhari v. Appellate Authority\/Tribunal\/ASJ, Alipur, District Muzaffargarh & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3460_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"For the purposes of attracting disqualification under section 27(2)(e) of the Punjab Local Government Act, 2013, it is to be seen that the candidate or the elected member of the local body is in the service of \"statutory body\" or \"body\", which is owned and controlled by or that controlling share or interest therein is of Federal, Provincial or Local Government.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1087","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2016","dateCreated":"09-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":60},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2167\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Khan Toti & others v. Government of NWFP thr. Secretary Finance, Peshawar & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2167_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Moharars, Readers and Examiners attached to the District Judiciary are holding similar grades\/BPS scales like Senior and Junior Clerks serving in the executive department, therefore, they are entitled to the same benefits.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1206","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2016","dateCreated":"09-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":56},{"caseNumber":"C.A.908\/2012","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd thr. its Executive Wise President (Legal Affairs) v. Employyes Old Age Benefits Institution & another","caseFileName":"C.A._908_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited cannot be regarded a statutory body and is liable to pay contributions under the provisions of Employees? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976 from the date of its incorporation.","citation":"2016   PLC  483","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-03-2016","dateCreated":"09-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.529\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Seniority","caseTitle":"Faqir Muhammad Jatoi v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others","caseFileName":"C.P._529_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court delineates the structure of the Sindh Police Force and issues directives with regard to the matters of recruitment, probation, confirmation, training, promotion and transfer of its personnel.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1254","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2015","dateCreated":"07-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":129},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.209-K\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Report of Karachi Cantonment Board regarding Hoardings and Signboards installed with permission and without permission","caseFileName":"C.M.A._209_K_2014_dt_5-5-2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No billboard or hoarding can be permitted to be installed on any public property by any authority under the garb of by-laws which militate against the civil rights of the public at large. Further, the learned Additional Attorney General is directed to hold meetings, within a month, with all the stakeholders who grant permission for installation of billboards\/hoardings in Karachi to finalize the amendments in the proposed by-laws applicable beyond the public properties so that city-wide uniformity could be achieved on the one hand and safety measures of the citizens of Karachi shall be ensured on the other hand.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2016","dateCreated":"05-05-2016","fileSizeInBytes":158},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1440\/2007","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Dausa etc v. Province of Punjab, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._1440_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The amendment application by the appellants\/plaintiffs for incorporating the correct date of the mortgage in the plaint does not alter the nature of the case pleaded by them. The prayer for the incorporation of an undisputed fact is of a formal nature and brings factual clarity which promotes the fair adjudication of the controversy and the interest of justice. Compliance with the said criteria satisfies the principles for allowing amendment in pleadings even by the highest Court. \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1621","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2016","dateCreated":"27-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.12-P\/2011","caseSubject":"For Enhancement","caseTitle":"The State through Director ANF Peshawar v. Rashmali Khan","caseFileName":"Crl.A._12-P_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2016 SC 471","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2016","dateCreated":"25-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1519\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Haroon-ur-Rasheed v. Chairman Lahore Development Authority & another","caseFileName":"C.A._1519_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MUSHIR ALAM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The remedy of appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal against any order passed under Ss. 16 & 17 of the Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006 could only be invoked and availed by the employees falling within the ambit of S. 2(h)(ii) of the said Act and not by employees of statutory corporation\/authority\/body etc. falling under S. 2(h)(i) of the said Act. Employees of a statutory corporation\/authority\/body proceeded against under statutory rules or any statutory dispensation could challenge action of the competent authority under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan.\r\n","citation":" \n2016   SCMR  931","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-02-2016","dateCreated":"25-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":65},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1213\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Govt of KPK through Chief Secretary Peshawar & others v. Hayat Hussain & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1213_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rahman","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The eligibility criterion of promotion of government employees is essentially an administrative matter falling within the policy decision making of the government and interference in such matters by the Courts is not warranted.","citation":"2016   SCMR  1021","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2016","dateCreated":"25-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.424\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Aman Ullah v. Mst. Ghulam Bibi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._424_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions of Section 154 Cr.P.C. are to be read in a pragmatic, holistic and realistic manner in order to ensure that its true spirit and object is achieved and it is not abused at the hands of individuals or police, who may be adamant to make mockery of this system. It is for these reasons that no definite principle can be laid down barring the registration of another FIR.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 484","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2016","dateCreated":"25-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.A.101\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(On appeal from judgment dated 27.04.2010, of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar, passed in Writ Petitions No.205 of 2010 and 33 of 2009).","caseFileName":"C.A._101_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The expression ?upgradation?, which is not defined either in the Civil Servants Act or the Rules framed thereunder, is distinct from the expression ?promotion?; it does not form part of the terms and conditions of service of the civil servants and is amenable to writ jurisdiction of the High Court.","citation":"2016   SCMR  859","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-02-2016","dateCreated":"25-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":360},{"caseNumber":"C.A.77\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Professor Dr. Razia Sultana v. Professor Dr. Ghazala Yasmeen Nizam & others","caseFileName":"C.A._77_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 12(1) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Universities Act, 2012 gives discretion to the Chancellor\/Governor to appoint anyone out of the candidates recommended by the Search Committee on the advice of the Chief Minister and mere allegation without supporting material that the appointed person belongs to the constituency of the Chief Minister cannot be termed as an act of mala fide. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  992","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2016","dateCreated":"25-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.97\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ishtiaq Ahmed, Ex PS Supreme Court of Pakistan v. Hon'ble Competent Authority through its Registrar","caseFileName":"Const.P._97_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Rule 13 of the Supreme Court (Appointment of Officers and Servants and Terms and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1982 (since repealed) and Rule 17 of the Supreme Court Establishment Service Rules, 2015, which barred an accused officer\/staff member of the Supreme Court from being represented by a counsel before the Appellate Forum are not ultra vires the Constitution.","citation":"2016   SCMR  943","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-03-2016","dateCreated":"18-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.247\/2011","caseSubject":"Service","caseTitle":"P.T.C.L., etc v. Masood Ahmed Bhatti, etc","caseFileName":"C.R.P._247_ 2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The employees of Pakistan Telegraph and Telephone Department who were first transferred to Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation and then to Pakistan Telecommunication Company did not remain civil servants any more but the terms and conditions of their service provided by sections 3 to 22 of the Civil Servants Act and protected by section 9(2) of the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991 and sections 35(2), 36(a) and (b) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996 are essentially statutory. Violation of any of them would thus be amenable to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  1362","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-02-2016","dateCreated":"18-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":63},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1219\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Khalid Hussain Magsi v. Mir Abdul Rahim Rind & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1219_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Doubtful voting patterns at disputed polling stations justify fresh election in the constituency.","citation":"2016   SCMR  900","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2016","dateCreated":"18-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.A.493\/2011","caseSubject":"Tax","caseTitle":"M\/s. X.E.N. Shahpur Division (LJC) Quarry Division Sargodha v. The Collector of Sales Tax (Appeals) Faisalabad, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._493_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1030","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-03-2016","dateCreated":"18-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":54},{"caseNumber":"C.A.384\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Khan v. Obaid Ullah Jan Babat & others","caseFileName":"C.A._384_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Only a validly nominated candidate who has neither withdrawn nor retired from the elections i.e. a contesting candidate can file or maintain an election petition under Section 52 of the Representation of People Act, 1976.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 492","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-03-2016","dateCreated":"18-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":247},{"caseNumber":"C.A.760\/2016","caseSubject":"Election\/of Local Bodies","caseTitle":"The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another v. Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM) & others","caseFileName":"C.A._760_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2016","dateCreated":"15-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1072\/2005","caseSubject":"Service\/Absence without Leave","caseTitle":"Chairman, Pakistan Railway, Govt. of Pakistan and another v. Shahjhan Shah","caseFileName":"C.A._1072_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Article 371-A of the Civil Service Regulations would not ipso facto or simpliciter allow government servants rendering temporary service in a temporary establishment for more than five years to be entitled to grant of pension, rather such period would only be counted towards such government servants' pension if otherwise entitled to pension.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 534","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2016","dateCreated":"14-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"C.P.781\/2016","caseSubject":"Exit Control List\/Removing the name","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan through Collector of Customs, Model Custom Collectorate, Islamabad v. Ayyan Ali & Others","caseFileName":"C.P._781_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016 P.S.C. 938","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2016","dateCreated":"13-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1084\/2008","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax Legal Division, Lahore v. Khurshid Ahmad","caseFileName":"C.A._1084_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 545","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2016","dateCreated":"05-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":130},{"caseNumber":"C.A.870\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/In case of Exit Control List","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Interior, Govt. of Pakistan v. General (R) Pervez Musharraf & others","caseFileName":"C.A._870_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Freedom of movement is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of the country under Article 15 of the Constitution and it cannot be abridged or denied arbitrarily without any lawful justification. Further, Article 4 of the Constitution guarantees right to every individual to be dealt with in accordance with law. A complete mechanism in the form of Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981, read with Exit from Pakistan (Control), Rules, 2010 is provided for the situation which needs to restrict the movement of any person from going abroad where there is lawful and valid justification for this purpose. \r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 570","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2016","dateCreated":"01-04-2016","fileSizeInBytes":502},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1491\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Younas Abbas v. Additional Sessions Judge Chakwal & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1491_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The functions performed by the Ex-officio Justice of Peace being quasi judicial in nature cannot be termed as executive, administrative or ministerial. Such functions being complementary to those of the police do not amount to interference in the investigative domain of the latter. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 581","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-02-2016","dateCreated":"28-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":118},{"caseNumber":"C.A.939\/2004","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition\/Others","caseTitle":"Dilawar Hussain and others v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Department and others","caseFileName":"C.A._939_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The land owner of acquired land shall not be entitled to receive additional compensation for the amount already received and that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 would only be attracted to those cases where some amount remained unpaid\/outstanding on account of delay by the acquiring authority. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 514","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-03-2016","dateCreated":"28-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"C.A.39\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Enhancement in pay and allowances","caseTitle":"Province of Sindh Thr. its Chief Secretary v. Amanullah Khan Yousafzai & another","caseFileName":"C.A._39_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Majority equity ownership of the respondent Corporation is with the Federal Government and not with Muslim citizens of Pakistan. Federal Government is excluded from the status of ?Sahib-e-Nisab? under Section 2(xxiii)(a) of the Ordinance. Hence, respondent Corporation stands exempted from the charge and collection of Zakat.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 468","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-02-2016","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":108},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.634\/2015","caseSubject":"Sentence\/Suspension of","caseTitle":"Sobha Khan v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._634_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1325","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2016","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.A.525\/2013","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Ghulam Farid & another v. Sher Rehman (decd) thr. LRs.","caseFileName":"C.A._525_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Fraud vitiates every solemn transaction and Court of law shall, in no eventuality, endorse and perpetuate a fraud once it is proved to have been committed. Any transaction, which is the result of misrepresentation, is not protected on the ground of period of limitation. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  862","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-01-2016","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1169\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Warraich v. Muhammad Nasir Cheema & othes","caseFileName":"C.A._1169_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  998","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-05-2015","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":100},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.888\/2015","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Naseem Akhtar v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.P._888_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-01-2016","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.A.946\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Ch. Muhammad Ayaz v. Asif Mehmood & others","caseFileName":"C.A._946_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rahman","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Non-compliance of the mandatory provisions contained in Section 55(3) of the Representation of the People Act as well as Order VI Rule 15(2) CPC as to the verification of the election petition along with schedule and annexures is fatal and the same could not be cured after expiry of the limitation period.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  849","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2015","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"C.A.294\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Nawaz Chandio v. Muhammad Ismail Rahu & others","caseFileName":"C.A._294_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The principle of severability is well recognized and the same is duly attracted to elections thereby isolating the result in a few Polling Stations where poll was contaminated and directing a fresh poll. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  875","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-12-2015","dateCreated":"17-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":217},{"caseNumber":"C.A.94-P\/2012","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Islam-ud-Din (decd.) thr. LRs. & others  v. Mst. Noor Jahan (decd.) thr. LRs. & others ","caseFileName":"C.A._94-P_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  986","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-03-2016","dateCreated":"02-03-2016","fileSizeInBytes":340},{"caseNumber":"C.A.118\/2016","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Abdul Hameed Dogar v. Federal Government, Islamabad through Secretary M\/o Interior & others","caseFileName":"C.A._118_2016.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A person aiding or abetting another in an act is privy to the act itself but a beneficiary takes benefit or advantage of the act after the event and he may not necessarily be a party to the act itself. The Court allows the appeal filed against the decision of Special Court directing the Federal Government to treat Mr. Shaukat Aziz, Mr. Zahid Hamid and Mr. Abdul Hameed Dogar, who held the offices of the Prime Minister, Federal Law Minister and Judge of the Supreme Court on 03.11.2007 respectively, as co-accused of General (r) Pervez Musharraf facing trial on the charge of committing high treason. Fresh investigation into the said offence by associating any person with the same lies within the prerogative of the Federal Government.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 454","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-02-2016","dateCreated":"26-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1471\/2015","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"Zahid Zaman Khan & others v. Khan Afsar & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1471_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The judicial determination of the value of a suit for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction by a judicial forum shall have precedence over the valuation made by the plaintiff and it shall be such valuation which shall be taken into account while determining the forum of appeal from a decree passed in such a suit. All trial courts of the country are directed that separate decree sheets with all the material particulars as per the requirements of Order XX of the C.P.C. must be drawn up where two or more suits have been consolidated and disposed of through a common judgment. Where the decrees passed have different valuations i.e. one falling within the jurisdiction of the High Court and the other in the jurisdiction of the District Court, the appellants are required to file two appeals before the High Court and the District Judge according to the value of the original suit. The learned High Court, however, while exercising its power under Section 24 of the C.P.C. if a case is made out within the purview of the section ibid may transfer the appeal filed before the District Judge to the High Court and decide the same along with the appeal which had been competently filed before the High Court. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 409","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2016","dateCreated":"24-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"C.A.158\/2006","caseSubject":"Tax","caseTitle":"Zila Council Jhelum through District Coordination Officer v. M\/s  Pakistan Tobacco Company Ltd. thr. its Company and another","caseFileName":"C.A._158_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A statute is not to be applied retrospectively in the absence of express enactment or necessary intendment especially where the statute is to affect vested rights, past and closed transactions or facts or events that have already occurred. The charging section of a fiscal statute is the key and pivotal provision which imposes a fiscal liability upon a taxpayer\/person, thus, it should be strictly construed and applied. When companies in question stood excluded from the payment of 'goods exit tax' in terms of the un-amended provision, then any subsequent amendment in such provisions could not be used to collect such tax with retrospective effect. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 398","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-02-2016","dateCreated":"24-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":49},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Javed Iqbal  & another v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._24_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  787","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-02-2016","dateCreated":"23-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":105},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3451\/2015","caseSubject":"NAB\/Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Chairman NAB thr. Prosecutor General Accountability & another v. Muhammad Khalid","caseFileName":"C.P._3451_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TARIQ PARVEZ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once a court of competent jurisdiction by exercising its powers which are discretionary in nature has issued a favourable order in respect of a person accused in an offence, this Court is always slow to interfere unless it finds that the order granting bail was against the record, perverse or unreasonable.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  676","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-01-2016","dateCreated":"16-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":134},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.163\/2013","caseSubject":"Life Imprisonment\/Narcotic Substance Case","caseTitle":"Taimoor Khan  v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._163_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  621","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-02-2015","dateCreated":"16-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":191},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.72\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Justice Raja Jalal-ud-Din v. Federation of Pakistan & Others.","caseFileName":"Const.P._72_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TARIQ PARVEZ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Granting full rights to the people of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) does not in any way prejudice the eventual determination of the status of Jammu and Kashmir. There should be no discrepancy in the fundamental rights available to those in GB relative to Pakistani citizens anywhere in the country. GB Supreme Appellate Court is a \u201cconstitutional\u201d court inasmuch as it has the jurisdiction to strike down any law made by a GB legislature on the recognized concept of ultra vires but it would not be in a position to question, in any manner and on any ground whatsoever, the very law that created it.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 269","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-01-2016","dateCreated":"16-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":145},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3729\/2015","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"M\/s World Trans Logistics & another, Karachi v. Silk Bank Ltd, Karachi & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3729_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The pledgee-bank, in view of the letter of pledge, was only having constructive possession of the pledged goods, therefore, it is not liable to account for the alleged theft or misappropriation of the pledged goods.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  800","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-01-2016","dateCreated":"16-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.176\/2015","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC","caseTitle":"Tehsil Council (now TMA) Pattoki thr. its Administrator Pattoki, District Kasur v. Faqeer Muhammad","caseFileName":"C.A._176_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Doctrine of merger was applicable to the reversal and modification cases and also to all those cases in which the judgment etc. of a lower forum had been affirmed in appeal or revision by a higher forum(s) subject to certain exceptions. Where the appellate\/revisional\/ constitutional forum recorded reasons on the consideration of the issues of law and\/or fact, the judgment of subordinate court\/forum would merge into the decision of the appellate court etc. irrespective of the fact that such judgment reversed, varied or affirmed the decision of the subordinate court\/forum. Forum for application under S.12(2) of the C.P.C., in such circumstances, would be maintainable before the appellate\/revisional\/ constitutional forum (High Court, District Court, Tribunal or Special Court as the case may be). However, doctrine of merger has some exception, where appeal\/revision\/writ not disposed of on merits but on some other grounds. Same rule is applicable to Supreme Court as well. Where leave to appeal was declined by the Supreme Court, the judgment would not merge into the leave refusing order for the purposes of an application under S.12(2), C.P.C. which could only be filed before the last forum.  When a question of law and fact had been elaborately and explicitly dealt with by the Supreme Court in the leave refusing order, an application in the nature of S.12(2) of the C.P.C. could be filed before the Supreme Court. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-01-2016","dateCreated":"10-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":95},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.43-K\/2012","caseSubject":"Service","caseTitle":"Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and others v. Iqbal Hussain Shaikh","caseFileName":"C.R.P.43-K_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The seniority of the respondents was to be determined in terms of Rule 4 of the Civil Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1993, which provided that seniority of persons on deputation was to be reckoned from the date of their regular appointment\/permanent absorption in the transferee Group or Department and not from their posting or transfer (date) or any earlier date. \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  773","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-11-2015","dateCreated":"09-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":212},{"caseNumber":"C.A.194-P\/2010","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Ownership","caseTitle":"Mst. Saadia v. Mst. Gul Bibi","caseFileName":"C.A.194-P_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" If a document in the form of memorandum of gift has been executed between the parties (donor and donee) as an acknowledgment of past transaction of oral gift, its non-registration will not have much bearing as regards its authenticity or validity, but the other important thing is the proof of fulfillment of three conditions of a valid gift: \"offer\", \"acceptance\" and \"delivery of possession\".\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  662","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-12-2015","dateCreated":"09-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":358},{"caseNumber":"C.A.95\/2005","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v. The Board of Trustees, Employees Old Age benefits and another","caseFileName":"C.A._95_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Kitchen department of the appellant, PIA, producing food at mass scale for passengers is more akin to manufacturing plant, bringing such process within the meaning of ?manufacturing process? and consequently rendering the kitchen department a ?factory? in terms of Factories Act. Same is the case with maintenance department. Kitchen and engineering departments of the appellant are declared to be establishments within the purview of the Employees? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976. ","citation":" \n2011   SCMR  1102","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-02-2016","dateCreated":"09-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.135\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Tariq Mehmood v. Naseer Ahmed and another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._135_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"In all cases covered by the provisions of subsection (2) of section 345, Cr.P.C. no compromise entered into by the parties privately can have any legal sanctity or validity vis-\u00e0-vis compounding of the relevant offence unless the court before which the prosecution for the relevant offence is pending grants a formal permission accepting the compromise between the parties and in all such cases if no prosecution is pending before any court when the compromise is entered into and no permission by the trial court is granted to compound the offence any compromise privately entered into between the parties cannot be accepted as valid compounding as is declared by subsection (7) of section 345, Cr.P.C. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 347","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-01-2016","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":49},{"caseNumber":"C.A.654\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf Baig v. NESCOM, thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others","caseFileName":"C.A._654_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The rules framed under Sections 7, 9 and 15 of the National Command Authority Act, 2010 are statutory on all accounts and by every attribute. \r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 377","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-01-2016","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":102},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1774\/2014","caseSubject":"Allotment\/of Plot","caseTitle":"Mehmood Khan & others v. Government of Balochistan, Local Government Department, Quetta thr. its Secretary & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1774_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The land was compulsorily acquired by the Government of Balochistan for a public purpose, \"public purpose\" having been exempted from the bar against compulsory acquisition as prescribed by Article 24 of the Constitution, which provision guarantees protection of proprietary rights in accordance with law, and therefore, not utilizing the land for the public purpose and selling the same to private person(s) is violative of the object, spirit, principle and the purpose of the provisions of Article 24 of the Constitution, in view whereof, the land, even in case the same would not have been required for any public purpose, and even otherwise could have been lawfully sold, the person(s) from whom the same was acquired ought to have been provided an opportunity to participate in the process so as to enable them to make an offer for its purchase in accordance with law.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1428","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-05-2015","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1648-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Rafique Bhatti, etc v. The Co-operative Judge, LHR, etc","caseFileName":"C.P._1648-L_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The general powers of a liquidator\/receiver to avoid voluntary transfers and make pro rata distribution meant to treat similarly placed creditors of an insolvent entity equally are encapsulated in the provisions of Section 7 of the Punjab Undesirable Cooperative Societies (Dissolution) Act, 1993. Accordingly, the preference given to the petitioners over other similarly placed creditors of the two defunct CFCs defeats any claim of locus poenitentiae posited by the petitioners. The said reason therefore suffices to cancel the NOC issued in favour of the petitioners.","citation":"2016   SCMR  670","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2015","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1540\/2006","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC","caseTitle":"Khurshid Ahmad & others v. Rana Mumtaz Ahmad & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1540_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chairman Evacuee Trust Property is competent to decide whether an evacuee property is attached to charitable, religious or educational trust or institution or otherwise. Any proceeding in such regard before the Civil Court shall be coram non judice.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  679","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-01-2016","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":58},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1207\/2004","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Others","caseTitle":"Mohammad Ijaz v. Mohammad Shafi (decd.) through LRs.","caseFileName":"C.A._1207_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  834","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-01-2016","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1020\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ahmad Chatta v. Iftikhar Ahmad Cheema & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1020_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  763","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-01-2016","dateCreated":"08-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.561\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Govt. of Punjab thr. its Chief Secretary, Lahore and another. v. Aamir Zahoor-ul-Haq and Others.","caseFileName":"C.R.P._561_2015_dt_04-02-2016.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Per Qazi Faez Isa, J [Minority view]: The majority judgment has decided to enlarge the scope of the dispute as it wants to examine the \u201cobjects of wildlife legislation in respect of all vulnerable and threatened game species including the Houbara Bustard\u201d. The stated objective may be otherwise commendable, but such enlargement of jurisdiction (when hearing review petitions), is not contemplated by the Constitution or the Supreme Court Rules, 1980. The laws of Pakistan and of the provinces specifically recognize both Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), which categorize Houbara Bustard respectively as \u201cthreatened with extinction\u201d and whose conservation status is \u201cunfavourable\u201d. The judgment under review had however noted that these laws are also backed by both Federal and provincial laws, however, certain provisions of the wildlife laws of the provinces Balochistan, Sindh and Punjab violated\/infringed the Pakistan Trade Control of Wild Fauna and Flora Act 2012, CITES and CMS. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 421","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"04-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":232},{"caseNumber":"C.A.616\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Sheikh Muhammad Akram v. Abdul Ghafoor & others","caseFileName":"C.A._616_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A candidate is not disqualified to contest elections merely because a criminal case is pending against him; non-disclosure of a pending case cannot be equated with the non-disclosure of a criminal case in which a person has been convicted and one which may entail his disqualification; and incorrect particulars (incorrect number of the CNIC) of the person who had seconded him could hardly be categorized as being of a substantial nature.  ","citation":"2016   SCMR  733","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-02-2016","dateCreated":"03-02-2016","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"C.A.301\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Feroze Ahmed Jamali v. Masroor Ahmad Khan Jatoi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._301_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Election Tribunal has given no reason to reject the report of NADRA. It is clear and unmistakable that 2,147 used counterfoils had invalid NIC numbers. Since the votes to be excluded are greater in number than the winning margin, this would materially affect the result of the election, thereby bringing the case within the purview of Section 70 of the Representation of People Act, 1976, warranting declaration of the election to be void as a whole. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  750","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-01-2016","dateCreated":"26-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":56},{"caseNumber":"C.A.651\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Raja Ghous Bux Bijarani v. Sardar Ghulam Abid Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._651_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Non-verified votes cannot be declared to be bogus and excluded from the count altogether so as to hold that the election result was procured by the respondent through illegal and corrupt practices or that there has been noncompliance of the provisions of the Representation of People Act, 1976 or the Rules made thereunder, thereby bringing the case within the purview of Section 70(a) or even (b) of the Act. \r\n\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  769","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2016","dateCreated":"25-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":175},{"caseNumber":"C.A.448\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ibrahim Jatoi v. Aftab Shaban Mirani & others","caseFileName":"C.A._448_2014_DJ.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  722","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-01-2016","dateCreated":"25-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":193},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1611\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Asghar Ali Sheikh v. Liaquat Ali Jatoi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1611_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The runner-up candidate was unable to prove through positive evidence his entitlement to the satisfaction of the Election Tribunal to be duly elected under section 69 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976; therefore, the declaration to his entitlement to this effect by the learned Tribunal was unwarranted and erroneous. \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  690","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2016","dateCreated":"25-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":167},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.561\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Govt. of Punjab thr. its Chief Secretary, Lahore and another. v. Aamir Zahoor-ul-Haq and Others.","caseFileName":"C.R.P._561_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Per Mian Saqib Nisar, J [Majority View]: All provincial wildlife laws do not envisage a permanent ban on the hunting of Houbara Bustard, but allow its hunting subject to obtaining a licence. Conservation efforts of a species could not be successful without uplifting the economic well being of areas where the species is found. Amount generated by issuing licences for hunting are presumably used for the uplifting of the people of the area where the licensees hunt, thus, locals have an economic interest in conserving the species rather than indulging in illegal hunting. The judgment under review contains an apparent error on the face of the record, therefore, the Supreme Court sets aside the same and directs that the matter should be listed for hearing afresh.\r\n\r\nPer Qazi Faez Isa, J [Minority view]: The majority judgment has decided to enlarge the scope of the dispute as it wants to examine the \u201cobjects of wildlife legislation in respect of all vulnerable and threatened game species including the Houbara Bustard\u201d. The stated objective may be otherwise commendable, but such enlargement of jurisdiction (when hearing review petitions), is not contemplated by the Constitution or the Supreme Court Rules, 1980. The laws of Pakistan and of the provinces specifically recognize both Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), which categorize Houbara Bustard respectively as \u201cthreatened with extinction\u201d and whose conservation status is \u201cunfavourable\u201d. The judgment under review had however noted that these laws are also backed by both Federal and provincial laws, however, certain provisions of the wildlife laws of the provinces Balochistan, Sindh and Punjab violated\/infringed the Pakistan Trade Control of Wild Fauna and Flora Act 2012, CITES and CMS. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 421","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2016","dateCreated":"22-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":63},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1086\/2009","caseSubject":"Tax\/Income Tax","caseTitle":"Commissioner of Income Tax, Peshawar v. M\/s Islamic Investment Bank Ltd","caseFileName":"C.A._1086_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It cannot be said that the income years which relate to the period covered under the repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, cannot be brought under scrutiny under its provisions after 30.06.2002 on the strength of Section 239(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Additionally, this could be done even on the strength of the provisions of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act as the charge of tax stood created on or before 30.06.2002.","citation":"2016   SCMR  816","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2015","dateCreated":"22-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":74},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.264\/2006","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal\/NAB","caseTitle":"The State v. Anwar Saifullah Khan","caseFileName":"crl.a.264_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 276","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-01-2016","dateCreated":"21-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":582},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2515\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Senate thr. its Chairman v. Shahiq Ahmed Khan & another","caseFileName":"C.P._2515_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No limitation is prescribed to competently and successfully challenge a void order\/notification. The principle of locus poenitentiae is meant to condone a bona fide mistake and not to be pressed into service for reaping the benefit of any fraud or to camouflage the same.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  460","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-11-2015","dateCreated":"13-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2532\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Regulatory Duty","caseTitle":"Majeed & Sons Steels (Pvt) Ltd v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, M\/o Finance, Economic Affairs, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P._2532_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Absence of the word bilateral from the proviso to subsection (5) of section 18 of the Customs Act is significant and self-speaking and we cannot read bilateral in the proviso when it is not there. \r\n \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  655","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-09-2015","dateCreated":"13-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.A.139\/2013","caseSubject":"License","caseTitle":"World call Telecom Ltd thr. its Chief Executive Officer v. Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (P.T.A.)  thr. its Chairman","caseFileName":"C.A._139_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"In case of conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of a licence and the provisions of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act (the Act), and the relevant rules and regulations framed thereunder, the latter shall prevail. Amount exacted from the Access Promotion Contribution (APC) for the Universal Service Fund (USF) could not be made part of the Federal Consolidated Fund. Neither the parameters prescribed by Articles 78 and 79 of the Constitution for the Federal Consolidated Fund nor the purpose of APC for USF prescribed by the Act could be enlarged or extended without amendment in the Constitution and the Act.","citation":"2016   SCMR  475","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-12-2015","dateCreated":"13-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1600\/2006","caseSubject":"Customs\/Regulatory Duty","caseTitle":"Indus Trading & Contracting Company v. Collector of Customs (Preventive) Karachi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1600_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When a regulatory duty was charged, the importer ought to challenge the same before the forum provided under the Customs Act, 1969 instead of invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199(1) of the Constitution. \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  842","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-01-2016","dateCreated":"13-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1149\/2015","caseSubject":"WAPDA\/Electricity","caseTitle":"National Electric Power Regulatory Authority v. Faisalabad Electric Supply Company Ltd","caseFileName":"C.A._1149_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  550","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-12-2015","dateCreated":"13-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":65},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1256\/2008","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases","caseTitle":"Allah Ditta v. Ali Muhammad","caseFileName":"C.A._1256_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The western corner of the suit property merely touching the southern corner of the purported pre-emptor's land would not meet the requirement of the two properties being \"adjacent\" to each other in terms of the explanation to section 6 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 73","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-11-2015","dateCreated":"12-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1348\/2006","caseSubject":"Tax\/Excise Duty","caseTitle":"Superintendent Central Excise Sheikhupura v. Fauji Sugar Mills Sheikhupura & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1348_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Whenever the Federal Government in exercise of its powers issues SROs, the same should be intelligible and must not be open to misinterpretation or to more than one meaning. In case of contradictory S.R.Os open to different interpretations, the interpretation favorable to taxpayer would prevail and SRO issued later in time would be applicable.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  121","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-11-2015","dateCreated":"12-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"C.A.911\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Habib Safe Deposit Vault Pvt Ltd v. The Province of Sindh thr. the Secretary M\/o Finance, Karachi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._911_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  484","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-12-2015","dateCreated":"12-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.337\/2015","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases\/From one Court to another Court within District","caseTitle":"Khuda-e-Noor v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._337_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The act of honour killing would amount to \"terrorism\" only if accompanied by the design or purpose specified in section 6(1)(b) or (c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 195","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-11-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3228\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/Challenge of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Shakeel Sardar Awan & another v. Election Appellate Authority, Tehsil Gujranwala & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3228_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chairman or Member of District Bait-ul-Mal, being non-official Member performing voluntary service, cannot be termed persons in the service of a statutory body. The Chairman or Member of District Bait-ul-Mal is not barred under section 27(2)(e) of the Punjab Local Government Act, 2013 from contesting elections for local bodies. Two year post-resignation\/retirement bar from contesting elections does not apply to Chairman or Member of District Bait-ul-Mal.","citation":"2016   SCMR  242","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-11-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3181\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/Challenge of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Zahid Iqbal v. Hafiz Muhammad Adnan & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3181_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The disqualification enumerated in section 27(2) of the Punjab Local Government Act, 2013 could be invoked and inflicted both at pre-election and\/or post-election stage.\r\n \r\n\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  430","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-11-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.P.689-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Kareem Nawaz Khan v. The State, through Prosecutor General Punjan,  etc","caseFileName":"C.P._689-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Conviction of an accused under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, in view of the bar contained in sub-section (7) of section 345 Cr.P.C., will remain intact despite compromise in other sentences in compoundable offence. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  291","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-06-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.P.130\/2015","caseSubject":"Arbitration\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Railways thr. the Assistant General Manager (Traffic), Lahore v. M\/s Four Brothers International (Pvt) Ltd & another","caseFileName":"C.P._130_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court should not pass restraining order against recovery of the amounts in terms of section 41 (b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 without examining the three ingredients for grant of injunction i.e. prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 199","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-10-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.A.308\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Upgradation","caseTitle":"Government of Pakistan M\/o Railways, thr. its Secretary\/Chairman Railways & others v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema & others","caseFileName":"C.A._308_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The upgradation of pay scales of different categories of employees in a conscious manner looking to the nature of their jobs is a policy decision and such decision cannot be challenged in writ jurisdiction on the purported plea of discrimination especially when Article 25 of the Constitution itself provides a provision for such discrimination on the principle of reasonable classification. ","citation":" \n2016   SCMR  442","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-12-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"C.A.305\/2008","caseSubject":"Arbitration\/Challenge to Award","caseTitle":"Karachi Dock Labour Board v. M\/s Quality Builders Ltd.","caseFileName":"C.A._305_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The arbitration clause impliedly provides for the appointment of a sole arbitrator with the consent of both the parties. Admittedly no application was ever made to the Court, and consequently, as the mandate of law prescribed by Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, was not followed by the respondent, the award passed by the arbitrator cannot be deemed to be valid. Further, the parties cannot confer jurisdiction upon a Court or other judicial or quasi-judicial forum through consent which otherwise in law would have no jurisdiction and such being an inherent defect cannot be cured on the rules of consent, waiver, estoppel, acquiescence etc. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 121","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":85},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1086\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Syed Hafeez-ud-Din v. Abdul Razzak & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1086_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Sections 68 and 69 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 constitute a two-pronged test, both limbs of which must be satisfied by any election petitioner challenging the election of the returned candidate, if he wishes to be declared duly elected in place of such returned candidate. The rules of proof for the grounds challenging the election which are founded on corrupt and illegal practices are quite strict and stringent and the allegations in this regard must be absolutely proved through positive evidence without accepting any inferences and if there is any doubt, the benefit must go to the person against whom corrupt or illegal practices are being alleged. A bare perusal of the findings of the learned Tribunal vis-\u00e0-vis polling station no. 29 clearly suggests that it has concluded that the evidence indicates committal of illegal practices in connivance and collusion with the returned candidate based on pure inference and conjecture, without ruling out all the possibilities in light of the circumstantial evidence and without correctly appreciating the evidence and properly applying the law on the matter.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 79","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-11-2015","dateCreated":"06-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":69},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.383\/2005","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery","caseTitle":"Zakaria Ghani and others v. Muhammad Ikhlaq Memom and others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._383_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The auction purchaser cannot be blamed and consequently non-suited for the error of the court especially when the judgment debtor had not raised any objection regarding the reserve price before any forum.\r\n","citation":" \nPLD 2016 SC 229","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2016","dateCreated":"05-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":173},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1208\/2011","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases","caseTitle":"Malik Muzaffar Ahmed v. Majlis-e-Ilmi Society, LHR","caseFileName":"C.A._1208_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 207","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2015","dateCreated":"04-01-2016","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.A.363-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Civil Suits","caseTitle":"Ch. Nazir Ahmed v. Ali Ahmed, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._363-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A suit for rendition of accounts shall be competent by the partner(s) of unregistered firm against the other, however, with the clear limitation and qualifier that the firm should have already been dissolved and if not so, be first sought to be dissolved, because an exclusive and simple suit for the rendition of accounts while the partnership\/firm is in existence shall not be competent in view of the absolute bar contained in section 69 of the Partnership Act, 1932. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 214","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-12-2015","dateCreated":"23-12-2015","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"C.P.3186\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/Challenge of Nomination Papers","caseTitle":"Ghazanfar Ali v. Appellate Authority\/Additional District Judge, Sahiwal & others","caseFileName":"C.P._3186_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The qualifications and disqualifications imposed by section 27 of the Punjab Local Government Act 2013 for a candidate to contest the election and even to hold office should be construed and applied strictly, and a person can only be debarred from contesting elections or holding an office if the case falls squarely within the strict scope of the qualifications and disqualifications stipulated by law.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 151","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2015","dateCreated":"21-12-2015","fileSizeInBytes":87},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1560\/2008","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Administration of property","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ramzan (decd) thr. L.Rs. etc v. Nasreen Firdaus,etc","caseFileName":"C.A._1560_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Territorial jurisdiction of courts in Pakistan has been limited within the purview of section 16 C.P.C only to such properties which are situated within the territorial boundaries of Pakistan. Properties outside Pakistan are expressly excluded from the purview of jurisdiction of Courts of Pakistan as a whole.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 174","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2015","dateCreated":"21-12-2015","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1137\/2008","caseSubject":"Evacuee Property \/ Settlement\/Others","caseTitle":"M\/s Beach Luxury Hotels, Karachi v. M\/s Anas Muneer Ltd. & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1137_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  222","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2015","dateCreated":"21-12-2015","fileSizeInBytes":286},{"caseNumber":"C.A.307-L\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Siddique Khan Baloch v. Jahangir Khan Tareen, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._307-L_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The widespread scale of the violations of election law committed by the election staff makes the pervasiveness of their default to infect the election process as a whole with doubt and suspicion thereby materially affecting the election result and non-compliance of the election laws render whole election void. However, there is no circumstantial, let alone, any direct evidence implicating the appellant in the commission of corrupt or illegal practices during his election. Consequently, there cannot be any finding that the result of the said election is vitiated by such practices under Section 68(1)(d) or Section 70(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1976. A finding of fact about the disqualification of a returned candidate in election matters must be based on affirmative evidence and not on presumptions, inferences and surmises. The state of evidence on record about the falsity of the appellant's educational qualification is cursory, defused and inferential. Any reasonable hypothesis available in the recorded evidence to avoid the disqualification of the returned candidate under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution ought to be adopted by the Court of law.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 97","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2015","dateCreated":"12-12-2015","fileSizeInBytes":103},{"caseNumber":"C.A.194\/2015","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Jam Madad Ali v. Asghar Ali Junejo & others","caseFileName":"C.A._194_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Recording of evidence is not essential for Election Tribunal to pass an order for recount as it may on its own also order a recount. Minimum criteria or the essential pre-requisites for satisfying the conscience of the Court for permitting a recount was that there should be specific allegation of tampering, manipulation and maneuvering. Election Tribunal should keep in mind that secrecy of the ballot should not be violated on the basis of frivolous, vague and totally unfounded allegations and that the primary object should be to do full justice in the matter.","citation":"2016   SCMR  251","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-11-2015","dateCreated":"30-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":75},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1702\/2015","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Others","caseTitle":"M.C.B. Bank Ltd, Karachi v. Abdul Waheed Abro & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1702_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rahman","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"After the induction of Article 10A in the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, it would postulate that opportunity of fair trial had not been afforded to the respondent-worker by depriving him his right of cross-examining the witnesses in inquiry as such it could be held that principles and procedures of due process of law and fair trial had not been followed, which are against the principle of natural justice.\r\n \r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  108","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.496\/2009","caseSubject":"Sentence\/Enhancement of (in ATA\/STA Cases)","caseTitle":"Azeem Khan v. Mujahid Khan & others","caseFileName":"Crl.A._496_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Magistrate in order to record a confession has to essentially observe all mandatory precautions of section 364 read with section 164, Cr.P.C and High Court Rules & Orders. It cannot, at present, be held that the report of biochemical expert on DNA is an admissible piece of evidence in the absence of any sanction of law.","citation":"2016   SCMR  274","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.685\/2015","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Niaz Ahmed v. Hasrat Mahmood & others","caseFileName":"Crl.P._685_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 70","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-11-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2093\/2015","caseSubject":"PTA\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) thr. its Chairman v. Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ld","caseFileName":"C.P._2093_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Regulation 18(2) of the Number Allocation and Administration Regulations, 2005 may not be happily worded and could have been constructed with a greater care and accuracy but it is not ultra vires the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act, 1996.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  69","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-10-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":106},{"caseNumber":"C.P.51\/2015","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Maqbool Ahmed Lehri v. National Accountability Bureau thr. its D.G., Quetta & another","caseFileName":"C.P._51_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There is no question of double jeopardy or violation of the mandate of Article 13(a) of the Constitution in the present case as no reference other than the present one has ever been filed against anyone in respect of the subject land\/transaction. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  154","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-04-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"C.A.461\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry v. Mumtaz Ahmed Tarar & others","caseFileName":"C.A._461_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":6464},{"caseNumber":"C.A.535\/2015","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases","caseTitle":"Wasal Khan & another v. Dr. Niaz Ali Khan","caseFileName":"C.A._535_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The trial court shall calculate the sale consideration mentioned in the registered sale deed or mutation or any other document and if these documents are not available then through other reliable source it has to calculate the same and then to direct the vendee\/preemptor to deposit a specific amount within a stipulated period, however, the period for deposit must be reasonable.","citation":"2016   SCMR  40","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-09-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.604\/2015","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Nisar Ahmed v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._604_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 11","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-09-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1125\/2014","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition","caseTitle":"Sheikh Muhammad Ilyas Ahmad & others v. Govt. of Pakistan thr. Secy. Defence & another","caseFileName":"C.A._1125_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 64","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-10-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"C.A.340\/2002","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Anwar v. Muhammad Akram & others","caseFileName":"C.A._340_2002.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The discretionary power vested in the Court to direct that the awarded sentences shall run consecutively or concurrently is to be exercised in the light of the facts and circumstances of each case, keeping in view the scope of section 35 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908, the nature and manner of occurrence and the gravity of the offence. Thus, it seems quite strange and unreasonable that through impugned judgment, the learned Division Bench of the High Court had done away with the conditionality of such sentences to run consecutively while exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, which is equitable and discretionary in nature and not meant to give premium to a criminal for commission of heinous crime.","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 65","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2015","dateCreated":"28-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.15\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Acquittal of Mustafa Kanju s\/o Siddique Kanju (Former State Minister) and his four Security Guards Due to Lack of Evidence","caseFileName":"S.M.C_15_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-11-2015","dateCreated":"19-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.P.45\/2015","caseSubject":"Tax\/Sales Tax Act","caseTitle":"Federal Board of Revene thr. its Islamabad v. M\/s Bed & Blanket (Pvt) & others","caseFileName":"C.P._45_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2015","dateCreated":"16-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":1312},{"caseNumber":"C.P.816-L\/2009","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Najam Qureshi v. Chase Manhattan Bank now MCB & others","caseFileName":"C.P._816-L_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There is no order in the decree for payment of interest on the unpaid amount of accrued interest. Interest pendente lite and further interest are both discretionary reliefs granted under section 34, C.P.C. Unless expressly ordered in a decree such interest accrues on principal amount adjudged and not on the aggregate of that amount with accumulated interest. The net effect in the present case is that accrual of interest occurs at simple rate rather than compound rate.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1461","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-06-2015","dateCreated":"04-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"C.A.69\/2015","caseSubject":"Permission to file and argue\/.","caseTitle":"Shahbaz Khan @ Tipu, etc v. Learned Special Judge ATC No.3, Lahore, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._69_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The presumption that the natural and inevitable consequences of the acts of an accused are deemed to be intended provides a reliable touchstone for gathering the design, intention or mens rea of an assailant in the context of Section 6(1)(b) of ATA. ","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-09-2015","dateCreated":"04-11-2015","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.210\/2015","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Anti-Terrorism Act","caseTitle":"Malik Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab","caseFileName":"Crl.A._210_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2016 SC 17","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-10-2015","dateCreated":"27-10-2015","fileSizeInBytes":140},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.488\/2015","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Zaigham Ashraf v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._488_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  18","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2015","dateCreated":"14-10-2015","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.433\/2015","caseSubject":"Sentence\/Suspension of","caseTitle":"Muhammad Adnan @ Dana v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P._433_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1570","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2015","dateCreated":"14-10-2015","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1481\/2007","caseSubject":"Allotment","caseTitle":"Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy. and others v. Syed Kabir Bokhari","caseFileName":"C.A._1481_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2016   SCMR  101","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2015","dateCreated":"14-10-2015","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"C.A.616\/2006","caseSubject":"Company Law\/.","caseTitle":"Mian Javaid Aamir, etc. v. United Foam Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. Lahore, etc.","caseFileName":"C.A._616_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There is no legal bar for a Company Court to enter into factual inquiry, framing of issues for determination and recording of oral as well as documentary evidence in coming to the just conclusion of the case. ","citation":"2016   SCMR  213","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-06-2015","dateCreated":"14-10-2015","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.A.248-P\/2010","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance\/Contract","caseTitle":"Muhammad Wahid & another v. Nasrullah & another","caseFileName":"C.A._248-P_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The application for extension of time to deposit remaining amount of consideration filed after the lapse of the period granted vide preliminary decree in a suit for specific performance is not competent.  ","citation":"2016   SCMR  179","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-02-2014","dateCreated":"14-10-2015","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.475-L\/2010","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Dy. District Officer (Revenue), Lahore v. Raja Muhammad Yousaf","caseFileName":"C.A._475-L_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Conveyance \/ sale deeds prepared pursuant to a decree in a suit for specific performance shall be stamped in accordance with stamp duty as is applicable under the Stamp Act on the date that the same is presented for registration, however, if a valuation table has been notified pursuant to section 27-A (1) of the Stamp Act then the applicable stamp duty will be calculated in accordance therewith in respect of documents wherein the sale consideration that is mentioned is less than that specified in the said valuation table.","citation":"2016   SCMR  203","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-09-2015","dateCreated":"14-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"C.A.545\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Lahore Development Authority thr. its D.G. v. Ms. Imrana Tiwana & others","caseFileName":"C.A._545_2015_dt_8-7-2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1739","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-05-2015","dateCreated":"10-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":158},{"caseNumber":"C.P.145\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary & others v. Lal Khan Chandio & others","caseFileName":"C.P._145_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Qazi Faez Isa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The fundamental right to life and to live it with dignity (Articles 9 and 14 of the Constitution) is one lived in a world that has an abundance of all species not only for the duration of our lives but available for our progeny too. It has now been scientifically established that if the earth becomes bereft of birds, animals, insects, trees, plants, clean rivers, unpolluted air, soil it will be the precursor of our destruction \/ extinction.","citation":"2016   SCMR  48","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2015","dateCreated":"08-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":74},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3704\/2015","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Reply to Show Cause Notice by Syed Ali Zafar v. -","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3704_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Order IV, Rule 30 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 ensures the dignity and high standard of Senior Advocates, Advocates of the Supreme Court and Advocates-on-Record and if they are guilty of misconduct or conduct unbecoming of an Advocate, with regard to any matter pending in the Court, disciplinary action could be taken against them, including suspension and removal from practice of the Court, after affording them an opportunity of oral hearing.","citation":"2016   SCMR  141","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-09-2015","dateCreated":"08-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.56\/2003","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"M. Kowkab Iqbal . v. Govt. of Pakistan through Secretary  Cabinet Division, Islamabad.","caseFileName":"Const.P.56_2003_U_dt_8-9-2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 1210","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-09-2015","dateCreated":"08-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":783},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.56\/2003","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"M. Kowkab Iqbal . v. Govt. of Pakistan through Secretary  Cabinet Division, Islamabad.","caseFileName":"Const.P._56_2003_E_dt_3-9-15.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Directions are issued to the Federal and Provincial Governments to take immediate steps for enforcement of Article 251 in line with Article 5 of the Constitution.","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 1210","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-09-2015","dateCreated":"08-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":532},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1282\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quashment","caseTitle":"Haider Ali & another v. District Police Officer, Chakwal & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1282_2014_dt_4-9-15.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court issues directions to address the issues of inefficiency, maladministration and abuse of power by the police and the deficiencies in the criminal justice system of Pakistan.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1724","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-09-2015","dateCreated":"05-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.12\/2015","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"SUO MOTU ACTION REGARDING UNSATISFACTORY INVESTIGATION IN CASE FIR NO.544\/15 UNDER SECTION 420\/468\/471 PPC AT PS DEFENCE-A, LAHORE.","caseFileName":"s.m.c.12_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr.Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-03-2019","dateCreated":"04-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":63},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1603\/2012","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Anti Corruption Establishment thr. D.G. Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore v. N.A.B. thr. its Chairman, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p.1603_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" It is prima facie indicated that Chairman National Accountability Bureau (NAB), and possibly other officers of NAB, misused their authority to extend undue benefit\/favour to Bahria Town and its officials. Therefore, NAB is directed to investigate the matter of the application submitted by Chairman NAB under section 16-A(a) of the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) before the Special Judge Anti-Corruption, to complete the investigation expeditiously and proceed in accordance with section 18(g) of NAO.\r\n","citation":"2016   SCMR  92","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-08-2015","dateCreated":"04-09-2015","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.46\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Application by Abdul Hakeem Khoso","caseFileName":"Const.P._46_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Province, with regard to the unilateral extension of a natural gas mining lease after its expiry by efflux of time, has rightly drawn the attention of the Federal Government to Article 172 (3) of the Constitution. If the Federal Government has disregarded this constitutional provision, the province has rightly aired its grievance. To ensure the functioning of the Federation in accordance with the Constitution we expect that every provision of the Constitution, including Article 172 (3), will be given effect to and the matter resolved by the next date.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 350","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-08-2015","dateCreated":"29-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3325\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Progress report of NAB in OGRA case","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3325_2012_OrderDated_21-8-15.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD. S. KHAWAJA, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Considering the progress of National Accountability Bureau (NAB) in OGRA case, the Court, in exercise of judicial powers conferred under Articles 187 and 190 of the Constitution, Order XXXII, Rules 1 and 2 read with Order XXXIII, Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 coupled with the principles of Civil Procedure Code including Order XXVI, Rule 10 appoints a Local Commission to examine two reports prepared by NAB and submit his report with regard to whether NAB, FIA, National Highway Police and\/or the Punjab Police had facilitated the escape of the accused and also look into the performance of NAB in pursuing high profile mega scams. ","citation":"2015 SCMR 1813","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-08-2015","dateCreated":"22-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"Crl.R.P.47\/2015","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Azhar Iqbal(Azhar Hussain) v. Abid Hussain & another","caseFileName":"Crl.R.P._47_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD. S. KHAWAJA, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1795","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-08-2015","dateCreated":"22-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1184\/2011","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Mst Basharat Jehan v. Director General Federal Govt. Education, FGEI (C\/G) Rawalpindi & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1184_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1418","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-07-2014","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1774\/2015","caseSubject":"WAPDA\/Electricity","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Water & Power, Islamabad & others v. M\/s Mughal Alloyes Muhammad Tariq Iqbal Mughal & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1774_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1428","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-05-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1011\/2006","caseSubject":"Land Acquisition","caseTitle":"Mst. Nasreen Zohra v. Multan Development Authority thr. its D.G. and another","caseFileName":"C.A._1011_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The compliance of the provision of Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by the Collector is mandatory for the simple reason that its non-compliance gives rise to penal consequences and such penal consequences are those as are provided in Section 34 of the Act i.e. interest prescribed therein will become payable.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1440","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"C.R.A.248\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Against the judgment dated 20.05.2009 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Abbottabad Bench in Criminal Revision No. 1 of 2008)","caseFileName":"C.R.A._248_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The accused had acted in a cruel and brutal manner and his conduct was nothing short of being callous because he and his co-accused had murdered one person and had injured three others in the courtyard of a mosque. In the peculiar background of the case, the partial compromise would not furnish a valid basis for reduction of the appellant's sentence of death to imprisonment for life.\r\n","citation":"PLJ 2015 SC 879","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.P.816\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(On appeal from the judgment dated 31.03.2009 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in FAO No. 143 of 2007&C.R.1058\/07).","caseFileName":"C.P._816_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1461","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-06-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"C.A.697\/2008","caseSubject":"Personal Law\/Relating to Gift","caseTitle":"Baja (decd.) thr. LRs. etc v. Mst. Bakhan, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._697_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1704","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-06-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1000\/2006","caseSubject":"Damages\/Compensation under Fatal Accident Act","caseTitle":"NLC, a Statutory Organization thr. its Commander v. Irfan Khan and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1000_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Where the wrong, damage or injury is caused by two or more persons, each of the wrongdoer is jointly and severally liable to make good the loss to the claimant who suffered at the hands of such tortfeasors. It is the prerogative of the plaintiff to proceed against any or all such wrongdoers. Where a person is injured as a result of negligence on the part of two or more wrongdoers, it is said that the person was injured on account of the composite negligence of those wrongdoers. On the other hand, where a person suffers injury, partly due to his own negligence, then the negligence on the part of the injured which contributed to the accident is referred to as his contributory negligence.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1406","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-01-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":65},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.268\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Secretary Govt. of Punjab Finance Department, Lahore & others v. Anwra Kamal & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._268_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The discretion in granting bail shall ordinarily not be exercised in a routine manner when ingenious, contrived and designed methodology is pressed into service for defrauding a bulk of poor people.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1716","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1700\/2011","caseSubject":"Evacuee Property \/ Settlement\/Sale of land to private school without lawful authority","caseTitle":"American International School System thr. its Director v. Mian Muhammad Ramzan (decd) thr. LRs & others","caseFileName":"C.P._1700_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Record shows that on mere desire of the then Chief Minister of Punjab, the Member (Colonies) Board of Revenue (BoR), Punjab doled out valuable \"residual evacuee property\" at a throw away price to the petitioner-School, knowing fully well that the subject property is not the State land and that the subject evacuee land could only be disposed off through open auction in terms of the Scheme for Management and Disposal of Available Urban Properties, 1977 (Scheme, 1977) and otherwise, he was not at all competent to undertake such exercise, which authority under the Scheme, 1977 vested in the Member, BoR (Residual Properties).The Chief Minister does not possess any plenary authority and or jurisdiction to allot any land as a matter of grace or favour at his whims and fancy, but in accordance with law. ","citation":"2015   SCMR  1449","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-12-2014","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":63},{"caseNumber":"C.P.565\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust (PTET) thr. its M.D., Islamabad v. Muhammad Arif & others","caseFileName":"C.P._565_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The respondents, who were the employees of the Pakistan Telegraph and Telephone (T&T) Department having retired after their transfer to the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation and the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited, will be entitled to the same pension as is announced by the Government of Pakistan and that the Board of Trustees of the Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust is bound to follow such announcement of the Government in respect of such employees.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1472","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2015","dateCreated":"13-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":82},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.12\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"District Bar Association, Rawalpindi v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.12of2010Urdu.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 401","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"05-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":1750},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.12\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"District Bar Association, Rawalpindi v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.12of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 401","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2015","dateCreated":"05-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":5260},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3221\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding cutting of trees for canal widening project Lahore","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3221_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court grants permission to the Provincial Government for proposed further widening\/construction activities on Lahore Canal Road subject to minimum environmental intrusion.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1520","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-05-2015","dateCreated":"05-08-2015","fileSizeInBytes":95},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1656\/2015","caseSubject":"Impleadment","caseTitle":"Application filed by Asad Kharal","caseFileName":"C.M.A._1656_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Considering the report about investigation of major scams by NAB, the Court directs the law officer for the Federation to submit a report about possible amendment in the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) on the basis of instructions from the government; the NAB to add, in the chart reflecting the breakdown of the amount of rupees 262 billion which had been statedly recovered by it on the basis of voluntary return (VR) or plea bargain (PB), two further columns one mentioning the total amount given in the complaint and the other column indicating the amount determined after investigation; and the NAB to also submit a separate comprehensive report on the NLC Scam of Rupees four billion and other scams before the next date of hearing.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-07-2015","dateCreated":"31-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.210\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Secretary Govt. of Punjab Finance Department, Lahore v. Muhammad Maqbool Elahi & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._210_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Relevant statistical data in the context of formation of a sub-committee in terms of item no. 6 of the National Action Plan for the purpose of choking the financing for terrorists and terrorist organizations has not yet been furnished by any of the governments to the Secretary LJCP. As a consequence, the on-ground monitoring of NGOs\/INGOs is not evident. The governments shall, therefore, expedite their efforts to gather the relevant data and furnish the same to the Secretary LJCP who shall collate the data and submit a report before the next date of hearing.","citation":"2015 P.S.C. Crl. 705","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-07-2015","dateCreated":"23-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.4729-P\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Malik Muhammad Shafi","caseFileName":"H.R.C._4729_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015 SCMR 1779","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2015","dateCreated":"15-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.A.150\/2006","caseSubject":"Tax\/Cess and Fee","caseTitle":"Lucky Cement Ltd v. Commissioner Income Tax, Peshawar","caseFileName":"C.A._150_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The question is whether income\/interest generated from profitable schemes\/banks where Public Limited Company (before commencing its business activities) invests its surplus money\/reserves amounts to 'income from business' or 'income from other sources.\r\n[Per Sh. Azmat Saeed, J.] Main object of the company in the present case as mentioned in its Memorandum of Association was to install, establish and run a cement manufacturing plant. One of the clauses mentioned in the Memorandum of Association provided that company's object and purpose was also \"to invest or otherwise deal with the money of the company in such manner as may from time to time be determined\". However a prohibitory clause was also mentioned in the Memorandum of Association, which stated in unequivocal terms that in spite of anything contained in any of the object clauses in the Memorandum of Association, nothing therein shall continue to empower the company to undertake or indulge in the business of inter alia investment. Company, in the present case, could, thus, invest its money but such a transaction could not be deemed to be business of the company, consequently, the income derived from such investment must fall in the category of \"income from other sources\". \r\n[Per Mushir Alam, J.] Such activity was carried out during the period when cement plant\/factory was under construction, therefore, the company, could not be said to be carrying on any business at that point of time within the contemplation of S. 22 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. Such income was rightly assessed as 'income from other sources\" under S. 30(2)(b) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1494","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-07-2015","dateCreated":"10-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":135},{"caseNumber":"C.A.545\/2015","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Lahore Development Authority thr. its D.G. v. Ms. Imrana Tiwana & others","caseFileName":"C.A._545_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Article 140A of the Constitution, in case of conflict in the exercise of their respective powers or on account of legal provisions having overriding effect, confers primacy upon the authority vesting in an elected Local Government over the powers conferred by law on the Provincial Government or an agency thereof. Section 46 of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, purporting to override conflicting action taken by an elected Local Government, is held to be against the scheme of the Constitution and should either be read down or declared ultra vires as determined in the detailed judgment. Environment Impact Assessment cannot be struck down upon presumption or mere apprehension.  In the vacuum resulting from the absence of an elected Lahore Metropolitan Corporation, the initiation, approval and execution of the disputed Signal Free Corridor project by the Provincial Government through its agency, LDA, is held to be valid. The only touchstone for this purpose is conflict of statutory law with the provisions of the Constitution.\r\n\r\n\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1739","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2015","dateCreated":"09-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4109\/2015","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"C.M.A._4109_2015_Urdu.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2015","dateCreated":"08-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":390},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4109\/2015","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"C.M.A._4109_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The expected legislation for local bodies elections in federal capital is not yet in place, therefore, the Election Commission of Pakistan may notify a revised schedule for the said elections if this becomes necessary on account of delays in Parliament to provide elected Local Governments at the grass-root level.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2015","dateCreated":"08-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3305\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Ameer Rehman & others v. Amir Mumtaz & others","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3305_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Perjury and fabrication of documentary evidence are to be taken very seriously by Courts because this is necessary for ensuring that the administration of justice is not undermined and that baseless and false litigation is also deterred.\r\n \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1373","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.309\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Review on behalf of Anjum Aqeel","caseFileName":"C.R.P._309_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the review proceedings arising out of the judgment given in the matter of illegalities and irregularities in the procurement of land and allotment of plots in the housing schemes launched by National Police Foundation (NPF), makes an exception for bona fide purchasers\/subsequent allottees as well as police officers and employees of NPF who were allotted only one plot and constitutes a commission comprising a former High Court Judge to determine the market price of the plots and suggest the mode of recovery of the difference between the allotment price and the market price for other allotments.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1348","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":127},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1359\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Regularization of Service","caseTitle":"Pir Imran Sajid v. Managing Director\/General Manager (Manager Finance) Telephone Industries of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1359_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Telephone Industries of Pakistan (TIP) is wholly owned, controlled, managed and financed by the Federal Government. Therefore, TIP clearly falls within the definition of a \"person\" as envisaged by Article 199 of the Constitution. Vested right of regularization in service accrued in favour of contract employees working in TIP for the past more than 12 years.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1257","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-05-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.3\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Arshad Ali Tabassum v. The Registrar, Lahore High Court, Lahore","caseFileName":"C.R.P._3_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions of sections 148, 149, 324, 337-L(2) & 452, P.P.C. & 7(h) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 are not attracted in the case of injuries suffered by the lawyers of Sahiwal who had gathered to take out a rally in support of the independence of judiciary. The conviction of the accused police officials under these sections is set aside and instead they are each convicted under section 337-H(1), P.P.C. and sentenced to simple imprisonment for two years along with payment of daman of an amount of fifty thousand rupees to be disbursed amongst injured victims in equal shares.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1265","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1132\/2007","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"Hyderabad Cantonment Board thr. its Executive Officer v. Raj Kumar  & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1132_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Parking fee is not envisioned under Section 200 of the Cantonment Act, 1924. Cantonment Board has no authority to enlarge the scope of charging section and include, conjecture or read some activity which is not envisioned or is not the contemplation of the charging Section 200 of the Act. ","citation":"2015   SCMR  1385","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-05-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.247\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Pension","caseTitle":"Secretary Govt. of Punjab Finance Department, Lahore & others v. Abdul Rauf & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._247_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" If one fails to prove any mala fide or ulterior motive in the first pre-arrest bail petition before the learned Additional Sessions Judge or before the learned High Court then the only remedy available to him is of challenging the said order before the Supreme Court or before the learned High Court in case the bail before arrest is declined by the learned Sessions Court. Filing of pre-arrest bail petitions again and again amounts to misuse of law and increases the backlog of the Courts.   \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1394","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-05-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.49\/2015","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC\/.","caseTitle":"Haji Farmanullah v. Latif ur Rehman","caseFileName":"C.A._49_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"If a decree is set aside under section 12(2), C.P.C., the suit is revived and the case needs to be remanded to the trial court to decide the suit on merit. ","citation":"2015   SCMR  1708","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-05-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.A.394\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Sardar Muhammad Naseem  Khan v. Returning Officer PP-12,etc","caseFileName":"C.A._394_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The amended election petition for all intents and purposes shall be a final, independent and separate document which had to be verified per the mandate of law. Once the original election petition was replaced and substituted by the amended election petition, the earlier could not be resorted to and it is not left to the choice of the appellant to fall back on the original election petition.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1698","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-04-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1194\/2014","caseSubject":"Suit for Possession\/Through Partition","caseTitle":"Zafeer Gul v. Dr. Riaz Ali & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1194_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Every co-sharer in the immovable property is legally deemed to be in its joint possession to the extent of his undivided share. Therefore, in a suit for partition and separate possession, law permits him tentative valuation of his share in the immovable property as specified in the plaint for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction, which is subject to final determination by the Court; till then the valuation shown in the plaint is to be deemed as proper value of the suit property for the purpose of availing the remedy of appeal qua determining the forum of appeal.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1691","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.861\/2007","caseSubject":"Trade Mark and Patent","caseTitle":"Wella Aktiengesellschaft v. M\/s Shamim Akhtar & another","caseFileName":"C.A._861_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"For seeking the relief of removal\/revocation of a registered trade mark under S. 37(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1940, specific minimum timeframe of five years has been provided during which there has been no bona fide use of such trademark by its proprietor, which is to be computed from a date one month before the date of application submitted by any aggrieved person in such regard. Burden of proof as to whether there was no bona fide use of the registered trademarks for a continuous period of five years up to a date one month before the date of the application without any lawful excuse or special circumstances as envisaged under S. 37(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1940, is squarely upon the aggrieved party\/applicant which has submitted the application for removing the trademark from the Register of Trademarks.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1274","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-04-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":96},{"caseNumber":"C.A.503\/2006","caseSubject":"Pre-emption Cases\/Jurisdiction of trial court","caseTitle":"Dr. Pir Muhammad Khan v. Khuda Bakhsh and others","caseFileName":"C.A._503_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The principles of Muhammadan Law of pre-emption, which is the original source of statutory law on the subject, set out equally high standard for making talb-i-muwathibat and talb-i-ishhad, as prescribed under the statutory law. Two talbs were not made by the respondents in the required manner of vigilance and promptness. The suit of pre-emption filed by the respondents is dismissed.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1243","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-03-2015","dateCreated":"03-07-2015","fileSizeInBytes":91},{"caseNumber":"C.A.710\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Lt. Col Ghazanfar Abbas Shah v. Mehr Khalid Mehmood Sargana & others","caseFileName":"C.A._710_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"If the election petition has not been verified in accordance with law, this cannot be treated as a curable defect and the Election Tribunal particularly after the lapse of the period of limitation prescribed for filing of election petition cannot permit the election petitioner to cure the same.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1585","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-05-2015","dateCreated":"29-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":66},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1171\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Registrar Peshawar High Court, Peshawar v. Shafiq Ahmad Tanoli & others","caseFileName":"C.A._1171_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appointment of members of District Judiciary and determination of their seniority is a statutory responsibility, in terms of Rule 16(ii) of the High Court Rules and Orders because it is regulated by sections 5 & 8 of the KPK Civil Servants Act and Rule 5 and 10 of the KPK Judicial Service Rules, 2001, to be exercised by the Administration Committee and the Chief Justice cannot do anything on his own in the scheme of the Rules of 2001 and High Court Rules and Orders. ","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 360","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2015","dateCreated":"29-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":95},{"caseNumber":"C.A.319\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Hina Manzoor v. Malik Ibrar Ahmed & others","caseFileName":"C.A._319_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is mandatory that an election petition has to be attested by the Oath Commissioner. Otherwise, it should be dismissed as per the provisions of Section 63 of the Representation of People Act, 1976 read with Section 55(3). The amended election petition even if was attested by the Oath Commissioner but by the time, the time for the petition having lapsed could not be considered to be a valid institution for the purposes of condoning the incurable defect of non-attestation of the election petition.","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 396","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2015","dateCreated":"29-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2066\/2013","caseSubject":"Trade Mark and Patent","caseTitle":"M\/s Farooq Ghee & Oils Mills (Pvt) Ltd v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Mark Registry, Karachi & another","caseFileName":"C.P._2066_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioners have adopted the trade mark \"FAROOQ'S Hayat\" which encompasses the mark \"HAYAT\" and is the striking or dominating feature of the trade mark of IFFCO. Adoption of dominant feature being \"HAYAT\" is not only strikingly similar but is identical. Merely adding prefix of \"FAROOQ'S\" in inconspicuous manner to the dominant or striking feature of the existing trademark HAYAT is of no consequence. The prefix \"FAROOQ'S\" as used by the petitioner does not eclipse, overshadow or obscure the dominating mark HAYAT in a way that may distinguish his goods with that of the goods of the IFFCO. If the competing trade mark of the petitioner is allowed registration, it would not only be encouraging unscrupulous traders to steal someone else's goodwill and (intellectual) property, but at the same time unwary purchaser would be exposed to more than reasonable probabilities of confusion and deception. \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1230","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-01-2015","dateCreated":"26-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"C.A.167-Q\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(On appeal against the judgment dated 14.12.2004 of the High Court of Baluchistan, Quetta in RFA No.58 of 1999)","caseFileName":"C.A._167-Q_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1341","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-04-2015","dateCreated":"26-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1125\/2007","caseSubject":"Tax","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan and others v. M\/s Delta Innovations Limited","caseFileName":"C.A._1125_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1239","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-04-2015","dateCreated":"26-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1646\/2000","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Against the judgment dated 18.2.2009, 10.8.2006 of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi passed in C.P. No.D-2659\/1994, C.P. No.34-D\/1995)","caseFileName":"C.A._1646_2000.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" If there is an inordinate delay in pronouncement of judgment after hearing of the matter, the Judges shall not be in a position to exactly recall and record with precision and exactitude as to what propositions of law and facts were argued before them. \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1550","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-04-2015","dateCreated":"24-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":73},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.94\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Dr. Raja Amir Zaman v. Omar Ayub Khan & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._94_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"When section 70 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 requires the election as a whole to be declared void, it is not possible to hold that it includes the jurisdiction to declare the election at a few polling stations to be void. \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1303","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-06-2015","dateCreated":"19-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":98},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1890\/2002","caseSubject":"Tax\/Property Tax","caseTitle":"Govt. of Sindh  through Secretary & Director General Excise & Taxation and another. v. Muhammad Shafi and others.","caseFileName":"C.A._1890_2002.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A lease which is not in consonance with section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908 cannot at all be held to be permanent in nature under any circumstances and since the lease in question was not in perpetuity, the Tax department has no lawful authority to demand\/levy property tax from the lessee in term of section 4 (a) & (b) of the Urban Immovable Property Tax Act, 1958.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 380","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-03-2015","dateCreated":"11-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":67},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2352\/2008","caseSubject":"Banking\/Recovery Suits","caseTitle":"United Bank Ltd. v. Fateh Hayat Khan Tawana, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._2352_2008.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An application filed during the pendency of a timely first execution application cannot be considered a 'fresh application' because it elaborates or amends the pending first execution application. On the other hand, when a subsequent execution application has been filed after the disposal of the first execution application, the objection of limitation may be relevant. However, even in such a case, the subsequent execution application may survive notwithstanding its belated institution beyond six years after the decree under execution, if it satisfies the test and criteria of amendment of a previously disposed of execution application that had been filed timely. \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1335","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2015","dateCreated":"10-06-2015","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.335\/2014","caseSubject":"Tax\/Others","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M\/o Petroleum & Natural Resources & another v. Durrani Ceramics & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P._335_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The certificate by the Speaker of the National Assembly providing that a Bill is a Money Bill would only be relevant if proceedings arise in the Parliament. Such a certificate would not prevent the Court from examining whether a particular item could have validly been included in a Money Bill. The words should be given their ordinary meaning unless the context otherwise requires. No case is made out for review of the judgment on any ground.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 354","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2015","dateCreated":"29-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.589\/2006","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Abdul Ghaffar v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A._589_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" Merely because an heir has compromised with the convict would not automatically result in the imposition of the lesser punishment of imprisonment for life.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1064","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-04-2015","dateCreated":"29-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"Crl.A.465\/2006","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Mian Khalid Rauf v. Ch. Muhammad Saleem and another","caseFileName":"Crl.A._465_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 10(1) of Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958, provides that the forum for filing an appeal from the Judgment of a Special Judge is the High Court and the same Court has also been given the powers of revision. Any aggrieved person whether it be the Federal or the Provincial Government or an accused or a complainant could approach the High Court in appeal against either an order of conviction or acquittal or for that matter for the purpose of enhancement of a sentence passed by any Special Judge appointed under the Act of 1958. \r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 348","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2015","dateCreated":"29-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"C.A.620\/2006","caseSubject":"Allotment\/of Plot","caseTitle":"Mansoor Sharif Hamid and another v. Shafique Rehman and others","caseFileName":"C.A._620_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Umar Ata Bandial","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1172","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2015","dateCreated":"29-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":69},{"caseNumber":"C.A.794\/2006","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"Syed Hussain Naqvi etc. v. Begum Zakara Chatha (decd) thr LRs and others","caseFileName":"C.A._794_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Contingent agreement to sell colony land did not fall within the mischief of S. 19 of Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912. ","citation":"2015   SCMR  1081","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2015","dateCreated":"29-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1340\/2014","caseSubject":"NAB\/Bail","caseTitle":"Himesh Khan v. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Lahore & others)","caseFileName":"C.P._1340_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An accused person cannot be left at the mercy of the prosecution to rot in jail for an indefinite period. The inordinate delay in the conclusion of trial of detained prisoners cannot be lightly ignored provided it was not caused due to any act or omission of accused. Despite the exclusion clause, beneficial provision of section 497 Cr.P.C. can be pressed into service in some genuine and rare cases to provide relief of grant of bail to a highly deserving accused, incarcerated in prison for a longer duration. There is also a long chain of authorities and dicta of this Court where bail has been granted on account of shocking delay in the conclusion of trial in cases falling under the NAB laws.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1092","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2015","dateCreated":"29-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"C.A.90\/2011","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Proof of legitimacy through DNA test","caseTitle":"Ghazala Tehseen Zohra v. Mehr Ghulam Dastagir Khan, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._90_2011_UrduVersion.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 327","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2015","dateCreated":"28-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":669},{"caseNumber":"Crl.P.15\/2015","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Socha Gul v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.P._15_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1077","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-03-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.A.80-L\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Upgradation","caseTitle":"Govt. of the Punjab through Chief Secratery, Lahore, etc v. Ch. Abdul Sattar Hans","caseFileName":"C.A._80_L_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Article 25 of the Constitution is only attracted where there is an apple-to-apple comparison. In the present case, this is not the position because both sets of individuals i.e. Sr. Auditors of the Federal Government (BPS-16) and Dy. Accountants of the Provincial Government (BPS-14) are not equally placed. They are employed by different employers with different financial resources. ","citation":"2015   SCMR  915","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-03-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1797\/2005","caseSubject":"Suit for specific performance","caseTitle":"Farid Bakhsh v. Jind Wadda and others","caseFileName":"C.A._1797_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Testimony of scribe cannot be equated with that of an attesting witness as both of them had signed the document in different capacity and with a different state of mind. The scribe does not meet the requirements of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1044","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-03-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.A.548\/2009","caseSubject":"Suit for recovery\/Rendition of Accounts","caseTitle":"M\/s. Shahnawaz & Sons Govt. Contractor v. Govt. of N.W.F.P. thr. Secy. Works & Services & others","caseFileName":"C.A._548_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Unnecessary remand of cases results in undue delay and consequent prolonging of the agony of the litigants.","citation":"2015   SCMR  945","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-04-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.84-P\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Sarhad Development Authority through its Chairman, Peshawar and another v. Syed Muhammad Latif Shah and others","caseFileName":"C.P._84_P_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Government was required to frame rules pertaining to terms and conditions of services of the officers and employees of Sarhad Development Authority (\u201cthe Authority\u201d). Such omission, prima facie, shows that the Government, in absence of the proposed rules, is regulating the service of the Authority by exercising its unstructured discretion in recruitment\/promotion of officers and employees in the Authority.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1060","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1122\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Reinstatement","caseTitle":"Commandant KPK Constabulary,  Peshawar,& another v. Muhammad Nasir & ohers","caseFileName":"C.A._1122_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The status of civil servant cannot be conferred by a deeming clause on an employee of the organization which has its own statutory service rules. The terms and conditions of service of the respondents are regulated by the North West Frontier Constabulary Act of 1915 which authorizes the Appellants to frame rules. The rules were framed in 1958 and are duly notified which regulate the terms and conditions of service of the Respondents. Inquiries were conducted by the Appellants without following the procedure provided in Rule 18 of the Rules of 1958. Partly allowing the appeals, the matters are remanded to the departmental Authority of the Appellants to hold de novo inquiry after reinstating the Respondents in service and pass appropriate orders within four months from the date of communication of the judgment.","citation":"2015   SCMR  1040","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.A.9\/2006","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Dy. Director Custom Intellegence & Investigation v. Farman Ali and others","caseFileName":"C.A._9_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1052","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"C.A.718\/2007","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Court Martial","caseTitle":"Gunner Muhammad Mushtaq v. Secy. Ministry of Defence, Federal Govt. thr. Chief of the Army Staff","caseFileName":"C.A._718_2007.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  1071","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-01-2015","dateCreated":"09-05-2015","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.P.41\/2015","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Secretary Establishment, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad v. Aftab Ahmed Manika & others","caseFileName":"C.P.41_66_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A plain reading of Section 9 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 7 of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973 makes it clear that the appointing Authority has to make promotions in BPS 20 and 21 only upon the recommendations of the Central Selection Board (CSB). It does not provide in either of the provision that the recommendations of CSB are binding and consequently be returned by the appointing Authority only when the procedure followed by CSB suffers from any factual or legal flaw.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  1006","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-04-2015","dateCreated":"22-04-2015","fileSizeInBytes":71},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3854\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"MATTER REGARDING NON-IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT WITH RESPECT TO DEMARCATION OF PROPERTY","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3854_2014_dt_17-04-2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018   SCMR  1864","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-09-2015","dateCreated":"17-04-2015","fileSizeInBytes":733},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3854\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/.","caseTitle":"MATTER REGARDING NON-IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT WITH RESPECT TO DEMARCATION OF PROPERTY","caseFileName":"C.M.A._3854_2014_dt_31-3-2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"An honest, upright and ethical Bar is absolutely essential for the just dispensation of justice, particularly in our adversarial legal system. This has to be ensured at all cost if an independent Bench and Bar are to be maintained. ","citation":"2018   SCMR  1864","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-03-2015","dateCreated":"01-04-2015","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.592-K\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Matter to the extent of Show Cause Notice to Mr.Irfan Qadir,ASC in compliance of Order dated 26.3.2015","caseFileName":"C.M.A._592_K_2013_order_dt_26_03_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court suspends the practicing license of an Advocate of the Supreme Court in order to maintain the honour, respect and dignity of the Bar and the Court, and issues him a notice to show cause as to why he should not be removed from practice as an Advocate of the Supreme Court.\r\n\r\n\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  810","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-03-2015","dateCreated":"27-03-2015","fileSizeInBytes":134},{"caseNumber":"C.A.90\/2011","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration\/Proof of legitimacy through DNA test","caseTitle":"Ghazala Tehseen Zohra v. Mehr Ghulam Dastagir Khan, etc","caseFileName":"C.A._90_2011_EnglishVersion.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Article 2(9) of QSO provides that when one fact declares ?to be conclusive proof of another [fact], the Court shall on proof of one fact, regard the other as proved and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it?. The stipulation in Article 128 is that the birth of a child within the period stipulated in Article 128 is conclusive proof that he is a legitimate child. Once the relevant facts as to commencement and dissolution of marriage and the date of birth of a child within the period envisioned in Article 128 are proved, and the date of birth is within the period specified in Article 128(1), then the Court cannot allow evidence to be given for disproving the legitimacy of a child born within the period aforesaid. For the purpose of harmonious construction of Article 2(9) and 128 of QSO, the Court resorts to Section 2 of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1962, which provides that if parties are Muslim and in all questions regarding legitimacy or bastardy the rule of decision shall be Muslim Personal Law. As per Imam Abu Hanifa paternity must be denied immediately after the birth of child while as per Imam Yousaf period for denial to the legitimacy\/paternity of the child be made within the post-natal period (maximum of 40 days). First denial was made after the period specified above, therefore, the respondent-plaintiff cannot be allowed to deny the legitimacy\/paternity of the two children. ","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 327","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2015","dateCreated":"19-03-2015","fileSizeInBytes":153},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.315\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"National Highway Authority through its Chairman v. Roedad Khan","caseFileName":"C.R.P._315_2013_DT_19_03_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The concise statement by the petitioners, who had maintained that the Director (Industries & Labour) had violated the order of stopping of illegal activities, quarrying etc. within the area of the Margallah Hills National Park, be filed in the Court.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-03-2015","dateCreated":"19-03-2015","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.315\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"National Highway Authority through its Chairman v. Roedad Khan","caseFileName":"C.R.P._315_2013_DT_18_03_2015.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of construction of tunnel, crushing of stones and encroachment etc. in the Margallah Hills National Park, observes that the name of this Court has been used in an unjustified manner in a letter cancelling the mining lease of a cement factory issued by the Director (Industries and Labour) ICT and directs the said official to appear and explain the contents of his letter.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-03-2015","dateCreated":"18-03-2015","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.P.232\/2014","caseSubject":"Rent\/Ejectment\/Others","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yaar v. Ghulam Murtaza & others","caseFileName":"c.p.2132_2014_with_urdu_translation.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"As effective procedures, sufficient to ensure diligence and efficiency in pursuing those in respect of whom National Accountability Ordinance was promulgated, are not in place within National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the case is adjourned for personal appearance of Chairman NAB.\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-02-2015","dateCreated":"17-02-2015","fileSizeInBytes":370},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4343\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Matter regarding publishing\/printing incorrect version of Section 23 of Contract Act, 1872 in the Book titled \"The Contract Act, 1872, 2nd Ediction\/2011\" by M. Mahmood, Advocate","caseFileName":"c.m.a.4343_2014_etc_with_urdu_translation.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"In suo motu proceedings emanating from glaring mistakes committed by authors and publishers in the text of the statutes in privately published law books, the Court issued directions for compilation and online as well as hard bound availability of the complete Pakistan Code (including translated version in national language while translations of the Code into provincial\/vernacular languages where deemed appropriate shall be made by the Provinces), subordinate legislation, statutory orders and notifications, and preparation of a legislative and\/or administrative regime with effective enforcement and prosecution mechanisms to ensure that law publications for sale to the public were error free and, where applicable, had the permission of the Government owning copyrighted material, and that the Provinces shall follow the same pattern of publication of soft and hard copies of laws, rules and notifications.","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 257","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2015","dateCreated":"12-02-2015","fileSizeInBytes":723},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.126\/2012","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Zahid Rehman v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A.126of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Per Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J (Majority View): The  provisions  of  and  the  punishments provided in section 308, P.P.C. are relevant only to cases of Qisas and that they have no relevance to cases of Ta'zir and also that any latitude or concession in the  matter  of  punishments  contemplated  by  the  provisions  of sections 306, 307 and 308, P.P.C. and extended to certain categories of offenders in Qisas cases mentioned in such provisions ought not to be mistaken as turning those cases into cases of Ta'zir with the same latitude or concession in the punishments. Qisas and Ta'zir are two distinct and separate legal regimes which are mutually exclusive and not overlapping and they are to be understood and applied as such. \r\n\r\nPer Ejaz Afzal Khan, J (Minority View): Sections 306, 307 and 308, P.P.C. are equally applicable to the cases going outside the pail of qisas.\r\n\r\nPer Dost Muhammad Khan, J (Agreeing with Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J): The provisions of sections 306, 307, 308, 309 and 310 P.P.C. in unequivocal and clear terms mention the punishment of Qisas leaving no room for Ta'zir punishment to be read or included therein by implication. \r\n\r\nPer Qazi Faez Isa, J (Agreeing with Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, J): Section 306 attends to three different categories of cases \u2013 i) \"when an offender is minor or insane\" (section 306 (a) P.P.C.), ii) \"when an offender causes the death of his child or grandchild, howlowsoever\" (section 306(b), P.P.C.) iii) \"when any wali of the victim is a direct descendant, howlowsoever, of the offender\" (section 306(c), P.P.C.). In the second and third categories \"qatl-i-amd is not liable to qisas\" therefore it has been made liable to tazir. ","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 77","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2014","dateCreated":"15-01-2015","fileSizeInBytes":529},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1122\/2011","caseSubject":"Service","caseTitle":"Muhammad Zafar Ali & others v. Asim Gulzar & others","caseFileName":"C.A.1122of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Appointments are always prospective in nature notwithstanding a vacancy occurring earlier. The appointment of the encadred police officers from the Provinces in the Police Service of Pakistan is to be made with prospective effect and retrospective effect can be given to such appointments only for the limited purpose of determining their own inter se seniority in accordance with Rule 11(2)(c) of the Police Service of Pakistan (Composition, Cadre and Seniority) Rules, 1985.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  365","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2014","dateCreated":"06-01-2015","fileSizeInBytes":214},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.193\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh and others","caseFileName":"C.R.P.193of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Any appointment by transfer under Rule 9(1) of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, has to be for a fixed term, and, on completion of such term, the civil servant has to join back his parent department. The concept of absorption of a civil servant and\/or government servant is foreign to the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, as well as Rule 9(1) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The said rule does not permit transfer of non-civil servant to a non-cadre post or to a cadre post. \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  456","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-05-2015","dateCreated":"05-01-2015","fileSizeInBytes":8875},{"caseNumber":"C.A.404\/2011","caseSubject":"Service\/Dismissal from Service","caseTitle":"Ali Hassan Brohi v. Province of Sindh, thr Chief Secy.  & others","caseFileName":"C.A.404of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Amir Hani Muslim","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Absorption of officers from different departments into the Provincial Government can neither be ordered under S. 24 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973, nor under R. 9(1) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1974, and is also violative of the Fundamental Rights of the civil servants.\r\n           \r\n\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  353","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-05-2015","dateCreated":"05-01-2015","fileSizeInBytes":201},{"caseNumber":"C.A.727\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Raza Hayat Hiraj v. The Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"cas_727-730_777_778_2014_etc.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The interlocutory orders passed by the Election Tribunal were not liable to be set aside by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction as the petitioners before the High Court had a remedy available to them by way of appeal under section 67 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 after disposal of the election petitions.\r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  233","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-12-2014","dateCreated":"17-12-2014","fileSizeInBytes":107},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1038\/2000","caseSubject":"NAB","caseTitle":"The Chairman NAB, Islamabad. v. Fahmida Begum, etc","caseFileName":"ca.1038_2000.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A person may be a director or employee of a company while at the same time be a guarantor as well. The National Accountability Bureau Ordinance only provides for exclusion of those individuals from the definition of \u201cperson\u201d who are in fact employees but have been appointed as the Chief Executive or Directors of the company. \r\n","citation":"2015   SCMR  172","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2014","dateCreated":"25-11-2014","fileSizeInBytes":218},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2124\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Promotion","caseTitle":"Ghulam Rasool v. Government of Pakistan, thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"c.p.2124_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is the exclusive preserve of the Federal Government to appoint heads of statutory bodies, autonomous bodies, semi-autonomous bodies, regulatory bodies etc. as also to make appointments on merits under the Acts\/Ordinances wherein certain criteria has been laid down for such purpose. However, the Court's deference to the Executive Authority lasts for only as long as the Executive makes a manifest and demonstrable effort to comply with and remain within the legal limits which circumscribe its power. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 6","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-11-2014","dateCreated":"14-11-2014","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"CRL.SH.A.7\/2011","caseSubject":"Sentence\/More than 10 years","caseTitle":"Imran @ Dully v. The state","caseFileName":"crl.s.a.07_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   SCMR  155","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-11-2014","dateCreated":"13-11-2014","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1646-L\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Gohar Nawaz Sindhu v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif,etc","caseFileName":"cp_1646-l_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-10-2014","dateCreated":"10-11-2014","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1646-L\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Gohar Nawaz Sindhu v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif,etc","caseFileName":"cp_1646-l-2014_urdu_order_dt_16.10.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-10-2014","dateCreated":"16-10-2014","fileSizeInBytes":325},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.19\/2012","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Sarwar, etc v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"crl.a.19of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions of section 91, Cr.P.C. and section 497, Cr.P.C. are meant to cater for different situations. If the court issuing process against an accused person decides to issue summons for his appearance then the intention of the court is not to put the accused person under any restraint at that stage and if the accused person appears in response to the summons issued for his appearance then the court may require him to execute a bond, with or without sureties, so as to ensure his future appearance before the court as and when required. If in response to the summons issued for his appearance the accused person appears before the court but fails to submit the requisite bond for his future appearance to the satisfaction of the court or to provide the required sureties then the accused person may be committed by the court to custody till he submits the requisite bond or provides the required sureties.","citation":"2014   SCMR  1762","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-10-2014","dateCreated":"03-10-2014","fileSizeInBytes":240},{"caseNumber":"C.A.482\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Mst. Shahista Bibi & others v. The Superintendent Central Jail, Mach & others","caseFileName":"c.a.482_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions of Ss. 35 & 397 Cr.P.C. widen the scope of discretion of the court to direct that sentences of imprisonment or that of life imprisonment awarded at the same trial or at two different trials but successively shall run concurrently. Once the Legislation has conferred the above discretion in the Court then in hardship cases, Courts are required to seriously take into consideration the same to the benefit of the accused so that to minimize and liquidate the hardship treatment, the accused person is to get and to liquidate the same as far as possible.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2015 SC 15","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-09-2014","dateCreated":"19-09-2014","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"C.A.1540\/2013","caseSubject":"Tax\/Others","caseTitle":"Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M\/o Petroleum & Natural Resources & another v. Durrani Ceramics & others","caseFileName":"c.a.1540-1599_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Courts have decided the question of whether a particular levy is a 'tax' or a 'fee' upon examining the facts and circumstances of each case. Cess has been defined as a tax which raises revenue to be applied for a specific purpose. Nomenclature, however, would not be relevant and whether the imposition of a particular cess can be termed as a 'tax' or 'fee' would depend upon the nature of a levy. Both are compulsory exaction of money by public authorities. Whereas 'tax' is a common burden for raising revenue and upon collection becomes part of public revenue of the State, 'fee' is exacted for a specific purpose and for rendering services or providing privilege to particular individuals or a class or a community or a specific area. So long as the levy is to the advantage of the payers, consequential benefit to the community at large would not render the levy a 'tax'. GIDC is not a 'tax' but a 'fee' and the same could not have been introduced as money bill under Article 73 of the Constitution. Natural gas is subject to levy of Sales Tax and GIDC Act does not appear to suggest that it is another instance of Sales Tax levied by the Parliament on the supply of natural gas. Double taxation can be imposed only by clear and specific language and not by implication. For a 'tax' to fall under the Federal Legislative List it must be covered by Entries Nos. 43 to 53. The non-inclusion of any tax in the divisible pool may have other consequences but would not render the levy unconstitutional. GIDC is a fee and not a tax, in the alternative it is not covered by any Entry relating to imposition or levy of tax under Part-I of the Federal Legislative List. On either counts the 'Cess' could not have been introduced through a money bill under Article 73 of the Constitution. The same was, therefore, not validly levied in accordance with the Constitution.\r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  1630","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-08-2014","dateCreated":"22-08-2014","fileSizeInBytes":354},{"caseNumber":"C.P.784\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"M\/o Inter Provincial Coordination Islamabad thr. its Secy. v. Arbab Altaf Hussain & others","caseFileName":"C.P.784of2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The writ petitions by the respondent-employees of the Pakistan Cricket Board, whose services were not governed by any statutory rules and employment admittedly was contractual in nature, before the High Court were not competent.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  1573","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-07-2014","dateCreated":"28-07-2014","fileSizeInBytes":317},{"caseNumber":"C.P.784\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"M\/o Inter Provincial Coordination Islamabad thr. its Secy. v. Arbab Altaf Hussain & others","caseFileName":"cpla_784_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  1573","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-07-2014","dateCreated":"21-07-2014","fileSizeInBytes":10},{"caseNumber":"C.P.853\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Chairman Management Committee, P.C.B. & others v. Sanobar Gul & others","caseFileName":"cps_853-876_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 SCMR 1573","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-07-2014","dateCreated":"21-07-2014","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2943\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Independent Media Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan through M\/o Information and PEMRA","caseFileName":"cma_2943_2014_dt_02.07.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rahman","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in a miscellaneous matter regarding unwanted posters and banners in Islamabad, directs the Inspector General of Police to submit a report about the progress in case FIR No. 234\/14 before the next date of hearing.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 666","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-02-2014","dateCreated":"02-07-2014","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"smc_16._2011_24.06.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-06-2014","dateCreated":"25-06-2014","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"smc_16_23.06.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-06-2014","dateCreated":"23-06-2014","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Suicide Bomb Attack of 22.09.2013 on the Church in Peshawar. ","caseFileName":"smc_1_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2014 SC 699","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-06-2014","dateCreated":"19-06-2014","fileSizeInBytes":2961},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.9\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"M. Aslam Awan, ASC v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p.9_2014_detail_reasons.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  1289","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-06-2014","dateCreated":"04-06-2014","fileSizeInBytes":183},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2943\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Independent Media Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan through M\/o Information and PEMRA","caseFileName":"cma.2943_2014_order_dt_28.05.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 666","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"28-05-2014","fileSizeInBytes":401},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2774\/2014","caseSubject":"Revival","caseTitle":"Independent Media Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan through M\/o Information and PEMRA","caseFileName":"c.m.app.2274_2014_in_const.p.51_2010_final_order_dt_26.05.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The application is disposed of in the light of the statement of the counsel for PEMRA that PEMRA will ensure that there is no shifting of the channels contrary to or in violation of the order dated 13.08.2012 passed in Constitution Petition No. 51 of 2010. ","citation":"PLD 2014 SC  650","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-05-2014","dateCreated":"27-05-2014","fileSizeInBytes":1019},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2774\/2014","caseSubject":"Revival","caseTitle":"Independent Media Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan through M\/o Information and PEMRA","caseFileName":"cma_2774_2014_in_const.p.51_2010_dt_22.05.14.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is always for the Judge himself to make a determination as to whether or not his relationship with any other person is such that he should not hear a particular case in which such person is a party. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2014 SC  650","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-05-2014","dateCreated":"22-05-2014","fileSizeInBytes":698},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.86\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Report of Secretary Punjab Bar Council, Lahore","caseFileName":"crl.misc.app_86_2014_order_dt_20.05.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 SCMR 747","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-05-2014","dateCreated":"20-05-2014","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.1\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Review on behalf of SNGPL through its M.D.","caseFileName":"crp_1_2014_dt_14.05.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI,","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-05-2014","dateCreated":"14-05-2014","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.9\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"M. Aslam Awan, ASC v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"const.p.9_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The inter se seniority of Judges of a High Court shall reckon from the order and date of their appointment as Additional Judges of that Court. The inter se seniority of Additional Judges of a High Court appointed vide the same order and date shall reckon from their seniority in age. If appointment of two or more service candidates is simultaneously made with that of the candidates from the Bar, the service Judges shall retain their existing seniority in the department regardless of their age, though that would be the determining factor in respect of their seniority vis-a-vis the candidates from the Bar. ","citation":"2014   SCMR  1289","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-06-2014","dateCreated":"06-05-2014","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.908\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Mr. Liaquat Baloch, Secretary General Jamat-e-Islami, applicant v. Secretary, M\/o Commerce & Trade, Islamabad","caseFileName":"cma_908_2014_22.04.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mushir Alam","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court observes that from the reports of the committees formed to conduct on ground visits of the provinces, it does appear that fundamental rights as given in Articles 9 and 14 of the Constitution may not be available presently to a substantial number of citizens. The Governments shall be heard, their actions to alleviate the abject condition of the citizens will be taken into account and the possibility of seeking a professional\/scientific study of the matter will be considered on the next hearing. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-04-2014","dateCreated":"22-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.908\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Mr. Liaquat Baloch, Secretary General Jamat-e-Islami, applicant v. Secretary, M\/o Commerce & Trade, Islamabad","caseFileName":"cma.908_2014_14.04.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The minimum nutritional needs of the citizens are the standards which will ensure that the fundamental rights mentioned in Article 9, 14 and the principles of policy set out in Article 38 of the Constitution are assured. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2014","dateCreated":"14-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.908\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Mr. Liaquat Baloch, Secretary General Jamat-e-Islami, applicant v. Secretary, M\/o Commerce & Trade, Islamabad","caseFileName":"cma.908_2014_14.04.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The minimum nutritional needs of the citizens are the standards which will ensure that the fundamental rights mentioned in Article 9, 14 and the principles of policy set out in Article 38 of the Constitution are assured. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-04-2014","dateCreated":"14-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"C.A.297\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/Delimitation of Constituencies","caseTitle":"Election Commission of Pakistan thr. its Secretary v. Province of Punjab thr. its Chief Secretary & others","caseFileName":"ca.297_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The power to hold elections of the Local Government stands vested in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in terms of Article 140A of the Constitution. Since the delimitation of constituencies of the Local Government is part of the process of organizing and holding elections honestly, justly and fairly which is the constitutional mandate of ECP, the power to carry out such delimitation should vest with ECP. Sections 8 to 10 of the Punjab Local Government Act, 2013 and the relevant Rules framed there-under are ultra vires of the Constitution in so far as they empower the Provincial Government to carry out the delimitation of the constituencies for the Local Government. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 463","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-03-2014","dateCreated":"11-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.328\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"General (R) Parvez Musharaf v. Nadeem Ahmed (Advocate) & another","caseFileName":"crp.328-329_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 585","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"10-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":789},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4581\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Muhammad Younis against Arif Mehmood Gill, MPA","caseFileName":"cma.4581_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No conclusive finding with regard to the authenticity of the FA degree of the respondent can be given in these proceedings and the applicant may take recourse to other remedy, if available under the law. The suo moto notice issued to the respondent as also the order of suspension of his membership from the Provincial Assembly is withdrawn.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-09-2014","dateCreated":"09-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.3\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action upon an incident of indiscriminate firing and suicide attack in District Courts, Islamabad.","caseFileName":"smc.3_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 PSC (Crl.) 562","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-07-2014","dateCreated":"07-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.4925-G\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Press Clipping of \"Daily News\" Dated 25-02-2014, regarding supplying cancer-diagnostic injections allegedly contaminated with undesirable radionuclides","caseFileName":"hrc_4925-g_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The suo moto action taken on news report regarding diagnostic injections causing cancer is disposed of in view of the submitted report with the observations that the news item is not based on a correct appreciation of the relevant facts.  ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2014","dateCreated":"03-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.25-Q\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Muhammad Akram Baloch v. Election Tribunal Balochistan & others","caseFileName":"cp_25-q__399_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2014","dateCreated":"03-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.6\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Rape Victim sets herself Ablaze after Accused freed on Bail.","caseFileName":"smc_6_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-02-2014","dateCreated":"02-04-2014","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.203-L\/2014","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Shakeel v. The State etc","caseFileName":"crl.p.203-l_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC  458","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-03-2014","dateCreated":"22-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.A.38\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Province of Sindh through it Chief Secretary & others v. MQM through its Deputy Convener & others","caseFileName":"ca.38-45_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 531","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-03-2014","dateCreated":"20-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":580},{"caseNumber":"C.A.297\/2014","caseSubject":"Election\/Delimitation of Constituencies","caseTitle":"Election Commission of Pakistan thr. its Secretary v. Province of Punjab thr. its Chief Secretary & others","caseFileName":"ca_297_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The power to hold elections of the Local Government stands vested in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in terms of Article 140A of the Constitution. Since the delimitation of constituencies of the Local Government is part of the process of organizing and holding elections honestly, justly and fairly which is the constitutional mandate of ECP, the power to carry out such delimitation should vest with ECP. Sections 8 to 10 of the Punjab Local Government Act, 2013 and the relevant Rules framed there-under are ultra vires of the Constitution in so far as they empower the Provincial Government to carry out the delimitation of the constituencies for the Local Government. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 463","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-03-2014","dateCreated":"19-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.26\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Khurram Shehzad Chughtai v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"const_petition_26_2013_17.03.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2014","dateCreated":"17-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.86\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Report of Secretary Punjab Bar Council, Lahore","caseFileName":"crl_misc_app_86_2014_17.03.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 SCMR 747","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2014","dateCreated":"17-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.6\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Syed Mubashir Raza Jaffri & another v. Emolyees Old Age Benefits Institutions (EOBI) through its President.","caseFileName":"const.p.6_2011_final.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  949","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-03-2014","dateCreated":"17-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":143},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.310\/2006","caseSubject":"Against Acquittal","caseTitle":"Haider Zaman v. he State and another","caseFileName":"crl.a_310_2006_12.03.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The principle of vicarious liability is not attracted in the case of sudden flare-up as strictly as in the case where crime is committed in a pre-planned and well-calculated manner.","citation":"2014 PSC (Crl.) 569","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-12-2014","dateCreated":"12-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.3\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action upon an incident of indiscriminate firing and suicide attack in District Courts, Islamabad.","caseFileName":"smc_3_2014_10.03.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 PSC (Crl.) 562","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-03-2014","dateCreated":"10-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.P.70\/2014","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Tariq Khan v. Government of KPK thr. Secretary Irrigation, Mardan & others","caseFileName":"cp_70_2014_04.03.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-04-2014","dateCreated":"04-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1472\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Absence without Leave","caseTitle":"Commandant KPK Constabulary, FC, HQ, Peshawar, KPK & another v. Amir Ullah Islam &  another","caseFileName":"cp_1472_2013_03.03.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2014","dateCreated":"03-03-2014","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.86\/2014","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Report of Secretary Punjab Bar Council, Lahore","caseFileName":"crl.misc.a.86_2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The disciplinary mechanism of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1976 and the proceedings taken by the Punjab Bar Council in this case appear, prima facie, to have fallen short of the standards set out for Advocates in the code of conduct prescribed under the aforesaid Act. ","citation":"2014 SCMR 747","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-02-2014","dateCreated":"27-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":300},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.240\/2012","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Salamat Ali alias Cheema v. The State & another","caseFileName":"crl.p.240_2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  743","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-08-2012","dateCreated":"27-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":403},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2014","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Suicide Bomb Attack of 22.09.2013 on the Church in Peshawar. ","caseFileName":"smc_1_2014_dt_27.02.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2014 SC 699","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-02-2014","dateCreated":"27-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"smc_16_2011_order_dt_26.02.14.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-02-2014","dateCreated":"26-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"smc_16_2011_24.02.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-02-2014","dateCreated":"24-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.413\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"crl.a_413-414_2013_18.02.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"As the legislature has provided for awarding alternative sentence of life imprisonment in case of offence of murder, it would be difficult to hold that death penalty is the normal penalty and should ordinarily be awarded. A single mitigating circumstance, available in a particular case, would be sufficient to put on guard the Judge not to award the penalty of death but life imprisonment. The motive set up in the F.I.R. was not of the degree and magnitude, if at all it did lay with the accused, to take lives of two persons, more so, when the same has remained shrouded in mystery.","citation":"2014   SCMR  1034","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-02-2014","dateCreated":"18-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.3677-E\/2014","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Non-availability of machine readable passports in Pakistan Embassy in China]","caseFileName":"hrc_3677-e_2014_17.02.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Secretary Interior is directed to appear in the Court in the matter of non-availability of machine readable passports in Pakistan Embassy in China and explain the factual position.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-02-2014","dateCreated":"17-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"C.A.407\/2013","caseSubject":"Service\/Absence without Leave","caseTitle":"Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd.  Islamabad thr. G.M. (HR) HQS v. Member NIRC, Lahore & others","caseFileName":"ca_407_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Once it is established through any means that the employer or group of employers has an establishment, group of establishments, industry, having its branches in more than one provinces, then the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission would be exclusive in nature and of overriding and super imposing effects over the Provincial Labour Court for resolving industrial dispute including unfair labour practice, etc. \r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  535","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-04-2014","dateCreated":"17-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1545\/2009","caseSubject":"License\/Acquisition of","caseTitle":"Pak Telecome Mobile Ltd v. Pakistan Telecommunication Authority, Islamabad","caseFileName":"cp_1545_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 478","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2014","dateCreated":"14-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":49},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.12\/2014","caseSubject":"Bail Before Arrest","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ramzan v. The State & another","caseFileName":"crl.p_12_2014_07.02.2014.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Dost Muhammad Khan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-07-2014","dateCreated":"07-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.7546\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Raja Rabnawaz v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"cma_7546_2013-cma_18_14.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court directs the learned Attorney General for Pakistan to assist as regards the consequences of any further delay in the holding of Local Government Elections in the Cantonment Areas and if the Local Government Elections in the Cantonment Areas can be held under the existing law. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-06-2014","dateCreated":"06-02-2014","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.328\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"General (R) Parvez Musharaf v. Nadeem Ahmed (Advocate) & another","caseFileName":"crp_328-329_2013_short_order.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 585","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-01-2014","dateCreated":"30-01-2014","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"CRL.R.P.8-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Cancellation of Bail","caseTitle":"Nazir Ahmed  v. The State and another ","caseFileName":"crl_r_p.8-l_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 241","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-01-2014","dateCreated":"22-01-2014","fileSizeInBytes":155},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.29388-K\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Mohabat Shah S\/o Kabul Shah for Recovery of Yaseen Shah","caseFileName":"hrc_29388-K_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iqbal Hameedur Rahman","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the case of missing persons of Malakand Internment Centre, orders that the matter be listed for hearing on 20.01.2014 and all relevant quarters may file comments\/replies by 17.01.2014.","citation":"K.L.R. 2014 Supreme Court 5","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-10-2014","dateCreated":"10-01-2014","fileSizeInBytes":483},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.193\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"cma_193-194_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Office objection no. iv is overruled; two days\u2019 time is allowed for compliance of office objections no. iii, v, vi, vii & ix; while office objections no. i, ii & viii are ordered to be placed before the Court at the time of hearing of review petition. ","citation":"2015   SCMR  456","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-01-2014","dateCreated":"08-01-2014","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.35\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Against involvement of Zafar Iqbal Gondal, Former Chairman, EOBI, DG Investment and DG HR, etc in multibillion scam in the Employees Old Age Benefit Institute","caseFileName":"const.p.35_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The matter is adjourned in view of a written request for adjournment on behalf of a counsel.\r\n\r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-06-2014","dateCreated":"06-01-2014","fileSizeInBytes":10},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.46\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Application by Abdul Hakeem Khoso","caseFileName":"Const.P.46of2013-dt-27-12-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 350","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-12-2013","dateCreated":"27-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":847},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Regarding death of more than 90 heart patients under treatment in Punjab Institute of Cardiology on account of spurious drugs","caseFileName":"SMC1of2012-dt-27-12-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"K.L.R. 2014 Supreme Court 11","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-12-2013","dateCreated":"27-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":90},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.7679\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Party Pakistan thr. Akhtar Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"cma.7679_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in an application filed with a grievance that the directions given by this Court in the judgment reported as Workers Party Pakistan v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2012 SC 681) have not been complied with, seeks parawise comments from the Secretary, Election Commission of Pakistan and report from Election Tribunals Lahore and Multan.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2013","dateCreated":"18-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14392\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Action on the news clipping published in Daily Pakistan dated 17.04.2013","caseFileName":"hrc_14392_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of action taken regarding unprecedented load shedding in the country, holds that load shedding of electricity in the country is manageable subject to dedicated and committed efforts to ensure the maximum possible generation which is sufficient to cater to the requirements of all categories of consumers and that a formula must be put in place to ensure equitable distribution.","citation":"2014 PSC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-12-2013","dateCreated":"10-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":179},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.1\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Mst. Rohaifa v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary M\/o Defence, etc","caseFileName":"const.p.1_ 2012_etc.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The bar of jurisdiction of Supreme Court in terms of Article 247(7) of the Constitution would be applicable where cause of action and subject matter of dispute is in the Tribal Areas and the parties to the  dispute are also resident of Tribal Areas.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 174","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-12-2013","dateCreated":"10-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":146},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.20107-G\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Action on News clipping in the daily \"Dawn\" dated 26.05.2013 regarding incident of burning of school van in Gujrat]","caseFileName":"hrc_20107-G_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of action taken on a news report regarding the incident of burning of school van in Gujrat, issues directions for ensuring safety of public carrying vehicles.","citation":"2013 PSC (Crl.) 987","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-12-2013","dateCreated":"09-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"smc.24_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-12-2013","dateCreated":"06-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":219},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.115\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"const.p.115_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  873","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2013","dateCreated":"05-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":398},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.20\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Action Against Distribution of Development Funds by Ex-Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf","caseFileName":"const.p.20_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Constitution does not permit the use\/allocation of funds to MNAs\/MPAs\/Notables at the sole discretion of the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister. The National Assembly, while giving assent to a grant which is to be utilized by the Executive at its discretion, has to follow the procedure provided in Articles 80 to 84 of the Constitution as well as the Rules of Procedure, 2007. ","citation":"PLD 2014 SC  131","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2013","dateCreated":"05-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":162},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"const.p.5_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court declares that project in question could not be allowed to continue being based on illegalities from its very inception and is accordingly set aside; that all losses caused to and incurred by the State, State enterprise SSGCL and the people arising out of and as a result of the bidding process and during the tenure of Implementation Agreement are to be made good and recovered from JJVL and all persons who had actively participated and had made substantial decisions in the bidding process and making of the Implementation Agreement.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 206","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-12-2013","dateCreated":"04-12-2013","fileSizeInBytes":103},{"caseNumber":"H.R.42389-P\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Action taken on news clipping from \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcDaily Dunya\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 dated 4.11.2013 regarding rape on a deaf and mute lady at Nankana Sahib]","caseFileName":"hrc_42389-P_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in an action taken on a news item regarding the rape of a deaf and mute lady at Nankana Sahib, directs the Inspector General of Police, Punjab to initiate criminal proceedings against all concerned delinquent police officers\/officials and ensure an independent investigation without being influenced by anyone who is allegedly involved in the case.","citation":"2014 SCMR 515","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-11-2013","dateCreated":"27-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":257},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.29388-K\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Mohabat Shah S\/o Kabul Shah for Recovery of Yaseen Shah","caseFileName":"hr.29388-k_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the missing person case of district Malakand, directs the Additional Attorney General to take up the matter with the Ministry of Defence with the direction to produce the persons from the custody of the Army during the course of the day and submit his report at 1.00 p.m.","citation":"K.L.R. 2014 Supreme Court 5","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-11-2013","dateCreated":"26-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.37\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Petition Regarding miserable condition of a school in Gujranwala, where girls sit beside graves whilst taking a test during their daily classes in graveyard","caseFileName":"const.p.37_2012_final.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court identifies the issues, challenges and problems confronting the schools all over the country as well as measures required to be taken to achieve the goal of compulsory and free education for the children of the age of 5 to 16 years in view of Article 25A of the Constitution.","citation":"2014 SCMR 396","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2013","dateCreated":"22-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":368},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding violatin of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurement loss of billions of rupees of exchequer case by National Insurance Compant Ltd.","caseFileName":"smc.18_2010_final.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  585","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-11-2013","dateCreated":"22-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":1294},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Asaf Fasihuddin Khan v. Govt. of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.33_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The appointment of Air Marshal (r) Khalid Chaudhry as Director General, Civil Aviation Authority has been made in a non-transparent manner. Further, contracts awarded for construction and completion of New Benazir Bhutto International Airport Project, Islamabad to 17 contractors and their subsequent performance as noted in the Inquiry Report and Audit Report is not transparent.","citation":"2014   SCMR  676","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2013","dateCreated":"19-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":283},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.6882\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of Local Bodies","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"cma.6882-13.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Article 140A(2) of the Constitution casts a duty upon the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to hold local government elections in terms of Article 140A(1), therefore, it should always remain prepared to meet the challenge. Whenever any request by the Federal or the Provincial Government is made for holding elections, ECP should comply with the same at the earliest. ECP and Provincial Governments have shown their commitment to hold local bodies elections on 7th December, 2013. Constitutional petition is disposed of accordingly.\r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  1","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-11-2013","dateCreated":"13-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.5959\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Raja Rab Nawaz v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"cma.5959_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The commitment to hold local bodies elections in Cantonment Boards till 15 September, 2013 has not been fulfilled. Therefore, notice  of  the  Contempt of Court is issued to the Secretary Defence. Three options \u2013 i) Decide within seven days to hold elections under the existing laws, ii) The Court would enforce the provisions of section 15E of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and iii) As no permission has been obtained to vary constitution of Cantonment Boards in terms of section 14(1)(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 after 5th May, 2013, the Court shall examine that under which authority of the law and how the expenditure etc. are being made from the funds of the Cantonment Boards \u2013 are available to the Federation with regard to holding of elections in Cantonment Boards. Progress report about holding local bodies elections in ICT and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa shall be sent to the Registrar of this Court within seven days.","citation":"2014   SCMR  101","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-11-2013","dateCreated":"05-11-2013","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.11\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"(Suo Moto action regarding allotment of hundreds of National Police Foundation's plots by Mr. Anjum Aqeel, MNA to his nominees without any formal agreement)","caseFileName":"smc.11_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 389","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-10-2013","dateCreated":"31-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":336},{"caseNumber":"C.A.669-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Malik Umar Aslam Awan v. Mst. Sumaira Malik, etc","caseFileName":"C.A.669-L_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court could intervene in the election of such candidates, who were found to be disqualified, even after having been elected as members of Parliament, and their election could subsequently be de-notified. The Member of Parliament was disqualified on account of possession of educational degree obtained by forgery, impersonation and dishonest means. \r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  45","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2013","dateCreated":"28-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":147},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.92\/2013","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Contempt proceedings against IMRAN KHAN, Chairman PTI\/MNA by the order of HCJ","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.92of2013-dt-9-10-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 367","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-10-2013","dateCreated":"21-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":253},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.77_2010_dt_14.10.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Federal and the Provincial Governments are directed to place on record their view points about the interim measures which are being contemplated to enforce the constitutional provisions under Articles 32 and 140A of the Constitution.","citation":" \n2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-10-2013","dateCreated":"14-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.A.149\/2010","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Habibullah Energy Ltd. v. WAPDA thr. its Chairman & others","caseFileName":"c.a.149-150_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The process of awarding lease of a Power Generation Company for 20 years by WAPDA to the respondent is not sustainable as the transaction in question, by no stretch of imagination, is legal, transparent, fair, open or the result of a competitive and fair process. The Power Plant is a public asset and those entrusted therewith were sadly found wanting. Direction is issued to the Federal Government to fix civil and criminal liabilities in this regard.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 47","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-08-2013","dateCreated":"10-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":788},{"caseNumber":"C.A.800-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Dossani Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. M\/s. Travels Shop (Pvt) LTd. & others ","caseFileName":"C.A.800Lof2013etc.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The parameters of exercise of constitutional jurisdiction of High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution are enumerated. Hajj Policy framed by competent authority in the absence of any illegality, arbitrariness or established mala fides, was not open for the High Court to annul.\r\n","citation":" \nPLD 2014 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-08-2013","dateCreated":"08-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":155},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14392\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Action on the news clipping published in Daily Pakistan dated 17.04.2013","caseFileName":"hrc.14392_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The case, in view of the statement of Attorney General regarding the request of Federal Government to the regulator (NEPRA) for reconsideration of determination of tariff of DISCOs and KESC, is adjourned for further hearing on the issues involved in the petition and also to ascertain the outcome of the policy statement\/decision of the Government.","citation":"2014 PSC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"04-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.22\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Orya Maqbool Abbasi v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.22of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Central Selection Board (CSB), being a semi judicial forum, has been authorized to examine the cases of the officers justly and fairly. Notification of promotion of all the officers from BS-20 to 21 issued in pursuance of the recommendations of CSB is set aside with the direction to the competent authority to undertake the process of the promotion to all of them strictly in accordance with law on merits under section 9 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, read with rules 7, 7A and 8 of the Civil Servants (Appointments, Promotions and Transfers) Rules, 1973 as well as Promotion Policy as amended up to date. The Government shall also undertake exercise to outline the objective criteria for promotion to make the civil servant an honest officer and free from political pressure.","citation":"2014   SCMR  817","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-11-2013","dateCreated":"03-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":156},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.9\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding illegal selling out of the Auqaf Property by the Chairman, Evacuee Trust Property Board.","caseFileName":"smc.9_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2014 SC 100","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2013","dateCreated":"02-10-2013","fileSizeInBytes":146},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"smc.16of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-10-2013","dateCreated":"26-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":150},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Asaf Fasihuddin Khan v. Govt. of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CAA_25.09.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in a constitutional petition filed under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution regarding alleged corruption, illegalities, irregularities, mismanagement and delay in the construction and completion of New Benazir Bhutto International Airport Project, Islamabad, directs that Project Director and concerned officials of project management unit of the Airport should be replaced with competent officials; that Secretary Aviation should evolve a strategy  by  making  a  steering  committee  to  monitor  the project and to ensure that all procurements hence forth are as per specification and relevant Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules; that DG, Federal Investigation Agency should himself supervise the inquiries\/investigations which are to be conducted for fixing criminal liabilities upon all the concerned persons\/contractors; and that the Federal Government  should  take  all  necessary  steps  to ensure  the completion of the project as early as possible.\r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  676","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-09-2013","dateCreated":"25-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":593},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3470\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Fake Degree","caseTitle":"News Clipping Published in Daily Jang dated 04.06.2013","caseFileName":"C.M.A.3470_2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"In a matter relating to the Parliamentarians? fake\/bogus degrees, the case is adjourned for verification of the genuineness of the ?O? and ?A? Levels testimonials of a Member of the Provincial Assembly.","citation":"2014 SCMR 98","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2013","dateCreated":"13-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Asaf Fasihuddin Khan v. Govt. of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"const.p.33-2013_dt_12.09.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court inquires as to how the Secretary (Aviation Division) has been transferred without allowing him to serve his complete tenure and without assigning any exceptional reasons inasmuch as without moving any summary to the Prime Minister. ","citation":"2014   SCMR  676","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-09-2013","dateCreated":"12-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.70\/2012","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Contempt Proceedings against Weekly Magazine \"Pulse\"","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.70_2012_dt_10-09-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-09-2013","dateCreated":"12-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.70\/2012","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Contempt Proceedings against Weekly Magazine \"Pulse\"","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.70_2012_dt_04-06-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2013","dateCreated":"12-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2408-L\/2009","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Wukala Mahaz Barai Tahafaz Dastoor v. Federation of Pakistan & another","caseFileName":"C.P.2408-LOF2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The issues raised in the constitutional petition and the prayers made are relatable to matters of foreign policy, defence and security of the country which are neither justiceable nor fall within the judicial domain for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution and, therefore, leave is refused.\r\n","citation":"2014   SCMR  111","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-09-2013","dateCreated":"04-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Nasir Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"const.p.39_90_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission of Pakistan shall make all possible efforts so that the expatriates may also participate in the General Elections in exercise of their fundamental rights conferred under Article 17(2) of the Constitution.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 72","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-04-2013","dateCreated":"02-09-2013","fileSizeInBytes":80},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"SMC16-2011_ord_dt_30-8-13.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-08-2013","dateCreated":"30-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.92\/2013","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Contempt proceedings against IMRAN KHAN, Chairman PTI\/MNA by the order of HCJ","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.92of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 367","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-08-2013","dateCreated":"28-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":10},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.35\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Against involvement of Zafar Iqbal Gondal, Former Chairman, EOBI, DG Investment and DG HR, etc in multibillion scam in the Employees Old Age Benefit Institute","caseFileName":"Const.P.35of2013_28.08.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The hearing in the matter of multi billion scam in EOBI is adjourned and the counsel for EOBI may seek further instruction in the matter as regards various proposals noted in the order. The other parties are also required to make compliance of various directions contained in this order and the earlier order of this Court. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-08-2013","dateCreated":"28-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010_dt_27-8-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-08-2013","dateCreated":"28-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":70},{"caseNumber":"C.A.800-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Dossani Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. M\/s. Travels Shop (Pvt) LTd. & others ","caseFileName":"C.A.800LOF2013_27.08.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is not the function of the High Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution to interfere in the policy making domain of the Executive. The High Court can under Article 199 of the Constitution annul an order or a policy framed by the Executive, if it is violative of the Constitution, law or is product of mala fides. However, nothing has been placed before this Court to indicate that the Hajj Policy challenged before this Court seriously suffered from any of these infirmities.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-08-2013","dateCreated":"27-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.A.149\/2010","caseSubject":"Suit for Declaration","caseTitle":"Habibullah Energy Ltd. v. WAPDA thr. its Chairman & others","caseFileName":"CAs.149-150of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The transaction i.e. the lease for 20-years in respect of Lakhra Power Station GENCOIV, dated 11.09.2006, followed by Power Purchase Agreement, dated 15.12.2007, between M\/S Associated Group (AG) and the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) is not sustainable being non-transparent and also suffers from irregularities, illegalities, omissions and commissions as well as violates the relevant rules and precedents set forth by the superior courts.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 47","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-08-2013","dateCreated":"21-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.12271-S\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Complaint by Ameer Zadi","caseFileName":"hrc_17082013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-08-2018","dateCreated":"17-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.92\/2013","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Disrespecting the Court","caseTitle":"Contempt proceedings against IMRAN KHAN, Chairman PTI\/MNA by the order of HCJ","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.92_2013_dt_02.08.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 367","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-08-2013","dateCreated":"02-08-2013","fileSizeInBytes":75},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2234\/2005","caseSubject":"Educational Institutions Cases\/Admission Matters","caseTitle":"Secretary Economics Affairs Div. Islamabad. etc v. Anwar ul Haq Ahmed","caseFileName":"C.A.2234and2235of2005-dt-31-8-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Educational institutions are independent to follow policy for admission including affairs relating to changing conditions for endowment funds or fee, either under the policy given by the government or adopted by the college; and interference in the policy by the Court is possible only in exceptional circumstances. The protection of Article 25 of the Constitution  can  be  denied  in  peculiar  circumstances  of  the  case on the basis  of  reasonable  classification founded  on  an  intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from those who have been left out. The differentia, however, must have rational nexus to the object sought to be achieved by such classification. The classification between the students, who secured more marks and succeeded in getting admission on open merit and the students, who, after failing to get admission on open merit, opted to get the benefit of Self Finance Scheme, is based on an intelligible differentia as such reasonable. \r\n","citation":"2013 SCMR 1687","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-07-2013","dateCreated":"31-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":120},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2915\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Amina Masood Janjua v. The State through M\/o Interior and others","caseFileName":"cma.2916_etc._26.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Lists of the internees confined in Internment Centres in FATA and PATA, with details about their involvement in the criminal cases (if any) and why they are not being proceeded against, may be filed. SOPs be prepared and focal persons be appointed, preferably to be the District and Sessions Judges of the areas where Internment Centres are situated or otherwise the Political Agents or the Deputy Commissioners would themselves be focal persons, who would be responsible to manage the meeting of the relatives with the internees according to rules without any inconvenience. A report regarding medical treatment to the detenues be also called from both the Secretaries FATA and PATA. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2013","dateCreated":"26-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.35\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Against involvement of Zafar Iqbal Gondal, Former Chairman, EOBI, DG Investment and DG HR, etc in multibillion scam in the Employees Old Age Benefit Institute","caseFileName":"Const.P.35of2013_order_dated_26.7.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"FIA shall ascertain the value of the properties purchased by EOBI at the time of transactions and prevailing rates through a qualified and independent property evaluator. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-07-2013","dateCreated":"26-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Asaf Fasihuddin Khan v. Govt. of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.33of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Advisor to the Prime Minister on Aviation appears and informs the Court that he, in view of the controversy surrounding his appointment, has decided to tender resignation. It is observed that the learned Attorney General shall place on record the notification of the acceptance of his resignation in due course of time.","citation":"2014   SCMR  676","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-07-2013","dateCreated":"25-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3470\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Fake Degree","caseTitle":"News Clipping Published in Daily Jang dated 04.06.2013","caseFileName":"CMA.3470of2013etc.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner had filed a bogus degree with her nomination papers and indulged in unfair means to substantiate her educational qualification to contest general elections. She cannot be considered to be honest, righteous or ameen, hence, does not possess the qualifications prescribed under Article 62(1)(f) of the constitution to become a legislator. Consequently, the notification declaring her as a returned candidate being invalid is set aside.","citation":"2014 SCMR 98","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-07-2013","dateCreated":"25-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":36},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.749-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Habeas Corpus","caseTitle":"Ali Muhammad v. The State, etc","caseFileName":"Cr.P.749-Lof2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1484","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2013","dateCreated":"24-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Raja Muhammad Zafar-ul-Haq v. Election Commission of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.39-2103.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission of Pakistan is required to facilitate the voters and electors to exercise their right of franchise in the election to the office of the President of Pakistan. Therefore, it is directed to change the schedule keeping in view the grounds raised by the petitioner.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1480","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-07-2013","dateCreated":"24-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19526-G\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Application by Mst. Bibi Zahida for arrest of accused of murder of her daughter Waheeda]","caseFileName":"HRC19526of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 SCMR 83","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-07-2013","dateCreated":"24-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":485},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.115\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Abdul Rahim Ziaratwal and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.115-2012etc.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  873","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-07-2013","dateCreated":"22-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.35\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Against involvement of Zafar Iqbal Gondal, Former Chairman, EOBI, DG Investment and DG HR, etc in multibillion scam in the Employees Old Age Benefit Institute","caseFileName":"Const.P35of2013-dt-20-7-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-07-2013","dateCreated":"20-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.213\/2013","caseSubject":"Habeas Corpus","caseTitle":"Mst. Rasoolan v. Station House Officer, Police Station, Head Marala, District Sialkot & others","caseFileName":"Crl.P.213of2013-dt-20.7.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2013","dateCreated":"20-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010-dt-20-7-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2013","dateCreated":"20-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.35\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Against involvement of Zafar Iqbal Gondal, Former Chairman, EOBI, DG Investment and DG HR, etc in multibillion scam in the Employees Old Age Benefit Institute","caseFileName":"Const.P.35-2013_18.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court observes that the owner of the television channel shall not take any drastic action against the employee who had broken the news of the scam relating to purchase of land by the EOBI. The Law Enforcing Agencies are also directed to ensure the protection of person and property of the journalist concerned. Additional Director General, FIA, apprises that prima facie a deal was entered in a highly un-transparent manner between the EOBI and DHA, Islamabad.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2013","dateCreated":"18-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P77-2010-17.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2013","dateCreated":"17-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.105\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Hamid Mir and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.105-2012-eng-urd.PDF","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 244","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2013","dateCreated":"16-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":850},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3470\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Fake Degree","caseTitle":"News Clipping Published in Daily Jang dated 04.06.2013","caseFileName":"CMA3470of2013_10.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Different orders are passed in the matter of verification of educational testimonials of legislators.","citation":"2014 SCMR 98","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-07-2013","dateCreated":"10-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Asaf Fasihuddin Khan v. Govt. of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.33of2013_09.07.13.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  676","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-07-2013","dateCreated":"09-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":37},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3470\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Fake Degree","caseTitle":"News Clipping Published in Daily Jang dated 04.06.2013","caseFileName":"CMA3470OF2013_08.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014 SCMR 98","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-07-2013","dateCreated":"08-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3258\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Raja Rab Nawaz v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CMA3258of2013inCP65of09DetailOrder.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The deadline for holding elections in the Cantonment Boards is extended to 15th September, 2013 in view of the commitment made on behalf of the Executive.\r\n","citation":" \n2013   SCMR  1629","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-07-2013","dateCreated":"05-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":64},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3393\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Syed Adil Gillani against appointment of Federal Ombudsman","caseFileName":"CMA.3393-2013_03.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in an application against the appointment of Federal Ombudsman, directs the Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Secretariat, AGPR, Managing Director Printing Press and Law Secretary to place relevant documents on record. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-07-2013","dateCreated":"03-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.213\/2013","caseSubject":"Habeas Corpus","caseTitle":"Mst. Rasoolan v. Station House Officer, Police Station, Head Marala, District Sialkot & others","caseFileName":"Crl.P.213-2013_03.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-07-2013","dateCreated":"03-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2255\/2010","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Moulvi Iqbal Haider v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Law, Justice, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P.2255-2010-03.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitions seeking direction to the Federal Government to lodge a complaint under Article 6 of the Constitution against respondent General (r) Pervez Musharraf and others are disposed of with  the  observation  that  the  Federal  Government  shall  proceed  as per  undertaking given in the statement filed on 26-6-2013 without unnecessary delay.\r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1683","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-07-2013","dateCreated":"03-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14392\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Action on the news clipping published in Daily Pakistan dated 17.04.2013","caseFileName":"hrc.14392of2013-01.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of action taken on news clipping regarding unprecedented load shedding in the country, issues notice to all provincial Chief Secretaries for giving reaction if the supplies from the National Grid and the Sui Gas are ensured in bulk  by the respective agencies as per their requirements, making them responsible to ensure equitable supply of the electricity and the gas to the consumers of all categories and the Federal Government may deduct, in advance, the charges\/price through the NFC.","citation":"2014 PSC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2013","dateCreated":"01-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.35\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Against involvement of Zafar Iqbal Gondal, Former Chairman, EOBI, DG Investment and DG HR, etc in multibillion scam in the Employees Old Age Benefit Institute","caseFileName":"Const.P.35of2013_01.07.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Director General FIA is directed to conduct inquiry\/investigation in the cases pertaining to alleged corruption in making investment by the EOBI in 18 properties as well as in respect of any transaction of the EOBI wherein it is noticed that corruption or corrupt practices have been committed by the responsible persons.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2013","dateCreated":"01-07-2013","fileSizeInBytes":49},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.20\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Action Against Distribution of Development Funds by Ex-Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf","caseFileName":"Const.P.20of2013-dt-28-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of action against distribution of development funds by ex-Prime Minister, observes that prima facie there must be some criteria for allocation of such funds because the Parliamentarians, Members of the Provincial Assemblies, other functionaries\/officers\/officials and other persons (Notables) who received such amounts in the name of development schemes cannot be permitted to be benefitted from such funds and discretion has not been exercised in allocating the funds in a transparent manner, and directs the Secretaries Finance and the Economic Affairs Divisions and all other concerned to provide assistance to the learned Attorney General for Pakistan so that he may assist the Court in a befitting manner.  ","citation":"PLD 2014 SC  131","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2013","dateCreated":"28-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2255\/2010","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Moulvi Iqbal Haider v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Law, Justice, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P.No.2255of2010-dt-28-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1683","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-06-2013","dateCreated":"28-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.A.39\/2010","caseSubject":"Service\/Absence without Leave","caseTitle":"Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority and others v. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed","caseFileName":"C.A.39_2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Courts generally apply the \"function test\" to consider whether a statutory body is a \"person\" within the meaning of Article 199 of the Constitution. Constitutional petition before High Court by an employee of a statutory body is maintainable subject to \"function test\".\r\n\r\n \r\n           \r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1707","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-05-2013","dateCreated":"28-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":217},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2255\/2010","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Moulvi Iqbal Haider v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Law, Justice, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P.No.2255of2010-dt-27-6-2013 .pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1683","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-06-2013","dateCreated":"27-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2005","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Engineer Iqbal Zafar Jhagra v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.No.33and34of2005-dt-27-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1337","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-06-2013","dateCreated":"27-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":214},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.486\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Adnan A. Khawaja v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A.No.486of2010-dt-26-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  1917","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-06-2013","dateCreated":"26-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2007","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Abdul Wahab & others v. H.B.L. & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.39of2007-dt-25-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The nature of relationship between the petitioners i.e. employees of Habib Bank Limited (HBL) and the respondent i.e. HBL was contractual. The impugned orders of compulsory retirement of the petitioners were in accord with the Habib Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules, 1981 which are non-statutory. HBL is not performing any function in connection with the affairs of the Federation or a Province. No question of public importance with reference to enforcement of fundamental rights has been raised. The  grievances  voiced  through  this  petition  are  individual in nature. The petition having no merits is accordingly dismissed. ","citation":"2013   SCMR  1383","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-10-2012","dateCreated":"25-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":96},{"caseNumber":"C.A.579-L\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"ca679-lof2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" When the tenancy agreement is not entered and registered according to the provisions of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009 and a landlord or the tenant approaches the Rent Tribunal for the enforcement of his right(s) under the said Act, he has to pay a fine. The Rent Tribunal is left with no discretion to waive off, exonerate or absolve a party coming before it from such a fine.\r\n \r\n","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-06-2013","dateCreated":"21-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":89},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3821\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Interim Order","caseTitle":"Regarding sudden increase in the prices of petroleum products.","caseFileName":"Civil.Misc.A.3821of2013_21.06.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Government is not authorized to impose or increase sales tax from 16% to 17% on the value of taxable supplies, i.e. by inserting in the Finance Bill (Money Bill) 2013-14 a declaration under section 3 of the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931 as such declaration neither has the status of legislation nor sub-legislation, therefore, it has no force of law. Immediate recovery of sales tax from 16% to 17% on the value of taxable supplies w.e.f. 13.06.2013 is unconstitutional being contrary to Articles 3, 9, 24 and 77 of the Constitution.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1337","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-06-2013","dateCreated":"21-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14392\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Action on the news clipping published in Daily Pakistan dated 17.04.2013","caseFileName":"H.R.C.14392OF2013-dt-19-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court in an action taken on unprecedented load shedding in the country directs that supply of electricity shall be made on the formula of equitable distribution to industries and other consumers of electricity.","citation":"2014 PSC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-06-2013","dateCreated":"19-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.13\/2004","caseSubject":"Death Sentence\/Sessions","caseTitle":"Hassan v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A.13-14-15and16of2004and53of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The principles of practice being followed by the courts of the country in respect of the principle of expectancy of life are stated.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 793","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-05-2013","dateCreated":"13-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":122},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.30\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.30of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Caretaker Cabinet\/Prime Minister is empowered to carry out only day-to-day affairs of the State with the help of the available machinery\/resources\/ manpower and also to watch national interest against war or national calamity or disaster faced by the nation, including terrorism, etc. The civil servants who have already been appointed in accordance with the rules\/regulations on the subject ought not to be posted\/transferred, etc., except in extraordinary circumstances, that too, temporarily. The Caretaker Government should detach itself from making permanent policies having impact on future of the country.\r\n \r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1205","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2013","dateCreated":"12-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":185},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.89\/2011","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Contempt proceeding against Chief Secy. Govt. of Sindh & others","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.89of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1752","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-05-2013","dateCreated":"12-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":3537},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3393\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Application by Syed Adil Gillani against appointment of Federal Ombudsman","caseFileName":"C.M.A.3393of2013-dt10.6.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Examining the appointment of Mr. Salman Faruqui as Wafaqi Mohtasib, the Court directs concerned officials to produce all relevant record and the case is adjourned to enable the counsel to file Power of Attorney on behalf of Mr. Salman Faruqui.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-06-2013","dateCreated":"10-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.67\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan,etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.67of2011-dt-10.6.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of machinery\/equipment of power projects lying at Karachi Port, issues notices to officers\/officials of the Ministry of Law and Justice Division, who have not made their appearance before the Court, and their names have been supplied by the Ministry itself through its Deputy Legislative Advisor. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-06-2013","dateCreated":"10-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.5216\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Against appointment of Raja Azeemul Haq as Executive Director of the World Bank","caseFileName":"C.M.A.5216OF2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE AMIR HANI MUSLIM","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The matter of appointment of Raja Azeemul Haq as Executive Director\/Alternate Executive Director of the World Bank is under consideration and the case is adjourned for confirmation regarding acceptance of his resignation from the World Bank.","citation":"2014   SCMR  949","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2013","dateCreated":"08-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.140\/2005","caseSubject":"NAB","caseTitle":"Abdul Aziz Memon v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.A.140of2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 594","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-05-2013","dateCreated":"07-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":188},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.127\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Regarding pensionary benefits of the Judges of Superior Courts from the date of their respective retirements, irrespective of their length of service as such Judges","caseFileName":"Const.P.127of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2013 SC 829","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-04-2013","dateCreated":"07-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":4311},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.59\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf Tiwana v. Pakistan through Secretary M\/o Finance, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.59of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The selection and appointment of respondent no. 4, Muhammad Ali Ghulam Muhammad, as Commissioner and Chairman Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (\"SECP\") does not meet the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act 1997 (\"the Act\") and the Federal Government shall, without delay, make appointments to statutory positions in SECP which meet the requirements of the Act; the insertion of section 5(5) in the Act through the Finance Act 2003 was violative of the Constitution and in particular Article 73 thereof; and Clause 3(1) of Chapter 11 of the SECP Service Rules (HR Handbook), which allow for termination simpliciter (without cause) of employees of SECP, is ultra vires the Constitution and inter alia, the Act, and must be replaced appropriately by provisions ensuring due process and adherence, inter alia to Articles 9, 10A, 14, 18 and 25 of the Constitution and which are consistent with the provisions of the Act ensuring independent and objective decision making without fear or favour, required of an independent regulator.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1159","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2013","dateCreated":"06-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":183},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.170\/2013","caseSubject":"Bail After Arrest","caseTitle":"Haseeba Taimoor Afridi v. The State & another","caseFileName":"Crl.P.170of2013-dt-5-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-06-2013","dateCreated":"05-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.30\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.PetitionNo.30of2013-dt-4-6-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1205","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-06-2013","dateCreated":"04-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.A.83\/2006","caseSubject":"Labour Cases\/Declaration as to Workmen","caseTitle":"Fauji Fertilizer Company Ltd. thr. its Factory Manager v. National Industrial Relations Commission thr. its Chairman and others","caseFileName":"C.A.83and84of2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The employees of the contractor were involved in  running  the  affairs  of  the  company  such  as  filling  and  loading of urea bag as well as cleaning of machines and floors, therefore, for all intents and purposes, they are employees of the company through the contractor.\r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1253","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-05-2013","dateCreated":"01-06-2013","fileSizeInBytes":90},{"caseNumber":"C.P.240-K\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Saddiq Ali Memon v. Returning Officer,NA-237 Thatta-1,etc","caseFileName":"C.P.No.240and241-Kof2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The successful candidate in general election 2013 while filing nomination papers for contesting by-election in 2010 had filed a declaration to the effect that he fulfilled qualification specified in Article 62 of the Constitution and was not subject to any disqualification specified in Article 63 of the Constitution despite the fact that he was holding dual nationality and in terms of  Article  63(1)(c)  of  the  Constitution on   acquiring  the  citizenship of   a  foreign  state  he  stood  disqualified  from  being  elected  or chosen  as a Member of Majlis-e-Shoora or the Provincial Assembly.\r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1246","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-05-2013","dateCreated":"31-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":40},{"caseNumber":"C.A.427\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Moulana Agha Muhammad v. Returning Officer NA-261 Pishin cum Ziarat, DC Office Pishin & others","caseFileName":"C.A.No.427of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The result of the election, where the appellant\u2019s nomination papers were rejected by the Returning Officer, the Election Tribunal and the High Court but the operation of all three orders operating against the appellant was suspended and leave was granted by the Supreme Court, shall be subject to the decision of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court. \r\n\r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1158","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-05-2013","dateCreated":"31-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.73\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Ch. Nisar Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.73of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 568","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-05-2013","dateCreated":"31-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":98},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14392\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Action on the news clipping published in Daily Pakistan dated 17.04.2013","caseFileName":"H.R.C.No.14392of2013andH.R.C.No.790-Gof2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court in an action taken on unprecedented load shedding in the country directs the implementation of order dated 21.05.2013 in letter and spirit and adjourns the matter. ","citation":"2014 PSC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-05-2013","dateCreated":"31-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.P.784\/2014","caseSubject":"Writ Petition","caseTitle":"M\/o Inter Provincial Coordination Islamabad thr. its Secy. v. Arbab Altaf Hussain & others","caseFileName":"cp784of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  1573","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-05-2013","dateCreated":"30-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.A.411\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of National Assembly","caseTitle":"Abdul Ghafoor Lehri v. The Returning Officer, PB-29, Naseerabad-II at Dera Murad Jamali & others","caseFileName":"ca411to414of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Sanad produced by the appellant while contesting election in 2002 has been declared not equivalent to B.A. degree. He submitted false or incorrect declaration in respect of his educational qualification and was, thus, not righteous, sagacious, non-profligate, honest and Ameen within the meaning of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution, as such, was not qualified to be elected or chosen as a member of Parliament. A person who is not qualified under Article 62(1)(f) cannot become qualified by efflux of time. The appellant has rightly been disqualified by the learned Election Tribunal. Since the appellant was not qualified to contest the elections, therefore, his success in the general elections held under the stay order granted by this Court while granting leave to appeal, cannot be helpful to him.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1271","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-05-2013","dateCreated":"30-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":56},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.73\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Ch. Nisar Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"const.p.73_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The consultation in the appointment of Admiral (r) Fasih Bokhari as Chairman National Accountability Bureau was not made in accordance with Section 6 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 and the law declared by this Court, and, therefore, his appointment is declared to be without lawful authority and is set aside with immediate effect.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 568","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-05-2013","dateCreated":"28-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":9},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.32\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali v. Election Commission of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.32of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner, a returned candidate from NA-266, primarily has voiced an individual grievance in a constitutional petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution that on the application of one of the defeated candidates, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has directed that recounting of rejected votes be carried out and report be submitted to ECP. However, in view of the fact that the petition is directed against an ex-parte order and the petitioner has leveled serious allegations, the petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may move the proper High Court against the order of ECP within 5 days and in the meanwhile the order of ECP shall not be given effect to.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-05-2013","dateCreated":"24-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.30\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Khawaja Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"const.p.30of2013_dt_22.05.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1205","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-05-2013","dateCreated":"22-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.P.796\/2007","caseSubject":"Corporate","caseTitle":"Maulana Abdul Haque Baloch & others v. Government of Balochistan thr. Secy. Industries & Mineral Development & others","caseFileName":"C.P.796of2007-UrduTranslation-dt-10-5-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  511","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-05-2013","dateCreated":"10-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":1114},{"caseNumber":"C.P.756-L\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Khalid Pervaiz Gill v. Saifullah Gill & others ","caseFileName":"C.P.756-Lof2013-dt-10-5-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Leave to appeal is granted in order to examine as to whether the candidate is qualified to contest the election in terms of Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution. Meanwhile, he is restrained from contesting the election owing to availability of evidence\/finding on record against him.         \r\n\r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1310","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-05-2013","dateCreated":"10-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.P.796\/2007","caseSubject":"Corporate","caseTitle":"Maulana Abdul Haque Baloch & others v. Government of Balochistan thr. Secy. Industries & Mineral Development & others","caseFileName":"C.P.796of2007-dt-10-5-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chaghi Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement for exploring copper and gold reserves in Reko Diq area of the province of Balochistan between Balochistan Development Authority and respondent-company, with percentage interest as respondent-company entitled to 75% interest and the Provincial Government given 25% \"free carried interest up to discovery\", was entered into for an inadequate consideration as regards the percentage interest of the Provincial Government and is held to be void and unenforceable.\r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  511","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2013","dateCreated":"10-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":1479},{"caseNumber":"C.P.636\/2013","caseSubject":"Election\/of Provincial Assembly","caseTitle":"Miss Kulsum Khaliq v. The Election Commission of Pakistan, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P.No.636of2013-dt-9-5-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Leave  to  appeal  is  granted to examine as to whether respondent-candidate is not disqualified under Article 63(1)(o) of the Constitution from contesting elections as admittedly he had paid government dues towards Social Security for over six months at the time of filing of his nomination papers. Meanwhile, he is restrained from contesting elections.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1295","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-05-2013","dateCreated":"09-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2376\/2013","caseSubject":"Impleadment\/.","caseTitle":"Shakeel Ahmed Turabi v. Fed. of Pakistan ","caseFileName":"C.M.A.2376of2013inConst.P.105-dt-9-5-13.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The matter is adjourned for appearance of DG Federal Audit and presentation of requisite figures indicating the amounts from the Federal Consolidation Fund and the Public Accounts of the Federation which have remained un-audited, with break-up specific to each Ministry, during the past 3 years. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-05-2013","dateCreated":"09-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2376\/2013","caseSubject":"Impleadment\/.","caseTitle":"Shakeel Ahmed Turabi v. Fed. of Pakistan ","caseFileName":"C.M.A.2376of2013inConst.P.105-dt-7-5-13.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The entire revenues of the Federation are either part of the Federal Consolidated Fund or the same are part of the Public Accounts of the Federation. There is no third account of the Federation. No part of the Consolidated Fund and the Public Accounts of the Federation is exempted from audit under the Constitution.  ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-05-2013","dateCreated":"07-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":50},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Nasir Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.39and90of2011-dt-3-5-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission of Pakistan shall make all possible efforts so that the expatriates may also participate in the General Elections in exercise of their fundamental rights conferred under Article 17(2) of the Constitution.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 72","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-04-2013","dateCreated":"03-05-2013","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.64\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Party and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"C.M.A.64of2013-dt-30-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is declared that ECP in compliance of Article 218(3) read with Article 222 of the Constitution and sections 103 & 104 of Representation of Peoples Act, 1976 as well as the judgment in the case of Workers? Party Pakistan has prepared\/improved nomination papers for the forthcoming General Elections of Pakistan for National and Provincial Assemblies in accordance with the Constitution and the law.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 406","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-04-2013","dateCreated":"30-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.14392\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Action on the news clipping published in Daily Pakistan dated 17.04.2013","caseFileName":"HRC.14392of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of action taken on news clipping regarding unprecedented load shedding in the country, directs power generation companies to achieve maximum target of production for the purpose of supply to all categories of consumers so they may be facilitated during the summer season and adjourns the case for submission of replies and voluntary expert opinion.","citation":"2014 PSC 282","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2013","dateCreated":"27-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2380\/2013","caseSubject":"Impleadment","caseTitle":"Rameeza Nizami v. Fed. of Pakistan ","caseFileName":"C.M.A.NO2380OF2013-DT-25.4.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Notice is issue to the other parties including the petitioners in the main petitions who may file a reply to the same within a week and the Director General Federal Audit shall audit the amount mentioned in list ?A? referred to in the previous order within three weeks and submit the report in the Court. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-04-2013","dateCreated":"26-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4918\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Regarding posting of Two Govt. Officers namely Hassan Waseem Afzal and his wife Farkhanda Waseem Afzal as OSD","caseFileName":"C.M.A.4918of2012-dt-26-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Observing political victimization in the matter of denying promotion to a civil servant couple, the Court directs the Secretary Establishment to convene a meeting for passing an appropriate order after considering the aforesaid officers for promotion to the next higher scale before the sunset of the day.","citation":"2013 SCMR 1150","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2013","dateCreated":"26-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.20\/2013","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Action Against Distribution of Development Funds by Ex-Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf","caseFileName":"Const.P.20of2013-dt-19-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court in the matter of distribution of development funds by Ex-Prime Minister amongst Parliamentarians and \"Notables\" for development schemes directs that Accountant General Pakistan Revenues should put up the details in respect of each development scheme in question; that each Executing Agency in whose favour cheques were issued, should submit reply through the Accountant General Pakistan Revenues about feasibility of the scheme and also to disclose as to whether the (relevant) Public Procurement Rules were followed and to what extent schemes have been executed along with details of funds so far utilized for each scheme separately.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 131","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2013","dateCreated":"20-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":86},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1674\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Hamid Mir and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CMA1674OF2013-DT-17-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-04-2013","dateCreated":"17-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":15822},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.59\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf Tiwana v. Pakistan through Secretary M\/o Finance, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.59of2011dt-9-4-2013[UrduTranslation].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1159","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-04-2013","dateCreated":"12-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":493},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Nasir Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.39of2011dt-11-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court expects that the Election Commission of Pakistan and all other functionaries shall as early as possible finalize the procedure so that the facility of exercising their right of franchise can be extended to the overseas citizens of Pakistan in the forthcoming general elections scheduled to be held on 11th May, 2013. ","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 72","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-04-2013","dateCreated":"12-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.59\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Ashraf Tiwana v. Pakistan through Secretary M\/o Finance, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.59of2011dt-9-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1159","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2013","dateCreated":"12-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"SMC16of2011-dt.5.4.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2013","dateCreated":"09-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"C.P.2255\/2010","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Moulvi Iqbal Haider v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M\/o Law, Justice, Islamabad & others","caseFileName":"C.P.2255OF2010dt-8-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The learned Attorney General for Pakistan is busy before Bench-1 and therefore the petition be listed for hearing on 03.07.2013.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1683","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-04-2013","dateCreated":"08-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"S.M.C.16of2011dt.4.4.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-04-2013","dateCreated":"05-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":79},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1674\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Hamid Mir and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CMA No.1674of2013dt-2-4-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The learned Deputy Attorney General is directed to ascertain the correct factual position and submit a report in response to an application contending that a summary has been approved for making payment of very heavy amounts for the purpose of advertisements in a media campaign in violation of rules. Meanwhile, disbursement to any advertising agent\/media house should be put on hold. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-04-2013","dateCreated":"02-04-2013","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1652\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"News clipping regarding no-go Areas in Karachi","caseFileName":"CMA.1652_2013_in_SMC_16_2011_Order_dt_29.03.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, with regard to a story about the existence of no-go areas in Karachi published in the Express Tribune, seeks explanation from the Provincial Police and Sindh Rangers about law and order situation prevailing in the provincial capital. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-03-2013","dateCreated":"29-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Nasir Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Const.Ps.No.39and90of2011-Dt-27-3-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 72","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-03-2013","dateCreated":"27-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1535\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Fake Degree","caseTitle":"Implementation\/Modalities of judgment passed in C.A.191-L & 409\/2010 regarding submission of  fake\/bogas degrees at the time of Election","caseFileName":"C.M.A.No.1535and1536of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A citizen, who is also an elector or voter, has a right to have access to the information in all manners with reference to credentials, antecedents etc. of a candidate for whom he is going to vote for electing him as his representative, therefore, in terms of Article 19-A of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 it is the Fundamental Right of a citizen to have access to information about the candidate for whom elector\/voter may cast his vote. ","citation":"2013   SCMR  862","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-03-2013","dateCreated":"26-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":489},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.10\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Against the violence in Christian Colony in Badami Bagh area over alleged blasphemy","caseFileName":"Const.P.No.10 of2013-Dt-25-3-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":" \n2013   SCMR  918","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2013","dateCreated":"25-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"S.M.C.16of2011dt-22-3-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-03-2013","dateCreated":"25-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":131},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.53\/2007","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Sh. Riaz-ul-Haq, Advocate Supreme Court v. Federationof Pakistan thr. M\/o Law, etc","caseFileName":"ConstP.No.53of2007andConst.P.83of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 501","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-01-2013","dateCreated":"25-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":242},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Nasir Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Const.Ps.No.39and90of2011Dt-15-3-2013.PDF","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 72","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-03-2013","dateCreated":"15-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":365},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.64\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Party and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"C.M.A.No.64of2013-dt14.3.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chief Secretaries of the Provinces and the Chief Commissioner ICT are directed to ensure complete control of law and order situation throughout the country so that the process of the general elections is completed peacefully.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 406","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-03-2013","dateCreated":"15-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.64\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Party and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"C.M.A.No.64of2013-dt13.3.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Executive Authorities in terms of Article 190 of the Constitution should have no hesitation to implement the judgment of the Court wherein different Articles of the Constitution for organizing, conducting and making necessary arrangements to ensure free and fair elections have been interpreted and a comprehensive report shall be submitted by both the sides in this regard.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 406","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-03-2013","dateCreated":"13-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":460},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Interim Order","caseTitle":"Dr. Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri  v. The Fed. of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.5of2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner has failed to make out a case for exercising the discretionary jurisdiction by this Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution for the fact that violation of any of the Fundamental Rights has neither been listed in the petition nor established during the arguments. He has also failed to prove his bona fides to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court coupled with the fact that under the peculiar circumstances he has no locus standi to claim relief as prayed for in the petition, inter alia, for the reasons that being a holder of dual citizenship, he is not qualified to contest the election to the Parliament in view of the constitutional bar under Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution. However, as a voter like other overseas Pakistanis, whose names have been incorporated in the Electoral Rolls, he can exercise his right of vote. ","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 413","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-02-2013","dateCreated":"13-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":1096},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.64\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Party and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"C.M.A.64of2013dt-12-3-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Learned counsel appearing for the Election Commission is directed to bifurcate the details of the measures regarding the conduct of general elections in respect of which the Election Commission has sought amendment firstly showing the portion which is to be implemented in pursuance of the directions of this Court and for which no legislation is called for and secondly with a separate portion in respect of those directions, observations and improvements that the Election Commission on its own intends to achieve the objective under Article 218(3) of the Constitution so that the matter could be resolved.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 406","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-03-2013","dateCreated":"12-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":578},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1145-K\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Suo Moto Action on the news clippings published on 04.03.2013 in Daily \"The News\", Dawn and \"The Nation\" Islamabad, regarding incident of Abbas Town at Karachi on 03-03-2013] - English\/Urdu\/Sindhi","caseFileName":"CMA_1145-K_2013_in_SMC_16-2011_08-03-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There is prima facie no coordination between the forces on intelligence sharing and concerted efforts are required to materialize such information between all these agencies. However, in order to fix responsibility on any of the institutions, further material is awaited for examination without loosing sight of the national interest.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-03-2013","dateCreated":"08-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":716},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1145-K\/2013","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Suo Moto Action on the news clippings published on 04.03.2013 in Daily \"The News\", Dawn and \"The Nation\" Islamabad, regarding incident of Abbas Town at Karachi on 03-03-2013] - English\/Urdu","caseFileName":"CMA_1145-K_2013_in_SMC_16-2011_06-03-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The manner in which the terrorist incident had taken place at Abbas Town, Karachi and the behaviour of the executive with the victims etc. is highly unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal. ","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-03-2013","dateCreated":"06-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":500},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.229\/2006","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Rana Muhammad Naveed and another v. ederation of Pakistan thr. Secy. M\/o Defence","caseFileName":"CRP.229_2006_in_CA.802_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  596","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-02-2013","dateCreated":"06-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2243\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"3rd and 10th fornightly progress report in ISAF Containers Scam","caseFileName":"CMA.2243-2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Report be obtained from the Federal Tax Ombudsman (\u201cFTO\u201d) as well as Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue (\u201cFBR\u201d) as to the extent of the implementation by the department of the recommendations of FTO, given in response to a reference in terms of section 9 of the Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 in suo moto case pertaining to the ISAF Container Scam.","citation":"2013 SCMR 634","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2013","dateCreated":"04-03-2013","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.26\/2007","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Deadbeats got loans of 54 billions written off","caseFileName":"SMC_26-2007_dt_20.02.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2018 P.S.C. 1369","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-02-2013","dateCreated":"20-02-2013","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.39\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Ch. Nasir Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.39and90of2011-dt-15-2-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of seeking appropriate direction for making arrangements enabling the overseas Pakistanis to exercise their right of franchise, adjourns the hearing to allow the learned Attorney General for Pakistan to hold a meeting with all relevant authorities to consider the options noted in the order and evolve a mechanism so that overseas citizens may exercise their right of franchise.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 72","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-02-2013","dateCreated":"15-02-2013","fileSizeInBytes":29},{"caseNumber":"C.A.269\/2011","caseSubject":"Service\/Absence without Leave","caseTitle":"Zari Taraqiati Bank Ltd. (Z.T.B.L.) thr. its President, Islamabad & another v. Said Rehman & others","caseFileName":"C.A.269_ETC_OF_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The salient characteristics of statutory rules are threefold - (i) Rules or Regulations are framed by statutory or public body; (ii) Those are framed under the authority or powers conferred in the statute; (iii) Those have statutory Governmental approval or statutory sanction. On account of S. 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002, the previous Regulations i.e. Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961, and Promotion Policy, 1999, which were non-statutory, stood incorporated by way of legislative reference and thereby acquired a statutory status under the new dispensation.\r\n","citation":" \n2013   SCMR  642","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-02-2013","dateCreated":"15-02-2013","fileSizeInBytes":109},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2013","caseSubject":"Against Interim Order","caseTitle":"Dr. Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri  v. The Fed. of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.5of2013-dt-13-2-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner has failed to make out a case for exercising the discretionary jurisdiction by this Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution for the fact that violation of any of the Fundamental Rights has neither been listed in the petition nor established during the arguments. He has also failed to prove his bona fides to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court coupled with the fact that under the peculiar circumstances he has no locus standi to claim relief as prayed for in the petition, inter alia, for the reasons that being a holder of dual citizenship, he is not qualified to contest the election to the Parliament in view of the constitutional bar under Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution. However, as a voter like other overseas Pakistanis, whose names have been incorporated in the Electoral Rolls, he can exercise his right of vote. ","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 413","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-02-2013","dateCreated":"13-02-2013","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3325\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Progress report of NAB in OGRA case","caseFileName":"C.M.A.3325_of_2012_dt_11-2-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Supreme Court directs all state institutions to render full and prompt assistance to NAB in diligently pursuing the absconding accused and to bring him back to Pakistan.","citation":"2015 SCMR 1813","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-02-2013","dateCreated":"11-02-2013","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3325\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Progress report of NAB in OGRA case","caseFileName":"C.M.A.3325_of_2012_dt_31-1-2013_ENG_URDU.pdf.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court in the matter of progress of NAB in OGRA case expresses concern that prima facie there may have been interference in the proceedings before the Court and notes that the issue involves the question of deportation\/extradition, and the case is adjourned for the assistance of amicus curiae and consideration of the sought reports.","citation":"2015 SCMR 1813","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-01-2013","dateCreated":"31-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":623},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3685\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"6th and 7th fortnight progress report by NAB","caseFileName":"cma.3685-3686_of_2012_in_hrc.7734-g_of_2009_dt_31.01.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in implementation proceedings of the judgment, dated 30.3.2012, passed in HRC No. 7734-G of 2009 regarding alleged corruption in Rental Power Plants, issues notice to the Chairman National Accountability Bureau under Article 204 of the Constitution read with Section 3 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003, for writing a letter to the President which tentamounts to causing interference with and obstruction in the process of the Court.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-01-2013","dateCreated":"31-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"REFERENCE.1\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Appointments of Judges in view of 18th & 19th Constitutional Amendments","caseFileName":"Ref.01_2012_addl.note_HJ.ejaz_afzal_khan.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 279","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2012","dateCreated":"31-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":969},{"caseNumber":"","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[In the matter of death\/murder\/suicide of Mr. Kamran Faisal, (deceased) Assistant Director\/IO of NAB in Rental Power Plants Case]","caseFileName":"kamran_faisal_case.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-01-2013","dateCreated":"23-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3685\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"6th and 7th fortnight progress report by NAB","caseFileName":"C.M.A.No.3685of2012-dt-17-1-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chairman NAB, in the proceedings resulting from the judgment delivered in the case of ?Alleged Corruption in Rental Power Plants etc.?, is directed to furnish a comprehensive report from the date of commencement of the investigation\/inquiry in all Rental Power Plants (RPPs) cases.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-01-2013","dateCreated":"17-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":650},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.64\/2013","caseSubject":"Election-National Assembly\/Others","caseTitle":"Workers Party and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CMA.64_of_2013_etc._15.01.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has submitted a comprehensive reply in an application filed against non-implementation of the judgment reported as PLD 2012 SC 681 wherein ECP was directed to ensure that the elections are conducted honestly, justly, fairly and in accordance with law and that corrupt practices are guarded against. The Federal Government is itself desirous of conducting\/holding free and fair elections in the country. The learned counsel for the petitioner is required to go through the reply. Similarly, learned Attorney General, after having gone through the reply, shall assist this Court, on the issues raised in the judgment as well as the implementation report, which has been filed today.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 406","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2013","dateCreated":"15-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3685\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"6th and 7th fortnight progress report by NAB","caseFileName":"CMA No.3685of2012-dt-15-1-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2013","dateCreated":"15-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.105\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Hamid Mir and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.105of2012-dt-15-1-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 244","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-01-2013","dateCreated":"15-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.1\/2013","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Regarding killing of 20 years old Shahzeb Khan in Karachi","caseFileName":"Const.P.No.1_2013_order_dated_10.01.2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-01-2013","dateCreated":"10-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"SMC-16of2011-translation.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2013","dateCreated":"09-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":538},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"SMC.16_2011_etc_MQM_case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2013","dateCreated":"08-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":530},{"caseNumber":"C.P.796\/2007","caseSubject":"Corporate","caseTitle":"Maulana Abdul Haque Baloch & others v. Government of Balochistan thr. Secy. Industries & Mineral Development & others","caseFileName":"CPLA_796_2007_ETC_SHORT_ORDER_REKO_DIQ_CASE.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  511","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-01-2013","dateCreated":"07-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":1309},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.4671\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"News Item Published in Daily Express Tribune, Partner of International Herald Tribune, on 14.03.2012 under the following Caption \"Misappropriation:- Govt. withdrew Millions from Intelligence Bureau's Account","caseFileName":"CMANo.4671of2012-dt-2-1-2013.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the action taken on a news item captioned \u201cMisappropriation: Government withdrew Millions from Intelligence Bureau\u2019s Account\u201d, seeks comprehensive fresh reply from DG IB and directs Mr. Tariq A. Lodhi, former DG IB, to appear in person on the next date of hearing.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-01-2013","dateCreated":"02-01-2013","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.105\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Hamid Mir and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"const.p.105-12_hamid_mir_case_20-12-12.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 244","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-12-2012","dateCreated":"21-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2005","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Engineer Iqbal Zafar Jhagra v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"cng_prices_order_21-12-12-alongwith_translation.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) is directed to come up with a pricing formula for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) based on evidence and in accordance with the prescribed process in a swift manner after obtaining all necessary feedback from the stakeholders.  \r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  1337","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-12-2012","dateCreated":"21-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":1370},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010-dt-21-12-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-12-2012","dateCreated":"21-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.9\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding irregularities and illegalities in P.I.A.","caseFileName":"S.M.C.9of2012dt-21-12-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  352","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-12-2012","dateCreated":"21-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.126\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Nadeem Ahmed, Advocate v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.126of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Khilji Arif Hussain","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  1062","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2012","dateCreated":"21-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":186},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.765\/2012","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Notice in the matter of derogatory language used by Altaf Hussain, Leader of MQM against the Judges of this Court","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.96_12_Altaf_Hussain _1.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  170","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2012","dateCreated":"16-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":591},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.Petition No.77of2010-08-12-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-12-2012","dateCreated":"08-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":671},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2134\/2017","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Civil Misc. Applications No.2134, 2148, 2165 & 2249 OF 2007 & SMC No.9 of 2007 & Const.P.54 of 2007 & HRC.3564 of 2007 & Crl.O.P.40 of 2008 in Const.P.56 of 2007] including Urdu translation.","caseFileName":"Lal-masjid-04.12.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013 SCMR 103","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-12-2012","dateCreated":"06-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":449},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.31\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Imran Khan v. Election Commission of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.31of2011etc.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) under Article 218(3) of the Constitution is charged with the duty to ensure free, fair and just elections in the country. ECP, under Article 219 of the Constitution, is also commanded to revise the electoral list annually. The electoral rolls of Karachi do not inspire confidence. An accurate Electoral Roll is a sine quo non for the holding of a free, fair and transparent election. Thus, ECP is directed to carry out proper and complete door-to-door verification in Karachi so as to ensure that no voter is disenfranchised or dislocated and all other discrepancies are rectified as early as possible.","citation":"PLD 2013  SC 120","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2012","dateCreated":"05-12-2012","fileSizeInBytes":988},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.31\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Imran Khan v. Election Commission of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.31of2011-21.11.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of revision of voters\u2019 lists, asks the Secretary Election Commission of Pakistan to depute a Senior Officer along with the learned Deputy Attorney General to appear in the Court and satisfy why the names of about more than three million voters have been shifted from Karachi to other towns\/cities of Pakistan. ","citation":"PLD 2013  SC 120","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-11-2012","dateCreated":"21-11-2012","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.23\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Petition by Ms. Anita Turab for protection of Civil Servants)\r\r\n- including Urdu translation.","caseFileName":"const.p.23of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Appointments, removals and promotions of civil servants must be made in accordance with the law and the rules made thereunder; where no such law or rule exists and the matter has been left to discretion, such discretion must be exercised in a structured, transparent and reasonable manner and in the public interest. When the ordinary tenure for a posting has been specified in the law or rules made thereunder, such tenure must be respected and cannot be varied, except for compelling reasons, which should be recorded in writing and are judicially reviewable. Civil servants are not bound to obey illegal orders. Officers should not be posted as OSD except for compelling reasons, which must be recorded in writing and are judicially reviewable. If at all an officer is to be posted as OSD, such posting should be for the minimum period possible and if there is a disciplinary inquiry going on against him, such inquiry must be completed at the earliest.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC  195","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-11-2012","dateCreated":"12-11-2012","fileSizeInBytes":761},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19\/1996","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Air Marshal Retd. Muhammad Asghar Khan v. Gen. Retd. Mirza Aslam Baig, etc.","caseFileName":"H.R.C.19of1996[AsgharKhanCase]DetailedReasonsUrduTranslation.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2012","dateCreated":"08-11-2012","fileSizeInBytes":3689},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19\/1996","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Air Marshal Retd. Muhammad Asghar Khan v. Gen. Retd. Mirza Aslam Baig, etc.","caseFileName":"H.R.C.19of1996[AsgharKhanCase]DetailedReasons.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Asghar Khan Case - The general election held in the year 1990 was subjected to corruption and corrupt practices as in view of the overwhelming material produced by the parties during hearing it has been established that an \u201cElection Cell\u201d had been created in the Presidency, which was functioning to provide financial assistance to the favored candidates, or a group of political parties to achieve desired result by polluting election process and to deprive the people of Pakistan from being represented by their chosen representatives. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2012","dateCreated":"08-11-2012","fileSizeInBytes":2102},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.PetitionNo.77of2010_31.10.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-10-2012","dateCreated":"31-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":383},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2005","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Engineer Iqbal Zafar Jhagra v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.33and34of2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chairman Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) is directed to fix the price of CNG after taking into consideration the statement in writing filed by the Government as well as this order and the matter is adjourned for further proceedings.","citation":"2013   SCMR  1337","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-10-2012","dateCreated":"25-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":475},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19\/1996","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Air Marshal Retd. Muhammad Asghar Khan v. Gen. Retd. Mirza Aslam Baig, etc.","caseFileName":"H.R.C.No.19of1996DT19-10-2012[UrduTranslation].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2012","dateCreated":"19-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":588},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19\/1996","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Air Marshal Retd. Muhammad Asghar Khan v. Gen. Retd. Mirza Aslam Baig, etc.","caseFileName":"H.R.C.No.19of1996DT19-10-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The general election held in the year 1990 was subjected to corruption and corrupt practices in view of the overwhelming material produced by the parties during hearing.","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2012","dateCreated":"19-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi v. Federal Government through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Order-DNC-nd-note.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 1054","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-09-2012","dateCreated":"16-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":668},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Urdu-Const.P-77-2010-12.10.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-10-2012","dateCreated":"12-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":1636},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.PetitionNo.77of2010_12.10.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-10-2012","dateCreated":"12-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":2305},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19\/1996","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Air Marshal Retd. Muhammad Asghar Khan v. Gen. Retd. Mirza Aslam Baig, etc.","caseFileName":"HRC19of1996.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-03-2012","dateCreated":"04-10-2012","fileSizeInBytes":16},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.19002\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Baluchistan Law and Order Case","caseFileName":"C.M.A.No.19002of2012Dt-27.09.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chief Secretary of Balochistan may discuss the issue of missing persons and target killings of the citizens in the province, and the suggestions for conflict resolution and Baloch reconciliation process made before the Court by Sardar Akhtar Jan Mengal with important state functionaries and give their reaction in black and white to the Court.","citation":"2012   SCMR  1928","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-09-2012","dateCreated":"27-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi v. Federal Government through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"URDU_CONST.P.05-2012-20.09.12.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 1054","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-09-2012","dateCreated":"20-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":677},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi v. Federal Government through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"ConstP5of2012_dt_20092012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 1054","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-09-2012","dateCreated":"20-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.486\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Adnan A. Khawaja v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.Misc.A.786of2010inCrl.A.22of2002_dt180912.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  1917","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-09-2012","dateCreated":"18-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.74\/2012","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Contempt proceedings against Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, the Prime Minister of Pakistan in compliance with this Court's order dated 08.08.2012","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.74of2010in SMC.4of2010_dt18092012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC  1086","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-09-2012","dateCreated":"18-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Baz Muhammad Kakar and another v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"AdditionalNoteConst.P.77of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012  SC 923","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"17-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":634},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Baz Muhammad Kakar and another v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2012[DetailedOrderFinal].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012  SC 923","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-08-2012","dateCreated":"15-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":536},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.3685\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"6th and 7th fortnight progress report by NAB","caseFileName":"CMAs Nos.3685-3686of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Notice be issued to the Chairman as well as other relevant officers of National Accountability Bureau to appear and show cause as to why contempt proceedings may not be initiated against them for not implementing the judgment of the Court in Rental Power Plants\u2019 case.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-09-2012","dateCreated":"14-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":9},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Baz Muhammad Kakar and another v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010dt-08.09.2012[UrduTranslation].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012  SC 923","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-08-2012","dateCreated":"08-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":544},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010dt-08.09.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Directions are repeated to the Frontier Corps, Balochistan to affect the recovery of missing persons. The Court observes with dismay that both the Federal Government and the Balochistan Government avoided to honour the statement made before the Court of making all out efforts to ensure early and safe recovery of missing persons; taking steps and measures to identify and arrest the culprits involved in the target\/sectarian killings, kidnapping for ransom and putting them to justice; strengthening the level of coordination at the highest level amongst different stakeholders to efficiently discharge with their constitutional obligations; restoring peace and harmony amongst all segments of society in the province and creating conducive environment for the economic development, well being and prosperity of the province.","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-09-2012","dateCreated":"08-09-2012","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.167\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Dr. Arslan Iftikhar v. Malik Riaz Hussain & others","caseFileName":"C.R.P.167of2012-dt-30-8-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Any inquiry by National Accountability Bureau in the matter will not be free from perception of partiality or bias or lack of competence and, therefore, to meet the ends of justice and to ensure a fair, impartial, honest and competent inquiry, the same is transferred to a one man inquiry Commission.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 903","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-08-2012","dateCreated":"30-08-2012","fileSizeInBytes":112},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.91\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Raja Mujahid Muzaffar v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.91of2011Dt-23-8-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE SH. AZMAT SAEED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  1651","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-08-2012","dateCreated":"23-08-2012","fileSizeInBytes":141},{"caseNumber":"C.A.357\/2012","caseSubject":"Tax\/Cess and Fee","caseTitle":"M\/s M.A. International thr. its Proprietor  Lahore v. The Appellete Tribunal of Customs, Excise & Sales Tax thr. Collector of Customs Karachi & others","caseFileName":"C.A.357OF2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The transfer order of Mr. Muhammad Tanvir, Dy. DG, DRAP has been withdrawn and the grievance of the applicant apparently seems to have been redressed. Accordingly, the application filed by Mr. Muhammad Tanvir stands disposed of.  \r\n","citation":"2012   SCMR  870","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-08-2012","dateCreated":"09-08-2012","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.486\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Adnan A. Khawaja v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A.486of2010dt-08-08-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  1917","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-08-2012","dateCreated":"08-08-2012","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Baz Muhammad Kakar and another v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.No.77of2012[ShortOrder2.8.2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012  SC 923","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-08-2012","dateCreated":"03-08-2012","fileSizeInBytes":85},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.167\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Dr. Arslan Iftikhar v. Malik Riaz Hussain & others","caseFileName":"CRP167of2012dt31-7-12.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 903","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-07-2012","dateCreated":"01-08-2012","fileSizeInBytes":27},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.486\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Adnan A. Khawaja v. The State","caseFileName":"Crl.M.A.486of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  1917","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-07-2012","dateCreated":"12-07-2012","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.40\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Azhar Siddique, ASC v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.40of2012-DetailJudgment[UrduTranslation]-dt-3.7.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 660","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-07-2012","dateCreated":"03-07-2012","fileSizeInBytes":1229},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.40\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Azhar Siddique, ASC v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.40of2012-AdditionalNoteofJusticeJawwadSKhawaja.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 660","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-07-2012","dateCreated":"03-07-2012","fileSizeInBytes":572},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.40\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Azhar Siddique, ASC v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.40of2012-DetailJudgment-dt-3.7.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Speaker of the National Assembly, under Article 63(2) of the Constitution, exercises powers which are not covered by the definition of internal proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora, therefore, this Court, in exercise of power of judicial review, is not debarred from inquiring into the order of the Speaker by which she refused to send a reference against the Prime Minister to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in view of his conviction for contempt of court. The conviction of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani has attained finality and he has become disqualified from being a Member of the Parliament in terms of Article 63(1)(g) of the Constitution. ECP is required to issue notification of disqualification of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani from being a member of the Parliament from the date of his conviction and the President shall take necessary steps under the Constitution to ensure continuation of the democratic process.","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 660","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-07-2012","dateCreated":"03-07-2012","fileSizeInBytes":348},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.40\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Muhammad Azhar Siddique, ASC v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.40of2012-ShortOrder[19.06.2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Speaker of the National Assembly, under Article 63(2) of the Constitution, exercises powers which are not covered by the definition of internal proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora, therefore, this Court, in exercise of power of judicial review, is not debarred from inquiring into the order of the Speaker by which she refused to send a reference against the Prime Minister to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) in view of his conviction for contempt of court. The conviction of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani has attained finality and he has become disqualified from being a Member of the Parliament in terms of Article 63(1)(g) of the Constitution. ECP is required to issue notification of disqualification of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani from being a member of the Parliament from the date of his conviction and the President shall take necessary steps under the Constitution to ensure continuation of the democratic process.","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 660","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-06-2012","dateCreated":"19-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.5\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action regarding allegation of Business Deal between Malik Riaz Hussain & Dr. Arsalaan Iftikhar attempting to influence the judicial process.","caseFileName":"SMC5of2012[UrduVersion]dt16-6-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC  664","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-06-2012","dateCreated":"16-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":806},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.5\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action regarding allegation of Business Deal between Malik Riaz Hussain & Dr. Arsalaan Iftikhar attempting to influence the judicial process.","caseFileName":"S.M.C.5of2012dt14-6-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC  664","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-06-2012","dateCreated":"14-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":102},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77to85,89and92of2011[dt12.6.2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-06-2012","dateCreated":"12-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":31},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.87\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Workers Party Pakistan through its General Secretary & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.87of2011[UrduVersion].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 681","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2012","dateCreated":"08-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":1514},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.87\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Workers Party Pakistan through its General Secretary & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.87of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 681","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2012","dateCreated":"08-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":309},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2371\/2012","caseSubject":"Customary\/.","caseTitle":"Action taken upon the News Clipping regarding untoward incident in Kohistan","caseFileName":"C.M.A.2371of2012dt[07-06-2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A delegation, in the matter of action taken on media reports about killing of five women\/girls in Kohistan as punishment for clapping while two boys were dancing, visited the area and reported that it was able to meet two of the girls. The Court further asks the Attorney General to make arrangements for visit of the delegation to trace out remaining three girls.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-06-2012","dateCreated":"07-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.5\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action regarding allegation of Business Deal between Malik Riaz Hussain & Dr. Arsalaan Iftikhar attempting to influence the judicial process.","caseFileName":"SMC5of2012-2dt[07-06-2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC  664","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-06-2012","dateCreated":"07-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.5\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action regarding allegation of Business Deal between Malik Riaz Hussain & Dr. Arsalaan Iftikhar attempting to influence the judicial process.","caseFileName":"SMC5of2012-1dt[07-06-2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC  664","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-06-2012","dateCreated":"07-06-2012","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi v. Federal Government through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"ConstitutionPetitionNo5of2012[UrduTranslation].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 1054","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2012","dateCreated":"25-05-2012","fileSizeInBytes":493},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi v. Federal Government through Secretary Law and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.5of2012dt.25.5.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Parliamentarians\/Members of Provincial Assemblies in question having acquired the citizenship of Foreign States are found disqualified from being members of Parliament and Provincial Assemblies because of their disqualification under Article 63(1)(c) of the Constitution.","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 1054","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2012","dateCreated":"25-05-2012","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.15\/2009","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto Action Regarding Corruption in Pakistan Steel Mill by Ex-Chairman ","caseFileName":"SMC15OF2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012  SC  610","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-05-2012","dateCreated":"21-05-2012","fileSizeInBytes":198},{"caseNumber":"C.A.368\/2011","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"Pakistan Sports Board  thr. its D.G., Islamabad & another v. Pakistan Volley Ball Federation & others","caseFileName":"C.A.368TO370OF2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Pakistan Sports Board (PSB) cannot regulate or control any sports association which does not seek affiliation with it. However, if the respondent sports bodies want to be affiliated with the PSB and reap benefits which accrue with such affiliation, they cannot claim any exemptions from following the directives issued by the PSB.\r\n","citation":"2012   SCMR  992","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-05-2012","dateCreated":"16-05-2012","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"C.A.212\/2011","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Quo Warranto","caseTitle":"Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh Karachi & another v. Rasheed A. Rizvi & others","caseFileName":"C.A.212and213OF2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The notification which had taken away the power of recruitment of Judges in Sindh Judicial Service from the High Court to give it to Sindh Public Service Commission did not meet constitutional standards. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 649","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-05-2012","dateCreated":"16-05-2012","fileSizeInBytes":59},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.6\/2012","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Contmept Proceedings against Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani, the Prime Minister of Pakistan in compliance with this Court's order dated 16.01.2012","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.6of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  909","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2012","dateCreated":"08-05-2012","fileSizeInBytes":236},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.6\/2012","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Contmept Proceedings against Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani, the Prime Minister of Pakistan in compliance with this Court's order dated 16.01.2012","caseFileName":"Crl.O.P.6of2012-dt-26-4-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  909","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-04-2012","dateCreated":"26-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"ConstitutionPetitionNo.77of2010-dt-17-04-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-04-2012","dateCreated":"17-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"ConstitutionPetitionNo.77of2010-dt-12-04-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2012","dateCreated":"13-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1362\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CMA1362OF2012-DT-10-04-2012[URDU].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  870","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-04-2012","dateCreated":"10-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":522},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1362\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CMA1362OF2012-DT-10-04-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in the matter of grant of quota of ephedrine against the rules, observes that prima facie transfer\/posting of Director-General, Regional Director and Deputy Director, Anti Narcotics Force (\u201cANF\u201d) is not free from extraneous consideration. Regional Director and Deputy Director ANF are directed not to relinquish the charge and continue with the investigation of the case without being influenced in any manner from anyone. \r\n","citation":"2012   SCMR  870","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-04-2012","dateCreated":"10-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":55},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CONST.P.77OF2010-DT-05.04.12[URDU].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court issues different directions relating to law and order situation and recovery of missing persons in Balochistan. ","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2012","dateCreated":"07-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":756},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CONST.P.77OF2010-DT-06.04.12[URDU].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2012","dateCreated":"07-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":647},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010-DT-05-04-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-04-2012","dateCreated":"07-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":116},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010-DT-06-04-2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Attorney General for Pakistan and the Advocate General of Balochistan are directed to provide assistance in the matter of the statement involving Frontier Corps personnel in the kidnapping and murder of two persons in the area of Mastung made on the floor of the House of Provincial Assembly. Directions about recovery of missing persons, improvement of law and order situation in Balochistan and investigation of murder of wife and daughter of Mir Bakhtiar Domki are also given.","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-04-2012","dateCreated":"07-04-2012","fileSizeInBytes":53},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.7734-G\/2009","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"News Clippling","caseFileName":"HRC7734-G_1003-GOF2009[UrduTranslation].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  773","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2011","dateCreated":"30-03-2012","fileSizeInBytes":12267},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.7734-G\/2009","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"News Clippling","caseFileName":"HRC7734-G_1003-GOF2009[AllegedCorruptionInRentalPowerPlants].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  773","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-12-2011","dateCreated":"30-03-2012","fileSizeInBytes":405},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.19\/1996","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Air Marshal Retd. Muhammad Asghar Khan v. Gen. Retd. Mirza Aslam Baig, etc.","caseFileName":"HR-19of1996.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The hearing of Air Marshal (r) Muhammad Asghar Khan\u2019s Case is re-scheduled. ","citation":"PLD 2013 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-03-2012","dateCreated":"08-03-2012","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.1\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Against the order dated 02.02.2012 passed by this Court in Criminal Original No. 06\/2012] ","caseFileName":"ICA-1OF2012-UrduTranslation.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 466","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2012","dateCreated":"05-03-2012","fileSizeInBytes":834},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.1\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Against the order dated 02.02.2012 passed by this Court in Criminal Original No. 06\/2012]\r\r\n","caseFileName":"ICA-1OF2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 466","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2012","dateCreated":"05-03-2012","fileSizeInBytes":190},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.1\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"ICA-1-2012-Dt10.02.2012[UrduVersion].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 466","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2012","dateCreated":"10-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":500},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.1\/2012","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Mst. Rohaifa v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary M\/o Defence, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.1of2012Dt-10.02.2012[ProductionOfDetenus].pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is the responsibility of the respondents, Director-General ISI, Director-General MI and Judge Advocate-General JAG Branch, to comply with the order of the Court of the production of four detenus in letter and spirit. They as well as the Chief Secretary, Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, who is the head of the Civil Administration over there are directed to ensure the production of these persons before this Court in safe custody without fail on 13-2-2012.","citation":"PLD 2014 SC 174","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2012","dateCreated":"10-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.1\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Against the order dated 02.02.2012 passed by this Court in Criminal Original No. 06\/2012]","caseFileName":"ICA-1-2012-Dt10.02.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 466","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2012","dateCreated":"10-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":28},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.1\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Against the order dated 02.02.2012 passed by this Court in Criminal Original No. 06\/2012]","caseFileName":"ICA-1-2012-Dt09.02.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 466","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-02-2012","dateCreated":"09-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.5\/2004","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Dr. Akhtar Hassan Khan v. Fed. of Pakistan thr. Cabinet Committee for Privatization & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.5and15-HRC14144-DetailedReasons.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A mere advice or suggestion from an international financial institution, which assists and aids developing countries towards economic progress, may not amount to a pressure of the kind to have deprived the competent authority under the law to have taken independent decision. Better performance and rising profits of Habib Bank Limited (HBL) justified the impugned process of sale and made it a credible exercise. Approval of HBL's privatization by the Privatization Committee was within the purview of Privatization Commission and the whole process did not reflect violation of any statutory provision. Process of privatization was neither tainted with lack of transparency or mala fides nor the successful bidder lacked qualifications prescribed in law.\r\n\r\n","citation":"2012   SCMR  455","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-11-2011","dateCreated":"08-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":222},{"caseNumber":"C.P.796\/2007","caseSubject":"Corporate","caseTitle":"Maulana Abdul Haque Baloch & others v. Government of Balochistan thr. Secy. Industries & Mineral Development & others","caseFileName":"C.P.796of2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Balochistan and Federal Governments are directed to make a request to the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) not to take any further steps in the arbitration proceedings and extend the period for nomination of arbitrator so that Supreme Court may finally dispose of the petitions filed before it on the same subject and matter.\r\n           \r\n","citation":"2013   SCMR  511","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-02-2012","dateCreated":"07-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"C.M.APPEAL.1\/2012","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"F.K.Butt, ASC v. President of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"CivilMisc.Appeal1of2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The office objection is set-aside and the appeal is allowed subject to all just and legal exceptions. Consequently, the office is directed to entertain the petition in accordance with law.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-02-2012","dateCreated":"07-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.31\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Imran Khan v. Election Commission of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.31of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It is a matter of great concern that bye-elections of some legislators were conducted by the Election Commissioner although after the 18th Constitutional Amendment such elections were to be organized under Article 219(b) of the Constitution by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). The notifications issued by ECP in respect of these legislators shall remain suspended till the time the rectification has not been obtained through a Constitutional Amendment.","citation":"PLD 2013  SC 120","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-02-2012","dateCreated":"07-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":34},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"President, Balochistan High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2010[dt-06-02-2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The gruesome murder of the wife and daughter of Mir Bakhtiar Domki at Karachi on 30.01.2012 is a very sensitive incident having repercussions on the situation prevailing in the Province of Balochistan. The Advocate General Sindh and the Inspector General of Police Sindh are directed to appear in person on the next date of hearing.","citation":"2014   SCMR  176","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-02-2012","dateCreated":"06-02-2012","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.290\/2012","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Constitution Petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution regarding alleged Memorandum to Admiral Mike Mullen by Mr. Hussain Haqqani, former Ambassador of Pakistan to the United States of America] ","caseFileName":"Const.P.77-2011-Dt-30.01.2012[MemoScandalCase].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-01-2012","dateCreated":"30-01-2012","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"REFERENCE.1\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 186","caseTitle":"Reference by the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Under Article 186 of the Constitution to revisit the case of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto reported as PLD 1979 SC Page 38-53","caseFileName":"REFERENCE-1-2011[OrderDt-17.01.2012].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011   SCMR  962","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-01-2012","dateCreated":"17-01-2012","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77-78-79 [Memogate]DetailedOrder.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court, in view of the material placed before it in suo motu action and petitions under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, passes observations, issues declarations and gives directions as regards law and order situation in Karachi.","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-12-2011","dateCreated":"12-01-2012","fileSizeInBytes":900},{"caseNumber":"CRL.M.A.486\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Adnan A. Khawaja v. The State","caseFileName":"NROCaseDt.10.01.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  1917","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-01-2012","dateCreated":"10-01-2012","fileSizeInBytes":43},{"caseNumber":"REFERENCE.1\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 186","caseTitle":"Reference by the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Under Article 186 of the Constitution to revisit the case of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto reported as PLD 1979 SC Page 38-53","caseFileName":"REFERENCE-1-2011OrderDt05.01.2012[UrduVersion].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011   SCMR  962","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2012","dateCreated":"05-01-2012","fileSizeInBytes":421},{"caseNumber":"REFERENCE.1\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 186","caseTitle":"Reference by the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Under Article 186 of the Constitution to revisit the case of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto reported as PLD 1979 SC Page 38-53","caseFileName":"REFERENCE-1-2011OrderDt05.01.2012.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011   SCMR  962","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2012","dateCreated":"05-01-2012","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"MemoCase-final-30.12.2011(UrduVersion).pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-12-2011","dateCreated":"31-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":657},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77-2011[MemoScandal]dt.30.12.2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A commission is appointed in the Constitution Petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution to probe into the matter of a memorandum allegedly written by Mr. Husain Haqqani, former Ambassador of Pakistan to the United States of America, to Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff. ","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-12-2011","dateCreated":"30-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":51},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77of2011[MEMO SCANDAL CASE]-ShortOrder.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-12-2011","dateCreated":"23-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.5144\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Against the judgment dated 16.12.2009 passed in Constitution Petitions No. 76 to 80 of 2007] --- NRO Case","caseFileName":"CMA No.5144of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petition, seeking review of the judgment of this Court vide which the National Reconciliation Ordinance, 2007 was declared void ab initio, neither discloses discovery of a new important matter nor evidence of which the petitioner was not aware of at the time of hearing of the main petition to bring it to the notice of Supreme Court. Moreover, the application seeking permission to argue the review petition by the counsel who admittedly did not appear for the petitioner in the main case is violative of Order XXVI, Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980. Review petition is dismissed accordingly.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 106","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2011","dateCreated":"08-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":129},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77to85of2011-ShortOrder-1[UrduVersion].pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-12-2011","dateCreated":"02-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":577},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.77\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Watan Party through its President Hashim Shaukat Khan and another v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.77to85of2011-ShortOrder-1.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 292","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-12-2011","dateCreated":"01-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":45},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"(Suo Moto action regarding irregularities and non payment of salaries to the workers of Pakistan Railways)","caseFileName":"S.M.C.18of2011-ShortOrder-1.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"30-11-2011","dateCreated":"01-12-2011","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.50\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Fiaqat Hussain and others v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Planning and Development and others","caseFileName":"Const.P.50-69of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The proposed action of closing down \u2018Establishment and Operation of Basic Education Community Schools\u2019 is without lawful authority and of no legal effect and is in violation of Article 25-A of the Constitution. Also, the proposed act of winding up of the National Commission of Human Resources is unconstitutional and of no legal effect.","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 224","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-10-2011","dateCreated":"25-11-2011","fileSizeInBytes":106},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1427\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Reply to Show Cause Notice dated 18.04.201 issued to Syed Nasir Ali Shah, Solicitor General, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad] ","caseFileName":"C.M.A.1427of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Unconditional apology tendered by former Solicitor General is accepted.","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 106","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2011","dateCreated":"25-11-2011","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.5144\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"[Against the judgment dated 16.12.2009 passed in Constitution Petitions No. 76 to 80 of 2007] ","caseFileName":"C.M.A.5144of201(ShortOrder)1.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"No case is made out for the review of judgment dated 16.12.2009 in pursuance whereof the National Reconciliation Ordinance, 2007 was declared void ab initio. ","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 106","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-11-2011","dateCreated":"25-11-2011","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.42\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yasin v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"const.p.42of2011(UrduVersion).pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-10-2011","dateCreated":"25-11-2011","fileSizeInBytes":788},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.42\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Muhammad Yasin v. Federation of Pakistan, etc","caseFileName":"const.p.42of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mian Shakirullah Jan","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The process conducted for the selection of Chairman, Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) was inherently unsuited for identifying and coming up with a suitable person. ","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-10-2011","dateCreated":"25-11-2011","fileSizeInBytes":398},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1498\/2011","caseSubject":"Application under section 12(2), CPC","caseTitle":"Muhammad Afsar v. Malik Muhammad Farooq & others","caseFileName":"cp1498of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2012   SCMR  274","dateOfAnnouncement":"09-10-2011","dateCreated":"19-10-2011","fileSizeInBytes":46},{"caseNumber":"C.P.987\/2011","caseSubject":"Writ Petition\/Others","caseTitle":"All Pakistan Newspapers Society thr. its Executive Director & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy. M\/o Information & others","caseFileName":"CPs987-989OF2011-DT19.10.2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2012 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-10-2011","dateCreated":"19-10-2011","fileSizeInBytes":209},{"caseNumber":"C.A.239\/2011","caseSubject":"Service\/Others","caseTitle":"Masood Ahmed Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through M\/o Information Technology & Telecommunication Govt. of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"CA239-241of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The guarantee provided through proviso to section 36(1) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, does not change the nature or status of PTCL as the principal obligant required under law to adhere to the protected terms and conditions of service of transferred employees. The only effect of the guarantee is to ensure that in the event PTCL becomes incapable of fulfilling its obligations as to pensionary or other benefits, for reasons such as bankruptcy etc., the employees do not suffer from such event of default. \r\n","citation":" \n2012   SCMR  152","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-10-2011","dateCreated":"11-10-2011","fileSizeInBytes":109},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1017-L\/2011","caseSubject":"Service\/Appointments","caseTitle":"Rana Aamer Raza Ashfaq & others v. Dr. Minhaj Ahmad Khan & another","caseFileName":"C.P.No.1017-Lof2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Governor while acting as Chancellor is a statutory functionary in terms of section 11(1) of the Bahauddin Zakariya University Act and, in the performance of his functions under the Act, he is to act and is bound by the advice tendered by the Chief Minister in the manner provided in section 11(8) of the Act read with Article 105 of the Constitution and the timeline given in proviso to Article 105 of the Constitution which stands incorporated in the Act by legislative reference.\r\n","citation":"2012   SCMR  6","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-10-2011","dateCreated":"07-10-2011","fileSizeInBytes":125},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"SMC16of2011_detailed_judgment.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-10-2011","dateCreated":"06-10-2011","fileSizeInBytes":461},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.16\/2011","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding law and order situation in Karachi","caseFileName":"SMCNo16of2011-OrderDt5.09.2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2013 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-09-2011","dateCreated":"15-09-2011","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.25\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Cutting of Trees for Canal Widening Project Lahore)","caseFileName":"SMCNo25of2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011 SCMR 1743","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-09-2011","dateCreated":"15-09-2011","fileSizeInBytes":480},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding violatin of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurement loss of billions of rupees of exchequer case by National Insurance Compant Ltd.","caseFileName":"S.M.C.18OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  585","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-08-2011","dateCreated":"15-09-2011","fileSizeInBytes":110},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"S.M.C.24of2010[urdu-version].pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-07-2011","dateCreated":"01-08-2011","fileSizeInBytes":3103},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"SMC24-2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"29-07-2011","dateCreated":"30-07-2011","fileSizeInBytes":104},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.18\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Lahore High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Paksitan, etc","caseFileName":"Constitution_Petition_No.18.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1165","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2011","dateCreated":"07-07-2011","fileSizeInBytes":101},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding violatin of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurement loss of billions of rupees of exchequer case by National Insurance Compant Ltd.","caseFileName":"S.M.C.No18of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  585","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-07-2011","dateCreated":"01-07-2011","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.29\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Al-Jehad Trust and another Vs. Federation of Pakistan,etc (Deputy Chairman NAB Case)","caseFileName":"Const.P.29of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Federal Government is directed to fill the vacant offices of the Chairman, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) and the Prosecutor-General Accountability within one month positively failing which Deputy Chairman NAB shall ipso facto and without further ado stand denuded of his authority to continue exercising the delegated powers of the Chairman NAB and performing any other function not conferred upon him by the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999.","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 811","dateOfAnnouncement":"21-06-2011","dateCreated":"21-06-2011","fileSizeInBytes":197},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding violatin of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurement loss of billions of rupees of exchequer case by National Insurance Compant Ltd.","caseFileName":"Order_in_contempt_case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  585","dateOfAnnouncement":"08-06-2011","dateCreated":"16-06-2011","fileSizeInBytes":26},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.10\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Brutal Killing of a young boy by Rangers at Karachi)","caseFileName":"Suo_Motu_Case_No10of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 799","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-06-2011","dateCreated":"10-06-2011","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.62\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Flood Commission","caseFileName":"Const.P.NO.62OF2010_orderdt06062011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 854","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-06-2011","dateCreated":"07-06-2011","fileSizeInBytes":3800},{"caseNumber":"C.P.683\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Geo Super Case","caseFileName":"CIVILPETITIONNO.683of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) is under obligation, both legally and morally, to issue licence to the petitioners because the reason which prevailed upon it for refusing to issue licence to the petitioners i.e. \u201csecurity clearance\u201d has not been accepted by the learned High Court, therefore, the petitioners who on the basis of their application waited for a period of more than 100 days, during which their application has not been rejected, have acquired a right that they should be dealt with in accordance with law as is envisaged under Article 4 of the Constitution. Any excuse now being made on behalf of the PEMRA is not acceptable.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 805","dateOfAnnouncement":"06-06-2011","dateCreated":"06-06-2011","fileSizeInBytes":24},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.24\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Const.Petition.24_2011_dt02062011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011   SCMR  1254","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-06-2011","dateCreated":"02-06-2011","fileSizeInBytes":82},{"caseNumber":"C.P.796\/2007","caseSubject":"Corporate","caseTitle":"Maulana Abdul Haque Baloch & others v. Government of Balochistan thr. Secy. Industries & Mineral Development & others","caseFileName":"FINAL_RIKO_DIQ_CASE_DT250511.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  511","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2011","dateCreated":"25-05-2011","fileSizeInBytes":35},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.3\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"ICA3,4,6TO11of2011dt2011.04.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 680","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-05-2011","dateCreated":"18-05-2011","fileSizeInBytes":215},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.163\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Mukhtar Mai Case","caseFileName":"Crl.P.163_to_171_S.M.C.5_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mian Saqib Nisar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 554","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-04-2011","dateCreated":"21-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":240},{"caseNumber":"R.P.46\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"(Urdu version included)","caseFileName":"REVIEW_P_46&47_2011_full.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 752","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-04-2011","dateCreated":"20-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":580},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.129\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy. M\/o Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad. v. Dr. Mobashir Hassan, etc","caseFileName":"NRO_REVIEW_CRP_129_DT18042011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 674","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-04-2011","dateCreated":"18-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":21},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.13\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"CDA-MULTI PROFESSIONAL JOINT VENTURE CASE DATED 15.04.2011.","caseFileName":"SMC.13-2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 619","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-04-2011","dateCreated":"15-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":102},{"caseNumber":"REFERENCE.1\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 186","caseTitle":"Reference by the President of Islamic Republic of Pakistan Under Article 186 of the Constitution to revisit the case of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto reported as PLD 1979 SC Page 38-53","caseFileName":"Presidential_refernce_13042011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011   SCMR  962","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2011","dateCreated":"13-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.129\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy. M\/o Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad. v. Dr. Mobashir Hassan, etc","caseFileName":"Review_nro_12042011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 674","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-04-2011","dateCreated":"12-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.129\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"The Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy. M\/o Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad. v. Dr. Mobashir Hassan, etc","caseFileName":"REVIEW_nro.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 674","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-04-2011","dateCreated":"11-04-2011","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.6\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Syed Mubashir Raza Jaffri & another v. Emolyees Old Age Benefits Institutions (EOBI) through its President.","caseFileName":"Const.P_6of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  949","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-03-2011","dateCreated":"25-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":4058},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.43\/2009","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Dr. Mohammad Aslam Khakhi & another v. S.S.P. (Operations) Rawalpindi and others","caseFileName":"Const.P_43_of_2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2013   SCMR  187","dateOfAnnouncement":"22-03-2011","dateCreated":"22-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.10\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CPs.10-18of2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAHMOOD AKHTAR SHAHID SIDDIQUI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 407","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-03-2011","dateCreated":"21-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":821},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"SMC_24OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-03-2011","dateCreated":"11-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"SMC_24OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-03-2011","dateCreated":"11-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"SMC_24OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-03-2011","dateCreated":"11-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.60\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Chairman_NAB_case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The spirit of consultation with the Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly in the matter of appointment of Chairman National Accountability Bureau appears to be that it should aim at developing a consensus and it should manifestly be shown that a serious, sincere and genuine effort is made towards evolving a consensus because otherwise the consultation would neither be meaningful or purposive nor consensus-oriented. The Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) also comes in as a consultee in his capacity as a guardian and defender of the constitutional and legal rights of the people at large. The role of CJP as a neutral arbiter in disagreements, differences or disputes over matters of national importance already stands recognized through Articles 152 and 159(4) of the Constitution.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 365","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-03-2011","dateCreated":"10-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":113},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.9\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CONTEMPT_OF_COURT_CASE_ORDER_DT_03_03_2011_ica.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 315","dateOfAnnouncement":"03-03-2011","dateCreated":"03-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":32},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.24\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding corruption in Hajj arrangements in 2010.","caseFileName":"SMC_24_2010_DT_01_03.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikahr Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2015   PLC(CS)  73","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-03-2011","dateCreated":"01-03-2011","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"I.C.A.3\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"ICA3 &4-2011DT2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 680","dateOfAnnouncement":"18-02-2011","dateCreated":"18-02-2011","fileSizeInBytes":14},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.1\/2011","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Crl. Misc. As. Nos. 01 & 02 of 2011 in \r\r\nCrl. Org. Nos. 97 & 98 of 2009.\r\r\n","caseFileName":"Decision_in_CMAs1&2_of_2011.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAHMOOD AKHTAR SHAHID SIDDIQUI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 197","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2011","dateCreated":"02-02-2011","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"CRL.O.P.93\/2009","caseSubject":"Contempt of Court\/Non-compliance of Court Order","caseTitle":"Contempt Proceedings against Mr.Justice(R) Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry","caseFileName":"Criminal_Original_P93to98.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE MAHMOOD AKHTAR SHAHID SIDDIQUI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 197","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-02-2011","dateCreated":"02-02-2011","fileSizeInBytes":30},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.18\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184(3)","caseTitle":"Suo Moto action regarding violatin of Public Procurement Rules, 2004 in procurement loss of billions of rupees of exchequer case by National Insurance Compant Ltd.","caseFileName":"SMC18-2010DT25.01.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2014   SCMR  585","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-01-2011","dateCreated":"25-01-2011","fileSizeInBytes":18},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.3\/2011","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Independent Music Group Pvt. Ltd. and another v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.3 OF 2011.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"It was for the PEMRA either to have rejected the application, submitted for issuance of licence to establish and operate satellite T. V. Broadcast Channel Station under Rule 6 of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules 2002, within 100 days under the law or it would have accepted the same; but now when the Court has intervened and passed the impugned order, no other excuse shall be acceptable for the purpose of causing delay in disposal of application of the petitioners. The PEMRA is directed to issue licence to the petitioners and submit compliance report of this order to the Registrar of this Court.","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-01-2011","dateCreated":"24-01-2011","fileSizeInBytes":23},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.57701-P\/2010","caseSubject":"Hajj Policy","caseTitle":"Application by Abdul Rashid","caseFileName":"SuoMoto24of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikahr Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"P L D 2011 SC 963","dateOfAnnouncement":"20-01-2011","dateCreated":"20-01-2011","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.58\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Judgment of Supreme Court on appointment of president National Bank of Pakistan","caseFileName":"CONST P 58-2010 DT 01.05.2011 [HEARING] - Judgment of Supreme Court on appointment of president National Bank of Pakistan.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The amendment in section 11(3)(d) of the Banks (Nationalization) Act, 1974 could not have been introduced by way of the Finance Act, 2007, as it lacked constitutional requirement envisaged by Article 70 of the Constitution i.e. approval by two Houses of Parliament. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 213","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"14-01-2011","fileSizeInBytes":39},{"caseNumber":"CRL.A.652\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Criminal Appeal No652 of 2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikahr Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2011   SCMR  429","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-01-2011","dateCreated":"05-01-2011","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"C.A.468\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"C.A.468OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikahr Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The contract employees have no right to invoke writ jurisdiction, particularly in the instant case where their services have been terminated on completion of period of contract. Since they fall within the definition of workman, they would be entitled to one month's notice or salary in lieu thereof, as permissible to them under the rule of master and servant.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 132","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"23-12-2010","fileSizeInBytes":77},{"caseNumber":"C.A.16\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 CA-16 of 2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2011 SC 181","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-11-2010","dateCreated":"23-12-2010","fileSizeInBytes":62},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.11\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/.","caseTitle":"Nadeem Ahmed, Advocate v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"18TH_AMENDMENT_ORDER.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court chooses not to express its opinion on the merits of the case, involving a challenge to Article 175-A of the Constitution mainly on the ground of being violative of the principle of judicial independence, and rather, in the first instance, defers to the parliamentary opinion qua Article 175-A on reconsideration by it in terms of the present Order and the issue of appointment process of Judges of the Superior Courts introduced by Article 175-A  in the light of the concerns\/reservations expressed and observations\/ suggestions made and observes that it would thereafter decide all petitions adverting to all the issues raised therein.","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1165","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"21-10-2010","fileSizeInBytes":56},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2981\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Note initiated by worthy Registrar.","caseFileName":"CMA NO. 2981-2010 IN CP 09-2010 [18.10.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court adjourns the case granting time to the committee, formed to conduct an inquiry about the spread of news of withdrawal of executive order\/notification vis-a-vis restoration of judges dated 16-3-2009 in the print and electronic media, to submit final report.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2010  SC 1151","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-10-2010","fileSizeInBytes":20},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.11\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Nadeem Ahmed, Advocate v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"The_Pakistan_Supreme_Court_Rules.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1165","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-10-2010","fileSizeInBytes":229},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2981\/2010","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Note initiated by worthy Registrar.","caseFileName":"CMA2981-2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikahr Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010  SC 1151","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-10-2010","dateCreated":"15-10-2010","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.19\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"SMC19of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GHULAM RABBANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"04-10-2010","dateCreated":"04-10-2010","fileSizeInBytes":38},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.11\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Nadeem Ahmed, Advocate v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"Const.P.11-2010etc.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The case is adjourned to a date in office.\r\n\r\n","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1165","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"07-09-2010","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.20\/2009","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases","caseTitle":"The Bank of Punjab v. Haris Steel Industries, etc.","caseFileName":"ConstitutionPetitionNo39of2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GHULAM RABBANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1109","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-09-2010","dateCreated":"01-09-2010","fileSizeInBytes":145},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.14\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"SMC14of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE GHULAM RABBANI","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"01-09-2010","dateCreated":"01-09-2010","fileSizeInBytes":25},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.426\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Crl.P.No.426of2009&Crl.A.No.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1021","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"13-08-2010","fileSizeInBytes":92},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.46\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Dr. Shahid Masood v. Federation of Pakistan & others","caseFileName":"Const.P.46and47of2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Chairman Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) shall ensure that transmission of broadcast of petitioner channels is continued to be aired without any hindrance and the Provincial Police Officers shall take care of any law and order situation which may arise in this regard. The Chairman PEMRA and the CEOs\/licence holders of the four T.V. cable operators who caused obstruction in distribution of the transmission of the petitioners shall appear in person on the next date of hearing and show cause why action should not be ordered to be taken against them in accordance with law.","citation":"2010   SCMR  1849","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-08-2010","dateCreated":"13-08-2010","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.4668\/2006","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"HRC-4668of2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 759","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-05-2010","dateCreated":"04-06-2010","fileSizeInBytes":205},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.22\/2009","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases","caseTitle":"The Bank of Punjab v. Haris Afzal, etc","caseFileName":"Const.P.20to27-39&45.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1109","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"27-05-2010","fileSizeInBytes":1106},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.11\/2010","caseSubject":"U\/A 184","caseTitle":"Nadeem Ahmed, Advocate v. Federation of Pakistan","caseFileName":"SpeechOfMr.JusticeChIjaz.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE CH. IJAZ AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1165","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-05-2010","dateCreated":"04-05-2010","fileSizeInBytes":33},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.5\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"SMCASE5OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 731","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2010","dateCreated":"28-04-2010","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"H.R.C.8340\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"HR8340OF2010.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE CH. IJAZ AHMED","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Rules are not presently available for promotion to the selection grade of BS-22. Reliance, thus, has to be placed on section 9 (2) clauses (a) and (b) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, according to which in case of selection post, selection has to be made on the basis of merit and in the case of non-selection post on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness. Therefore, while examining the case of promotion from BS-21 to BS-22, no other criterion has to be taken into consideration except merit. There are no rules for promotion to selection post of grade-22 meaning thereby that competent authority may exercise discretion which has to be structured in view of the principles laid down in the judge made law by full application of mind.","citation":"2010 SCMR 1301","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-04-2010","dateCreated":"28-04-2010","fileSizeInBytes":136},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1049\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CPs1406of09etc.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-02-2010","dateCreated":"19-02-2010","fileSizeInBytes":12},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.2\/2010","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Const.P.2,3and4-II.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Article 177 of the Constitution provides that a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President after consultation with the Chief Justice of Pakistan. No such consultation by the President having taken place with the Chief Justice of Pakistan regarding the appointment of Chief Justice of a High Court as a Judge of the Supreme Court, notification of appointment of such Judge in the Supreme Court, prima facie, appeared to have been issued in violation of the provisions of the Constitution, particularly Article 177, hence the same is suspended subject to notice to the Federation of Pakistan, the Attorney-General for Pakistan and the Advocate-General of the concerned Province. ","citation":"2010   SCMR  563","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-02-2010","dateCreated":"13-02-2010","fileSizeInBytes":13},{"caseNumber":"C.P.76\/2007","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Temporary Injunction","caseTitle":"Pakistan Sports Board thr. D.G. Islamabad v. M\/s Shams & Brothers & others","caseFileName":"NRO_Judgment.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2008 SC 80","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"16-12-2009","fileSizeInBytes":1544},{"caseNumber":"C.P.76\/2007","caseSubject":"Civil Suits\/Temporary Injunction","caseTitle":"Pakistan Sports Board thr. D.G. Islamabad v. M\/s Shams & Brothers & others","caseFileName":"Short order.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2008 SC 80","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-12-2009","dateCreated":"16-12-2009","fileSizeInBytes":52},{"caseNumber":"C.M.APPEAL.120\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"c.m.a.no20&21of2009.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The purpose of filing the constitutional petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution side by side a separate review petition is an attempt to achieve the same objective as that of review petition i.e. to subvert the judgment of the Supreme Court reviewed against. The judgment dated 31-07-2009, on dismissal of most of review petitions filed against it, has attained finality and the review petition filed by the appellant has not been entertained and rightly so by refusing to receive the same on valid objections. The settled principle of law is that what cannot be achieved directly cannot be permitted to be achieved indirectly.","citation":"2010   SCMR  312","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"11-11-2009","fileSizeInBytes":41},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.21\/2007","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"ConstitutionPetitionNo21OF2007.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 61","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"03-11-2009","fileSizeInBytes":1594},{"caseNumber":"C.M.A.2745\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CMA2745of2009etc.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The applicants i.e. Judges of High Courts who were affected by the Court\u2019s judgment dated 31.07.2009, which had declared the actions of proclamation of emergency of 03.11.2007 as un-constitutional and void ab initio, seek permission to get the judgment reviewed, on the ground, inter alia, that they had been condemned unheard. The Court observes that no stricture was passed qua their eligibility, integrity, entitlement, qualifications and besides that their removal from the office of Judges does not amount to be a stigma and, therefore, the doctrine of \u2018audi alteram partem\u2019 cannot be pressed into service which otherwise is not universally recognized due to certain limitations. The applicants had no vested right to be heard and furthermore they had acted illegally and in violation of the order dated 03.11.2007 of 7-Member Bench of the Supreme Court for obtaining illegal gains and benefits which cannot be ignored while examining the principle of \u2018audi alteram partem\u2019. The reviews are not maintainable.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 483","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"13-10-2009","fileSizeInBytes":240},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.14\/2009","caseSubject":"Miscelleneous","caseTitle":"Allowing regularization of 50 acres of Karachi Land at throw away prices causing losses running into hundreds of millions to the state exchequer.","caseFileName":"S.M.C14 of 2009.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"11-09-2009","fileSizeInBytes":130},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.9\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CONST.P.9OF2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 789","dateOfAnnouncement":"31-07-2009","dateCreated":"31-07-2009","fileSizeInBytes":57},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.9\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"const.p.9and8of2009.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 789","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"31-07-2009","fileSizeInBytes":4667},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.200\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"Crl.P.200of2009.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE NASIR-UL-MULK","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 814","dateOfAnnouncement":"17-07-2009","dateCreated":"17-07-2009","fileSizeInBytes":149},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.20\/2009","caseSubject":"Transfer of cases","caseTitle":"The Bank of Punjab v. Haris Steel Industries, etc.","caseFileName":"CONST.P.20-27OF2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Muhammad Sair Ali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The assumption of the office of Acting Chairman NAB by Deputy Chairman is illegal and it is, therefore, directed that a regular appointment to the vacant office of Chairman NAB be made in terms of section 6 of the NAB Ordinance, 1999 within thirty days. Also, the appointment of Mr. Irfan Qadir, Advocate Supreme Court, as the Prosecutor-General Accountability is unlawful and of no legal effect. ","citation":"PLD 2010 SC 1109","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-07-2009","dateCreated":"14-07-2009","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.33\/2005","caseSubject":"U\/A 184\/Enforcement of Fundamental Rights \/ Human Rights","caseTitle":"Engineer Iqbal Zafar Jhagra v. Federation of Pakistan and others","caseFileName":"CONST.P.33-34-2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"There was prima facie no justification for imposition of carbon surcharge in place of Petroleum Development Levy because such a tax could be imposed subject to certain conditions, such as provision of petroleum products free of lead or carbon dioxide and consequential pollution free atmosphere to all citizens. ","citation":"2013   SCMR  1337","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-07-2009","dateCreated":"07-07-2009","fileSizeInBytes":22},{"caseNumber":"J.P.56\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"J.P.No.56of2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 460","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"01-06-2009","fileSizeInBytes":1144},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.45\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"DetailJudgmentofCRP45OF2009.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 644","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"26-05-2009","fileSizeInBytes":187},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.45\/2009","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CRP59-62of2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 644","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-05-2009","dateCreated":"26-05-2009","fileSizeInBytes":42},{"caseNumber":"C.P.878\/2008","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CP878OF2008CMA95OF2009.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Mohammad Moosa Khan Leghari","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 237","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2009","dateCreated":"25-02-2009","fileSizeInBytes":1795},{"caseNumber":"C.P.778\/2008","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CP778-779.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sheikh Hakim Ali","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2009 SC 284","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-02-2009","dateCreated":"25-02-2009","fileSizeInBytes":614},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1512\/2008","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CP1512of2008.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Fakir Muhammad Khokar","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"","dateOfAnnouncement":"19-12-2008","dateCreated":"19-12-2008","fileSizeInBytes":1009},{"caseNumber":"C.A.2206\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Civil Appeal No.2206\/2005, Civil Appeal No.721\/2006, Criminal Appeal No.304\/2003, Civil Petition No.459 of 2006 and Suo Moto Case No.8\/2006","caseFileName":"JR_PMDC_VS_Ziauddin_Medical_University_Others.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2007 SC 323","dateOfAnnouncement":"15-12-2006","dateCreated":"15-12-2006","fileSizeInBytes":60},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1097-L\/2004","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Superintending Engineer GEPCO Sialkot \r\r\nVERSUS\r\r\nMuhammad Yousaf","caseFileName":"CJD_Civil_Petition_No_1097-L_of_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The civil servant who was acquitted by extending him the benefit of doubt would be deemed to have been acquitted honourably and would be entitled to all financial benefits during the period of his confinement in custody on account of his involvement in the criminal case.\r\n","citation":"2007   SCMR  537","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-11-2006","dateCreated":"23-11-2006","fileSizeInBytes":108},{"caseNumber":"C.P.378-L\/2004","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Muhammad Aslam\r\r\nVERSUS\r\r\nWater & Power Development Authority etc.","caseFileName":"CJD_Civil_Petition_No_378-L_of_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2007   SCMR  513","dateOfAnnouncement":"23-10-2006","dateCreated":"23-11-2006","fileSizeInBytes":81},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.9\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Pakistan Bar Council\r\r\nVerses\r\r\nThe Federal Government & others","caseFileName":"JR_Constitution_Petition_No_9_of_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2007 SC 394","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-11-2006","dateCreated":"16-11-2006","fileSizeInBytes":48},{"caseNumber":"C.A.970\/2003","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Atique-ur-Rahman\r\r\nVERSUS\r\r\nHaji Khan Afzal etc.","caseFileName":"CJD_Civil_Appeal_No_970_of_2003.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"A candidate intending to contest election for the Provincial Assembly, in the light of section 99 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 (RoPA), must fulfill the condition contained therein including attaining the age of 25 years on the date of filing the nomination papers and enrolment as voter in the constituency from which he is contesting the election. The validity of the decree passed by the Civil Court could neither be challenged before the Election Tribunal established under RoPA nor could the same be ignored to be given legal effect.\r\n","citation":"2007   SCMR  507","dateOfAnnouncement":"02-10-2006","dateCreated":"02-10-2006","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.P.788\/2006","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"M\/S Al-Mahmudia (Pvt) Ltd.\r\r\nVERSUS\r\r\nPakistan through Secretary M\/O Housing & Works, Islamabad etc.","caseFileName":"CJD_Civil_Petition_No_788_of_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":" The Court approves the view taken by a larger Bench of this Court in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Tariq Pirzada (1999 SCMR 2744) that hearing before Section Officer is sufficient to meet the requirements of Article 32 of the Establishment of the Office of Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) Order, 1983 (President's Order 1 of 1983).\r\n","citation":"PLD 2007 SC 79","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-09-2006","dateCreated":"14-09-2006","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"C.P.788\/2006","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Recommendations & Future Plan to Control The Flow of Spurious Medicine in Market \r\r\n(Undertaken by Health Department, Govt of Pakistan)","caseFileName":"JR_Civil_Petition_No_788_of_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2007 SC 79","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-09-2006","dateCreated":"14-09-2006","fileSizeInBytes":11},{"caseNumber":"C.A.792\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Whole Text incluing Operative Part","caseFileName":"CJD_Section 2-A_Case_as_on_26_06_2006.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Section 2-A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 (\u201cSTA 1973\u201d) is, partially, ultra vires of Articles 240 and 260 of the Constitution, to the extent of the category of employees, whose terms and conditions of service have not been determined by the Federal Legislature and by a deeming clause they cannot be treated civil servants as defined under section 2(1)(b) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 (\u201cCSA 1973\u201d) and they are not engaged in the affairs of the Federation. Section 2-A of the STA 1973 cannot be enforced in the absence of amendment in the definition of the civil servant under section 2(1)(b) of the CSA 1973. The cases of the employees under, section 2-A, STA 1973, who do not fall within the definition of civil servant as defined in section 2(1)(b) of the CSA 1973 shall have no remedy before the Service Tribunal, functioning under Article 212 of the Constitution, and they would be free to avail appropriate remedy.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2006 SC 602","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"26-06-2006","fileSizeInBytes":398},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.9\/2006","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Constitution Petition No. 9 of 2006 & Civil Petition Nos. 345 & 394 of 2006","caseFileName":"CJD_Pakistan_Steel_Mills_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2006  SC 697","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"23-06-2006","fileSizeInBytes":244},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.36\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Conversion of Public Park into a Mini Golf Course","caseFileName":"CJD_Constitution_Petition_No_36_of_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The lease agreement executed by the Capital Development Authority with Al-Falah Mini Golf, for the development of mini golf course on the site of Jubilee Park, Sector F-7, is not sustainable in the eye of law, being contrary to fundamental rights of the general public, enshrined under Article 26 of the Constitution.\r\n \r\n","citation":"PLD 2006 SC 394","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-02-2006","dateCreated":"07-02-2006","fileSizeInBytes":86},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.848-L\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"CJD_Criminal_Petition_No_848-L_920-L_921-L_of_2002_more.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"Leave to appeal is granted to examine the contentions that in accordance with the provisions of section 391 read with section 396 PPC, the accused persons deserved the same sentence because they were all equally responsible for the commission of the offence and on reduction of the death sentence to imprisonment for life of the other co-accused by the High Court, the sentence of death of the petitioner-accused was not liable to be maintained.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2006 SC 145","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-12-2005","dateCreated":"12-12-2005","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.11\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Judgment on Kite Flying","caseFileName":"CJD_Suo_Motu_Petition_No_11_of_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The Court takes suo motu notice of the hazards of kite-flying and issues various directions to the government including a ban on kite-flying activity pending the decision of the petition. \r\n","citation":"PLD 2006 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"25-05-2005","dateCreated":"25-10-2005","fileSizeInBytes":3025},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1532-L\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Shaukat Ali and another\r\r\nVS\r\r\nDistrict Returning Officer and another","caseFileName":"CJD_Civil_Petition_No_1532-L_of_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The petitioner was not qualified to contest the election as his academic qualification i.e. Sanad, from a Madrissa not recognized by the University Grants Commission, was not equivalent to Matriculation in accordance with the provisions of section 152(1)(e) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001. As regards the question as to whether runner-up can be declared as a successful candidate, it is held that as disqualification was not notorious, therefore, the doctrine of \u201cthrow away votes\u201d would not be applicable. The election as a whole of the constituency is declared bad and the Election Commission is directed to conduct fresh election.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2006  SC 78","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-10-2005","dateCreated":"12-10-2005","fileSizeInBytes":564},{"caseNumber":"CRL.P.55\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Ghulam Qadir\r\r\nVS\r\r\nThe State","caseFileName":"CJD_Criminal_Petition_No_55_of_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The accused cannot be absolved from the responsibility if the contraband items are being transported openly on the roof of the vehicle being driven by him. The contradiction in the stance taken by the prosecution at the initial and subsequent stages of the case regarding the recovery of poppy flowers is immaterial as the same were found lying on the roof of the vehicle and the technicality is not sufficient to acquit the accused. Leave to appeal is refused to the accused.\r\n","citation":"PLD 2006 SC 61","dateOfAnnouncement":"12-10-2005","dateCreated":"12-10-2005","fileSizeInBytes":970},{"caseNumber":"C.A.876\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"C.A.876-879of2005.pdf","authorJudge":"MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, HCJ","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"The provisions of section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (?the Ordinance?), are prospective in their application and do not apply to the assessment of a year ending on or before 30th June, 2002. The assessment of any year ending on or before 30th June, 2002 would be governed by the repealed Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and shall be dealt with as if the Ordinance had not come into force. \r\n","citation":"2009   SCMR  1279","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"12-10-2005","fileSizeInBytes":362},{"caseNumber":"Reference.2\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Hasba Bill","caseFileName":"CJD_Reference by_the_President_of_Pakistan_under_Article_186.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr.Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 873","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"18-08-2005","fileSizeInBytes":400},{"caseNumber":"C.P.1569-L\/2005","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Civil_Petitions_for_Leave_to_Appeal_No_1569-L_1579-L_1597-L_1600-L_1622-L_1624-L_of_2005.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 858","dateOfAnnouncement":"16-08-2005","dateCreated":"16-08-2005","fileSizeInBytes":55},{"caseNumber":"Crl.O.P.15\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"CR. ORIG. P. NO. 15 of 2002 & Cr. Misc. A.179\/2002 in  Civil  Review  Petition  No. 80  of  1999.","caseFileName":"JR_Fecto_Belarus_Tractor_Limited_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLJ 2006 SC 472","dateOfAnnouncement":"14-01-2005","dateCreated":"11-05-2005","fileSizeInBytes":165},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.13\/2004","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Judgment_on_17th_Amendmend_and_Presidents_Uniform_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 719","dateOfAnnouncement":"13-04-2005","dateCreated":"13-04-2005","fileSizeInBytes":182},{"caseNumber":"Crl.R.P.44\/2003","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Criminal   Review   Pettion  No.  44  of  2003.\r\r\n&\r\r\nCriminal Misc. Application  No.  230 of 2003.\r\r\n&\r\r\nCriminal  Original  Pettion No.  41  of   2002.","caseFileName":"JR_The_State_through_NAB_VS_Haji_Nasim-ur-Rehman.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 270","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"19-01-2005","fileSizeInBytes":90},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.23\/1999","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Ch. Muhammad Siddique and 2 others\r\r\n\r\r\nVS\r\r\n\r\r\nGov. of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division, Islamabad and 2 others\r\r\nAND\r\r\nGov. of Punjab through Secretary, Law, Justice & Parliamentary Department, Lahore & another","caseFileName":"JR_Constitution_Petitions_No_23_of_1999_and_21_of_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 1","dateOfAnnouncement":"05-12-2004","dateCreated":"05-11-2004","fileSizeInBytes":205},{"caseNumber":"C.A.224\/2003","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Varan_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, CJ.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 193","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"29-10-2004","fileSizeInBytes":139},{"caseNumber":"S.M.C.1\/2004","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"State\r\r\nVS\r\r\nNasir Javed Rana, Civil Judge 1st Class\/Magistrate Section 30, Rawalpindi.","caseFileName":"JR_Suo_Motu_Case_No_1_of_2004.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2005 SC 86","dateOfAnnouncement":"26-11-2004","dateCreated":"26-10-2004","fileSizeInBytes":130},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.55\/2003","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Mian Muhammad Shahbaz Sharief\r\r\nVS\r\r\nFederation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad & 5 others.","caseFileName":"JR_Constitution_Petition_No_55_of_2003.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, C.J.","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2004 SC 583","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-04-2004","dateCreated":"07-04-2004","fileSizeInBytes":47},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.38\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Constitution_Petition_No_38_of_2002_and_more_of_2003.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"2003   SCMR  390","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-02-2013","dateCreated":"10-02-2003","fileSizeInBytes":15},{"caseNumber":"C.R.P.103\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Civil_Review_Petition_No_103_of_2002.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2003 SC 82","dateOfAnnouncement":"28-10-2002","dateCreated":"28-10-2002","fileSizeInBytes":17},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.36\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Regarding Constitutional Amendments made by the Government","caseFileName":"JR_Judgment_on_Legal_Framework_Order_2002.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2003 SC 74","dateOfAnnouncement":"07-10-2002","dateCreated":"07-10-2002","fileSizeInBytes":44},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.15\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Detailed_Judgment_in_Referendum_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2002 SC 853","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2002","dateCreated":"27-07-2002","fileSizeInBytes":288},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.29\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Detailed_Judgment_in_Graduation_Qualification_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2002 SC 994","dateOfAnnouncement":"11-07-2002","dateCreated":"11-07-2002","fileSizeInBytes":175},{"caseNumber":"C.S.R.P.1\/2000","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Detailed_Judgment_in_Riba_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2002 SC 800","dateOfAnnouncement":"24-06-2002","dateCreated":"24-06-2002","fileSizeInBytes":147},{"caseNumber":"CONST.P.15\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Ameer Jamat-e-Islami\r\r\nVS\r\r\nGen Pervaiz Musharaf, Chief Executive and others","caseFileName":"JR_Constitution_Petition_No._15_17-24_and_512_of_2002.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2002 SC 853","dateOfAnnouncement":"27-04-2002","dateCreated":"27-04-2002","fileSizeInBytes":102},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.1\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"Appointment of Supreme Court Judges challenged on the ground that it has not been made on the seniority basis.","caseFileName":"JR_Appointment_of_Supreme_Court_Judges_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2002 SC 939","dateOfAnnouncement":"","dateCreated":"10-02-2002","fileSizeInBytes":19},{"caseNumber":"Const.P.1\/2002","caseSubject":"","caseTitle":"","caseFileName":"JR_Detailed_Judgment_in_Appointment_of_Supreme_Court_Judges_Case.pdf","authorJudge":"Mr. Justice Sh. Riaz Ahmed","judgmentText":null,"tagline":"","citation":"PLD 2002 SC 939","dateOfAnnouncement":"10-04-2002","dateCreated":"10-02-2002","fileSizeInBytes":249}]